/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/01/18/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
* tsimonq2 is gone: 06:00
sil2100jibel: hey! Looking at the silos that landed on Friday and which we would still need to land, it seems we'd need silo 41 and silo 36 still, right?08:00
sil2100jibel: 36 seems like a big change that would touch a lot of components... did you guys start testing the latest rc-proposed image already, or are we waiting for the mir silo?08:01
sil2100(by big change I mean 'mir')08:01
jibelsil2100, morning08:06
jibelsil2100, yes we still need 41 and 3608:06
jibelsil2100, 41 didn't land due to a server side issue08:07
sil210036 seems to be ready for QA at least now I suppose08:07
jibelsil2100, 36 didn't land because some webbrowser AP test failed and we wanted a confirmation that it was not due to the silo08:07
jibelsil2100, it's ready now yes08:07
jibelsil2100, we'll also land 13 for pd today08:08
sil2100jibel: yeah, saw Kevin's e-mail about it - ok, let's at least wait for the sign-off of mir08:08
jibelsil2100, do you do a snapshot for pd too?08:08
sil2100jibel: do you think it's worth it to kick a new image after mir is released?08:08
jibelsil2100, probably08:08
sil2100jibel: not really, but I can do one anytime when needed08:08
sil2100I'll prepare the snapshot for touch when we land mir08:09
jibelsil2100, about devel-proposed, I think you can promote it. scopes don't work, ringtones, notifications sound and brightness panels don't work in system-settings, the rest is okay-ish08:11
jibelI'll file bugs for system-settings08:11
jibelsil2100, you'll build the RC when mir lands?08:12
jibelsil2100, also we'll need new translations at some point this week08:13
jibelmaybe tomorrow08:13
sil2100jibel: ok, thanks!08:15
sil2100jibel: yeah, I suppose we'll do the RC with the mir landing and then unblock rc-proposed normally08:15
sil2100We'll cherry pick the in-app payments bits then08:15
sil2100jibel: I saw an e-mail that the China team already started testing the weekend image - the mir landing will probably invalidate most of those tests, right?08:38
sil2100jibel: since I could copy the current rc-proposed image to RC as well, but we'll need mir anyway so not sure if it makes sense08:43
jibelsil2100, we have 3 images to test + pd. We cannot afford 1 day of delay08:48
jibelsil2100, if mir lands today, we'll find any problem with the remaining tests. There is still one week of testing08:49
sil2100jibel: ok08:58
jibelsil2100, sorry google logged me out09:32
jibeltrying to rejoin09:33
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== _salem is now known as salem_
jibelbfiller, did you export the translations of the camera to LP? I cannot find the text of the new dialog12:34
jibelbfiller, if it is not done, I think you should publish the new camera app anyway so it's on the RC build12:34
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
sil2100jibel, davmor2, rvr: mir published, thanks for the testing! I'll kick a new image once it published in the PPA14:09
sil2100*it's14:09
jibelthanks14:09
jibelbfiller, can you publish the camera app before sil2100 builds a new image?14:10
jibelah, is it a public holiday in the US?14:11
sil2100Hope not!14:13
jibelsil2100, http://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/us/martin-luther-king-day14:13
Mirvrobru: sil2100: I think the britney results should use the "forced by" things from normal autopkgtests, otherwise I don't ever get to land any Qt stuff because of various broken reverse dependency tests like KDE's: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-060/excuses.html14:39
MirvI don't know where to get them from, but at least kactivities-kf5, marble and rocs have been on those lists, making it possible for things to migrate in xenial14:40
sil2100jibel: I guess bfiller is gone, so I kick an image without the camera-app...14:44
sil2100Or do we have someone else that could do that?14:44
sil2100Elleo: ping14:44
jibelKaleo, ^14:46
jibelKaleo, do you have the power to publish the camera app?14:47
sil2100Kaleo, Elleo: hey, does anyone of you guys have the knowledge and permissions to upload camera-app to the store?14:47
Kaleowhat?14:47
Kaleoah14:47
Kaleobfiller should be around extremely soon14:48
Kaleowe have a meeting in 10 minutes14:48
jibelokay, lets wait 10 min14:48
Kaleoand I don't think I can upload to the store, let me check14:48
Mirvsil2100: I might still have unless it's changed14:49
KaleoI don't have the ability to upload14:49
Mirvbut it seems people will be around anyway?14:49
Mirvso I have 3.0.0.614 .click here, I can try uploading it if wanted14:52
davmor2sil2100: no bregma so I'll let you know https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/875 passes14:54
Elleosil2100: not something I really know about I'm afraid, I've not been involved in publishing any of the click apps we manage14:54
sil2100Mirv: oh14:57
sil2100jibel: you remember the version number you guys tested?14:57
sil2100Mirv: since bfiller and the US seem to have a national holiday today14:57
jibelsil2100, we tested what is attached to the silo14:59
jibelsil2100, http://people.canonical.com/~kaleo/camera/com.ubuntu.camera_3.0.0.ci805_armhf.click15:00
sil2100I wonder if that's the same as 3.0.0.61415:01
Mirvsil2100: the process known to me is that MP:s are merged to trunk at https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/camera-app/trunk and a click package is automatically built on s-jenkins. I'd be somewhat wary of other methods of obtaining click packages.15:01
sil2100Mirv: I think I see the right change merged in15:02
sil2100So I suppose this is the right click that we would need15:02
sil2100(if it's auto-generated)15:02
sil2100jibel: what do you think? ^15:02
jibelsil2100, I've no idea, I don't know what Bill does to release a click15:03
jibelnor where he gets it from after we approved it15:03
Kaleosil2100, no it's not the right click15:03
Kaleohe normally rebuilds it15:03
jibelsil2100, okay, lets wait tomorrow then. It'll go straight to stable and if anything breaks it'll be worse than losing a day of testing15:04
Kaleoit's a bank holiday in the US15:04
jibelsil2100, you can rebuild with mir, then another build tomorrow with the new camera app15:05
sil2100Ok then15:06
jibelKaleo, do you know at least how to update the translation templates in LP. The new dialog is not in lp and cannot be translated.15:06
jibel?15:06
sil2100Building15:07
Mirvthe auto build from trunk is at http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/camera-app-click/15:10
jibelChrisTownsend, davmor2 approved silo 1315:10
ChrisTownsendjibel: davmor2: Thanks!15:10
davmor2jibel: Ah I didn't ChrisTownsend on here and couldn't see bregma either so just let sil2100 know :)15:10
davmor2didn't see even15:11
sil2100\o/15:11
ChrisTownsenddavmor2: Yeah, I just popped up online a little bit ago:)15:11
sil2100Will publish in a moment and then kick a new pd image15:11
davmor2and that'll be why then \o/15:11
ChrisTownsendsil2100: We have some packaging changes that *someone* will need to ack.15:12
davmor2ChrisTownsend: there are a rook load of issues with pd but none of them specifically related to the landing at hand :)15:12
ChrisTownsenddavmor2: Ok, care to give any specifics?15:13
Kaleojibel, I can check that15:14
Kaleojibel, I update the pot file in trunk15:26
Kaleojibel, hmmmm, I think it should update the launchpad translations apge15:26
Kaleopage*15:26
Saviqsil2100, what's ota9 status? can we land stuff yet?15:39
sil2100Saviq: one minute more, want the current image to finish pullin the packages, not sure if QA has enough resources for sign-off tho15:40
sil2100s/image/images15:40
Saviqsil2100, ack15:42
sil2100ChrisTownsend: ping16:55
ChrisTownsendsil2100: Hey, what's up?16:55
sil2100ChrisTownsend: hey! It's not a real problem, but I noticed you added a linux-image-generic dependency in libertine - I would like to know the reason for that :)16:55
sil2100(I'm reviewing the packaging diff)16:55
ChrisTownsendsil2100: So, for the lxc backend we only support unprivileged lxc's which only kernels >= 3.13 support.16:56
sil2100Ok, makes sense16:57
ChrisTownsendsil2100: Cool, thanks!16:57
jibelsil2100, 222 contains the mir landing nothing else?17:06
sil2100jibel: yes (just triple confirmed in the manifests)17:09
sil2100jibel: only mir packages have changed17:09
sil2100davmor2, jibel: who should I poke to get the latest music-app click for OTA-9?17:27
sil2100ahayzen I suppose?17:27
* ahayzen hides17:27
sil2100ahayzen: piiing ;)17:27
sil2100ahayzen: could you share teh click with me?17:28
jibelsil2100, http://people.canonical.com/~alan/music/20160114/com.ubuntu.music_2.3.931_all.click17:28
sil2100Thanks :)17:28
ahayzen^^ has issues btw :-)17:28
sil2100Ouch17:28
ahayzenwe've fixed all the issues that were found, just trying to make jenkins happy now17:29
ahayzenseems it can't find the keyboard sometimes17:29
jibelahayzen, we want to make sure that if it's ever published to the store before OTA9, users of the stable release won't see the update17:29
ahayzenjibel, ah yes, we bumped the framework, so in theory they shouldn't17:30
ahayzenbut good to test :-)17:30
jibelahayzen, yeah but better safe than sorry :)17:30
sil2100Cannot install com.ubuntu.music_2.3.931_all.click: Framework "ubuntu-sdk-15.04.3-qml" not present on system (use --force-missing-framework option to override)17:36
sil2100I guess we're safe ;)17:36
ahayzen\o/17:36
sil2100jibel: ok, anyway, let me copy the current rc-proposed image to rc, for now please use the rc-proposed version17:37
sil2100Since it will take a while17:37
jibelsil2100, when you copy to rc you tag it ota9?17:43
sil2100jibel: hm, I guess I could, although in theory it won't be our final candidate for sure - you want to test the tagging right now as well?17:44
sil2100Well, there's no problem in having 3 OTA-9 images in rc since that's what RC is about17:44
sil2100Oh, maybe I'll tag it OTA-9-rc?17:45
jibelsil2100, no, i was just curious17:48
sil2100I suppose a convention of tagging it as OTA-x-rc is a good idea anyway, tags are not carried over with image copies17:49
sil2100I'm importing the new chinese tarball to the -proposed-proposed channel now17:50
Saviqsil2100, are we there yet? (pop!)18:42
=== ChrisTownsend1 is now known as ChrisTownsend
sil2100Saviq: yep!19:13
Saviq\o/19:15
sil2100jibel, davmor2: I copied all rc-proposed candidate images to rc (phased percentage 0% for now) - all besides meizu.zh19:23
sil2100Since meizu.zh is still not ready because of the custom I suppose19:23
sil2100I can copy it over anytime19:23
davmor2sil2100: \o/19:25
sil2100Let me set the phasing for all to 100%19:25
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Please switch to Jenkins as a service: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: OTA-9 final freeze, rc with candidate images, rc-proposed landing normally
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
robrumichi: ping22:11
dobey"burned version number" ?22:12
dobeythat's a new one22:12
robrudobey: it means the destination archive has a package with the same version number but different source contents.22:12
robrudobey: happens when two conflicting silos build on the same day (thus having same version numbers built), one gets published, the other one is "burned"22:13
robrudobey: strictly speaking this was always a potential problem with conflicting train silos, it's just that only recently the train started detecting & reporting the situation.22:17
dobeyright. think it would be better to just use the same error message one would get from a package upload22:19
robrudobey: what, "version NNN not found in changelog"? that can't fire because the version *is* found in the changelog, it's just the wrong one.22:20
dobeyrobru: no. i mean, when you try to dput a package to a PPA for example, that has the same version and different contents, you get an error message saying it has different contents22:21
robrudobey: can you file a bug with the exact error text you want?22:22
dobeyor maybe for ci train, it could be more explicit somehow, stating which request was landed22:22
robrudobey: it doesn't really have a way of knowing what silo the upload at dest came from.22:23
dobeywell, i'll file a bug describing what i think the problem is, i guess22:24
dobeyah22:24
robrudobey: it's just checking the version number at dest, it could come from anywhere really, not even necessarily a train upload. just "oops, source contents don't match even though version is the same"22:24
robruso it indicates it 'needs rebuild' because there's no way to publish this silo with this version as-is22:25
dobeysure. i understand the reasoning for having an error there.22:26
dobeyjust trying to think of a nicer way to describe it more explicitly :)22:26
robrucool22:27
robrubbl, lunch22:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!