| === ljp is now known as lpotter | ||
| === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
| sil2100 | Saviq: hey! You mentioned that you guys were looking into the unity8 security-bugfix and checking if the deployed fix is enough - all good in regards to that? | 11:54 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | No follow up fix needed? | 11:54 |
| tsdgeos | sil2100: there's a follow up fix needed | 12:12 |
| sil2100 | tsdgeos: hmm... this won't make it for OTA-9 then, we'll have to get that into OTA-9.5 | 12:12 |
| tsdgeos | sil2100: saviq is on usa still, visiting friends, not sure if he said he'd be working or not though | 12:12 |
| tsdgeos | sil2100: yes, 9.5 is like "next week" anyway, right? | 12:13 |
| sil2100 | Yeah | 12:13 |
| tsdgeos | ok | 12:13 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, hey, yeah, I'm working | 13:27 |
| tsdgeos | oki | 13:28 |
| tsdgeos | morning | 13:28 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: was wondering, the few last MRs failed on xenial jenkass | 13:41 |
| tsdgeos | would it make sense like "wait 5 min and try again before failing" | 13:42 |
| tsdgeos | if the apt-get step fails? | 13:42 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, assuming I'm getting a meaningful exit code out of it, I might do that, yeah | 13:43 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, better than that I'll try to switch to the internal archive cache, which should have less trouble like that | 13:47 |
| tsdgeos | oki | 13:47 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: where's the autopkg test run in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/877 ? can't see it | 14:01 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, they only run when it's approved by the lander | 14:01 |
| tsdgeos | ah | 14:01 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, and since it got rebuilt, they got cleared | 14:02 |
| * Saviq rebuilds | 14:02 | |
| alan_g | Saviq: does API this work for you? https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/mir/add-mir_surface_spec_set_shell_chrome/+merge/283818 | 14:56 |
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| Saviq | alan_g, looks good here, dednick, can you have a look ↑ | 14:58 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, added that test. was harder that I thought. but should make us more bulletproof for the future | 15:03 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: cool, checking | 15:04 |
| dednick | alan_g, Saviq: is that dynamic? | 15:04 |
| Saviq | IIUC, yes | 15:05 |
| dednick | Saviq: or doesnt it need to be? | 15:05 |
| Saviq | it does need to be | 15:05 |
| dednick | i'm not familiar with the surface spec, but it doesnt look like it to me. | 15:05 |
| alan_g | dednick: yes. It can be set on creation, or applied later | 15:05 |
| Saviq | dednick, the second test is "apply..." | 15:05 |
| dednick | ah. ok. mir::options = cool. | 15:06 |
| dednick | then looks all good. | 15:06 |
| dednick | ahh. theres mir_surface_apply_spec. got it. | 15:07 |
| oSoMoN | hey, is https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537782 a known issue? | 15:11 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1537782 in qtubuntu (Ubuntu) "Modifier ignored when pressing a key if TextInput has active focus" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 15:11 |
| Saviq | dandrader, does that ring a bell ↑? | 15:14 |
| dandrader | Saviq, yeah... it might be possible that the modifiers get lost in translation in the "mir server interface -> unity8 qml scnene -> mir server-client wire procotol -> qtubuntu" road | 15:21 |
| Saviq | dandrader, think you could have a look? | 15:24 |
| dandrader | Saviq, once I get back home preferably. no bluetooth kbd or test machine to play with | 15:26 |
| Saviq | dandrader, ack | 15:27 |
| mzanetti | @unity: whoever is not jetlagged, standup :) | 15:31 |
| cimi | mzanetti, wrong irc server :P | 15:39 |
| mzanetti | ? | 15:39 |
| mzanetti | cimi, ^ | 15:39 |
| cimi | mzanetti, we usually ping for standup in canonical irc | 15:39 |
| mzanetti | ah... didn't know that was intentionally | 15:40 |
| cimi | mzanetti, was taking piss that you are probably jetlagged too :) | 15:40 |
| mzanetti | I kinda am, yes | 15:41 |
| mzanetti | feels like 4am, rather than 4pm right now | 15:41 |
| tsdgeos | :D | 15:44 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: is there a bug for https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/edgebarrier-click-transparent/+merge/283735 ? | 15:44 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, don't think so, but it's easy to repro and quite annoying when typing messages | 15:48 |
| * mzanetti searches | 15:48 | |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: i'm just trying to know what i need to do to test it :D | 15:48 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, type something with the OSK. the q key is quite nasty to press | 15:48 |
| mzanetti | depending on the layout, the a and shift key too | 15:49 |
| mzanetti | the ones that touch the left edge | 15:49 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, you'll notice the difference immediately if you try to press the osk very close to the edge. | 15:50 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, also have to ensure that the edge push to show spread & launcher are no affected | 15:50 |
| dandrader | *not | 15:50 |
| mzanetti | if you just type a normal message, you'd notice the q key often just doesn't react | 15:50 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: you mean with the mouse? | 15:50 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, yes | 15:51 |
| tsdgeos | k | 15:51 |
| tsdgeos | mzanetti: dandrader: about the push to show launcher, can you guys confirm that if you exit the launcher form the unity icon it won't autohide? | 16:13 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, confirm if it happens or if it's the expected behavior? | 16:16 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: happens | 16:16 |
| tsdgeos | i guess it's not the expected behaviour | 16:16 |
| tsdgeos | but if it is, that also helps :D | 16:17 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, by clicking with a mouse? | 16:17 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, I don't think it should autohide while the mouse is still hovering over it.... | 16:18 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: "exit the launcher" | 16:18 |
| tsdgeos | i have a typo | 16:19 |
| tsdgeos | form -> from | 16:19 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, ah, so you mean the mouse if hovering over the dash icon and then you move it away from the launcher? | 16:19 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: yes | 16:20 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, I confirm it happens and that's a bug in trunk it seems | 16:20 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, doesn't happen all the time though... | 16:22 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: ok, so do i file a bug, correct? | 16:23 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, yes.to safely reproduce it you have to perform the edge push already at the y position where the dash button will show up | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | that may be, yes | 16:24 |
| mzanetti | hmm, haven't managed to hit it yet | 16:25 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, if you do the edge push from elsewhere, move the pointer to the dash button, then exit the launcher. it will still autohide | 16:25 |
| tsdgeos | ok | 16:25 |
| tsdgeos | so it's not hide from | 16:25 |
| mzanetti | ah now it did | 16:25 |
| tsdgeos | but show and exit from | 16:25 |
| mzanetti | yeah, bug | 16:25 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, yes | 16:25 |
| mzanetti | nice catch :D | 16:25 |
| dandrader | I hope we can catch this with a tst_Shell.qml test... | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: mzanetti: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1537817 makes sense? | 16:28 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1537817 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Launcher autohide fails if opening and exiting the launcher via mouse push in the "unity" icon" [Undecided,New] | 16:28 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, yes | 16:29 |
| mzanetti | tsdgeos, it's also called BFB :) | 16:29 |
| mzanetti | but yeah, this works | 16:29 |
| mzanetti | and it's the ubuntu icon, not unity :D | 16:29 |
| tsdgeos | someone was confused about the BFB terminology the other day | 16:29 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, BFB? | 16:29 |
| mzanetti | big fat button | 16:29 |
| mzanetti | designers call it that way | 16:29 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, was searching for BFB and all kinds of stuff showed up :) | 16:30 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| === DanChapman is now known as DanChapman_ | ||
| === DanChapman_ is now known as DanChapman | ||
| Jemand_ | Hallo | 19:30 |
| davmor2 | mzanetti: Oh Fat yeah not the version I heard | 19:32 |
| gnukarabatak | Hello everybody. I am using Ubuntu 15.10 unity. Work areas are not working isolated from each other. I am writing this post to report it. Maybe the solution can be found. | 19:35 |
| gnukarabatak | work areas "workspace" :) | 19:35 |
| Saviq | gnukarabatak, can you please file a bug by running Alt+F2, "apport-bug unity"? | 19:36 |
| Saviq | or via https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+filebug, but the former is preferable as it will add some details about your setup | 19:37 |
| gnukarabatak | thanks. | 19:38 |
| mterry | tedg, I'm debugging why my qtmir branch doesn't work on top of your app-object branch -- it looks like I'm no longer seeing callbacks from ubuntu_app_launch_observer_add_app_starting | 20:23 |
| mterry | tedg, you said to keep using the old callbacks, right? | 20:24 |
| tedg | mterry: Hmm, not sure of a good reason that would happen. Yeah, use the old callbacks. | 20:24 |
| mterry | (rather than the new-style object callbacks) | 20:24 |
| tedg | mterry: I've tried to keep it as mostly a wrapper on the old code to reduce risk... | 20:25 |
| mterry | tedg, I could still be doing something dumb... | 20:25 |
| tedg | mterry: Hmm, okay, you can start a ubuntu-app-watch to see the signals in the CLI. | 20:25 |
| tedg | mterry: That might help to see if they're getting setn. | 20:26 |
| tedg | sent | 20:26 |
| mterry | tedg, ok... so what would cause Application::info() to return a null ptr? Seems I'm getting that for "ubuntu-system-settings" | 21:43 |
| mterry | tedg, line 61 in application-impl-legacy? | 21:54 |
| mterry | .cpp | 21:54 |
| mterry | tedg, and line 60 needs an "applications" in it | 22:14 |
| tedg | mterry: Fixed and pushed, need to still write tests for that code. | 22:17 |
| tedg | mterry: Does U8 have tests for all the desktop keys? | 22:18 |
| * tedg will have to look | 22:18 | |
| mterry | tedg, I don't think u8 does... qtmir might test some of them | 22:18 |
| mterry | tedg, but it would mock out u-a-l in that case | 22:18 |
| tedg | mterry: I mean, from before when it read the desktop file itself. | 22:19 |
| dandrader | tedg, fwiw qtmir has some tests for its desktop file reader I think | 22:20 |
| mterry | tedg, oh yeah, qtmir had some tests yeah | 22:27 |
| mterry | tedg, now I'm seeing why click apps aren't launching either :-P but ubuntu-system-settings does! | 22:27 |
| * tedg prefers to steal rather than write | 22:27 | |
| tedg | mterry: Heh, are you saying the real world is different than the one that exists inside my head? ;-) | 22:28 |
| mterry | tedg, who's to say we're not all figments of your imagination? But please tell your imagination to let click apps work | 22:30 |
| mterry | tedg, ... | 22:40 |
| mterry | tedg, so if I give parse() "com.ubuntu.camera_camera" what should I expect? | 22:41 |
| mterry | AppID::parse that is | 22:41 |
| tedg | mterry: I think you need the full appid today. | 22:42 |
| tedg | mterry: Yeah, it'll error. | 22:43 |
| mterry | tedg, hrm. So I have an appid input from an API, there's no easy way to get a proper AppID object... I don't know whether I have package or appname or version or what, so I can't use the discover API | 22:43 |
| tedg | So we need it to be smart enough to handle legacy AppIDs as well. | 22:45 |
| tedg | legacy/short/full | 22:45 |
| mterry | tedg, yeah I hoped parse() would parse what it could and use discover() behind the scenes if it wasn't enough | 22:45 |
| mterry | tedg, maybe that behavior should be a third call. But it would be a useful api call | 22:46 |
| tedg | Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. I can't think of a good name though. | 22:46 |
| tedg | "figure it out" | 22:46 |
| tedg | fromWTF | 22:46 |
| tedg | interpet? | 22:47 |
| tedg | applyHuristics() | 22:48 |
| mterry | tedg, an overloaded parse call? or another discover call? | 22:49 |
| tedg | Forgot the "e", knew that didn't look right. | 22:49 |
| tedg | Yeah, kinda thinking I want it a different name to just say "this might be doing more than you want" | 22:49 |
| tedg | stringSolver() | 22:50 |
| mterry | tedg, "discover" already implies that | 22:51 |
| mterry | tedg, "find" ? | 22:51 |
| tedg | Ah, I like find(), let's go with that. | 22:52 |
| mterry | tedg, also I don't think parse() does throw any errors | 22:52 |
| mterry | tedg, but if you try to use the result in other places, you might get errors yeah | 22:52 |
| tedg | mterry: No, it returns an empty() AppID. | 22:52 |
| mterry | tedg, only if the input is empty | 22:53 |
| tedg | mterry: Sure, otherwise it returns a legacy AppID. | 22:54 |
| mterry | tedg, otherwise it looks like it will have a valid package/appname but empty version | 22:54 |
| tedg | I think package is empty as well. | 22:54 |
| mterry | in the com.ubuntu.camera_camera case | 22:54 |
| mterry | tedg, that's in the legacy case | 22:54 |
| tedg | Yeah, so when you're going back to string it's not putting anymore '_' in. | 22:54 |
| mterry | tedg, but in any case, those aren't errors | 22:54 |
| tedg | We probably shouldn't let legacy appid's include a '_' — wonder if that'd break anything. | 22:55 |
| mterry | tedg, I'm not talking about legacy apps right now. com.ubuntu.camera_camera is a click id without a version | 22:55 |
| mterry | tedg, which AppID::parse correctly parses as an appId without a version | 22:55 |
| mterry | tedg, but it doesn't give an error. You implied you expected it to | 22:56 |
| tedg | Yeah, what it's doing is returning the tuple { '', 'com.ubuntu.camera_camera', '' } which is a legacy appid. | 22:57 |
| mterry | tedg, ah I see. weird behavior, yeah | 22:58 |
| tedg | mterry: Cool, I need to head out now, but I should get to this tomorrow. | 23:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!