/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/01/25/#ubuntu-devel.txt

attenteoh shoot. what's the new rest api for replacing ubuntu-sso-client?00:50
cpaelzergood morning06:52
pittiGood morning07:00
=== ljp is now known as lpotter
Mirv@pilot in09:23
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Wily (15.10) Released! | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-wily | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: Mirv
flexiondotorgMirv, you're a star! Thank you very much for sponsoring again :-)09:57
Mirvflexiondotorg: you're welcome again :) I did some sponsoring last week but it turns out today I'm actually on the calendar so continuing a bit, plus it's s good time with lts milestone coming09:59
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr
LocutusOfBorghi, nobody is swearing at me for the libsdl2 sync?10:41
LocutusOfBorgseeded-in-ubuntu returns ubuntu-mate, ubntukylin, lubuntu, going there10:42
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, you dropped mir support, didn't you?10:48
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, in general it's not nice, to forcesync things, effectively stealing a merge, and dropping ubuntu delta.10:48
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, it's ok for things to be ahead in debian, but a debian maintainer does not get to drop ubuntu delta for no reason.10:49
LocutusOfBorgxnox, the delta is upstream10:50
xnoxlubuntu have been working on mir enablement, and you should have talked to e.g. Artur or Brandon.10:50
LocutusOfBorgI checked and it is included upstream10:50
LocutusOfBorgI asked a while ago, and nobody complained10:51
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, you have dropped libmirclient-dev [i386 amd64 armhf], build-dep.10:51
xnoxthus it's not compiled with mirclient support any more, is it?10:52
LocutusOfBorglet me check, brandon answered me a few seconds ago10:52
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, hm, i see libmirclient-dev installed none the less in the new build.10:53
xnoxand it doesn't link against it.10:53
xnoxmaybe it's actually all ok, as you say.10:54
LocutusOfBorgactually I checked, checked and double checked the delta, it was patching upstream source files10:54
LocutusOfBorgchanging function names10:54
Laneyno10:54
LocutusOfBorgand I dropped, because upstream actually duplicated them10:54
Laneychecking for Mir support... no10:54
xnoxLaney, yeap, found the delta.10:55
Laneysome mir things get pulled in, evidently transiently, but that seems to not be sufficient10:55
LocutusOfBorgok let me fix it10:56
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, see at the end http://paste.ubuntu.com/14662490/ there are chuncks of things from debian/rules10:56
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, that are dropped. Evidentaly, since libmirclient-dev is available anyway, you can add those bits to debian/rules but with extra DEB_VENDOR treatment10:56
Laneyit's auto detected10:56
xnoxto e.g. enable it only on ubuntu, whilst uploading it into debian.10:56
Laneyso I guess you could add that to fail the build if it doesn't get enabled10:56
Laneybut probably not synacble if additional BDs are needed10:57
xnoxthen again i don't know how MIR or libsdl thing work...10:57
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, please work out and fix/re-enable mir support if needed =)10:57
LocutusOfBorgyes, I'll probably upload it in ubuntu in a few moments (I need to check in a ppa)10:58
LocutusOfBorgand then if the patch is sane enough go in debian too10:58
Laneymerci10:58
LocutusOfBorgthanks to you both for the help10:58
LocutusOfBorgbut at the end, why isn't it autodetected?10:58
LocutusOfBorgI think I should patch configure.ac somewhere, to fix the detection, instead of tweaking rules file10:59
LocutusOfBorg"if $PKG_CONFIG --exists mirclient egl xkbcommon ; then"11:01
LocutusOfBorgprobably just a missing build-dependency11:04
LocutusOfBorgI suspect mir support has been broken anyway also before11:04
LocutusOfBorgfor some little value of "broken" probably?11:04
Laneybroken how?11:06
xnoxLocutusOfBorg, it was not broken before11:07
xnoxchecking for Mir support... yes11:07
xnox-- dynamic libmirclient -> libmirclient.so.811:07
xnox-- dynamic libxkbcommon -> libxkbcommon.so.011:07
xnoxhttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/196165225/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-amd64.libsdl2_2.0.2+dfsg1-6ubuntu2_UPLOADING.txt.gz11:07
LocutusOfBorgyes, true11:07
LocutusOfBorgI'm actually checking, thanks11:07
LocutusOfBorgthe question is: the autodetect code never worked, but before it was forced in rules file11:08
LocutusOfBorginstead of forcing it would be better to fix the configure.ac file maybe?11:08
tkamppetercjwatson, hi11:09
LocutusOfBorgok I found a clie11:16
LocutusOfBorgclue11:16
LocutusOfBorgautoconf tries to compile a sample program11:16
LocutusOfBorg                    MirMotionToolType tool = mir_motion_tool_type_mouse;11:17
LocutusOfBorg 11:17
LocutusOfBorgbut that enum doesn't exist, even if it is in the documentation11:17
=== _salem is now known as salem_
cjwatsontkamppeter: hi, hwat's up?11:20
cjwatsoner, what11:20
cjwatsonexcessively Old English there11:20
tkamppetercjwatson, you told me that liblouis-bin would make it automatically into Main when I upload something which depends on liblouis-bin to Main.11:26
pittitkamppeter: not automatically, but it's a prerequisite11:28
pittitkamppeter: it's on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt , I'll promote it now11:28
pittitkamppeter: done, it now just needs a publisher run and mirror sync, so  < 1 h11:29
cjwatsonbeat me to it11:29
cjwatsonindeed, I didn't explicitly say it was automatic; though I wasn't very clear11:30
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: looks like that's only in the check11:36
Laneyyou can probably replace it with a version check instead?11:37
LocutusOfBorgLaney, it uses the check of a common api to know if the code can be compiled11:37
LocutusOfBorgso probably since somebody removed that part of api, I need to have something better-proof call?11:37
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: yes but it's not like the actual code itself uses API which is removed11:37
LocutusOfBorgI'm looking at bzr  mir code to understand the actual replacement11:37
Laneycan you just pkg-config check for a recent ish version?11:37
LocutusOfBorgLaney, this is true, I might also look to some calls that libsdl2 uses11:37
Laneyinstead of try-compiling?11:37
LocutusOfBorgsince the api seems to change, I would like to keep a try-compile and forward upstream11:38
LaneyI don't understand, you might pick the wrong bit11:39
Laneyit's going to fail to build if the API breaks anyway11:39
LocutusOfBorgso how do you suggest to fix it?11:40
LocutusOfBorg"if $PKG_CONFIG --exists mirclient egl xkbcommon ; then"11:41
LocutusOfBorgenable and live happy?11:41
LaneyIf you know a lower bound on the version then you can check for that - there's a PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro11:42
LocutusOfBorgI don't know a lower bound unfortunately11:42
Laneyit says something about 14.0411:42
Laneyso that's a good indicator, or maybe brandon knows11:43
LocutusOfBorgprecise isn't supported anymore AFAIK, so no check isn't good? :)11:43
LocutusOfBorgI'm a cmake guy, autoconf syntax is obscure to me :)11:44
LocutusOfBorgthe fix seems to be working11:52
LocutusOfBorgbut I need to patch it again, because mir changed api11:52
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: actually it looksl ike you can pass >= to pkg-config --exists, if that's helpful11:57
Laney--exists 'libmirclient >= the-version-in-trusty'11:57
ahasenackhi guys, what does the SRU queue look like nowadays? I have this bug for which I uploaded packages but they need review by the sru team: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/150811011:57
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1508110 in landscape-client (Ubuntu Wily) "Users tab doesn't work as expected" [Undecided,New]11:57
cjwatsonahasenack: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html#upload-queues  I've seen worse11:58
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I'll use the one from there12:22
LocutusOfBorghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/151324112:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1513241 in libsdl2 (Ubuntu) "libsdl2 No longer works with MIR 0.14 and greater (ABI/API break)" [Medium,In progress]12:22
pitticjwatson: I'm looking at bug 1537136; does it sound workable/correct if udev-udeb starts shipping a hook /usr/lib/finish-install.d/copy-persistent-net which copies /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules to /target/etc/udev/rules.d/ ?12:38
ubottubug 1537136 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "ISST-LTE: no network after install due to interface order change" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153713612:38
pitticjwatson: (sorry, not familiar with udebs at all)12:38
pittijust looked at http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/apb.html12:39
pitticjwatson: earlier would be better, so would post-base-installer.d/ be ok?12:39
pitticjwatson: unping, this script already exists, it just seems we aren't installing the generator12:42
mapreripitti: I believe your force for jquery & friends needs some adjustments, since jquery (and friends) are not migrating.12:43
LocutusOfBorgLaney, xnox actually due to MIR api changes, libsdl2 wasn't working anymore with the new MIR protocol12:44
LocutusOfBorghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/151324112:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1513241 in libsdl2 (Ubuntu) "libsdl2 No longer works with MIR 0.14 and greater (ABI/API break)" [High,In progress]12:44
LocutusOfBorgso it isn't actually a regression, but I promise I'll take care of it :)12:45
cjwatsonpitti: heh.  right, if the generator isn't in udev-udeb it probably won't work so well12:45
pitticjwatson: my grep apparently didn't catch the base-installer.d/05udev script, so that part should be okay12:46
tkamppeterpitti, thank you very much.12:47
pitticjwatson: all the udebs are bundled in netinst's initrd.gz, right? so I could just modify that to install an updated udeb locally12:47
pittimapreri: I can't force the migration as it makes things uninstallable; see "trying: jquery" on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt12:47
pittimapreri: apparently this needs some more rebuilds or porting to the new version12:47
pitti    * amd64: gitit, libghc-gitit-data, libghc-gitit-dev, libghc-gitit-prof12:47
cjwatsonpitti: yep12:47
pittimapreri: those packages become uninstallable with the new jquery12:48
pitticjwatson: ack, thanks12:48
cjwatsonoh, haskell might be improvable now that aeson is fixed12:48
cjwatson(gitit)12:48
cjwatsonit was stuck for a while12:48
* cjwatson goes to poke that12:48
maprerithank you.12:48
mapreripitti: wasn't force a thing to ignore uninstallability troubles and migrate that anyway?12:49
cjwatsonmapreri: not force-skiptest12:49
cjwatsonmapreri: sure, there are hints to force things really hard but they should almost never be used12:50
tjaaltonpitti: nfs shares fail to get mounted on boot if using the hostname in fstab, because apparently it can't resolve the hostname yet at that point.. do you know if this is filed somewhere already, or if it's a bug at all?12:50
tjaaltonand would it be in nfs-utils or elsewhere12:51
mapreriah, then the "forced by pitti" in _excuses means something related to the tests...  I thought it was the same "force" hint for britney...12:51
* mapreri is learning stuff every time he put his nose inside this channel :D12:51
cjwatsonpitti: if you need more complicated initrd changes, then you can grab the debian-installer source, drop updated udebs into build/localudebs/, and run "make -C build rebuild_netboot"12:51
pitticjwatson: oh cool, thanks; that seems useful as a more reliable way to test changes12:52
tjaaltonalso, all the hosts here that have sssd set up to use my local directory service kick me out during dist-upgrade to a new release. annoying as hell and no idea what's wrong and where12:52
cjwatsonmapreri: well, to be fair it does say "Should wait for tests relating to jquery 1.11.3+dfsg-4, but forced by pitti" :-)12:52
LocutusOfBorgpitti, I would like to do a no change rebuild against libpodofo0.9.3. for your krename12:52
pittimapreri: right, I forced the tests, but we can't/don't want to force over uninstallability12:52
LocutusOfBorgmapreri, ^^^12:53
pittiLocutusOfBorg: oh, sure; I can do that with a single command, hang on12:53
LocutusOfBorgI have already it pending12:53
cjwatsonit'll take a couple more days to work through the current ghc transition, assuming nothing else goes wrong with it12:53
mapreripitti: then please also add scribus and calibre to the list ♥12:53
cjwatsonbut I'll try to stay on top of it12:53
mapreri(same transition)12:53
pittiLocutusOfBorg: krename upload12:54
pittied12:54
pitti$ rebuild-lib-transition libpodofo0.9.3 krename12:54
pittimapreri: for the same libpodofo0.9.3 transition?12:54
mapreripitti: yup.12:54
LocutusOfBorgyes12:54
mapreridone in debian a cople of days ago12:54
LocutusOfBorgpitti, I did stole without shame from cjwatson, adding some bits http://paste.ubuntu.com/14662972/12:55
pittidone12:55
maprericool12:55
cjwatsonI suspect pitti's scripts are nicer than mine12:55
pittiLocutusOfBorg: heh, I guess everyone has their own little helpers for this :/12:55
cjwatsonThat is often the way12:55
LocutusOfBorgyes, I'm wondering why there isn't a tool in ubuntu-dev-tools for this12:55
pitticjwatson: by and large the same: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14662976/12:55
cjwatson(what LocutusOfBorg pasted isn't exactly mine though, I wouldn't have used the gratuitous/unnecessary bashism :P )12:55
LocutusOfBorg:p12:56
cjwatsonpitti: ah yes, close enough12:56
LocutusOfBorgmy script should work also after xenial12:56
LocutusOfBorgassuming "distro-info --devel" gets updated quickly :)12:56
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, :D13:03
bschaeferhello!13:04
* LocutusOfBorg is waiting for a punch13:04
LocutusOfBorghello and sorry :)13:04
* bschaefer wonders what happened13:04
LocutusOfBorgwrt libsdl213:04
bschaeferreading the comment umm13:05
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, is your patch base on the branch or the WIP branch?13:05
* bschaefer should just look13:06
bschaeferand i would prefer to have mir enabled13:06
LocutusOfBorgit is based on the patch on the bug report13:06
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, sure, this is why I would like to upload ASAP13:06
LocutusOfBorgwe were also talking about just doing some pkg-config --exists mir or whatever13:06
LocutusOfBorgwithout the try-compile13:06
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, the patch needs to be based on this branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/+junk/SDL2-new-mir-ABI13:07
bschaefersince it fixed quite a few bugs13:07
bschaeferumm i made a ppa13:07
bschaeferwith a patch13:07
bschaeferhttps://launchpad.net/~mir-team/+archive/ubuntu/staging13:07
LocutusOfBorgjust a question: libsdl2 was broken even before my sync, right?13:07
LocutusOfBorgI mean, with a no-change rebuild I would have triggered a build failure?13:07
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, yeah its been broken since mir 0.1313:08
bschaeferIIRC13:08
LocutusOfBorgok, this might explain something :D13:08
LocutusOfBorgbtw, with this patch you know we are enabling mir for everywhere available?13:08
bschaeferyeah, just been slow to getting a patch out then saw 2.0.4 being worked13:08
bschaeferon soo i waited13:08
LocutusOfBorgbefore it was enabled for i386, amd64, armhf13:08
LocutusOfBorgnow we are adding arm64, and maybe more13:09
bschaeferit should be i386/amd64/armhf13:09
bschaeferhmm13:09
bschaeferarm64 should be supported13:09
LocutusOfBorgok wonderful13:09
bschaefer*should* as in, i think :)13:09
bschaeferbregma, ^13:09
LocutusOfBorgso can I upload that version?13:12
LocutusOfBorgyou added "libmirclient-dev" as dependency, in my environment it gets installed automatically13:13
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, the version you attached to the bug? (Im also not *super* excellent on debain packing soo there could be a mistake there)13:14
bschaeferor the one in the ppa?13:14
cjwatsondirect dependencies should be explicit even if they're installed automatically via something else13:14
LocutusOfBorgthe one from ppa13:14
cjwatsonsimple rule: if you use it explicitly, depend on it explicitly13:14
LocutusOfBorgbut I'm looking to fix something13:14
LocutusOfBorgok13:14
bschaeferif we want to enable mir support by default it will be needed13:15
bschaeferbut its also not *required* to run SDL213:15
bschaeferbut since we want to run mir with sdl2 it should be included explicitly13:15
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, let me ... install that package and test it out13:15
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, I'm uploading in a ppa13:16
LocutusOfBorgplease wait :D13:16
bschaefero cool13:17
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, since i pushed that patch to a ppa and i tested the source file and checked mir was built13:17
bschaeferbut i havent tested the ppa out it self yet13:17
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/13:17
LocutusOfBorgI did some little changes, from your package13:18
LocutusOfBorg(I started from the ppa)13:18
LocutusOfBorg1) changelog merged with the debian one13:18
LocutusOfBorg2) removed the copyright patch parts (your patch was changing back copyright years, I removed the change)13:18
LocutusOfBorg3) rebased the version number13:18
bschaefernice13:21
LocutusOfBorgoh I also renamed from .patch to .diff, to be the same as the other patch13:21
LocutusOfBorgand I'm adding some verbosity to changelog13:21
LocutusOfBorgexplaining the ubuntu delta, because I presume I can't upload it on debian13:22
bregmabschaefer, once the SDL 2.0.4 package is in Ubuntu, can all the changes just go upstream  so 2.0.5 can be just a plain synch?13:23
bschaeferbregma, that would be ideal, and once 2.0.5 hits the patch *should* be removed and all should be well13:24
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, yup, ... once 16.04 hits ill push these changes upstream13:24
bschaeferand debian will have it from upstream :)13:25
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, so I'll wait for your ack13:25
bschaeferyup adding the ppa now!13:25
LocutusOfBorghttp://paste.ubuntu.com/14663107/13:25
LocutusOfBorgthis is the debdiff13:26
LocutusOfBorgI just added some verbosity in changelog13:26
LocutusOfBorgand as said before rebased the patch13:26
LocutusOfBorgbut no *useful* changes, and please note: we are enabling mir almost everywhere the test code compiles, not as before13:27
LocutusOfBorg+1 for upstreaming changes13:27
bschaefercool, yeah once you see it builds with mir13:28
bschaeferand it all compiles it *usually* worked out well :)13:28
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, hmm your ppa ... is losing to the archive :(13:28
Mirv@pilot out13:28
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Wily (15.10) Released! | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-wily | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots:
bschaefer *** 2.0.4+dfsg1-2 50013:29
bschaefer        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages13:29
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/889318613:29
LocutusOfBorgyou can just grab the deb files13:29
LocutusOfBorgthey aren't published yet I guess13:29
bschaefero13:29
* bschaefer should have checked that :)13:29
LocutusOfBorgchecking for Mir support... yes13:29
LocutusOfBorg-- dynamic libmirclient -> libmirclient.so.913:29
LocutusOfBorg-- dynamic libxkbcommon -> libxkbcommon.so.013:30
LocutusOfBorgthe build seems fine13:30
bschaefercool, sooo now its down to ... did i mess the patch up somehow :)13:30
jamespagethis has me scratching my head:13:30
jamespageold binaries left on amd64: libpe-status4, libpengine4, pacemaker-dbg (from 1.1.13-2ubuntu1)13:30
jamespageI'd assumed that it was due to some transitions that needed to be done, which I think I have completed - but I can't figure out what's holding onto those...13:31
LocutusOfBorgBTW bschaefer bregma if we force "libmirclient-dev" build-dependency we won't be able to sync it from debian13:32
LocutusOfBorgeven if the patch is upstreamed13:32
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, upstream wont have libmirclient in its control13:33
bschaeferi would assume we would just have a small patch in ubuntu to have that13:33
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, neither debian13:33
LocutusOfBorgok, that was the mean13:34
LocutusOfBorgso, plain sync isn't possible13:34
bschaeferunless debian has libmir :)13:34
LocutusOfBorgI guess not :D13:34
flexiondotorgMirv, you about?13:37
tkamppeterpitti, cjwatson, CUPS has built now, thank you for the help.13:47
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, yay terria still works13:47
tkamppeterpitti, cjwatson, will CUPS now get from -proposed into -release or do you have to give it a kick to do so?13:48
bschaefer:| but mouse doesnt seem to work... hmm one sec13:48
ginggs_hi, is there a reason we don't have ceres-solver in ubuntu ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ceres-solver I don't see it in the sync blacklist and it was uploaded to unstable at the end of november.13:48
cjwatsontkamppeter: the easiest way to find out is to wait and see13:50
cjwatsontkamppeter: normally no manual action is needed though13:50
cjwatsonjamespage: corner case in the handling of -proposed as a partial suite; I've removed those13:52
jamespagecjwatson, ack - thanks13:52
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, ignore my concern! Using an older client13:52
bschaefervs a newer server and i broken the server/client protocol soo no client mouse events13:52
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, patch working correctly for me! +1 to use it13:53
LocutusOfBorgso can I push on ubuntu?13:53
LocutusOfBorguploaded :D13:53
tkamppetercjwatson, thanks.13:53
LocutusOfBorgthanks a lot bschaefer13:54
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, awesome thanks! didnt expect to get that patch pushed so quickly :)13:54
bschaeferthank you!13:54
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, I actually broke the build, so I had to :D13:54
LocutusOfBorgfor the next time, just ping me, and I'll take care of it13:54
LocutusOfBorgBTW In debian we are planning an update of all the sdl2-* related libraries (just bugfixes)13:54
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, awesome, thats good to know13:55
bschaeferall the sdl2-* shouldnt cause issues for the mir stuff?13:55
LocutusOfBorgand then a question for cjwatson13:55
bschaeferat lease i never had to do anything special with those13:55
LocutusOfBorgIn debian the libpng16 transition is mostly "done" I mean, we patched the sources except for a few build failures, and we are waiting for the release team to proceed13:55
LocutusOfBorgI did ~30 NMUs and they are pending, and I'm planning to merge ubuntu whenever possible13:56
LocutusOfBorgdo you think we can arrange a transition for xenial?13:56
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: let's not have me be in charge of deciding whether to do transitions - I'm not sufficiently on top of things13:57
LocutusOfBorgso, moving to -release maybe?13:57
cjwatsonsure13:57
LocutusOfBorgthanks :D13:57
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, I'm also closing the #1513241 bug13:58
LocutusOfBorgin changelog13:58
LocutusOfBorgwow it is building awesomly fine13:58
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, awesome thanks!13:58
LocutusOfBorgnow mir is enabled everywhere, lets see how it goes13:59
* bschaefer hopes quite well14:00
LocutusOfBorgthanks to you, without your patch sdl2 would have been in a bad state14:00
LocutusOfBorgI should have asked before doing the sync14:00
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, :), didnt *know* anyone needed to be poked but ill know next time! (though hopefully this wont happen again!)14:03
bschaeferas it'll be upstream14:03
LocutusOfBorgbschaefer, it was me having to poke you before doing the sync14:05
LocutusOfBorgbut I actually checked the actual delta and it was upstreamed14:05
LocutusOfBorgI missed the rules part change14:06
LocutusOfBorgand I missed the new patch not yet uploaded14:06
LocutusOfBorgbut well, now we should be good14:06
bschaeferLocutusOfBorg, the reason i held off on the 2.0.3 patch is it didnt cleanly go from working with 2.0.3 --> 2.0.4...14:06
bschaeferfor some reason14:06
bschaefersooo i figured i should wait14:06
LocutusOfBorgI hope it is fine now14:07
sil2100mvo_: hey! I see you're doing commits to goget-ubuntu-touch along with Sergio - could you take a look at my quick noob MP by any chance? Nothing too urgent tho! https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/goget-ubuntu-touch/touch-devel-warning/+merge/28204514:07
bschaeferbuilding is a good start!14:07
mvo_sil2100: sure, I have a look14:11
sil2100mvo_: thank you!14:13
=== ginggs_ is now known as ginggs
=== roaksoax is now known as roaksoax-brb
dokopitti, is this temporary? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-redcarpet/xenial/s390x/ ?16:45
pittidoko: temporary how? It had been uninstallable for a while, but apparently that got resolved now?16:54
dokopitti, you only answered after it passed16:56
pittidoko: ah, ok; so I guess ruby 2.2.4 makes it installable?16:57
dokopitti, no, that's unrelated16:57
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
tsimonq2having a bit of a problem, trying to branch a Bazaar repo and I keep getting public key errors. But my GPG key is imported correctly in Launchpad...what should I do?23:14
sarnoldis the error instead in your ssh config?23:17
tsimonq2sarnold: what do you mean?23:19
tsimonq2keep getting:23:19
tsimonq2Permission denied (publickey).23:19
tsimonq2ConnectionReset reading response for 'BzrDir.open_2.1', retrying23:19
tsimonq2Permission denied (publickey).23:19
tsimonq2bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist.23:19
tsimonq2(sorry for the paste, it's only 4 lines)23:19
sarnoldtsimonq2: yeah, that looks like an ssh error instead of gnupg -- does launchpad know the ssh public key you're using?23:21
sarnold(at least I think it needs your ssh key.. it's been years since I set that up)23:22
roadmryes, what you need is ssh key for that23:22
roadmrtsimonq2: need to add your SSH public key (usually .ssh/id_rsa.pub) here: https://launchpad.net/~/+editsshkeys23:23
tsimonq2and I did23:24
roadmrtsimonq2: oh yes it's there :)23:24
tsimonq2http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?fingerprint=on&op=index&search=0x9C6058DF83975841F42717F99F9292DB1C174C6F23:24
tsimonq2this is the one on THIS computer23:25
roadmrtsimonq2: hm, what you're showing is a gpg key, not ssh key23:25
sarnoldthat looks like a gpg key, not ssh23:25
sarnoldit'd be one of these two https://launchpad.net/%7Etsimonq2/+sshkeys23:26
tsimonq2and this is my gpg --list-keys output(taking away my private key :P):23:26
tsimonq2pub   4096R/1C174C6F 2015-12-05 [expires: 2016-06-02]23:26
tsimonq2uid                  Simon Quigley <sqawesome99@gmail.com>23:26
roadmrtsimonq2: what happens if you try ssh bazaar.launchpad.net ? (it should reply "No shells on this server.")23:27
tsimonq2Permission denied (publickey).23:27
tsimonq2oh I SEE...I'll look at my ssh keys23:28
tsimonq2yay thanks guys23:30
sarnoldhah, my ssh bazaar.launchpad.net fails too. but my bzr+ssh tree still works.. go figure.23:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!