| doko | tumbleweed, jtaylor, barry, pitti: migration of python-numpy is needed for the python3.4 removal. any ideas? | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| * tumbleweed looks | 00:03 | |
| barry | numpy itself is failing, but maybe that's shallow | 00:05 |
| barry | (failing on py27?) | 00:05 |
| jtaylor | doko: whats blocking it? | 00:15 |
| jtaylor | oh the failure itself is simple | 00:15 |
| jtaylor | too bad morph doesn't care about adt tests :( | 00:15 |
| jtaylor | df70490874e33e1fad18720f5c74fb5e319c9e06 is the fix | 00:16 |
| jtaylor | fwiw scipy will fail with that numpy but an upload for that is waiting on a sphinx update | 00:16 |
| jtaylor | should be done soon | 00:17 |
| === rww is now known as rwd | ||
| doko | jtaylor, well, then why does he add these? | 00:19 |
| jtaylor | doko: I added them | 00:19 |
| doko | bad jtaylor ;-P | 00:19 |
| === rwd is now known as rww | ||
| tsimonq2 | ok, so I really don't know who to contact so I came here. I was looking at FTBFS and I noticed hplip was failing builds. So I peeked at the logs and it had a dependency error of cups that was already in the repos. On my machine, the build was successful. Where should I file a bug? Who should I report it to? | 00:51 |
| tsimonq2 | and it builds successfully upstream | 00:52 |
| tsimonq2 | hplip is in main | 00:52 |
| tsimonq2 | should this go in #ubuntu+1-maint? | 00:53 |
| cjwatson | tsimonq2: Probably fixed by the recent promotion of liblouis-bin to main. I've retried the failed builds. | 01:20 |
| tsimonq2 | cjwatson: ok thanks | 01:21 |
| * tsimonq2 watches the builds :D | 01:22 | |
| Pharaoh_Atem | woo! | 01:58 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I've finally made progress on the apache configs for php7.0 | 01:58 |
| tsimonq2 | can this bug be attached to apt in FTBFS? thanks! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lz4/+bug/1531923 | 02:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1531923 in lz4 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] lz4" [Undecided,New] | 02:27 |
| tarpman | mdeslaur: don't suppose you would have any insight into bug 1537762...? bit short on details unfortunately | 02:28 |
| ubottu | bug 1537762 in openldap (Ubuntu) "syncrepl does not work when using tls" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537762 | 02:28 |
| sarnold | tarpman: it reminds me a little of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/1534230 -- the openssl s_client and openssl x509 advice there may help debug that | 02:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1534230 in gnutls26 (Ubuntu) "LDAP TLS connection stopped working" [Undecided,Invalid] | 02:34 |
| sarnold | pity these bugs elide the useful details; it'd take one of us a few seconds to check.. oh well. | 02:34 |
| tarpman | to be fair, slapd's logging of tls errors leaves something (a lot) to be desired... I have a wishlist bug for that around here somewhere :) | 02:35 |
| sarnold | hehe :) | 02:35 |
| tarpman | yeah, that definitely looks relevant. thanks, posting the link now (unless you beat me to it) | 02:35 |
| sarnold | go ahead | 02:36 |
| tarpman | I always have to /whois you to remind myself you're not my former coworker with the same first initial last name :P | 02:36 |
| sarnold | the guy who's been stealing my username! | 02:37 |
| tarpman | heh, I don't think he IRCs... | 02:37 |
| tsimonq2 | I looked into devscripts on FTBFS, it seems like there is no longer a dependency problem but a build problem. Can someone please do a build to confirm this and to get bugs filed? Thanks! | 03:02 |
| tsimonq2 | It also seems like this is a problem on our part, since Debian's autobuilders succeed: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=devscripts&arch=i386&ver=2.15.10&stamp=1451535039 | 03:05 |
| tsimonq2 | looking at FTBFS again, can graphite2 be rebuilt? I might have some local problems but I know the dependency problems are fixed... | 03:26 |
| cpaelzer | good morning | 05:48 |
| pitti | Good morning | 06:41 |
| lathiat | morning | 06:48 |
| pitti | hey lathiat, good morning! | 06:49 |
| pitti | doko: looking at the regessions; I uploaded the fix for numexpr | 06:58 |
| pitti | doko: the "Specified path is invalid." warning in python-numpy is real, and does not happen with 1.8.2 | 07:20 |
| pitti | doko: it tries to os.path.isdir('') which is the value of runtime_library_dirs which gets initialized to [] | 07:28 |
| pitti | doko: this whole system_info code is new in 1.10 apparently | 07:30 |
| pitti | doko: I mean the part with the default_runtime_dirs, there's a few other default_*_dirs already | 07:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hi cjwatson a question wrt iulib | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can I steal your merge? if so, can we fakesync it? | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not sure what does it mean :) | 08:53 |
| henrix | pitti: may i have some tests lxc tests re-run please: run-autopkgtest -s trusty -a ppc64el --trigger linux-meta/3.13.0.77.83 lxc | 09:53 |
| pitti | henrix: started | 09:56 |
| henrix | pitti: awesome, thanks! | 09:57 |
| pitti | mdeslaur: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#php5 apparently regresses php-crypt-gpg and php-horde-icalendar, can you please have a look? (the other regressions are already overridden) | 10:48 |
| doko | that blocks the python3.4 removal | 10:50 |
| pitti | cjwatson: do you know a trick how to get the -images tarball from https://launchpad.net/~pitti/+archive/ubuntu/sru-test/+build/8897111 ? | 10:56 |
| pitti | or do PPAs simply not do that? | 10:56 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| jamespage | cking, are the zfs package bits aiming for main inclusion for 16.04? I was pondering enabling support in ceph for zfs but would need libzfslinux-dev in main for that | 11:21 |
| cking | jamespage, we hoping to get it into main, I've filed a MIR, so it's Work-in-Progress | 11:23 |
| === cpaelzer is now known as cpaelzer_afk | ||
| mitya57 | pitti, can you please make qbzr autopkgtest not blocking pygments migration? It's not a regression, but rather something seasonal (https://bugs.debian.org/776188#10) | 11:25 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 776188 in src:qbzr "qbzr: autopkgtest fails since 2015-01-01" [Normal,Open] | 11:25 |
| mitya57 | (and I've just fixed sphinx which was a real regression) | 11:26 |
| Laney | mitya57: wtf at that | 11:30 |
| Laney | but can't it be fixed? | 11:30 |
| mitya57 | I quickly looked at it, and didn't see an easy way to fix it. | 11:31 |
| mitya57 | And I don't have much time today to dig into that code. | 11:31 |
| henrix | pitti: can i also have this please? run-autopkgtest -s wily -a armhf --trigger linux-meta/4.2.0.27.30 flashcache | 11:33 |
| === cpaelzer_afk is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| pitti | henrix: done | 11:45 |
| henrix | pitti: thanks | 11:49 |
| pitti | mitya57: "the tests | 11:56 |
| pitti | fail on months containing J, that is Januarys, Junes and Julys" | 11:56 |
| pitti | ! | 11:56 |
| pitti | mitya57: it's not nearly as good as the infamous "OpenOffice does not print on Tuesdays" bug, but still fun :) | 11:57 |
| mitya57 | :) | 11:57 |
| pitti | mitya57: but the sphinx regression is really recent (it started failing on the new pygments), so that needs looking into | 11:59 |
| mitya57 | pitti, I've uploaded new sphinx fixing the issue | 11:59 |
| pitti | mitya57: ah great! I hinted qbzr | 12:00 |
| mitya57 | Thanks! | 12:00 |
| mdeslaur | pitti: yes, I'll look today (php5 migration failure) | 12:04 |
| pitti | mdeslaur: thanks | 12:04 |
| pitti | cjwatson: unping; the build log plus local build are sufficient | 12:13 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: Feel free to steal my iulib merge, don't mind what you do with it after that | 13:20 |
| quadrisp1o | pitti, no need to say that I trust you, so next time on libmtp you want to fix something, just fix it :) | 13:21 |
| pitti | quadrisp1o: ok :) | 13:21 |
| quadrisp1o | feel free to add yourself to Uploaders | 13:21 |
| pitti | quadrisp1o: we don't need an upload just for this, but good to know that we don't have a permanent delta because of this now | 13:22 |
| cjwatson | pitti: I don't think you can get the tarball as such, but it's unpacked and published to your PPA in the usual place - http://ppa.launchpad.net/pitti/sru-test/ubuntu/dists/trusty/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu318.34/images/ | 13:23 |
| pitti | cjwatson: oh! I guess that was too obvious, thanks! | 13:23 |
| tjaalton | doko: hi, llvm 3.8-rc1 got released, do you know if sylvestre plans to work on it soon? | 13:30 |
| doko | tjaalton, no | 13:31 |
| tjaalton | doko: ok, I'll ask him | 13:31 |
| doko | ta | 13:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cjwatson, question: the delta is now dropped, unfortunately the version naming is strange 0.4+is+0.3-3ubuntu2 | 13:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so I don't think I can sync | 13:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | do you have any advice? just rename the last entry and upload? | 13:32 |
| pitti | apw: do you still remember what we meant in bug 1497291? | 13:34 |
| tjaalton | doko: turns out it's already uploaded to experimental, but in NEW | 13:34 |
| ubottu | bug 1497291 in Auto Package Testing "britney is requesting/reporting test results for reverse-depends architectures even when used in forward context" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1497291 | 13:34 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: I would probably apply the same changes so that it's effectively in sync and call it 0.4+is+0.3-3ubuntu3; not much else we can do until the version in Debian increases to something past ours | 13:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks, I was wondering about epoch in debian and sync :) | 13:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | anyhow, I just changed the last changelog entry and uploaded | 13:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 13:35 |
| apw | pitti, i am reading that as when running a test for foo which triggers linux-keystone that it triggers tests for all of foo's architectures not all of linux-keystones' | 13:36 |
| rbasak | LocutusOfBorg: an epoch would be permenant. At least this way the mess is temporary. | 13:36 |
| apw | pitti, but ... it is rather vague | 13:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbasak, sure, I really don't like epoch too | 13:36 |
| * LocutusOfBorg never bumped an epoch | 13:36 | |
| pitti | apw: hm, I thought that got fixed a long time ago already | 13:38 |
| apw | pitti, may well so | 13:40 |
| pitti | apw: the bug says that http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/trusty/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-keystone was wrong, but it currently looks right, doesn't it? | 13:40 |
| apw | pitti, yep looks right. i'd be inclined to call it fixed as we'll never know anyhow now :)( | 13:40 |
| apw | :) | 13:40 |
| pitti | apw: ack | 13:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | question, an ubuntu delta about renaming library for gcc5 transition ( pitti ), can be dropped after wily? | 13:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | package: libclaw | 13:46 |
| pitti | LocutusOfBorg: no, after xenial only, as we need to support trusty → xenial upgrades | 13:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if not: can I steal your merge? | 13:47 |
| pitti | LocutusOfBorg: please do steal, thanks! | 13:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :D | 13:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks to you | 13:47 |
| * tsimonq2 wonders if he should repost wht he said yesterday, following up on some FTBFS issues... | 13:48 | |
| pitti | apw: FYI, we have a slight technical hitch (aka "we kill all instances"): http://paste.ubuntu.com/14671742/ | 13:48 |
| apw | pitti, that doesn't look good | 13:49 |
| apw | pitti, any idea what is triggering that ? | 13:49 |
| pitti | Laney: let's move here, to have everyone on the same channel | 13:49 |
| pitti | apw: I figure apt pinning + dist-upgrade again, let me check | 13:49 |
| apw | pitti, oh it might not be a real issue, one we are generating in the test environment | 13:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | pitti, it can be syncd | 13:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I missed that debian renamed the library too | 13:50 |
| pitti | LocutusOfBorg: heh, they better did; nice | 13:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was looking at the latest changelog entry, missing the previous one | 13:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and complaining about "why the hell the patch doesn't apply", when I discovered it was already there :p | 13:51 |
| pitti | LocutusOfBorg: someone (you?) already synced | 13:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | me | 13:51 |
| tsimonq2 | After using an schroot, is there anything I have to do to clean it? | 13:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | as you have noted, I'm merging all the libpng-dev packages from debian | 13:52 |
| tsimonq2 | For building a package | 13:52 |
| pitti | apw, Laney: yep, --apt-pocket=proposed=src:init-system-helpers does that; yay apt pinning being too clumsy :/ | 13:54 |
| pitti | I'll disable it for a moment, let the i-s-h tests run, and re-enable it | 13:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mterry, can I steal your xaos merge? | 13:55 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: doesn't need an epoch; the version in experimental is already greater than what we have, so we should be fine when it gets to unstable | 13:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cjwatson, yes, sure | 13:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | BTW the revert was back to oneiric | 13:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | when a reverse-dependency that now disappeared was needing the old version | 13:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so I presume without it, we might also push experimental to unstable and force-sync | 13:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I prefer to concentrate to fixing libpng | 13:56 |
| mterry | LocutusOfBorg, sure thanks | 13:56 |
| apw | pitti, phew (in a way) | 13:57 |
| pitti | dear apt: pinning priority of 800 does not mean "OMG stay away from it like the plague!" | 13:57 |
| pitti | Laney: so *now* it will test everything with kernel 4.4 too (without apt pinning, I mean) :) | 13:58 |
| Laney | pitti: heh | 13:59 |
| Laney | pitti: there's a forced lockstep upgrade of i-s-h and sysvinit-utils | 14:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xaos can be syncd | 14:00 |
| Laney | I guess this explodes apt | 14:00 |
| pitti | Laney: right | 14:00 |
| pitti | Laney: well, it's fine without pinning, but if you say "prefer the i-s-h binaries from -proposed" it doesn't grok that it should use proposed for the necessary dependencies too | 14:01 |
| pitti | Laney: it seems like it's either "ish binary deps are completely satisfiable in -release" or "I refuse" | 14:01 |
| apw | pitti, i thought that when things failed with pinning it fell back to enabling -proposed en-toto ? | 14:01 |
| pitti | apw: yes, but that's the early dist-upgrade | 14:01 |
| apw | oh heh only there, ok | 14:02 |
| pitti | way before installing the test deps | 14:02 |
| pitti | and it doesn't technically fail | 14:02 |
| pitti | it "just" removes openss.. | 14:02 |
| pitti | h | 14:02 |
| apw | pitti, hehe that must be a little bit disruptive to results gathering :) | 14:03 |
| pitti | since apt pinning is so completely useless for every nontrivial case, I wonder if there's a different approach that we can take | 14:03 |
| apw | pitti, we know the versions of them don't we, can we not install foo=version | 14:04 |
| pitti | perhaps, first install everything from -release, *then* add -proposed apt source, and install everything again | 14:04 |
| pitti | then it should not upgrade stuff unless dependencies mandate it | 14:04 |
| apw | that sounds feasable | 14:04 |
| pitti | I don't want to rewrite apt's resolver, no | 14:04 |
| pitti | just make it less greedy with picking stuff from -proposed, or alternatively fix the apt pinning to actually fall back from 900 -proposed to 800 -release | 14:05 |
| * apw doesn't even want to look at apt's resolver :) | 14:05 | |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| pitti | that sounds like a nice thing to look at tomorrow morning in the train | 14:05 |
| tsimonq2 | in FTBFS, libsecret is failing due to gjs not being in main but Universe, and there is no Mir bug filed...should *I* file one, not being the maintainer? | 14:06 |
| apw | i think upgrade from !-proposed, install triggers, add -proposed, install triggers would do pretty well, and better than it does now | 14:06 |
| apw | pitti, and remember thats not -release but -updates in the older releases | 14:07 |
| pitti | yeah, but same thing in this context | 14:07 |
| Laney | I guess that would improve things, yeah | 14:08 |
| tsimonq2 | same situation with appstream-glib depending on libgcab-dev... | 14:08 |
| pitti | apw: so in the second step we would iterate over all binaries of the triggers, check if they are instaslled, and if so, apt-get install them again | 14:08 |
| Laney | The other thing is to move testing to another phase after _output | 14:08 |
| pitti | (as we don't want to blindly install all binaries of the trigger -- that might not even be possible) | 14:08 |
| Laney | and do it per transaction | 14:08 |
| pitti | I wonder how that would fail with library transitions | 14:09 |
| apw | pitti, yeah good point | 14:09 |
| pitti | and for binNEW, or even source NEW, etc. (the trigger might not even *be* in teh release yeat) | 14:09 |
| pitti | yet | 14:09 |
| pitti | so, it's not going to become any easier (the contrary), just perhaps more useful | 14:09 |
| Laney | (Then you test the set of things you're trying to migrate) | 14:10 |
| pitti | Laney: "move testing to another phase after _output" → can't parse, sorry | 14:10 |
| Laney | excuses -> output -> test -> migrate | 14:10 |
| Laney | i.e. test things after they become a candidatge | 14:10 |
| pitti | Laney: ah, to avoid running into uninstallability | 14:11 |
| Laney | because britney has then worked out the transactions already | 14:11 |
| Laney | and those are the units of migration | 14:11 |
| pitti | interesting idea | 14:11 |
| Laney | so you'd make a fake Packages file or something which represents those | 14:11 |
| pitti | Laney: or we could pin all binaries involved in that transaction | 14:32 |
| pitti | Laney: which should work again, as that ought to be a closed set | 14:33 |
| pitti | Laney: sounds elegant, but we would then start depending on being able to download update_output.txt from everywhere | 14:33 |
| pitti | and more importantly, depending on that it is actually current | 14:33 |
| === coreycb` is now known as coreycb | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | sarnold, can I sync flogwatch? your security update seems icluded in the debian version (new release) | 15:05 |
| Laney | pitti: Hm? I imagine you'd feed the requests from britney still, just at a later phase | 15:22 |
| Laney | pitti: can't use update_output now as the packages we're testing aren't candidates yet so they don't appear there | 15:22 |
| pitti | Laney: oh right, you mean britney will forward the set of packages as test parameter, so that the worker can just add them to --apt-pocket=proposed=src:a,src:b, etc. | 15:23 |
| pitti | so, this is quite a heavy piece of reengineering, but sounds interesting indeed | 15:24 |
| Laney | pitti: I would ditch the pinning and just make a fake release as this is more robust | 15:24 |
| Laney | but it might work either way | 15:25 |
| Laney | definitely a lot of reworking | 15:25 |
| pitti | Laney: oh, you mean: apt-get update, create fake _Packages from the complete proposed_Packages and the sources we want, and replace -proposed apt source withthat | 15:26 |
| pitti | that doesn't work, as dependencies from the ones "we want" might also just be in -proposed | 15:26 |
| Laney | pitti: britney is saying that it wants to remove the -release package and all its binaries and put the -proposed one(s) and all its binaries in | 15:26 |
| pitti | so for that we need the britney "give me the complet set" features | 15:26 |
| Laney | yes | 15:26 |
| pitti | Laney: but once we have that, apt pinning works equally well :) | 15:26 |
| Laney | that's what update_output knows | 15:26 |
| Laney | pitti: I don't think that's the most important part of the proposal, so whichever way you like | 15:28 |
| Laney | The other way feels more like "this is the state we are trying to mutate -release into" to me | 15:28 |
| Laney | no possibility of an unclean environment | 15:29 |
| Laney | but, doesn't matter that much | 15:29 |
| * Laney goes to write weekly report | 15:29 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitya57, can you please merge tracker from debian? | 15:33 |
| mitya57 | LocutusOfBorg, sure | 15:52 |
| smoser | hey, do we have a plan for signed firefox addons ? | 15:58 |
| smoser | just upgraded and see that 'Uubntu Online Accounts', 'Unity Desktop Integration', 'Unity Websites integration' have all been disabled. | 15:59 |
| smoser | in addition to pentadactyl which i actually care about (https://github.com/5digits/dactyl/issues/99) | 15:59 |
| mitya57 | LocutusOfBorg, done | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitya57, <3 | 16:06 |
| smoser | barry, we are close https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/1538198 | 16:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1538198 in python-defaults (Ubuntu) "python in xenial cloud image" [Undecided,New] | 16:19 |
| smoser | no real digging yet as to what is getting the remaining bits pulled in. | 16:19 |
| barry | smoser: cool, thanks. i'm subscribed now. | 16:21 |
| slangasek | pitti: hi, re: bug #1537211, your changelog makes it sound like you're dropping the attachment of /var/log/udev rather than replacing it with attaching the udevadm info output? | 16:27 |
| ubottu | bug 1537211 in libmtp (Debian) "clean up /var/log/udev.log" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537211 | 16:27 |
| pitti | slangasek: attaching udevadm dump already has happened for a long time (UdevDb: field) | 16:28 |
| slangasek | pitti: hah ok | 16:34 |
| slangasek | pitti: thanks :) | 16:34 |
| === cpaelzer is now known as cpaelzer_afk | ||
| smoser | lamont, around ? | 17:47 |
| smoser | you're postfix maintainer... postfix seems to be what is pulling in python in cloud image http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.xenial/cloud-image.depends | 17:47 |
| lamont | smoser: sigh | 17:47 |
| smoser | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/1538198 | 17:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1538198 in python-defaults (Ubuntu) "python in xenial cloud image" [Undecided,New] | 17:47 |
| lamont | otp | 17:47 |
| smoser | its Recommends. | 17:47 |
| smoser | i'll poke a bit, but if you know why, and if we could do anything, that'd be good. | 17:48 |
| lamont | smoser: looks like https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538198 and some scripts that need to be taught about python3, and a change in Recommends | 18:13 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1538198 in postfix (Ubuntu) "python in xenial cloud image" [High,Confirmed] | 18:13 |
| lamont | bah | 18:13 |
| lamont | smoser: rather, * Recommend: python for postfix-add-* scripts. <-- that change | 18:13 |
| lamont | so postfix-add-* scripts need to learn about pytho3n | 18:14 |
| smoser | lamont, yeah. see bug, i posted a hack/quick 10 minute try | 18:14 |
| lamont | I expect to have some time on the plane this weekend, which is doubtlessly not soon enough for your happiness. | 18:14 |
| smoser | well, thats fine with me. we're down to just that in the image to my knowledge. | 18:15 |
| lamont | oh, cool | 18:15 |
| * lamont adds it to his plane-fun | 18:15 | |
| lamont | though, tbf, it's more airport-fun, I plan to sleep on at least the first leg | 18:15 |
| smoser | if you want, you can give my patch a try. i just verified running 'python3 <path>.py' worked for everything. | 18:15 |
| lamont | smoser: uh... you do the ubuntu1 version and I'll merge it upstream? | 18:16 |
| lamont | bounus if the hacked file runs under both :D | 18:16 |
| smoser | well, want to test it . i just verrified compiles | 18:17 |
| smoser | SHIP IT! | 18:17 |
| rbasak | I think "mk-sbuild sid" may be broken on Xenial. Not confirmed fresh yet. /dev/null inside the chroot ends up 644. Anyone else seen this? | 18:23 |
| rbasak | "mk-sbuild xenial" is fine. | 18:24 |
| === cpaelzer_afk is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| mdeslaur | xnox: did you get nodejs to build on s390x? | 18:34 |
| smoser | lamont, anoterh patch there now. this one passes pylint's checker | 18:37 |
| lamont | heh | 18:39 |
| lamont | thanks | 18:39 |
| lamont | I wonder, does launchpad bugs have anything like debian's bts (cli) for offline bug processing and perusal? thinking "wut? no..." | 18:40 |
| rbasak | Launchpad has an API, so you could write a CLI I guess, if nobody's done that. | 18:42 |
| rbasak | You can change bug statuses via email. | 18:42 |
| lamont | rbasak: the question was one of totally not wanting to write it, just wanting to be able to read the bug while wifi-disconneted. :/ | 18:43 |
| lamont | so no worries, I guess | 18:43 |
| mdeslaur | lamont: what's this "offline" thing you talk about? | 18:44 |
| lamont | mdeslaur: sometimes, it's my life. :( | 18:44 |
| rbasak | mdeslaur: says the security guy :-P | 18:45 |
| lamont | rbasak: to the security guy :D | 18:45 |
| mdeslaur | you don't get security updates when you're offline! :P | 18:47 |
| rbasak | Tell me that when you show me a CVE that affects my offline single-user machine :) | 18:47 |
| * rbasak half expects one to exist | 18:48 | |
| Odd_Bloke | CVE-2016-0123: rbasak left his front door unlocked | 18:48 |
| ubottu | ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-0123) | 18:48 |
| lamont | lol | 18:52 |
| === southey is now known as foxtrot | ||
| mdeslaur | hehehe | 18:55 |
| tedg | hallyn: So if I add a dep on libpam-cgm, should that be a "libpam-cgm | libpam-cgfs" ? | 19:15 |
| hallyn | tedg: or rather libpam-cgfs | libpam-cgm | 19:17 |
| tedg | K | 19:18 |
| rbasak | It's debootstrap that's broken I think. It now creates /dev/null as 644 because it runs mknod directly and doesn't set permissions. | 19:26 |
| * rbasak files a bug. | 19:26 | |
| sarnold | maybe try with umask 0 to see if that unblocks you? | 19:27 |
| rbasak | sarnold: I'm just reverting the upstream commit that caused the regression - http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debootstrap.git/commit/?id=5518b79792dd93a416464c0744b87eb1a32ff770 | 19:49 |
| rbasak | I just patched the functions file in reverse, and I think I'm good for now. | 19:49 |
| sarnold | rbasak: hah, nice fix.. | 19:54 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | rbasak: so I've got a question | 20:14 |
| rbasak | Pharaoh_Atem: o/ | 20:15 |
| rbasak | Sure | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I've got working dep8 tests for php7.0 now | 20:15 |
| rbasak | \o/ | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | and I've even added an fpm one | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | but my problem is how to handle adding the php-fpm httpd config to the php package | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | because right now, the php package does not provide one | 20:15 |
| nacc | Pharaoh_Atem: heya! | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | nacc: yo! | 20:15 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I saw your post on LP | 20:16 |
| rbasak | If I understand you correctly, you can just drop it into the test | 20:16 |
| rbasak | You don't need the package to provide one specifically; the test can have a local copy of what it needs. | 20:16 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | well, the config doesn't exist _at all_ in the php package, so there's no a2enconf or whatever for making php-fpm receive httpd input | 20:16 |
| rbasak | You have some way of making it work, right? | 20:17 |
| rbasak | If you can script that way, then the test is just that script. | 20:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I wrote a config file and dropped it onto my local xenial install | 20:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | but it might make sense to actually provide it as something people could use, too | 20:17 |
| rbasak | Sure | 20:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | that's what I need your advice on | 20:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I don't know how to go about this | 20:17 |
| rbasak | Until it provides it, you can write the test as you like. Either "cat > /foo <<EOT\nconfig_here\nEOT" within the script, or ship the file in debian/tests/foo.conf and have the script copy it in. | 20:18 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | ah | 20:18 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | well, then, I guess I'll do that | 20:18 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I'll prepare a git patch for you in a bit | 20:18 |
| rbasak | The test should declare "needs-root breaks-testbed" and the dep8 runner will do the right thing. | 20:18 |
| rbasak | (revert the VM or container before running the next test, etc) | 20:18 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | ah | 20:18 |
| rbasak | If it makes sense for the package to ship some configs, then that'd probably be best to send in a patch to Ondrej, and coordinate with him on what he thinks is suitable, etc. | 20:19 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
| ximion1 | robert_ancell: you really want to MIR AppStream itself: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/appstream | 20:51 |
| robert_ancell | ximion1, ta, will do that one too | 20:52 |
| ximion1 | if Protobuf and Qt5Core are in main for Ubuntu, it should have no dependencies on stuff which isn't already there | 20:52 |
| ximion1 | let me know if if you need any help :) | 20:52 |
| juliank | Meanwhile APT 1.2/1.2.1 and squashfs-tools are still in depwait due to lz4 MIR bug 1531923 | 21:07 |
| ubottu | bug 1531923 in lz4 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] lz4" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1531923 | 21:07 |
| xnox | mdeslaur, nope. it's strange it build on debian but not on ubuntu. Even if I, e.g. disable pie too. And i don't see anything obvious. I shall engage upstream on that. | 21:50 |
| xnox | mdeslaur, well porters in question. | 21:50 |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!