[02:41] <robru> I cant even
[10:07] <sil2100> brb
[12:48] <jgdx> robru, sorry about that. Abandoned!
[13:47] <rvr> oSoMoN: Hi
[13:47] <rvr> oSoMoN: I'm testing silo 13
[13:48] <rvr> oSoMoN: Control + T now focuses in the address bar, but I have an issue with the shortcut: it only works if focus in inside the web view
[13:48] <rvr> oSoMoN: Control + T doesn't work in the address bar
[14:00] <sil2100> bzoltan_: ping :)
[14:00]  * bzoltan_ hides
[14:00] <bzoltan_> sil2100: What can I do for you, sir
[14:01] <sil2100> bzoltan_: a quick ping about something we *probably* talked about some time ago - do you guys document in any way stuff like 'what UITK things are available in a framework'?
[14:02] <sil2100> bzoltan_: I remember we had and idea with Saviq to start documenting 'framework version -> available library versions' somewhere
[14:02] <sil2100> But not sure where that went, do you know if you guys do anything similar at least?
[14:03] <bzoltan_> sil2100:  The idea is still there and we have the the components API documented automatically in each release - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/staging/view/head:/components.api
[14:04] <sil2100> Oh, nice
[14:04] <bzoltan_> sil2100:  we should create the same file to all qml APIs and have an umbrella to cover them all
[14:04] <sil2100> Yeah, we need to get back to this sometime in the nearest future then
[14:04] <bzoltan_> sil2100: +100000T
[14:05] <sil2100> bzoltan_: yeah + something for everything non-QML too, which I suppose will be meh
[14:05] <sil2100> Do you know if there's a bug for the idea of documenting the APIs per framework?
[14:05] <bzoltan_> sil2100:  we even have an ABI checker tool in prototype stage
[14:06] <bzoltan_> sil2100: we do not need a bug or anthing :) that is my top priority secret plan for long time.. I wake up at nights dreaming about full scale platform api revisioning...
[14:13] <sil2100> bzoltan_: hah ;)
[14:13] <sil2100> Good to hear that!
[14:22] <oSoMoN> rvr, not seeing that on desktop, are you testing on a phone with bluetooth keyboard? I’ll test that use case in a moment
[14:27] <rvr> oSoMoN: Yes
[14:29] <oSoMoN> rvr, so what happens when you press Ctrl+T when the address bar is focused?
[14:29] <rvr> oSoMoN: Yes, that works
[14:29] <rvr> oSoMoN: The problem is that, if you are in the address bar already, Control+T doesn't open a new tab
[14:30] <oSoMoN> rvr, what does it do?
[14:30] <rvr> oSoMoN: Nothing
[14:30] <rvr> Well, it display "t"
[14:30] <rvr> types
[14:30] <oSoMoN> right, so it’s not nothing :)
[14:30] <oSoMoN> I’m seeing the same thing here, let me look into it
[14:30] <rvr> Ack
[14:40] <oSoMoN> rvr, this seems to be a more general bug (maybe in qtubuntu), pressing Ctrl+T in the text field in the messaging app also types "t" in the field, I’ll dig a bit deeper
[14:46] <rvr> oSoMoN: Yeah, my guess was that it was related to UI toolkit
[15:00] <oSoMoN> rvr, I can confirm, I can reproduce the issue with a minimal standalone app (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14663655/), it’s very likely a bug in qtubuntu, I’ll file one for it
[15:00] <rvr> oSoMoN: Great, thanks!
[15:02] <oSoMoN> rvr, and I can confirm it’s not an issue in the UITK but at a lower level, I can also reproduce with basic QML components, no toolkit import
[15:04] <rvr> oSoMoN: Interesting... Let's hope the fix is trivial and can be done quickly.
[15:08] <oSoMoN> rvr, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtubuntu/+bug/1537782
[15:10] <oSoMoN> rvr, feel free to confirm
[15:12] <rvr> oSoMoN:
[15:12] <rvr> Done!
[15:13] <oSoMoN> cheers
[15:55] <rvr> oSoMoN: Silo 13 approved
[15:57] <rvr> oSoMoN: I see a new recent car for silo 13
[15:57] <rvr> oSoMoN: Did silo packages get a rebuild?
[16:01] <jibel> rvr, when britney re-runs it changes the qa-status from ready to required then back to ready, and it's creates a new card
[16:02] <rvr> jibel: Ah
[16:08] <oSoMoN> rvr: thanks
[17:45] <rvr> Saviq: Silo 19 approved
[18:38] <robru> jibel: yeah I'm aware of this issue ^^, haven't figured it out yet, seems like silos that have unity8 autopkgtests are often re-run and so the status flops back and forth between running and approved
[18:59] <sil2100> robru: I'll be ~5 minutes late to the meeting
[18:59] <sil2100> slangasek: ^
[18:59] <slangasek> sil2100: ok
[19:11] <robru> slangasek: sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/britney/+bug/1537866
[19:42] <robru> slangasek: oh god I've ruined everythign
[19:43] <robru> slangasek: I seem to have deleted the weekly meeting from the UES calendar, was just trying to delete it from my personal calendar.
[19:59] <sil2100> o/
[20:03] <slangasek> robru: ah, is that all ;)
[20:04] <robru> slangasek: apparently there's a "trash" for events, I tried restoring it but I don't see it, can you confirm if it's all gone?
[20:04] <slangasek> robru: I see the event on my calendar yet, let's see
[20:04] <slangasek> robru: yeah I still see it everywhere
[20:04] <robru> slangasek: hm, ok, strange