[09:30] infinity, bah. we should fix that probably, somehow. [13:15] cjwatson, would you mind merging https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/s390x-el-torito/+merge/283798 and re-spinning s390x server image? [13:24] xnox: done [13:25] cjwatson, thank you. [14:54] xnox: infinity: not sure it's a failed merge anymore; s390 didn't really change [14:54] and amd64 doesn't look like it prompts for the kernels [16:54] cyphermox: Oh. If amd64 doesn't have the bug (you implied that it did), then it's just a failure to write a proper kernel selection case in base-installer for Ubuntu. [16:56] s/for Ubuntu/for Ubuntu s390x/ [17:09] cjwatson, would you please add me to ~ubuntu-cdimage such that i can manage bug statuses for the s390x bugs in e.g. ubuntu-cdimage project? I promise to do good. [17:12] or could somebody please reset https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1536981 to trianged. [17:13] infinity: right [17:13] infinity: what I did was say that I had seen that debconf question pop up somewhere [17:15] looking back at amd64.sh, I don't see how it could possibly happen there, it doesn't look like it changed at all since the previous merge. [17:15] (and it's very different from the s390x logic there) [17:24] cyphermox, the s390x logic looks obsolete, as ubuntu never supported tape, and debian dropped tape support. [17:25] i'd say there is only one kernel for s390x, in both ubuntu and debian. [17:26] xnox: reset the bug status since I don't remember OTTOMH precisely what that team grants :) [17:26] cjwatson, ha ha =) fair enough. [17:37] xnox: it's a merge from debian, it should be pretty close to what debian currently has [17:38] cyphermox, i'm tryng somet out. Whilst true all our $arch tings for kernel are different from deban, a we name everryhing differently. So adjusting s390x appropriately. [17:39] just arch_get_kernel is really wrong [17:39] cyphermox, i think this should do http://paste.ubuntu.com/14664998/ [17:40] just arch_get_kernel needs a change ;) [17:40] cyphermox, true. [17:40] or, maybe arch_check_usable_kernel too [17:41] and tests. [17:41] but arch_get_kernel_flavor shouldn't change [17:41] well, yeah, the tests [17:41] well. is this a bikeshed? =) i copied what we do for ppc64el. and it's our kernels. [17:48] xnox: Why are you listing generic in unusable? [17:50] Oh. You're not. I can't read. [17:50] But you need to also include linux-generic [17:50] Above it. [17:51] Which I note ppc64el doesn't. I wonder if that's my bug. [17:52] your bug? [17:52] As in, I probably wrote the ppc64el bits. [17:52] Which don't seem to match what amd64 do. [17:53] That's just the testsuite anyway. I guess if it passes, it passes. [17:58] xnox: Right. Nevermind my comments. Should be fine as-is. Just drop the unnecessary change to arch_get_kernel_flavour and you should be golden.