lifeless | where is the bug tracker for the laptop testing tracker? | 02:35 |
---|---|---|
lifeless | It keeps mutating bugs that are not part of Ubuntu, and I want to file a bug on it about that | 02:36 |
blr | lifeless: noticed your name cropping up in relation to that in my email... sadly laptop testing is something I know nothing about. Perhaps cjwatson will know when he's about. | 02:44 |
lifeless | blr: hmm, I haven't sent any email about that :) - just this ping here | 02:45 |
lifeless | blr: I presume wgrant is on leave or something ? | 02:46 |
blr | lifeless: you removed a tag from the qatracker supposedly | 02:47 |
lifeless | blr: oh yeah, I did | 02:47 |
lifeless | blr: from bug 10 | 02:47 |
mup | Bug #10: It says "displaying matching bugs 1 to 8 of 8", but there is 9 <laptop-testing> <lp-bugs> <Launchpad itself:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/10> | 02:47 |
blr | right | 02:47 |
lifeless | blr: which is an old lp bug | 02:47 |
blr | lifeless: stat holidays in au today and tomorrow | 02:48 |
cjwatson | I know nothing about this either, despite not being able to sleep again. A bit of googling finds https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Laptop which may be of some help | 02:50 |
cjwatson | Possibly ubuntu-qa-website? | 02:50 |
blr | lifeless: this appears to be the offending item? http://laptop.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/352/builds/108233/testcases/1479/results | 02:53 |
cjwatson | blr: Are you planning to land https://code.launchpad.net/~blr/launchpad/bug-1536363-codereviewcomment-reply-git-oops/+merge/283382 today? | 02:54 |
blr | lifeless: is it linking bugs from the comment field? i.e. "10." | 02:54 |
blr | cjwatson: I would love to, but I've yet to resolve the gpg agent error I'm experiencing. :( | 02:55 |
blr | cjwatson: is it possible to land that on my behalf? | 02:55 |
cjwatson | Oh really? Sure | 02:56 |
cjwatson | You should at least be able to turn off the agent and type in your passphrase every time though | 02:56 |
blr | yeah, quite perplexing, afaict, gpg is functioning perfectly fine, and the gpg-connect-agent responds to a health check | 02:56 |
lifeless | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1537587 | 02:57 |
mup | Bug #1537587: the bot "Ubuntu QA Website" keeps modifying bugs that are not Ubuntu bugs <Ubuntu QA Website:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537587> | 02:57 |
lifeless | blr: I don't know, its been doing it for years, and well, sigh. | 02:58 |
blr | cjwatson: if I enter my passphrase manually, bzr lp-land errors with: ERROR: Failed to GPG sign data with command "[u'gpg', '--clearsign', '-u', u'kit.randel@canonical.com']" - running clearsign manually is fine however. | 02:58 |
cjwatson | urgh | 02:58 |
cjwatson | blr: Anyway, edited the commit message to remove duplication with the tags that bzr lp-land will add, and sent to PQM. | 02:59 |
lifeless | cjwatson: thanks for digging up a plausible project | 02:59 |
blr | cjwatson: thanks for that. Hopefully can find the culprit this evening | 02:59 |
cjwatson | blr: damnit, that won't pass due to a pending db-devel exception run on buildbot | 03:00 |
cjwatson | blr: I've forced buildbot, will land that for you this coming morning | 03:00 |
blr | great, thanks | 03:00 |
daker | cjwatson: hi, is there a way to get the commit message from the webhook for bzr:push or git:push | 14:38 |
daker | ? | 14:39 |
cjwatson | daker: hm, not currently. Could you file a bug explaining how you'd want to use this? I don't think it would be too difficult to add - you can of course get hold of it using the information in the webhook payload but it would be more round-trips | 14:43 |
daker | cjwatson: sure i'll do | 14:44 |
cjwatson | At least in the git case we've already fetched that information immediately before dispatching the webhook, and I think that's true for bzr too | 14:45 |
daker | cjwatson: yes, i am building a launchpad integration for slack using webhooks | 14:48 |
cjwatson | neat! | 14:48 |
daker | cjwatson: https://i.imgur.com/bQrcu6i.png | 14:49 |
cjwatson | I've certainly got no problem including the information in the payload if it's going to be used. We'd probably only send the new tip commit message though - is that sufficient? | 14:49 |
cjwatson | (since we similarly only send the new tip commit ID) | 14:49 |
daker | cjwatson: well that's enough but i would love to have the commit message | 14:50 |
cjwatson | that's what I said ... | 14:50 |
cjwatson | I meant the commit message only for the new tip commit, rather than for all commits between the previous state and the new state | 14:51 |
cjwatson | the latter is a bit awkward and potentially very large indede | 14:51 |
cjwatson | *indeed | 14:51 |
daker | cjwatson: ah sorry yes! | 14:51 |
daker | only the commit message for the new tip commit | 14:51 |
daker | cjwatson: bug 1537780 | 14:58 |
mup | Bug #1537780: Provide the commit message in the webhook payload <Launchpad itself:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537780> | 14:58 |
cjwatson | Ah yes, db_branch.getTipRevision().log_body and err I think bzr_branch.repository.get_revision(bzr_branch.last_revision).message ? I never really got on with bzrlib | 15:02 |
daker | cjwatson: i'll try that | 15:06 |
daker | also i'll the add the author of the commit | 15:06 |
cjwatson | well, that was more for my own reference | 15:07 |
cjwatson | unless you fancy trying to write the patch | 15:07 |
daker | cjwatson: no :D | 15:07 |
cjwatson | daker: could you give a rationale in the bug? we may need to refer back to this years later wondering who was using this thing and why | 15:07 |
cjwatson | daker: so it's helpful to have more than a bare request | 15:08 |
daker | cjwatson: sure | 15:08 |
daker | cjwatson: good now bug 1537780 ? | 15:16 |
mup | Bug #1537780: Provide the commit message in the webhook payload <Launchpad itself:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537780> | 15:16 |
cjwatson | daker: yes, thanks | 15:18 |
=== heroux_ is now known as heroux |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!