[02:41] I cant even === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === ljp is now known as lpotter === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr [10:07] brb === _salem is now known as salem_ === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [12:48] robru, sorry about that. Abandoned! [13:47] oSoMoN: Hi [13:47] oSoMoN: I'm testing silo 13 [13:48] oSoMoN: Control + T now focuses in the address bar, but I have an issue with the shortcut: it only works if focus in inside the web view [13:48] oSoMoN: Control + T doesn't work in the address bar [14:00] bzoltan_: ping :) [14:00] * bzoltan_ hides [14:00] sil2100: What can I do for you, sir [14:01] bzoltan_: a quick ping about something we *probably* talked about some time ago - do you guys document in any way stuff like 'what UITK things are available in a framework'? [14:02] bzoltan_: I remember we had and idea with Saviq to start documenting 'framework version -> available library versions' somewhere [14:02] But not sure where that went, do you know if you guys do anything similar at least? [14:03] sil2100: The idea is still there and we have the the components API documented automatically in each release - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/staging/view/head:/components.api [14:04] Oh, nice [14:04] sil2100: we should create the same file to all qml APIs and have an umbrella to cover them all [14:04] Yeah, we need to get back to this sometime in the nearest future then [14:04] sil2100: +100000T [14:05] bzoltan_: yeah + something for everything non-QML too, which I suppose will be meh [14:05] Do you know if there's a bug for the idea of documenting the APIs per framework? [14:05] sil2100: we even have an ABI checker tool in prototype stage [14:06] sil2100: we do not need a bug or anthing :) that is my top priority secret plan for long time.. I wake up at nights dreaming about full scale platform api revisioning... [14:13] bzoltan_: hah ;) [14:13] Good to hear that! [14:22] rvr, not seeing that on desktop, are you testing on a phone with bluetooth keyboard? I’ll test that use case in a moment [14:27] oSoMoN: Yes [14:29] rvr, so what happens when you press Ctrl+T when the address bar is focused? [14:29] oSoMoN: Yes, that works [14:29] oSoMoN: The problem is that, if you are in the address bar already, Control+T doesn't open a new tab [14:30] rvr, what does it do? [14:30] oSoMoN: Nothing [14:30] Well, it display "t" [14:30] types [14:30] right, so it’s not nothing :) [14:30] I’m seeing the same thing here, let me look into it [14:30] Ack [14:40] rvr, this seems to be a more general bug (maybe in qtubuntu), pressing Ctrl+T in the text field in the messaging app also types "t" in the field, I’ll dig a bit deeper [14:46] oSoMoN: Yeah, my guess was that it was related to UI toolkit [15:00] rvr, I can confirm, I can reproduce the issue with a minimal standalone app (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14663655/), it’s very likely a bug in qtubuntu, I’ll file one for it [15:00] oSoMoN: Great, thanks! [15:02] rvr, and I can confirm it’s not an issue in the UITK but at a lower level, I can also reproduce with basic QML components, no toolkit import [15:04] oSoMoN: Interesting... Let's hope the fix is trivial and can be done quickly. [15:08] rvr, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu/+bug/1537782 [15:08] Launchpad bug 1537782 in qtubuntu (Ubuntu) "Modifier ignored when pressing a key if TextInput has active focus" [Undecided,New] [15:10] rvr, feel free to confirm [15:12] oSoMoN: [15:12] Done! [15:13] cheers [15:55] oSoMoN: Silo 13 approved [15:57] oSoMoN: I see a new recent car for silo 13 [15:57] oSoMoN: Did silo packages get a rebuild? [16:01] rvr, when britney re-runs it changes the qa-status from ready to required then back to ready, and it's creates a new card [16:02] jibel: Ah [16:08] rvr: thanks === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [17:45] Saviq: Silo 19 approved === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [18:38] jibel: yeah I'm aware of this issue ^^, haven't figured it out yet, seems like silos that have unity8 autopkgtests are often re-run and so the status flops back and forth between running and approved [18:59] robru: I'll be ~5 minutes late to the meeting [18:59] slangasek: ^ [18:59] sil2100: ok [19:11] slangasek: sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/britney/+bug/1537866 [19:11] Launchpad bug 1537866 in britney "Britney flops back and forth between Running and Approved a lot" [Undecided,New] === DanChapman is now known as DanChapman_ === DanChapman_ is now known as DanChapman [19:42] slangasek: oh god I've ruined everythign [19:43] slangasek: I seem to have deleted the weekly meeting from the UES calendar, was just trying to delete it from my personal calendar. [19:59] o/ [20:03] robru: ah, is that all ;) [20:04] slangasek: apparently there's a "trash" for events, I tried restoring it but I don't see it, can you confirm if it's all gone? [20:04] robru: I see the event on my calendar yet, let's see [20:04] robru: yeah I still see it everywhere [20:04] slangasek: hm, ok, strange === salem_ is now known as _salem