[02:20] <tsimonq2> balloons: About the Ubutnu Font Testing I have seen in the MLs, how can I be of assistance? I run Lubuntu Xenial.
[02:23] <balloons> You should have the font then. Give things a work
[02:23] <balloons> whirl*
[02:23] <tsimonq2> balloons: uhh what exactly should I be doing?
[02:23] <tsimonq2> :)
[02:24] <tsimonq2> and how do I make sure I am using the new one?
[02:24]  * tsimonq2 wishes there were test cases so he didn't have to bother balloons :P
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== la_juyis` is now known as la_juyis
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
[14:09] <balloons> It should be on the wiki. I guess it's not and that's why you are asking questions?
[16:42] <flocculant> balloons: given that there's been no apparent change in ubuntu font version - I'll just carry on pinning the old version until the bugs I reported get fixed
[16:43] <flocculant> seems a bit daft for them to ask you to ask people to test things if bugs reported when it changed don't get fixed first *shrug*
[16:43] <balloons> flocculant, yes, no new updates. I just never really mentioned it's existance to people
[16:44] <flocculant> ok - then bug 1520772 and bug 1525150 :)
[16:44] <ubot5> bug 1520772 in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) "New font uses Arabic-sized figures in Latin contexts" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1520772
[16:44] <ubot5> bug 1525150 in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu font missing part of 8 and 3 in hexchat" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1525150
[16:44] <balloons> you were one of like a handful of people who ever gave feedback. They are really really looking for Arabic and non-western feedback as they have the biggest changes. But the font stuff happens differently, so it'll be a bit before we see another update
[16:44] <flocculant> yea I assumed as much
[16:45] <flocculant> I know it's meh so pinned it :D
[16:45] <balloons> You can blame me for not getting more eyeballs on it sooner, heh
[16:45] <flocculant> ha ha ha
[16:48] <flocculant> balloons: posted to the qa list re the bugs I saw mid-Dec with that font
[16:48] <balloons> yes, I remember
[16:49] <balloons> it landed just after thanksgiving, and I knew about it early dec
[16:49] <balloons> well.. everything was in place early dev
[16:49] <flocculant> weirdest one I saw was it refusing to let me use ubuntu light - forced thin on me
[16:50] <flocculant> anyway now it's on the qa list we can see if we get more eyes
[22:37] <flocculant> balloons: so I found something that needs to be addressed somehow - nothing broken, kind of wishlisty
[22:38] <flocculant> if a bug becomes invalid - still shows in tracker, if we have a 'half good' test result listing that invalid bug an admin can remove the bug from the result
[22:39] <flocculant> but if someone has written 'sum stuff' and reported that invalid one - but not actually reported the issue which remains - admin fiddling about makes it a good result
[22:40] <flocculant> perhaps - looking at how useful gold was for fixed - make an invalid bug icon black ?
[22:40] <flocculant> thoughts on that last point?
[22:44] <tsimonq2> +1 flocculant
[22:47] <flocculant> I always +1 flocculant
[22:47] <flocculant> works for me
[22:50] <tsimonq2> lol