[00:22] <mapreri> ari-tczew: umh, you're welcome, but what did I do this time? :)  I don't recall giving out pbuilder suggestions in the last hours/days, umh…
[00:24] <ari-tczew> mapreri: what are you talking about?
[00:24] <mapreri> oh
[00:24] <mapreri> ooops
[00:24] <mapreri> ari-tczew: sorry, I misread the highlight
[00:25] <ari-tczew> mapreri: no problem, have a nice weekend anyway
[00:25] <mapreri> ari-tczew: since I became maintaining pbuilder I added an highlight on the 'pbuilder' word, and didn't notice your message at 07:37:10pm was not directed to me, sorry :(
[00:26] <ari-tczew> lol, something happens
[01:43] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks a lot cjwatson
[01:47] <LocutusOfBorg> I closed the sync bug
[07:52] <cjwatson> bdrung: I can't, no.  Try Mirv
[10:02] <doko> xnox, looks like the giflib autopkg test fails on s390x. can you re-enable tracker support on s390x, or do I misunderstand something?
[11:55] <Mirv> bdrung: file a bug against qtbase-opensource-src please and I'll see to it
[13:42] <ari-tczew> mapreri: are you going to merge liferea this cycle?
[13:44] <mapreri> if somebody would it would be awesome.  I don't like being the person keeping it broken on non-unity DE, and I don't have the skills to fix it.  (talking about #1186801)
[13:44] <mapreri> ari-tczew: that should be the only package left to merge with my name, isn't it?
[13:45] <ari-tczew> mapreri: on universe yes
[13:46] <ari-tczew> mapreri: hmm I need to take a look on that bug 1186801
[13:46] <mapreri> ari-tczew: recently I started to do merge the other way (ubuntu → debian) instead, I like them some more.  but I can't really incorporate that liferea diff :)
[13:48] <ari-tczew> mapreri: I'm not going to fix that patch, rather disable it or we could even ask the author => xnox
[13:55] <ari-tczew> mapreri: one tip: if you won't do a merge, it's appreciated to leave a comment on merge-o-matic like "feel free to take" or something
[13:55] <mapreri> ari-tczew: yeah, sorry.  please add it if indeed.
[14:26] <nn2> hi. both mpv and sflphone are missing (useful) features due to packaging (missing build-depends and probably depends).
[14:28] <nn2> could maybe someone have a quick look to get this fixed for xenial if possible?
[14:28] <nn2> (the relevant bugs are #1502533 and #1533840)
[18:19] <cjwatson> xnox: please could you merge guilt?  new findutils Breaks the current version
[18:23] <theweirdn8> Helllo, would u pay for a cross-breed between Unity and Game Maker that works on Linux?
[20:37] <ari-tczew> if a package has got debian/tests/*, should be there in debian/control "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest" added to enable tests?
[20:37] <tumbleweed> not any more
[20:38] <ari-tczew> thanks tumbleweed
[21:05] <GunnarHj> doko: My latest attempt to upload the language-selector package resulted in a build failure:
[21:05] <GunnarHj> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/0.155/+build/8861822
[21:05] <GunnarHj> It looks like it has something to do with version 3.5.1-1ubuntu1 of python3-defaults. What needs to be done to make l-s buildable again?
[21:08] <ari-tczew> could anyone point me, what's the actual path of /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/lockfile.py ? I've got FTBFS like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14559509/
[21:19] <theweirdn8> Are these pices outrageous? http://gamepencil.pawbyte.com/game-pencil-engine-comparison-chart/
[21:42] <infinity> ari-tczew: Lots of different lockfile.py I suppose it depends on which one taskcoach is looking for.  And why it's copying it instead of depending on it.
[21:42] <infinity> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=lockfile.py&mode=exactfilename&suite=xenial&arch=any
[21:43] <infinity> ari-tczew: This is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788974
[21:57] <teward> so, i made a bug requesting a package to be removed and blacklisted; do I have to subscribe ubuntu-archive to that?
[21:57] <teward> s/a package/two packages and corresponding binaries and source/
[21:58] <ari-tczew> infinity: thanks for looking up. however, there is already a one fix made by doko to get another path for lockfile.py. seems to be outdated :-(
[22:32] <mwhudson> why would sbuild be spamming call to get_tasks_recursive failed: Invalid arguments received in reply
[22:32] <mwhudson>  all over the place?
[22:32] <mwhudson> it seems to work still, mind