| Mirv | Saviq: no, no aware, let's try to find what it is about | 05:34 |
|---|---|---|
| tsdgeos | Saviq: you've made test failures be failures instaead of unstable? https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/15/ | 08:28 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, otherwise we'd end up in the make exit code situation potentially | 08:53 |
| tsdgeos | ok, that's a bit of a step back but not terrible i guess | 08:53 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, you mean to not see the difference between unstable and failed? | 08:54 |
| tsdgeos | yep | 08:54 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, I could interpret adt-run exit status http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man1/adt-run.1.html | 08:56 |
| tsdgeos | i guess it's fine, i mean it's just a few extra clicks | 08:56 |
| Saviq | so if 2,4,6,8, exit 0 | 08:56 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, no I get what you mean, when we get reports on MPs it's important to know the difference | 08:57 |
| Saviq | hopefully I can still mark it unstable if 2,4,6,8 | 08:57 |
| Saviq | so we don't miss make exit | 08:57 |
| Saviq | yeah easy enough to do | 09:00 |
| tsdgeos | ok :) | 09:01 |
| Saviq | d'oh, looks like we'll build up a dummy .xml file after all :P | 09:30 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: Saviq: we're going to need a decision on whether we want https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/fallback_for_empty/+merge/282002 or not | 09:57 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, mzanetti, you were arguing that it might be desirable to pass empty, I somewhat agree that fallback was meant for the case where the scope can't do anything about it, because they don't know if we successfully retrieve the image | 10:00 |
| Saviq | when sending empty, they might as well send the fallback url again | 10:00 |
| Saviq | s/again/instead/ | 10:00 |
| mzanetti | that's our thinking yes | 10:00 |
| mzanetti | but dobey strongly disagrees | 10:01 |
| tsdgeos | my guess is mostly by the "fallback" name than by real disagreeing | 10:01 |
| Saviq | ultimately it's the API guys' decision | 10:02 |
| Saviq | because they're signing the contract with the scope developer | 10:03 |
| Saviq | s | 10:03 |
| mzanetti | fair enough. | 10:04 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/16/ should come up unstable now instead of failed (/me should have ran the parallel qmluitests instead, cuts the time by half) | 10:09 |
| * Saviq starts thinking Jenkaas might be a good thing for us in the end | 10:17 | |
| Saviq | looks like I'll be able to cut the CI turnaround by a significant margin | 10:18 |
| Saviq | but we seem to have "lost" almost twenty tests somehow | 10:20 |
| tsdgeos | :? | 10:21 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, and btw, it was enough to make them run in parallel https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/unity8/parallel-qmluitests/+merge/282603 ;) | 10:23 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, I mean https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/unity8/parallel-qmluitests/+merge/282603/comments/717308 | 10:23 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, well, ok, not 20, but 7 https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/13/testReport/ vs. https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/13/testReport/ | 10:24 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: that's the same link twice | 10:24 |
| Saviq | grr | 10:24 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity-phablet-qmluitests-vivid/1774/testReport/%28root%29/ vs. https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/13/label=amd64,release=vivid+overlay/testReport/%28root%29/ | 10:25 |
| Saviq | meld to the rescue | 10:26 |
| tsdgeos | weird | 10:26 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, that's the diff http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14503845/ | 10:27 |
| Saviq | ah I wonder if it put the .xml file somewhere | 10:29 |
| Saviq | or or | 10:30 |
| Saviq | same name | 10:30 |
| Saviq | or not part of xvfballtests | 10:31 |
| Saviq | 'cause I can't see them at all in the adt-run log | 10:31 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, oh oh, and... good news and bad news https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/877 (check out "Automated test results") | 10:31 |
| tsdgeos | aren't they part of make test? | 10:32 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, I'll find them, nw | 10:32 |
| tsdgeos | hey, got a pass for amd64 | 10:33 |
| tsdgeos | still some failures though :/ | 10:33 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, the i386 fail on vivid is a time out, something got stuck (3h between start and timeout) | 10:34 |
| Saviq | armhf is like a swiss cheese :/ | 10:34 |
| tsdgeos | yeah :D | 10:35 |
| tsdgeos | i'll have a look | 10:35 |
| tsdgeos | i think most are timing related | 10:35 |
| tsdgeos | but still it'd be great if we could get them to pass | 10:35 |
| Saviq | 123 failures | 10:35 |
| Saviq | we could use the .xml out of that | 10:36 |
| Saviq | xenial i386 is just two fails in launcher that didn't get pulled out, so some improvement needed there, too | 10:37 |
| * Saviq worried to make them pass, they will shout Regression! at us all the time after that | 10:37 | |
| Saviq | ah, wonder if it's the parallel that made them stuck | 10:38 |
| Saviq | hmm no, xvfballtests still went -j1 | 10:38 |
| Saviq | only 52 failures on xenial armhf :) | 10:39 |
| tsdgeos | he he | 10:42 |
| Saviq | Mirv, hey, so yeah lp:ubuntu-settings-components cross-builds on vivid+overlay but not on xenial: https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/build-2-binpkg/arch=cross-armhf,release=xenial/163/console | 11:23 |
| Saviq | Mirv, same for lp:unity-api https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/build-2-binpkg/164/ | 11:28 |
| Saviq | owait that's actually a different - g++ - issue | 11:28 |
| mzanetti | Saviq, hey, I'm sure I saw a bug report coming by lately for apps crashing if you launch them immediately after closing them | 11:31 |
| mzanetti | can't find it any more, neither in my inbox nor on LP | 11:32 |
| mzanetti | you happen to know about it? | 11:32 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, bug #1527737 | 11:32 |
| ubot5 | bug 1527737 in qtmir (Ubuntu) "Apps do not start if restarted quickly after closing" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1527737 | 11:32 |
| mzanetti | faenil, ^ | 11:32 |
| mzanetti | thanks Saviq | 11:32 |
| faenil | ah finally :) thanks | 11:32 |
| Saviq | we almost landed a fix, but found a bad regression that sometimes stopped you from launching apps altogether... | 11:33 |
| faenil | I see | 11:35 |
| faenil | left a comment there with my current experience | 11:35 |
| Saviq | Mirv, *or* my chroots are borked, can't seem to reproduce locally | 11:43 |
| Saviq | ah | 11:43 |
| Saviq | proposed?? | 11:43 |
| Mirv | Saviq: hmm | 11:46 |
| Mirv | Saviq: maybe some gcc proposed update indeed | 11:46 |
| Saviq | Mirv, that would actually explain the boost issue as well | 11:46 |
| Mirv | Saviq: there was a new gcc-5 upload 14 hours ago | 11:46 |
| Mirv | at least | 11:46 |
| Saviq | hmm I first saw the issues earlier than that | 11:46 |
| Mirv | boost stuff from a week ago is in release pocket | 11:48 |
| * Saviq recreates the chroots | 11:58 | |
| Saviq | Mirv, meh, can't reproduce locally, will let you know what I find out | 11:59 |
| Mirv | Saviq: ok, let's see later | 12:01 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, yay, unstable https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/view/unity8/ (second from the top) | 12:27 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: third? | 12:28 |
| Saviq | maybe third by now | 12:28 |
| tsdgeos | parallel one, no? | 12:28 |
| Saviq | yes | 12:28 |
| Saviq | yellow-ish | 12:28 |
| Saviq | instead of red | 12:29 |
| Saviq | need to fix the upstream job, too (thought I did already) | 12:29 |
| Saviq | ah | 12:29 |
| Saviq | now I did | 12:29 |
| tsdgeos | food! | 12:30 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| mterry | Saviq, how trustworthy are the unity8 CI bot results so far? | 13:48 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: have a sec? | 13:50 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, yeah | 13:52 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: i can't figure out why mouseMove on the tests is failing to turn containsMouse of a MouseArea to true | 13:53 |
| tsdgeos | i thought it was the MouseTouchAdaptor | 13:53 |
| tsdgeos | but i've set it to false and still fails | 13:53 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: i can push the branch somewhere if you want | 13:55 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, MouseTouchAdaptor should be completely transparent to tests | 13:55 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, your second is up | 13:55 |
| dandrader | :) | 13:55 |
| tsdgeos | ok | 13:55 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, does it happens only in tests? | 13:56 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, or in "make tryFoo" as well? | 13:56 |
| tsdgeos | make tryFoo works if i uncheck the "mouse emulates touch" | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | checkbox | 13:57 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, add some wait(xxx) between commands. helps to see if there's some race/timing issue | 14:01 |
| tsdgeos | yeah i did, didn't seem to help | 14:01 |
| tsdgeos | will keep trying, don't worry | 14:01 |
| tsdgeos | it was just if you had something quick in mind | 14:02 |
| Saviq | mterry, by now should be really trustworthy, modulo autopilot, which don't run yet | 14:12 |
| Saviq | and armhf, which we can't build | 14:12 |
| Saviq | and I need to find 7 tests that disappeared :P | 14:12 |
| mterry | Saviq, hah we can't build armhf? Because of ci restrictions? that seems like a big gap :) | 14:12 |
| Saviq | mterry, no | 14:12 |
| Saviq | because of bug #1472186 (I wanted to cross-build) | 14:13 |
| ubot5 | bug 1472186 in indicator-network (Ubuntu) "Can't install libconnectivity-qt1-dev on multiarch" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1472186 | 14:13 |
| Saviq | where possible | 14:13 |
| mterry | Saviq, ah | 14:13 |
| Saviq | will likely need an armhf node for non-cross-buildable stuff | 14:13 |
| Saviq | and then we have a phone, but don't want to use that for building, only for ap | 14:13 |
| Saviq | on that note | 14:43 |
| oSoMoN | is there a way to change the keyboard layout of a bluetooth keyboard connected to a phone? | 14:54 |
| oSoMoN | nm, found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1412492 | 14:57 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk | ||
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1412492 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "can't change the keyboard layout" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 14:57 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, not sure what failed in launcher-sizing autopkgtest, added some debugging and restarted | 14:58 |
| ltinkl | oSoMoN, nope, not supported yet | 14:58 |
| mzanetti | hmm | 14:58 |
| oSoMoN | that’s unfortunate, there’s a lot of people out there who don’t use qwerty and want to type non latin1 characters | 14:59 |
| Saviq | oSoMoN, we're thinking hard about it ;) | 15:01 |
| Saviq | but | 15:01 |
| Saviq | people not using qwerty are... well, you know what I mean :P | 15:02 |
| oSoMoN | Saviq, no I don’t, what do you mean? | 15:02 |
| Saviq | I mean it's their own fault :P | 15:03 |
| Saviq | should be forced to use qwerty for the sake of humanity | 15:03 |
| ltinkl | Saviq, right but it's mainly about being able to input non latin1 stuff :) | 15:03 |
| Saviq | I'm using qwerty and input non-latin1 stuff all the time | 15:04 |
| Saviq | not to mention compose key | 15:04 |
| Saviq | we've done away with the "polish" layout some time ago and everyone uses "polish (programmer's)" now ;) | 15:04 |
| Saviq | with AltGr to add diacriticts | 15:04 |
| Saviq | but yeah, /me has caps mapped to compose, much more useful | 15:05 |
| oSoMoN | does Mir allow remapping keys? | 15:05 |
| Saviq | not yet I don't think | 15:07 |
| ltinkl | Saviq, yeah but not in u8, Mir forces a "en_US" layout | 15:10 |
| Saviq | ltinkl, I know, I know :P | 15:10 |
| ltinkl | Saviq, otherwise I'm using a cz+qwerty+AltGr as well | 15:12 |
| Saviq | grr /me broke autopkgtest job, fixing | 15:21 |
| Saviq | fixeded | 15:27 |
| faenil | Saviq: is it possible to install&run click apps on desktop unity8 yet? | 17:12 |
| faenil | I played a bit with click install + register | 17:12 |
| faenil | but didn't get anywhere | 17:13 |
| faenil | (note: it could have been that the click was corrupt as well) | 17:13 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, you have a recipe for that ↑ ;) | 17:13 |
| mzanetti | faenil, should work, yes | 17:14 |
| mzanetti | faenil, need click install, yes. but then it should just work | 17:15 |
| mzanetti | faenil, store is broken. you can still click on them to download them. they'll end up in ~/.cache | 17:15 |
| mzanetti | faenil, installation with pkcon will fail, but click install should work | 17:16 |
| mzanetti | you need multiarch or x86 packages obviously | 17:16 |
| faenil | mzanetti: yeah, does store hand out x86 or arm packages? | 17:17 |
| faenil | and I used click install + register but it didn't work...must have been the click then | 17:17 |
| faenil | mzanetti: pkcon is because it has apt configured as backend right? | 17:17 |
| faenil | I had a quick look at how to swap pkcon's backend but didn't find any simple way | 17:18 |
| oSoMoN | Saviq, ltinkl: I could use a review for https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/qtubuntu/qkeyevent-native-virtual-key/+merge/282515 | 17:24 |
| davidcalle | Here we go! https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/01/15/announcing-ubuntu-scopes-showdown-2016/ | 17:45 |
| mzanetti | faenil, yes, and yes | 17:49 |
| mzanetti | faenil, core apps are packaged multiarch nowadays | 17:49 |
| mzanetti | faenil, simple webapps or qml only would work too | 17:49 |
| faenil | mzanetti: okay, cool | 17:49 |
| faenil | mzanetti: nah, clicks | 17:49 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!