| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| barry | doko: ack, thanks. the evidence mounts against the python change | 00:47 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottK | barry: how's it looking for a quick resolution upstream? | 00:54 |
| barry | ScottK: fairly good i think. i'll do a few more tests locally but unless serhiy objects, i'm just going to back out that change for 3.5.2 then prep a patch for doko | 01:09 |
| barry | probably monday | 01:09 |
| ScottK | Cool. | 01:09 |
| doko | still need something for #809079, but I'm lost how to reproduce this | 01:10 |
| ScottK | barry: I think the same thing was committed for 3.4 and 2.7 too (just not released yet). Those'll need fixing too. | 01:10 |
| doko | we don't care about 3.4 anymore | 01:11 |
| ScottK | Upstream does. | 01:12 |
| barry | ScottK: right. and i want to back it out of the 3.6 branch too | 01:14 |
| psusi | is the sponsor queue really behind? bug #1250109 has been waiting for a sponsor to apply the patch for a month now | 02:03 |
| ubottu | bug 1250109 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please use dpkg-triggers" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1250109 | 02:03 |
| psusi | I wonder if it is because it is marked as assigned to apw? | 02:05 |
| sarnold | heh just the other day I waited through a few of those update-grubs and wondered how this fix was going :) | 02:06 |
| psusi | been waiting for either a sponsor to upload, or me to finally get upgraded to core-devel ;) | 02:07 |
| sarnold | hehehe | 02:07 |
| psusi | missed the meeting due to new baby and no sponsors yet, so if you care to sponsor: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PhillipSusi/DeveloperApplication2 | 02:07 |
| psusi | ;) | 02:07 |
| sarnold | psusi: I suspect whoever would patch-pilot this would want to know better what kinds of testing you've done with it -- | 02:07 |
| sarnold | congrats :) | 02:07 |
| psusi | thanks | 02:08 |
| sarnold | psusi: -- so if you could add to it which kinds of dist-upgrades, apt-get purges, dpkg --purge, mixed purge and install, etc. you've done with it, that'd probably ehlp grow confidence in the patch | 02:08 |
| psusi | it was a fairly straight forward stealing of the code from update-initramfs, and I tested it by removing a few older kernels and seeing that it only did an update once... then installing one new kernel and seeing that it also runs one update | 02:08 |
| === Saviq_ is now known as Saviq | ||
| === jincreator_ is now known as jincreator | ||
| doko | xnox, changed maintainer address: https://packages.qa.debian.org/libo/libopenobex.html | 10:32 |
| mapreri | can somebody try another run of pbuilder's autopkgtest on s390x ? | 15:29 |
| jamespage | doko, hey - just so I don't forget next week - I think I've done all the right bits to get fop demoted to universe, however its not showing up on the component mismatches report | 16:17 |
| jamespage | I can't find it in a seed - the only thing still showing is an alternative Recommends on xmlto - would that cause that? | 16:17 |
| cjwatson | mapreri: done | 16:52 |
| cjwatson | jamespage: no, it wouldn't; the reason it's not showing is that xmlstarlet is scheduled for promotion to main and build-depends on fop | 16:54 |
| cjwatson | mapreri: (in theory. doesn't seem to have done anything - maybe ask again when pitti's around if it doesn't happen eventually) | 16:57 |
| mapreri | cjwatson: ok, i'll poke pitti. "unfortunately" pbuilder has very few deps, so it's not triggered that often... | 17:25 |
| dobey | pitti: hey, if you happen to see this anytime, can you please re-run the amd64 autopkgtest for unity-scope-click? thanks. | 21:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!