=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
* tsimonq2 is gone: | 06:00 | |
sil2100 | jibel: hey! Looking at the silos that landed on Friday and which we would still need to land, it seems we'd need silo 41 and silo 36 still, right? | 08:00 |
---|---|---|
sil2100 | jibel: 36 seems like a big change that would touch a lot of components... did you guys start testing the latest rc-proposed image already, or are we waiting for the mir silo? | 08:01 |
sil2100 | (by big change I mean 'mir') | 08:01 |
jibel | sil2100, morning | 08:06 |
jibel | sil2100, yes we still need 41 and 36 | 08:06 |
jibel | sil2100, 41 didn't land due to a server side issue | 08:07 |
sil2100 | 36 seems to be ready for QA at least now I suppose | 08:07 |
jibel | sil2100, 36 didn't land because some webbrowser AP test failed and we wanted a confirmation that it was not due to the silo | 08:07 |
jibel | sil2100, it's ready now yes | 08:07 |
jibel | sil2100, we'll also land 13 for pd today | 08:08 |
sil2100 | jibel: yeah, saw Kevin's e-mail about it - ok, let's at least wait for the sign-off of mir | 08:08 |
jibel | sil2100, do you do a snapshot for pd too? | 08:08 |
sil2100 | jibel: do you think it's worth it to kick a new image after mir is released? | 08:08 |
jibel | sil2100, probably | 08:08 |
sil2100 | jibel: not really, but I can do one anytime when needed | 08:08 |
sil2100 | I'll prepare the snapshot for touch when we land mir | 08:09 |
jibel | sil2100, about devel-proposed, I think you can promote it. scopes don't work, ringtones, notifications sound and brightness panels don't work in system-settings, the rest is okay-ish | 08:11 |
jibel | I'll file bugs for system-settings | 08:11 |
jibel | sil2100, you'll build the RC when mir lands? | 08:12 |
jibel | sil2100, also we'll need new translations at some point this week | 08:13 |
jibel | maybe tomorrow | 08:13 |
sil2100 | jibel: ok, thanks! | 08:15 |
sil2100 | jibel: yeah, I suppose we'll do the RC with the mir landing and then unblock rc-proposed normally | 08:15 |
sil2100 | We'll cherry pick the in-app payments bits then | 08:15 |
sil2100 | jibel: I saw an e-mail that the China team already started testing the weekend image - the mir landing will probably invalidate most of those tests, right? | 08:38 |
sil2100 | jibel: since I could copy the current rc-proposed image to RC as well, but we'll need mir anyway so not sure if it makes sense | 08:43 |
jibel | sil2100, we have 3 images to test + pd. We cannot afford 1 day of delay | 08:48 |
jibel | sil2100, if mir lands today, we'll find any problem with the remaining tests. There is still one week of testing | 08:49 |
sil2100 | jibel: ok | 08:58 |
jibel | sil2100, sorry google logged me out | 09:32 |
jibel | trying to rejoin | 09:33 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
jibel | bfiller, did you export the translations of the camera to LP? I cannot find the text of the new dialog | 12:34 |
jibel | bfiller, if it is not done, I think you should publish the new camera app anyway so it's on the RC build | 12:34 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
sil2100 | jibel, davmor2, rvr: mir published, thanks for the testing! I'll kick a new image once it published in the PPA | 14:09 |
sil2100 | *it's | 14:09 |
jibel | thanks | 14:09 |
jibel | bfiller, can you publish the camera app before sil2100 builds a new image? | 14:10 |
jibel | ah, is it a public holiday in the US? | 14:11 |
sil2100 | Hope not! | 14:13 |
jibel | sil2100, http://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/us/martin-luther-king-day | 14:13 |
Mirv | robru: sil2100: I think the britney results should use the "forced by" things from normal autopkgtests, otherwise I don't ever get to land any Qt stuff because of various broken reverse dependency tests like KDE's: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-060/excuses.html | 14:39 |
Mirv | I don't know where to get them from, but at least kactivities-kf5, marble and rocs have been on those lists, making it possible for things to migrate in xenial | 14:40 |
sil2100 | jibel: I guess bfiller is gone, so I kick an image without the camera-app... | 14:44 |
sil2100 | Or do we have someone else that could do that? | 14:44 |
sil2100 | Elleo: ping | 14:44 |
jibel | Kaleo, ^ | 14:46 |
jibel | Kaleo, do you have the power to publish the camera app? | 14:47 |
sil2100 | Kaleo, Elleo: hey, does anyone of you guys have the knowledge and permissions to upload camera-app to the store? | 14:47 |
Kaleo | what? | 14:47 |
Kaleo | ah | 14:47 |
Kaleo | bfiller should be around extremely soon | 14:48 |
Kaleo | we have a meeting in 10 minutes | 14:48 |
jibel | okay, lets wait 10 min | 14:48 |
Kaleo | and I don't think I can upload to the store, let me check | 14:48 |
Mirv | sil2100: I might still have unless it's changed | 14:49 |
Kaleo | I don't have the ability to upload | 14:49 |
Mirv | but it seems people will be around anyway? | 14:49 |
Mirv | so I have 3.0.0.614 .click here, I can try uploading it if wanted | 14:52 |
davmor2 | sil2100: no bregma so I'll let you know https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/875 passes | 14:54 |
Elleo | sil2100: not something I really know about I'm afraid, I've not been involved in publishing any of the click apps we manage | 14:54 |
sil2100 | Mirv: oh | 14:57 |
sil2100 | jibel: you remember the version number you guys tested? | 14:57 |
sil2100 | Mirv: since bfiller and the US seem to have a national holiday today | 14:57 |
jibel | sil2100, we tested what is attached to the silo | 14:59 |
jibel | sil2100, http://people.canonical.com/~kaleo/camera/com.ubuntu.camera_3.0.0.ci805_armhf.click | 15:00 |
sil2100 | I wonder if that's the same as 3.0.0.614 | 15:01 |
Mirv | sil2100: the process known to me is that MP:s are merged to trunk at https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/trunk and a click package is automatically built on s-jenkins. I'd be somewhat wary of other methods of obtaining click packages. | 15:01 |
sil2100 | Mirv: I think I see the right change merged in | 15:02 |
sil2100 | So I suppose this is the right click that we would need | 15:02 |
sil2100 | (if it's auto-generated) | 15:02 |
sil2100 | jibel: what do you think? ^ | 15:02 |
jibel | sil2100, I've no idea, I don't know what Bill does to release a click | 15:03 |
jibel | nor where he gets it from after we approved it | 15:03 |
Kaleo | sil2100, no it's not the right click | 15:03 |
Kaleo | he normally rebuilds it | 15:03 |
jibel | sil2100, okay, lets wait tomorrow then. It'll go straight to stable and if anything breaks it'll be worse than losing a day of testing | 15:04 |
Kaleo | it's a bank holiday in the US | 15:04 |
jibel | sil2100, you can rebuild with mir, then another build tomorrow with the new camera app | 15:05 |
sil2100 | Ok then | 15:06 |
jibel | Kaleo, do you know at least how to update the translation templates in LP. The new dialog is not in lp and cannot be translated. | 15:06 |
jibel | ? | 15:06 |
sil2100 | Building | 15:07 |
Mirv | the auto build from trunk is at http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/camera-app-click/ | 15:10 |
jibel | ChrisTownsend, davmor2 approved silo 13 | 15:10 |
ChrisTownsend | jibel: davmor2: Thanks! | 15:10 |
davmor2 | jibel: Ah I didn't ChrisTownsend on here and couldn't see bregma either so just let sil2100 know :) | 15:10 |
davmor2 | didn't see even | 15:11 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 15:11 |
ChrisTownsend | davmor2: Yeah, I just popped up online a little bit ago:) | 15:11 |
sil2100 | Will publish in a moment and then kick a new pd image | 15:11 |
davmor2 | and that'll be why then \o/ | 15:11 |
ChrisTownsend | sil2100: We have some packaging changes that *someone* will need to ack. | 15:12 |
davmor2 | ChrisTownsend: there are a rook load of issues with pd but none of them specifically related to the landing at hand :) | 15:12 |
ChrisTownsend | davmor2: Ok, care to give any specifics? | 15:13 |
Kaleo | jibel, I can check that | 15:14 |
Kaleo | jibel, I update the pot file in trunk | 15:26 |
Kaleo | jibel, hmmmm, I think it should update the launchpad translations apge | 15:26 |
Kaleo | page* | 15:26 |
Saviq | sil2100, what's ota9 status? can we land stuff yet? | 15:39 |
sil2100 | Saviq: one minute more, want the current image to finish pullin the packages, not sure if QA has enough resources for sign-off tho | 15:40 |
sil2100 | s/image/images | 15:40 |
Saviq | sil2100, ack | 15:42 |
sil2100 | ChrisTownsend: ping | 16:55 |
ChrisTownsend | sil2100: Hey, what's up? | 16:55 |
sil2100 | ChrisTownsend: hey! It's not a real problem, but I noticed you added a linux-image-generic dependency in libertine - I would like to know the reason for that :) | 16:55 |
sil2100 | (I'm reviewing the packaging diff) | 16:55 |
ChrisTownsend | sil2100: So, for the lxc backend we only support unprivileged lxc's which only kernels >= 3.13 support. | 16:56 |
sil2100 | Ok, makes sense | 16:57 |
ChrisTownsend | sil2100: Cool, thanks! | 16:57 |
jibel | sil2100, 222 contains the mir landing nothing else? | 17:06 |
sil2100 | jibel: yes (just triple confirmed in the manifests) | 17:09 |
sil2100 | jibel: only mir packages have changed | 17:09 |
sil2100 | davmor2, jibel: who should I poke to get the latest music-app click for OTA-9? | 17:27 |
sil2100 | ahayzen I suppose? | 17:27 |
* ahayzen hides | 17:27 | |
sil2100 | ahayzen: piiing ;) | 17:27 |
sil2100 | ahayzen: could you share teh click with me? | 17:28 |
jibel | sil2100, http://people.canonical.com/~alan/music/20160114/com.ubuntu.music_2.3.931_all.click | 17:28 |
sil2100 | Thanks :) | 17:28 |
ahayzen | ^^ has issues btw :-) | 17:28 |
sil2100 | Ouch | 17:28 |
ahayzen | we've fixed all the issues that were found, just trying to make jenkins happy now | 17:29 |
ahayzen | seems it can't find the keyboard sometimes | 17:29 |
jibel | ahayzen, we want to make sure that if it's ever published to the store before OTA9, users of the stable release won't see the update | 17:29 |
ahayzen | jibel, ah yes, we bumped the framework, so in theory they shouldn't | 17:30 |
ahayzen | but good to test :-) | 17:30 |
jibel | ahayzen, yeah but better safe than sorry :) | 17:30 |
sil2100 | Cannot install com.ubuntu.music_2.3.931_all.click: Framework "ubuntu-sdk-15.04.3-qml" not present on system (use --force-missing-framework option to override) | 17:36 |
sil2100 | I guess we're safe ;) | 17:36 |
ahayzen | \o/ | 17:36 |
sil2100 | jibel: ok, anyway, let me copy the current rc-proposed image to rc, for now please use the rc-proposed version | 17:37 |
sil2100 | Since it will take a while | 17:37 |
jibel | sil2100, when you copy to rc you tag it ota9? | 17:43 |
sil2100 | jibel: hm, I guess I could, although in theory it won't be our final candidate for sure - you want to test the tagging right now as well? | 17:44 |
sil2100 | Well, there's no problem in having 3 OTA-9 images in rc since that's what RC is about | 17:44 |
sil2100 | Oh, maybe I'll tag it OTA-9-rc? | 17:45 |
jibel | sil2100, no, i was just curious | 17:48 |
sil2100 | I suppose a convention of tagging it as OTA-x-rc is a good idea anyway, tags are not carried over with image copies | 17:49 |
sil2100 | I'm importing the new chinese tarball to the -proposed-proposed channel now | 17:50 |
Saviq | sil2100, are we there yet? (pop!) | 18:42 |
=== ChrisTownsend1 is now known as ChrisTownsend | ||
sil2100 | Saviq: yep! | 19:13 |
Saviq | \o/ | 19:15 |
sil2100 | jibel, davmor2: I copied all rc-proposed candidate images to rc (phased percentage 0% for now) - all besides meizu.zh | 19:23 |
sil2100 | Since meizu.zh is still not ready because of the custom I suppose | 19:23 |
sil2100 | I can copy it over anytime | 19:23 |
davmor2 | sil2100: \o/ | 19:25 |
sil2100 | Let me set the phasing for all to 100% | 19:25 |
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Please switch to Jenkins as a service: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: OTA-9 final freeze, rc with candidate images, rc-proposed landing normally | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
robru | michi: ping | 22:11 |
dobey | "burned version number" ? | 22:12 |
dobey | that's a new one | 22:12 |
robru | dobey: it means the destination archive has a package with the same version number but different source contents. | 22:12 |
robru | dobey: happens when two conflicting silos build on the same day (thus having same version numbers built), one gets published, the other one is "burned" | 22:13 |
robru | dobey: strictly speaking this was always a potential problem with conflicting train silos, it's just that only recently the train started detecting & reporting the situation. | 22:17 |
dobey | right. think it would be better to just use the same error message one would get from a package upload | 22:19 |
robru | dobey: what, "version NNN not found in changelog"? that can't fire because the version *is* found in the changelog, it's just the wrong one. | 22:20 |
dobey | robru: no. i mean, when you try to dput a package to a PPA for example, that has the same version and different contents, you get an error message saying it has different contents | 22:21 |
robru | dobey: can you file a bug with the exact error text you want? | 22:22 |
dobey | or maybe for ci train, it could be more explicit somehow, stating which request was landed | 22:22 |
robru | dobey: it doesn't really have a way of knowing what silo the upload at dest came from. | 22:23 |
dobey | well, i'll file a bug describing what i think the problem is, i guess | 22:24 |
dobey | ah | 22:24 |
robru | dobey: it's just checking the version number at dest, it could come from anywhere really, not even necessarily a train upload. just "oops, source contents don't match even though version is the same" | 22:24 |
robru | so it indicates it 'needs rebuild' because there's no way to publish this silo with this version as-is | 22:25 |
dobey | sure. i understand the reasoning for having an error there. | 22:26 |
dobey | just trying to think of a nicer way to describe it more explicitly :) | 22:26 |
robru | cool | 22:27 |
robru | bbl, lunch | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!