| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose | ||
| === natefinch-afk is now known as natefinch | ||
| === med_ is now known as Guest77121 | ||
| pitti | hello | 08:23 |
|---|---|---|
| pitti | so several minutes ago I did "juju destroy-service autopkgtest-cloud-worker", and it did destroy the autopkgtest-cloud-worker/0 instance and the associated machine | 08:24 |
| pitti | but "juju status" still keeps "autopkgtest-cloud-worker" with a status of "life: dying", and it never goes away | 08:25 |
| pitti | http://paste.ubuntu.com/14485499/ | 08:25 |
| pitti | is that because some subordinate charms still reference this? | 08:26 |
| pitti | I can't redeploy the charm while it's in that state | 08:26 |
| pitti | I already tried "juju destroy-relation ksplice autopkgtest-cloud-worker", and same for landscape-client, but that doesn't help | 08:30 |
| pitti | I tried destroying the landscape-client and ksplice services too, but still didn't help | 08:42 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: taking a look | 08:53 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: axino suggested to do "sudo restart jujud-machine-0" on the 0 machine, but that didn't help either | 08:53 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: that's alos a bit...drastic | 08:54 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: it's odd, because it's referencing ksplice and landscape but I don't see services with those interfaces deployed | 08:55 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: well, they are subordinate charms -- they get deployed on each "real" service | 08:55 |
| pitti | they are not standalone services | 08:55 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: sure, but they're not in status at all | 08:55 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: right, but th relations for that service are listed with no units | 08:56 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: it seems the service isn't being recycled, because of this relation | 08:56 |
| marcoceppi | because the machine is basically gone, no units exist, etc | 08:56 |
| marcoceppi | does juju remove-relation autopkgtest-cloud-worker ksplice do anyhting? | 08:57 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: nothing visible at all | 08:59 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: weird. obviously this isn't supposed to happen | 08:59 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: well, they are in status, you see e. g. landscape-client/6 | 08:59 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: right, but not on the autopkgtest service | 08:59 |
| pitti | yeah, as that's gone after destroy-service | 09:00 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: does `juju destroy-service --force autopkgtest-cloud-worker` do anything? | 09:00 |
| marcoceppi | it's just stuck in dying, which usually means something as failed, a relation or something else | 09:00 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: there's no such option | 09:00 |
| pitti | juju --version: 1.24.7-trusty-amd64 | 09:00 |
| marcoceppi | :\ | 09:01 |
| pitti | it's actually quite simple for me to destroy and re-deploy the whole env, I was just wondering as this did work before | 09:01 |
| pitti | I re-deployed the worker service individually two or three times | 09:02 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: it should work, something is stuck where Juju says it's not ready to reap the service because there's still an action pending against this | 09:03 |
| marcoceppi | you see this a lot when relations fail on destroy, or stop hook fails | 09:03 |
| marcoceppi | but I can't see exactly what it's stuck on, and since it's a 1.22 version I don't remember if there were any oddities in that release | 09:03 |
| pitti | 1.24 | 09:04 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: anyway, I'll re-do the whole thing; thanks for looking! | 09:04 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: you may have 1.24 locally, that deployment is agent-version: 1.22.6. either way, good luck! | 09:05 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: ah, ok | 09:05 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: whatever is in prodstack | 09:05 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: but maybe they updated to 1.24 by now, and with re-deploying I'll get that too, I'll see | 09:06 |
| marcoceppi | \o/ | 09:07 |
| pitti | agent-version: 1.24.7 | 09:10 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: seems so | 09:10 |
| pitti | marcoceppi: so next time I run into errors I'll have a less outdated version | 09:11 |
| marcoceppi | pitti: awesome, it's easier to support 1.24.7 since 1.25.0 is latest | 09:11 |
| wesleymason | Anybody seen an issue were a reactive built charm during upgrade/install continually loops around uninstalling and reinstalling wheels? | 09:53 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: interesting. | 10:04 |
| cory_fu_ | Can't say that I have. | 10:04 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: do you have a link to the charm? more importantly can you show me the hooks/upgarde-charm file? | 10:04 |
| wesleymason | marcoceppi: charm is https://github.com/1stvamp/juju-errbot (WIP) | 10:04 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: I think I know the issue, we can patch in a few mins | 10:05 |
| wesleymason | marcoceppi: upgrade-charm hook: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14485929/ | 10:05 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: thought so, thanks, we'll patch this quickly | 10:06 |
| wesleymason | marcoceppi: cheers 😃 | 10:06 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: when this lands in a few mins, `charm build` again https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/pull/23 | 10:15 |
| wesleymason | marcoceppi: aha, tvm | 10:20 |
| wesleymason | perhaps marcoceppi's PR could get a bit of love? https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/pull/23 - in order to keep working on my charm I keep having to manually copy everything in and void a proper rebuild | 11:30 |
| wesleymason | s/void/avoid | 11:30 |
| tiagogomes__ | I am correct to assume the JuJu State Machine VM, needs to have access to the OpenStack endpoint APIs? If I use floating IPs, does the uJu State Machine communicates with other VMs using floating IPs or in the tenant network? | 11:39 |
| marcoceppi | wesleymason: I just poked cory_fu_ | 11:44 |
| wesleymason | marcoceppi: ta | 11:45 |
| cory_fu_ | marcoceppi: lgtm, but let me test it. ;) | 11:45 |
| marcoceppi | psh, tests ;) | 11:46 |
| wesleymason | In other news I can now deploy errbot with juju 🙌 (minus nrpe, http and the ability to install from a wheelhouse rather than pypi) | 11:48 |
| cory_fu_ | wesleymason: Ok, the wheelhouse loop on upgrade-charm is fixed, if you rebuild your charm. | 12:10 |
| wesleymason | cory_fu_: marcoceppi: cheers guys | 12:44 |
| D4RKS1D3 | Hi, I removed a charm via command line but in the juju-gui i see the charm, which it is the way to solve this problem? thanks in advance | 13:46 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 whats the current status when you look at the service in `juju status`? | 13:51 |
| D4RKS1D3 | environment: maas machines: {} services: {} | 13:53 |
| D4RKS1D3 | juju resolved -r neutron-api/0 ERROR unit "neutron-api/0" not found | 13:53 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 and the GUI still has the service as listed? Reloading the browser tab doesn't correct itself? | 13:54 |
| D4RKS1D3 | if I reload the page continue neutron-api service | 13:54 |
| D4RKS1D3 | but not the uni | 13:54 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 That sometimes happens when you destroy a machine out from under a service, and dont remove the service... but if your juju status output says there's nothing registered, thats bug worthy | 13:55 |
| D4RKS1D3 | http://s22.postimg.org/4aqldlaz5/Screenshot_130116_13_53_43.png | 13:56 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 can you psatebin me the output from juju status --format=tabular ? | 13:56 |
| D4RKS1D3 | of course | 13:56 |
| D4RKS1D3 | lazyPower, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14487078/ | 13:58 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 ok it appears you have removed the machine/unit, but not the service | 13:59 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 juju destroy-service netron-api | 13:59 |
| lazyPower | *neutron-api | 13:59 |
| D4RKS1D3 | I wrote this command, yes | 14:00 |
| lazyPower | seems stuck huh? try adding a unit to neutron-api, then running juju destroy-service neutron-api | 14:01 |
| D4RKS1D3 | Okey lazyPower | 14:01 |
| D4RKS1D3 | juju add-unit neutron-api --to lxc:3 ERROR cannot add unit 1/1 to service "neutron-api": cannot add unit to service "neutron-api": service is not alive | 14:02 |
| lazyPower | progress, seems that the service itself is stuck without a unit showing in status.. but somethings lingering in the state server keeping it around. | 14:03 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 Can i get you to file a bug about this? https://launchpad.net/juju-core/ https://login.launchpad.net/LfAACUW1CApYLLfk/+decide | 14:04 |
| D4RKS1D3 | Of course | 14:04 |
| lazyPower | include the status output, gui screenshot, and the all-machines.log, steps to reproduce | 14:04 |
| D4RKS1D3 | Yes | 14:05 |
| D4RKS1D3 | what do you need | 14:05 |
| lazyPower | > status output, gui screenshot, and the all-machines.log, steps to reproduce | 14:05 |
| tiagogomes__ | Hi, can someone reply to this: I am correct to assume the JuJu State Machine VM, needs to have access to the OpenStack endpoint APIs? If I use floating IPs, does the JuJu State Machine communicates with other VMs using floating IPs or in the tenant network? | 14:06 |
| lazyPower | tiagogomes__ the tenant network i do believe | 14:06 |
| D4RKS1D3 | I think the same, only the tenant network | 14:06 |
| lazyPower | tiagogomes__ juju uses the private interface for communicating with the nodes. I'm pretty sure floating-ip only effects the public interface | 14:07 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 oh lol i just realized i pasted a login link to you. the intended link was launchpad.net/juju-core | 14:07 |
| tiagogomes__ | ok. I see. And the JuJu state machine needs to call the OpenStack APIs right? Or is the client that does that? | 14:08 |
| * tiagogomes__ is trying to sort out network requirements | 14:08 | |
| lazyPower | The state server makes requests to the OS API's | 14:08 |
| lazyPower | depending, juju deploy openstack, juju deploy an environment into that openstack. So you'e got the idea of your cloud, and as beisner says, your "undercloud" | 14:09 |
| lazyPower | so it depends on which layer of cloudy goodness you're talking about :) | 14:09 |
| D4RKS1D3 | lazyPower, I do not see the the link in the juju-core | 14:09 |
| lazyPower | D4RKS1D3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+filebug | 14:10 |
| tiagogomes__ | I see. I am talking about JuJu bootstrapped on OpenStack. And The JuJu gui makes requests to the state server right? It doesn't call the OpenStack APIs | 14:10 |
| lazyPower | Correct | 14:10 |
| lazyPower | all juju interaction is routed through the model controller (state server) | 14:11 |
| tiagogomes__ | tvm lazyPower! | 14:12 |
| lazyPower | np tiagogomes__ | 14:12 |
| D4RKS1D3 | lazyPower, all-machines.log is a huge file! hahahaha | 14:17 |
| beisner | o/ hi all | 14:17 |
| D4RKS1D3 | hi beisner | 14:17 |
| beisner | is that mr beedy? | 14:22 |
| lazyPower | i dont think so bdx is beedy | 14:38 |
| beisner | hi D4RKS1D3 ;-) | 14:50 |
| beisner | lazyPower, chipping away at the rvw Q. i don't have merge perms on mysql. can you do the honors on this? https://code.launchpad.net/~barryprice/charms/trusty/mysql/add-innodb_file_per_table/+merge/281398 | 15:38 |
| jcastro | hey lazyPower | 15:38 |
| jcastro | so like marco told me with him the LXD provider breaks like every 6 bootstraps or so | 15:38 |
| jcastro | but I have not had issues | 15:39 |
| jcastro | what would be a good way to just automate having my laptop fire up workloads in a loop? | 15:39 |
| jcastro | I figure, let it run for like 8 hours and see what happens | 15:39 |
| jose | beisner: did you get it merged already? | 15:45 |
| beisner | hi jose! nope, but it's ready to land. | 15:46 |
| jose | beisner: ok, let me take a look | 15:46 |
| lazyPower | jcastro cronjob to run a bundletester job? | 15:49 |
| jcastro | I've not used bundletester before | 15:49 |
| jcastro | is there a tldr doc somewhere? | 15:49 |
| lazyPower | pip install bundletester && bundletester -F -l DEBUG -v in the charmdir | 15:49 |
| lazyPower | lemme see what we have in the docs | 15:50 |
| lazyPower | i'm positive we have somem stuff in the dev docs about this too | 15:50 |
| lazyPower | jcastro https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/developer-testing#bundletester | 15:51 |
| jcastro | ack, thanks | 15:51 |
| jose | beisner: and, pushed! | 15:51 |
| lazyPower | ta jose | 15:51 |
| jcastro | seems to still use juju-deployer | 15:52 |
| beisner | jose, great, thanks. i'll send a review mail to the list. | 15:52 |
| lazyPower | also, o/ jose | 15:52 |
| jose | hey, lazyPower! | 15:52 |
| lazyPower | jcastro thats probably the case. juju deploy is too new to have it consumed in our testing infra already | 15:52 |
| * jcastro nods | 15:52 | |
| lazyPower | does the lxd provider not work with juju-deployer? | 15:52 |
| jcastro | I am not sure yet, I was just reading the github page on bundletester | 15:53 |
| lazyPower | beisner have i introduced you to my personal assistant, charmbot 5000? aka jose | 15:57 |
| jose | >.> | 15:57 |
| lazyPower | xD | 15:57 |
| jcastro | huh, juju-jitsu is still in xenial | 15:59 |
| lazyPower | whoa | 16:01 |
| lazyPower | i thought that was deprecated as of precise | 16:01 |
| jcastro | I'll find out how to remove it | 16:01 |
| jose | jcastro: on main? | 16:02 |
| jose | or, I mean, universe? | 16:02 |
| lazyPower | hey jcastro, i have a potential TC attendee to the charmer summit. Think we have some space for floating heads in a box on a laptop? | 16:03 |
| lazyPower | tc = teleconference | 16:03 |
| jose | jcastro: you'll need to get a MOTU to remove the package | 16:04 |
| jcastro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-jitsu/+bug/1533738 | 16:07 |
| mup | Bug #1533738: Remove juju-jitsu package from Xenial <juju-jitsu (Ubuntu):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1533738> | 16:07 |
| jcastro | they told me what to do | 16:07 |
| jcastro | we just file a bug and subscribe ubuntu-archive with an explanation | 16:07 |
| beisner | lazyPower || jose - can you review/land this? it's a c-h resync to enable openstack mitaka (ceilometer + mongodb) deployability. https://code.launchpad.net/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/mongodb/ch-sync-mitaka/+merge/282211 | 16:32 |
| lazyPower | jose wanna take that one? | 16:33 |
| jose | beisner: I have to run an errand right now - if lazy hasn't done it by when I'm back I'll do it | 16:33 |
| jose | lazyPower: | 16:33 |
| jose | ^ * | 16:33 |
| lazyPower | sound good | 16:33 |
| jose | cool | 16:33 |
| lazyPower | beisner in a meeting, gimme a few and i'm on it | 16:33 |
| beisner | thx guys. fwiw, the code it's pulling in has already been reviewed and landed in lp:charm-helpers. | 16:33 |
| jacekn | hello. I am trying to write an amulet test for a simple subordinate. It uses "juju-info" relation. I am trying to relate it with cs:ubuntu charm like this: "cls.deployment.relate('ubuntu:juju-info', 'collectd:juju-info')" | 16:34 |
| jacekn | I am getting this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14488256/ | 16:35 |
| jacekn | any ideas what I am doing wrong? | 16:36 |
| beisner | jacekn, are you able to make the same relation on those services outside of the test? ie. juju add-relation X Y | 16:36 |
| jose | jacekn: not sure on this, but does your charm provide juju-info? | 16:36 |
| jose | like, explicitly stated? | 16:36 |
| jacekn | beisner: only if I do "juju add-relation ubuntu collectd" | 16:36 |
| jacekn | beisner: so it seems to me that the amulet depends on juju-info being in the metadata.yaml which it probably shouldn't | 16:37 |
| beisner | jacekn, yeah i've not looked at the code, but i suspect it just parses metadata.yaml to populate valid interfaces. | 16:38 |
| jacekn | see this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14488278/ | 16:38 |
| jacekn | so how should I test my subordinate? | 16:39 |
| beisner | given the empty dict, i bet you're right. { u'Error': u'no relations found', u'RequestId': 1, u'Response': { }} | 16:39 |
| beisner | i'd say it's in python-jujuclient | 16:39 |
| beisner | or hrm. that explicit juju add-relation fail takes me back to: juju-info is somehow super-special | 16:40 |
| jacekn | even juju itself can't add that relation (ubuntu:juju-info collectd:juju-info) | 16:40 |
| lazyPower | jacekn correct, juju-info relations are bad | 16:44 |
| lazyPower | using it as the implicit interface on a scope: container relation is ok | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | but not as the relation name | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | beisner ^ | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | jacekn swap that relation to be something like: "metric-host: interface: juju-info scope: container" and you should clear up that error | 16:46 |
| icey | in developing a layer, not a top level layer, is it OK to use any of the @hook decorators? | 16:47 |
| jacekn | lazyPower: you mean in my subordinate's metadata.yaml? | 16:49 |
| icey | also, would it be a good idea to (if possible) make a layer that is not intended to be the top layer deployable? | 16:50 |
| icey | ie: calling charm build on the layer would make a deployable charm | 16:50 |
| lazyPower | jacekn correct | 16:50 |
| lazyPower | icey you can | 16:50 |
| lazyPower | icey you just cant mix @hook and @when decorators | 16:50 |
| lazyPower | icey however we do prefer that you not use the @hook decorators unless they are absolutely necessary. Like set up a method that uses/provides a synthetic state | 16:51 |
| lazyPower | and use those states to drive, as thats more natural when charming with consuming layers | 16:51 |
| icey | I'm thinking more about the install hook :) | 16:51 |
| lazyPower | its odd to try to intercept @hooke('config-changed') in 3 layers, vs doing something like @when_not('dependency.installed') | 16:51 |
| icey | everything else I'm fine pushing to reactive state but can't figure out a non-ridiculous way to handle the install | 16:52 |
| lazyPower | well | 16:52 |
| lazyPower | considering states run until their state change occurs in the bus coupled with a guarding @when_not() | 16:52 |
| lazyPower | you can set the state you want to imply install, and @when() on your other 3 or 4 method decorators | 16:52 |
| jacekn | lazyPower: that did not help: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14488410/ | 16:56 |
| beisner | lazyPower, can you re-trigger tests for http://review.juju.solutions/review/2394 ? | 16:57 |
| lazyPower | beisner aws and lxc re-added to the queue | 16:58 |
| * lazyPower circles back | 16:58 | |
| beisner | lazyPower, thx | 16:58 |
| lazyPower | inc rev/merge on above link | 16:58 |
| icey | lazyPower: how would I get my needed state set? | 17:00 |
| lazyPower | icey charms.reactive set_state('thing.amabob') | 17:00 |
| icey | in an @hook('install')? | 17:00 |
| lazyPower | sure | 17:00 |
| lazyPower | from charms.reactive import set_state | 17:00 |
| lazyPower | set_state('thing.amabob') | 17:01 |
| icey | I know how to set states, wondering what the recommended way to replace an install hook would be | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | oh | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | @when_not('thing.amabob') | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | def do_something() | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | # do something here | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | set_state('thing.amabob') | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | then in followign methods | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | @when('thing.amabob') | 17:01 |
| jose | lazyPower: on it? | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | do_something() will trigger in that first sweep of the reactive bus | 17:01 |
| lazyPower | jose already merged | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | just need to push | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | actually the merge is hng up | 17:02 |
| jose | lazyPower: gotcha | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | if you wanna do it go for it | 17:02 |
| jose | bzr push :parent | 17:02 |
| jose | ^^ copy and paste | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | nah its stuck on the merge dude | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | $ bzr merge lp:~1chb1n/charms/trusty/mongodb/ch-sync-mitaka | 17:02 |
| lazyPower | sitting here on this, cycling | 17:02 |
| jose | ok let's see | 17:02 |
| jose | as long as it's not a fat charm I'm good | 17:02 |
| * icey lunches | 17:03 | |
| jose | beisner: merged | 17:05 |
| beisner | thanks jose | 17:06 |
| jose | np | 17:06 |
| beisner | jose o/ got one hot off the press. https://code.launchpad.net/~ajkavanagh/charms/trusty/mongodb/fix-unit-test-lint-lp1533654/+merge/282472 | 17:40 |
| beisner | ie. some old existing lint in the unit test file just crossed the failure line in whatever bleeding edge version of flake8 gets pulled from pypi | 17:41 |
| jose | beisner: lucky you, I still have that directory open | 17:42 |
| beisner | woot | 17:42 |
| jose | and landed | 17:45 |
| beisner | thanks again, jose :) | 17:57 |
| jose | np | 18:01 |
| icey | lazyPower: got a few minutes to chat more about the layers / reactive stuff, maybe on a hangout? | 18:11 |
| mbruzek | Hey guys I just reviewed a charm that uses SFTP and no crypto verification. Is that OK? | 18:30 |
| mbruzek | Does using sftp remove the need to do cryptographic verification of a payload? | 18:31 |
| marcoceppi | mbruzek: ehhhhhhhhh | 18:32 |
| marcoceppi | mbruzek: it's on the fence, I'd mail the list | 18:32 |
| lazyPower | icey : hey sorry i stepped out for lunch | 18:50 |
| lazyPower | marcoceppi are we doing standup in 10? | 18:50 |
| icey | no worries lazyPower :) I figure IRC is async | 18:50 |
| marcoceppi | lazyPower: probably, yes | 18:51 |
| marcoceppi | moving to better wifi | 18:51 |
| lazyPower | icey But i can help out of band, whats up? | 18:54 |
| icey | just trying to wrap my head around best practice for intermediate layers and hooks | 18:54 |
| lazyPower | icey well i prototyped some of what this looks like elsewhere | 18:55 |
| lazyPower | icey this is a sandwich layer with a short lifespan, it will be deprecated in favor of layer-docker-libnetwork | 18:55 |
| lazyPower | https://github.com/chuckbutler/flannel-layer/blob/master/reactive/flannel.py | 18:56 |
| lazyPower | but i dont bind to *any* of the default hookenv hooks | 18:56 |
| lazyPower | i'm sniffing states off the base layer and setting states for hte top layer to consume via unitdata.kv() | 18:56 |
| icey | marcoceppi: can you let me know how to depoloy a local charm with a bundle | 19:13 |
| marcoceppi | icey: set JUJU_REPOSITORY and set charm: local:trusty/charm | 19:15 |
| icey | thanks, yeah the bundle export from juju gui gave me an error with the charm number after | 19:15 |
| === jog__ is now known as jog | ||
| bdx | hey whats up guys? Is there a charmhelper function, or best practice anyone knows of to generate self-signed certificates other then using subprocess and pipes? | 21:45 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: you should talk to lazyPower | 21:52 |
| lazyPower | bdx hi there | 21:52 |
| marcoceppi | o/ arosales | 21:52 |
| marcoceppi | bdx: and mbruzek | 21:52 |
| lazyPower | bdx have you looked at the TLS layer in interfaces.juju.solutions? | 21:52 |
| bdx | oooh ... I just realized you can pass a -config option to a file | 21:52 |
| bdx | lazyPower: I was looking at the way its done in the apache2 charm | 21:53 |
| lazyPower | bdx nope! | 21:53 |
| lazyPower | we have new stuff | 21:53 |
| bdx | lazyPower: nice, I'll check it now, thanks | 21:53 |
| lazyPower | bdx https://github.com/mbruzek/layer-tls | 21:53 |
| lazyPower | the tls layer is only peer capable so its not server/client aware yet | 21:54 |
| lazyPower | but getting there | 21:54 |
| lazyPower | sets up PKI, each unit generates a CSR, the leader signs it and hands back the certificate | 21:54 |
| lazyPower | consume, easy self signed pki | 21:54 |
| bdx | this is great! | 21:55 |
| bdx | I want to use it now | 21:55 |
| lazyPower | do it! | 21:55 |
| lazyPower | we want bugs / feedback / layers to use this | 21:55 |
| lazyPower | bdx we're doing server/client key generation for kubernetes with this and its workign quite well | 21:55 |
| mbruzek | bdx it is still very new, but please give us feedback | 21:56 |
| lazyPower | so if you need an example to follow, we have one for ya | 21:56 |
| lazyPower | i should have the prelim work done w/ swarm to hand over soon'ish too, its about a week behind the k8s refactoring | 21:56 |
| bdx | lazyPower, mbruzek: entirely, awesome! | 21:56 |
| mbruzek | bdx we aim to please | 21:57 |
| === _thumper_ is now known as thumper | ||
| bdx | mbruzek: it was a great idea to make this a layer ... every website/api endpoint should/could need this | 21:58 |
| mbruzek | I know! Right? | 21:58 |
| mbruzek | To be honest we stumbled upon that with our kubernetes work | 21:58 |
| mbruzek | but yeah I want to make it more generic and useful to any charm layer so please advise, open bugs, or sing is praises in #juju | 21:59 |
| bdx | of course :-) | 22:00 |
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-afk | ||
| beisner | mysql charm mitaka prep ready for review/landing. https://code.launchpad.net/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/mysql/ch-sync-mitaka/+merge/282209 i believe this is the last of the mitaka uca blocker syncs - jamespage || gnuoy | 22:17 |
| * D4RKS1D3 GoodNight! | 23:06 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
