[12:58] Jeez. None of the Cof's seem to be perfect. And, the one I claimed to be standard is not. It has a defect. [12:58] Seems like cfhowletts uploads are the correct ones [14:46] zequence: gah :( [14:47] cfhowlett had the wrong brandmark if i recall correctly... [14:48] i wish i could help you identify the correct one... but i have no idea what the nunaces are in the one in current-standard [14:56] The text he uploaded was wrong, but the CoF's seem ok [14:56] Or, they seem to be the correct ones. Not perfect, though [15:18] what are the defect? [15:21] i guess the nature of the defect doesnt matter, but it would be nice if we could agree on which files to use soon :) [15:35] sakrecoer_: If you look really close on the CoFs, you will see it [15:36] sakrecoer_: The one in the current-standard branch has a visible defect in the top end of the outer ring [15:36] Zak fixed it. And, I believe the CoF's that cfhowlett published are the fixed ones [16:02] ok :) [16:02] feeling sorry for the HD render i put at home for the video-branding intro sequence :D [16:10] my own bad for not double checking :) [16:14] The difference is not big, but once you know it, at least it bothers me [19:00] zequence: of course, it would bother me too, if i knew... [22:07] now i see:( haha [22:08] like a lil dillydoing [22:09] the hd renders look great tho! easyfix+ motiondynamic lift up and then pifpafrender [22:10] but witch one to take? :/ [22:10] which one=which logo?