[00:06] <attente> robert_ancell: i pushed a branch to wip/williamhua/ubuntu-sso
[00:06] <attente> robert_ancell: it basically just hooks into ubuntu-sso-client's dbus service to get the oauth tokens
[00:15] <attente> robert_ancell: oh. btw, i've only tested the token retrieval... i didn't want to test sending the actual review to the production server so i inserted a 'return TRUE' locally
[00:32] <robert_ancell> attente, awesome!
[00:36] <robert_ancell> attente, you need to replace all your spaces with tabs. Silly tabs.
[00:37] <robert_ancell> attente, oh, my bad
[00:37] <robert_ancell> they already are. I was just confused by the output of git diff
[00:40] <TheMuso> I'll take tabs over spaces any day. :)
[01:12] <robert_ancell> attente, do I need to install anything? It didn't prompt me for anything
[03:49] <attente> robert_ancell: it shouldn't need anything besides ubuntu-sso-client i think
[03:50] <attente> but even that i think should be optional since it queries it over d-bus
[03:50] <attente> i mean from a "won't crash if it isn't installed" perspective
[03:50] <robert_ancell> Yeah, it didn't crash, but it didn't post the review either
[03:51] <attente> did it at least get the tokens for you?
[03:51] <attente> i didn't test the posting the review yet because i didn't want to test aginst the production server
[03:53] <robert_ancell> attente, I don't think so
[03:53] <robert_ancell> attente, there were some build issues, but that branch should now be merged and in the PPA
[03:54] <attente> robert_ancell: gdbus call --session --dest com.ubuntu.sso --object-path /com/ubuntu/sso/credentials --method com.ubuntu.sso.CredentialsManagement.find_credentials_sync 'Ubuntu One' '{}'
[03:55] <robert_ancell> attente, that seems to get them
[03:55] <attente> can you add a printf in the plugin to see if it also still gets them?
[03:58] <robert_ancell> attente, I'm about to sign off - I'll check next week
[03:59] <attente> robert_ancell: sure, i'll test it again tomorrow
[03:59] <attente> have a good w.e.
[03:59] <robert_ancell> attente, feel free to update the PPA
[03:59] <attente> sure, not sure if i have rights though
[04:00] <attente> actually, one last question: there isn't a development server to test on is there?
[04:03] <robert_ancell> attente, I think there is https://reviews.staging.ubuntu.com
[04:04] <robert_ancell> I never tried it though
[04:04] <robert_ancell> attente, one of the issues is you have a 30min window to re-review and then you can't change them. This was changed for phone apps, I have a MP to the reviews server to change the behaviour there too.
[04:06] <attente> does that also mean that reviews aren't published during that window? that might make testing a bit slow...
[04:07] <robert_ancell> attente, I think they are - you just get 30min to change your mind
[04:08] <robert_ancell> bye all
[07:44] <pitti> good morning
[08:26] <larsu> happy Friday!
[08:28] <hikiko> happy friday larsu
[08:28] <larsu> morning hikiko!
[08:28] <hikiko> and pitti :)
[08:29] <hikiko> good morning :)
[08:30] <pitti> hey hikiko and larsu, guten Morgen!
[08:30] <larsu> hallo pitti!
[08:57] <willcooke> morning all
[08:57] <willcooke> stupid Google now asks me which account I would like to use every time I open my calendar.
[08:58] <willcooke> I've only got one account
[08:58] <willcooke> sigh
[08:58] <willcooke> true story
[09:04] <Laney> heeeeeeeeeey
[09:05] <alexarnaud> good morning all!
[09:06] <hikiko> maybe it counts both the gmail and the canonical account?
[09:07] <hikiko> hi alexarnaud
[09:07] <hikiko> and willcooke
[09:12] <willcooke> hey Laney alexarnaud
[09:13] <Laney> hi willcooke, happy friday
[09:13] <willcooke> \o/
[09:14] <Laney> I have https://www.google.com/calendar/b/1/render?pli=1#main_7 for calendar
[09:14] <larsu> morning Laney and willcooke!
[09:14] <Laney> always goes to the right account
[09:14] <willcooke> morning larsu
[09:14] <Laney> I think "1" is the account id
[09:14] <willcooke> ah, nice one - thanks Laney
[09:14] <Laney> heeeeeeeeeeey larsu!
[09:15] <pitti> good morning Laney!
[09:15] <pitti> hey willcooke
[09:15] <Laney> hi hi pitti
[09:15] <willcooke> what up pitti
[09:15] <willcooke> so I solved my array issues last night
[09:15] <willcooke> took me faaaar to long
[09:15] <willcooke> the array was indeed being initialised with zeros
[09:15] <willcooke> but
[09:15] <willcooke> I'd #define ARRAY_LENGTH 4
[09:16] <willcooke> thinking 0,1,2,3,4 = 5
[09:16] <pitti> ah, statically sized?
[09:16] <pitti> hah
[09:16] <pitti> willcooke: #define? I thought you write C++?
[09:16] <willcooke> Is this hybrid Arduino C/C++
[09:16] <willcooke> probably not the best thing to learn on
[09:16] <willcooke> but flashing leds make me hapy
[09:16] <willcooke> happy
[09:16] <pitti> willcooke: for a statically sized array, it's much safer to do something like char* myarray[] = {"first", "second", "third", NULL};
[09:17] <willcooke> I know how big the array can be, but not what will be in it at compile time
[09:17] <davmor2> Laney: did you say you fixed the issue with the text in the scope for online and offline?
[09:17] <hikiko> why?
[09:17] <Laney> no
[09:17] <alexarnaud> hikiko: did you reveive my mail ?
[09:17] <hikiko> alexarnaud, let me check I wasn't here yesterday
[09:18] <willcooke> pitti, so I was running off the end of the array and that was making for for loop count to 46 instead of 4.
[09:18] <davmor2> Laney: ah so it was a fix for something else then that just happened to coinside with me confirming the issue for willcooke then \o/
[09:18] <Laney> I fix EVERYTHING all the time!
[09:19] <pitti> willcooke: if you know the array size, you can iterate over it using that, and not depend on a NULL  terminator
[09:19] <willcooke> pitti, I was just using a simple for (int x=0; x <=sizeof(array); x++)
[09:19] <willcooke> note the " <= " :)
[09:19] <pitti> willcooke: <
[09:19] <alexarnaud> hikiko: OK, take your time. We haven't had problem with our mail serveur it's why I ask to you ^^.
[09:20] <pitti> willcooke: ah :)
[09:20] <pitti> willcooke: but that shoudl be off-by-one, not off-by-42
[09:20] <Laney> mitya57: was it you that fixed ap-gtk?
[09:20] <willcooke> yeah, that's what totally confused me.  How running off the end of the array made it count to 46.  Probably an MCU thing.  Maybe I just got unlucky and poke the wrong byte in memory
[09:21] <willcooke> it was good fun though.
[09:21] <hikiko> alexarnaud, I can't find it
[09:21] <willcooke> Sat here until 10pm last night.  Shouting at the thing
[09:23] <pitti> willcooke: shouting with gdb usually helps :)
[09:23] <willcooke> :D
[09:23] <willcooke> The debugging on Arduino is, as far as I can tell, limited to Serial.println
[09:24] <willcooke> \o/
[09:24] <pitti> willcooke: expletives OTOH .. one should not anthropomorphize computers too much .. they don't like that!
[09:24] <willcooke> lol
[09:24] <willcooke> wfm ;)
[09:24] <Laney> physical violence works better
[09:24] <pitti> willcooke: ah, yay, good old printf debugging
[09:24]  * Laney remembers our boiler mallet back in student days
[09:24] <Laney> good times
[09:25] <pitti> "screw this, I use python" :)
[09:25] <pitti> Laney: "boiler" + "mallet"? that awfully sounds like "oops, I flooded the appartment"
[09:25] <willcooke> :D
[09:26] <Laney> it soudned like an explosion waiting to happen anyway :)
[09:26] <Laney> hitting it actually improved matters
[09:26] <pitti> *nnng* I don't want to know. I don't, no, no
[09:26] <pitti> in other news: I just submitted my first autopkgtest retry request over the web UI
[09:28] <Laney> oh!
[09:28] <Laney> web ui?
[09:28] <pitti> http://10.0.3.78:5000/?release=trusty&package=coreutils&arch=amd64&trigger=glib2.0/2.40.0-2
[09:28] <Laney> ha
[09:28] <pitti> (don't bother, this is a local LXC)
[09:29] <pitti> Laney: adding a "retry this test" button to excuses.html which devs can use
[09:29] <pitti> now, back to cranking test coverage back up to 100%
[09:29] <Laney> yeah I know the feature
[09:29] <Laney> not kept up with what you achieved at the sprint
[09:30] <pitti> Laney: I'll blog about that today, just wanted to finish this up
[09:30]  * Laney eyes glib/ppc64el
[09:35] <alexarnaud> hikiko: I re-send it to you now
[09:37] <Laney> mitya57: oh, it was autopilot-legacy, disregard
[09:38] <hikiko> oh alexarnaud I just saw both they were in spam folder and I hadn't sync it let me read it
[09:40] <hikiko> ok alexarnaud so the problem is that you change something and the gsettings are not stored right?
[09:41] <hikiko> or they are stored but you see no difference?
[09:42] <alexarnaud> hikiko: there are stored in Unity profile instead of mate-accessibility profile
[09:42] <hikiko> alexarnaud, 1st of all are you running unity+mate or ubuntu+mate?
[09:42] <hikiko> sorry
[09:42] <alexarnaud> and in CCSM the profile swiching produce no effect
[09:42] <hikiko> unity+compiz
[09:43] <hikiko> or mate+compiz
[09:43] <alexarnaud> Debian+Mate+Compiz
[09:43] <hikiko> the mate accessibility is only useful when you are on mate desktop
[09:43] <hikiko> oh so you set something for mate
[09:43] <hikiko> and is set for unity?
[09:44] <alexarnaud> It is set on the general section of the config file
[09:44] <alexarnaud> do you want the configuration file maybe ?
[09:44] <hikiko> is it the xml file?
[09:45] <alexarnaud> I use two files :
[09:45] <alexarnaud> 1) /etc/compiz*/config (I don't remember the exact name)
[09:45] <alexarnaud> and I use an override file with our (hypra.fr) parameters
[09:46] <hikiko> oh maybe compiz doesn't look at this file :)
[09:46] <alexarnaud> the first define gsettig backend and mate-accessibility as default profile
[09:46] <alexarnaud> hikiko: oh, really?
[09:46] <hikiko> so the problem is
[09:46] <hikiko> that you dont see the custom settings you wrote in the file
[09:46] <hikiko> right?
[09:47] <alexarnaud> The config file produce effect I want
[09:47] <alexarnaud> but gsettings DB doesn't match it
[09:47] <alexarnaud> so all configuration are stored in the wrong profile
[09:48] <alexarnaud> settings are stored in profile Unity instead of mate-accessibility. CSSM shows the default profile is mate-accessibility but no configuration in it.
[09:48] <hikiko> ok probably dconf and compiz look at different files
[09:49] <hikiko> alexarnaud, because I don't know how you configured compiz and dconf (paths etc) what I would do to be sure
[09:49] <alexarnaud> hikiko: is profile switching work on your computer when you used gsettings?
[09:49] <hikiko> is to add the configuration options in the xml files of compiz
[09:49] <alexarnaud> what is the xml file of compiz?
[09:49] <hikiko> give me a second (I don't have mate I think) let me check
[09:50] <alexarnaud> The gsettings schema maybe?
[09:50] <hikiko> alexarnaud, which settings did you change?
[09:50] <hikiko> what I would do is to add my files to compiz before installation and then install it
[09:50] <alexarnaud> hikiko: lets me alse a minute to give you all configuration and defails
[09:50] <hikiko> sure
[09:54] <alexarnaud> hikiko: the override file http://paste.ubuntu.com/14596794/
[09:55] <alexarnaud> hikiko: the config file http://paste.ubuntu.com/14575900/
[09:55] <alexarnaud> (in /etc/compiz*)
[09:56] <hikiko> /etc/compizconfig maybe?
[09:57] <hikiko> alexarnaud, and in dconf-editor
[09:58] <hikiko> which are the settings you look at?
[09:59] <hikiko> atm I dont have mate I only see org.profiles.unity
[10:00] <hikiko> .plugins and list
[10:01] <hikiko> alexarnaud, if you run gsettings set org.compiz.pluginname:variable value do you still have the same problem?
[10:10] <alexarnaud> hikiko: I will make you a dump of gsettings
[10:11] <alexarnaud> sorry someone come to meet me
[10:12] <Amoz> heh. This is funny. Starting synapse from "inside" desktop leads to a crash ( sigsegv in libgdk-3) everytime. Starting it in a tty (ctrl+alt+f4) makes it work.
[10:18] <Amoz> okay, so I found the culprit. unsetting GTK_IM_MODULE=xim makes it work "inside" again. Is this a bug or not?
[10:18] <Amoz> or is my install/conffiles incorrect somewhere?
[10:22] <Amoz> this happens in 15.10 btw ^
[10:28] <alexarnaud> hikiko: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14596877/
[10:28] <alexarnaud> hikiko: this is the dump of dconf org.compiz
[10:29] <alexarnaud> I hope you have all informations you want
[10:29] <alexarnaud> :)
[10:30] <hikiko> alexarnaud, I am not sure what's wrong it might be a bug I will look at it but maybe not today because I have to finish something else first before I install mate to experiment
[10:34] <Laney> mitya57: also it looks like the new kwallet backend for python-keyring is chosen too aggressively?
[10:34] <Laney> it's breaking the ubuntu-sso-client build at least it seems
[10:35] <alexarnaud> hikiko: OK
[10:37] <mitya57> Laney, one more item to my TODO list :) But a wild guess is that a new upstream release may fix it.
[10:38] <mitya57> (With upstream's "release several times a day" principle I'm quite lagging behind)
[10:38] <Laney> mitya57: funny that your name keeps coming up this time :)
[10:38] <Laney> mitya57: I'm trying to install a config file in the package build to select a different backend
[10:38] <Laney> maybe that works
[10:39] <mitya57> If you can test the latest release that will be also nice :)
[10:39] <Laney> too much red on glib/excuses atm
[10:39] <mitya57> Laney, do you have a build log link btw?
[10:39] <Laney> maybe soon
[10:39] <Laney> can boucne you one
[10:40] <Laney> done
[10:41] <Laney> second one is after adding xvfb-run -a dbus-run-session
[10:42] <mitya57> Laney, yes, 7.3 should fix it
[10:43] <mitya57> Maybe I'll even upload it today if I have time
[10:43] <Laney> cool
[10:44] <ksamak> hikiko: hi
[10:45] <hikiko> hi ksamak
[10:45] <ksamak> sorry about the incomplete questions. the actual question is rather like so
[10:45] <ksamak> we're using mate with compiz, with gsettings backend, and an .override file
[10:46] <ksamak> at install with our packages
[10:46] <ksamak> although the gsettings are set up fine, we have trouble identifying if profiles are worth someting with gsettings in compiz.
[10:47] <ksamak> so, is compiz only recognizing one sole profile when on gsettings backend?
[10:47] <ksamak> or can we hope to have several profiles configured differently?
[10:47] <ksamak> note: we are using ccsm to configure/change profiles, maybe it's not up to date
[10:48] <ksamak> we have doubts because changing profiles in ccsm doesn't change the actual final settings.
[10:49] <ksamak> and dconf-editor show our modifs hierarchically under the "unity" compiz profile
[10:49] <ksamak> hikiko:
[10:51] <hikiko> ksamak, as far as I know (I am not too familiar with the gsettings either) you can have many profiles but one profile per backend
[10:51] <hikiko> For instance, if you are using the GSettings backend then any new profile you create will be a GSettings profile. If you switch to a different backend then your current profile will not work and you will automatically switch to a profile available for that backend.
[10:51] <hikiko> just found that on the arch wiki here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Compiz_configuration#Profiles
[10:52] <hikiko> so I think what you suspect is correct
[10:52] <ksamak> yeah but we tried to implement a second gsettings profile.
[10:52] <ksamak> and the settings don't actually change between profiles.
[10:52] <ksamak> ok. thx
[10:52] <hikiko> everytime you create a new profile the settings go to unity?
[10:53] <hikiko> mmm andyrock Trevinho could you help? ^^
[10:54] <ksamak> well, it seems that whatever profile is active (all gsettings), doesn't change the actual settings.
[10:55] <ksamak> so what we override works, but we can't switch to any other. so i was wondering whether out override is correct
[10:55] <hikiko> when you say doesn't change you mean that you see no changes in compiz or that you cant see them in dconf?
[10:56] <ksamak> dconf displays settings under the unity profile. compiz behaves with overriden profiles, not changing when switching profiles
[10:56] <hikiko> if you restart compiz?
[10:57] <ksamak> reminder: andyrock Trevinho http://paste.ubuntu.com/14596794/
[10:58] <ksamak> hikiko: shouldn't we have a profile specified in our override by the way?
[10:58] <ksamak> that's what i was wondering
[10:58] <ksamak> cause this looks like global settings
[10:58] <ksamak> as for profile-less settings like for mate or so
[11:02] <hikiko> yes they look global and to be honest I never switched profiles to change the settings I have to look at it ksamak I don't know because I am not familiar with that part of code, it looks more reasonable that the setting should be per profile we might have a bug I'll ask Trevinho too (he is at a conference this week)
[11:03] <hikiko> also I'll install mate to reproduce the problem, there might be something with the settings
[11:05] <ksamak> i don't think this is linked with mate, but ok thanks for your interest
[11:05] <ksamak> i guess people don't use ccsm so much?
[11:05] <hikiko> yes probably I can check with a random new profile
[11:06] <hikiko> ksamak, usually people change the settings from ccsm for the profile that is already selected (either default or unity)
[11:06] <ksamak> yeah no-one ever changes profiles, right lol
[11:07] <ksamak> we're the only ones thinking that that might be nice XD
[11:07] <ksamak> we actually want to setup different profiles for different types of handicaps.
[11:07] <hikiko> then we should definitely look at this because it sounds like a bug
[11:08] <ksamak> for more flexibility with handicapped people
[11:08] <hikiko> yes, I understand
[11:09] <hikiko> well I ll look at it next week I believe it's a compiz or ccsm bug
[11:09] <hikiko> you should be able to have settings per profile
[11:26] <ksamak> thx
[12:12] <andyrock> morning
[12:12] <andyrock> hikiko: ksamak do you still need help?
[12:13] <willcooke> morning andyrock
[12:14] <hikiko> hi andyrock :)
[12:15] <hikiko> yes the question is: how could someone in compiz have different gsettings for different profiles
[12:15] <hikiko> it seems that we have a bug and when you select a profile in ccsm
[12:15] <hikiko> and you set some gsettings they go global
[12:15] <hikiko> they apply to all profiles
[12:16] <hikiko> ksamak, had this configuration file: https://paste.ubuntu.com/14596794/
[12:16] <hikiko> sorry: this: https://paste.ubuntu.com/14596794/
[12:17] <hikiko> he uses the existing unity and mate profiles
[12:17] <hikiko> but when he sets gsettings for mate
[12:18] <hikiko> they go to the unity section in dconf-editor
[12:18] <hikiko> and they are global
[12:18] <hikiko> I am not very familiar with that part of compiz :/
[12:19] <hikiko> if you could help it would have been nice otherwise I'll look at this problem next week
[12:19] <hikiko> sorry bbiab
[12:51] <andyrock> i'm not familiar with this part of compiz neither
[12:52] <andyrock> hikiko: we can wait for Trevinho or I can try to debug it if it's urgent
[12:53] <hikiko> when is Trevinho back?
[12:54] <willcooke> lemme check the spreadsheet..
[12:54] <hikiko> best case scenario is that marco knows a trick to do it without ccsm :)
[12:55] <willcooke> Flight is on Monday, so maaaaybe Tuesday PM, most likely weds
[12:56] <andyrock> it's actually no sleeping
[12:56] <andyrock> I was speeking with him few minutes ago on the phone
[12:56] <andyrock> but it's better to don't bother him at this time :D
[12:56] <andyrock> he needs to sleep too
[12:58] <hikiko> :)
[13:01] <hikiko> e ok let's get a look on monday then and when marco is back he helps us I don't know if it's urgent but if it's a bug I guess is important (no?) I don't know
[13:13] <hikiko|ln> mm ksamak
[13:13] <hikiko|ln> i have a more recent ccsm and dconf
[13:13] <hikiko|ln> I created a foobar profile
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> (new one)
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> added some settings
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> restarted dconf-editor
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> and they appear there
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> ksamak, Compiz 0.9.12.2 that's my version
[13:14] <hikiko|ln> dconf-editor 3.18.2
[13:15] <hikiko|ln> but I set the settings through ccsm
[13:15] <hikiko|ln> not manually
[13:15] <hikiko|ln> so I believe that it's just something in the settings
[13:16] <hikiko|ln> let me try to import your settings now
[13:21] <hikiko|ln> ksamak, when I select the ccsm profile and set the settings for it in ccsm they are applied to the profile only
[13:21] <hikiko|ln> when I import your .profile
[13:21] <hikiko|ln> they are globally applied
[13:22] <hikiko|ln> bbiab
[13:26] <hikiko|ln> ksamak, i think the syntax is not correct
[13:27] <hikiko|ln> ksamak try something like that: https://paste.ubuntu.com/14597543/ imported when your custom profile is selected and check dconf editor again I think it will work
[13:27] <hikiko|ln> it seems to work for me
[13:27] <hikiko|ln> basically try it with 2 settings only because that's huge :)
[13:28] <hikiko|ln> bbiab lunch break :)
[13:48] <ksamak> re
[13:50] <ksamak> hikiko|ln: ok, thanks for taking the time to test, it's kind of what we needed!
[13:51] <ksamak> although your file is the same syntax as ours, right?
[13:51] <ksamak> we can't really rely on that for an installation from .deb package though.
[13:51] <ksamak> if you're right
[13:51] <ksamak> i'll try and think again about that
[13:52] <hikiko|ln> no the difference is the []
[13:53] <hikiko|ln> basically ksamak I exported your settings from 1 profile
[13:53] <ksamak> oh, ok.
[13:54] <hikiko|ln> ksamak, when Trevinho is back he will help more
[13:54] <hikiko|ln> I am just experimenting I am not familiar with gsettings
[13:54] <ksamak> indeed
[13:54] <ksamak> there's a difference indeed.
[13:54] <ksamak> so this makes it relative to a profile.
[13:55] <ksamak> which is good. now we need to try and find a way to specify the profile applied.
[13:55] <hikiko|ln> there are some profile.ini files in my system
[13:55] <hikiko|ln> unity.ini
[13:55] <hikiko|ln> for example
[13:55] <hikiko|ln> but I don't have much time to look at this today
[13:56] <hikiko|ln> next week :)
[13:56] <hikiko|ln> I think they are relevant
[13:56] <hikiko|ln> if you want to get a look yourself
[13:57] <ksamak> yeah these are the ini backend files.
[13:58] <ksamak> we tested that, it works. but we need to migrate to gsettings.
[13:58] <ksamak> hikiko|ln: thanks again for all your help
[13:58] <hikiko|ln> np :)
[13:58] <hikiko|ln> hope it helps
[14:01] <ksamak> already does.
[14:04] <Sweet5hark1> oh, its Friday! Lets continue the discussion on C++.
[14:05] <willcooke> So
[14:05] <Sweet5hark1> http://45.media.tumblr.com/e545c444e8e28687ce9363e84017e7d5/tumblr_nz3134g9dT1rn7bzro1_500.gif might be a starting point.
[14:05] <willcooke> If I want to pass a 2 dimensional array as a pointer to a function....
[14:05] <willcooke> Sweet5hark1, love that gif :)
[14:08] <larsu> haha nice one
[14:32] <alexarnaud> hikiko: thanks again
[14:33] <alexarnaud> I've read the discusession
[14:33] <alexarnaud> It seems that maybe I need to make another test also
[15:36] <attente> Laney: hey, do you know if there are any docs for the software center rest api?
[16:03] <Laney> attente: short answer is no
[16:03] <Laney> attente: long answer is which API do you mean?
[16:03] <Laney> (that's not much longer!)
[16:04] <attente> which ever one we need for gnome-software to submit reviews
[16:04] <attente> i'm trying to add support for that there, but can't figure out why i keep getting a 401 error
[16:05] <Laney> ah, sorry, I thought robert_ancell had already done that though
[16:05] <Laney> but if I were to pick someone it would be m v o
[16:05] <attente> is someone writing a new server with new api or something?
[16:06] <Laney> I thought he was just interfacing with the same thing software-center uses currently
[16:07] <attente> yeah, i was just hoping there'd be an easier way than reverse engineering the old code
[16:08] <Laney> I bet not, but check with reverse(ovm) to be sure
[16:08] <attente> lol
[16:08] <Laney> is that part not done in robert's branch(es) already?
[16:09] <attente> it was missing the ubuntu sso which i added yesterday
[16:09] <Laney> ah
[16:09] <attente> but i guess it wasn't testable because of the lack of sso at the time
[16:09] <Laney> yeah sorry, I've not worked on the client at all
[16:09] <Laney> just the server bit
[16:10] <Laney> if you're after another task then you could see why the metadata doesn't load up properly (email from me and matthias to ubuntu-desktop last week)
[16:10] <Laney> otherwise will look at that first half of next week
[16:10] <attente> sure
[16:11] <attente> is that server bit you have include a staging server for testing?
[16:12] <attente> oh. just read it...
[16:14] <attente> mvo: hey, do you know if there are any docs for the software center rest api?
[16:14] <Laney> yeah but not integrated
[16:15] <Laney> so you get to use that shitty script I wrote to wangle the files into place
[16:25] <alexarnaud> It's friday :)! If you want to try your linux history knowledge you can deal with this quizz : http://fossforce.com/2016/01/how-well-do-you-know-your-linux-history/
[16:29] <willcooke> 15 / 18 - 2 of which were silly mistakes
[16:45] <alexarnaud> willcooke: it's the same for me
[16:45] <alexarnaud> I don't know anything about crises about legal rights
[17:40] <Laney> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/pending/
[17:40] <Laney> haz images
[17:52] <seb128> Laney, hey!
[17:53] <Laney> hi seb128!
[17:53] <willcooke> good stuff, thanks Laney
[17:53] <willcooke> hey seb128
[17:53] <Laney> what is up?
[17:54] <seb128> hey willcooke
[17:54] <seb128> smelling like w.e for you guys? ;-)
[17:55] <willcooke> :D
[17:55] <seb128> willcooke, just had a chat with alecu, +1 for the "keep click but drop the packagekit interface"
[17:55] <willcooke> seb128, awesome, thanks!  Good news indeed
[17:55] <willcooke> Laney, ^^ :D
[17:56] <Laney> cool
[18:01] <Laney> happy weekend!
[18:02] <Laney> bleh
[18:02] <Laney> can someone retry autopilot and autopilot-legacy once sphinx gets published please?
[18:02] <Laney> byeee
[18:02] <seb128> Laney, enjoy!
[18:02] <seb128> Laney, retry what? builds?
[18:42] <seb128> kenvandine, thanks for the reply on that bluetooth bug
[18:44] <seb128> go technologie, it's 2016 and you could expect that things get better
[18:44] <seb128>  not that new protocol suck so much that you can't even know what type of device you are listing
[18:45] <kenvandine> yeah
[18:46] <kenvandine> case #1 is the pressing issue we have now
[18:46] <kenvandine> but... i'm more interested in case #2
[18:46] <kenvandine> i've had to add several device types to our filter over the past 6 months or so
[18:47] <kenvandine> seb128, not sure about iOS, but android seems to let you pair anything too
[18:47] <seb128> well, android let you do things with devices
[18:47] <seb128> like send fles over obex
[18:47] <seb128> or use mouse pointers
[18:48] <seb128> which we don't
[18:48] <kenvandine> yeah, hopefully we will too :)
[18:48] <seb128> I find it a bit confusing that you can't pair a device that then does nothing
[18:48] <kenvandine> you mean can?
[18:48] <seb128> it feels like we have bugs
[18:48] <seb128> yes, sorry
[18:48] <kenvandine> i felt that way too :)
[18:48] <kenvandine> but simon convinced me i was wrong :)
[18:49] <kenvandine> hopefully someday we'll have uses for all of these :)
[18:49] <seb128> we can't have a dev convincing every user that they are wrong to feel like they do
[18:49] <seb128> well, we were always going to whitelist things that have an use
[18:50] <seb128> anyway if design is happy about it
[18:50] <seb128> let's see what's the user feedback
[19:15] <willcooke> night all.  Have a great time a SCALE, and safe travels for those of you on the way to FOSDEM and related activities.
[19:15] <willcooke> Everyone else, happy weekend!
[22:34] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: around?
[22:34] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, yes
[22:35] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: heya, on a sprint or something?
[22:35] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, at UbuCon yes ;-)
[22:36] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: anyway, 5.1.0~rc2 is build and in the ppa -- if there is no big complaints in the next days, i'd suggest to sponsor that into xenial.
[22:36] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: ah, cool, have fun!
[22:36] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, sounds good to me, let me know if you need sponsoring
[22:36] <seb128> I'm travelling on monday and should be back on tuesday
[22:37] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: rationale for going with rc2 already instead of final: winter releases are always a bit more tight and this release seems less risky than other major releases.
[22:38] <seb128> I'm all for not being overconservative and land the rc
[22:40] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: this release also still has libmwaw libw{d,g,s} and lpolve bundled, but Istill think we should upload it as-is, we can than still fix that afterwards without doing everything in one step.
[22:41] <Sweet5hark1> yeah, tuesday/wednesday sounds good. Ill be travelling to FOSDEM on Friday early morning.
[22:43] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: alright, tuning out for the weekend. have fun at UbuCon!
[22:52] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, thanks, have a good w.e!