| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| vayan | Can we still find meizu mx4 in Europe ? | 07:12 |
|---|---|---|
| MCMic | Is there a gesture for closing the displayed application? I know I can switch by swiping from the right but I need two actions to close it. Is there a shortcut I’m not aware about? | 07:49 |
| lotuspsychje | http://news.softpedia.com/news/here-s-what-s-new-in-the-ubuntu-touch-ota-9-update-for-ubuntu-phones-499419.shtml | 07:59 |
| lotuspsychje | lookin good guys! | 07:59 |
| zzarr | lotuspsychje, very nice, very nice indeed | 08:11 |
| zzarr | I wonder.... if the MX4 lacks the hardware to output MHL, why is this here? https://github.com/meizuosc/m75/tree/master/mediatek/kernel/drivers/mhl/driver/mhl_tx_drv | 08:12 |
| lotuspsychje | zzarr: really dont know mate, i have bq myself.. | 08:13 |
| zzarr | no need to tell me that it haven't been updated lately, I can see that my self | 08:13 |
| zzarr | the reason I'm so interested in connecting my MX4 to an external display is that... yea, it's about 2 3 times faster than my stationary computer | 08:15 |
| zzarr | I think it's the same with the BQ devices (lacks MHL) | 08:23 |
| * tathhu needs working bluetooth in nexus7, then it's time to say goodbye for a laptop | 08:34 | |
| tathhu | or that rumored bq tablet.. | 08:35 |
| tathhu | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluetooth-touch/+bug/1502524 | 08:36 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1502524 in bluetooth-touch (Ubuntu) "Bluetooth - Ubuntu Touch" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 08:36 |
| robin-hero | sil2100, hi, I read your mail last night, and you wrote there will be no delay for OTA-9, is this mean that the OTA-9 will be release tomorrow? | 08:49 |
| sil2100 | robin-hero: hey! Yes, that is the current expectation :) | 08:49 |
| robin-hero | thanks, this would be awesome \o/ :) | 08:50 |
| JamesTait | Good morning all! Happy Tuesday, and happy Australia Day! 😃 | 09:37 |
| V99 | and tomorrow ota :D | 09:46 |
| lotuspsychje | yayyy | 09:54 |
| lotuspsychje | you guys rocknroll! | 09:54 |
| victor_bq | Hi all! | 09:57 |
| victor_bq | quick question =) | 09:58 |
| victor_bq | I'm in rc 242 | 09:58 |
| victor_bq | with krillin and I found something strange in camera | 09:58 |
| victor_bq | in camera settings, when selecting 4:3 and 16:9 MP shown are incorrect | 09:59 |
| victor_bq | I think | 09:59 |
| davmor2 | victor_bq: will take a look, thanks for highlighting | 10:02 |
| victor_bq | davmor2 great! Would it be better if I look for it on Launchpad and report it if it's not reported yet¿ :) | 10:03 |
| teve | on my vegetahd only option available is 16:9 (19.5MP) | 10:05 |
| victor_bq | that's wrong too | 10:06 |
| victor_bq | krillin has 8Mpx sensor and vegeta 13Mpx | 10:06 |
| victor_bq | u're in rc to ? | 10:06 |
| teve | yep | 10:07 |
| victor_bq | would be great having that Mpx haha interpolated =) | 10:08 |
| davmor2 | victor_bq: hmmmm so just tested the rc image on krillin, I get too different sized images 2448x4352 and 3168x4224 | 10:14 |
| robin-hero | for me N4 shows 4:3 (8MP) on rc-proposed | 10:14 |
| davmor2 | victor_bq: is it that the MP reported are just incorrect | 10:20 |
| jibel | Kaleo, ^ do you know why the MPx reported by the camera do not correspond to the resolution of the sensors? (8Mpx and 5Mpx) | 10:29 |
| jibel | on krillin | 10:29 |
| Kaleo | jibel, yes | 10:30 |
| Kaleo | jibel, for krillin there is 2 resolutions for each sensor | 10:31 |
| Kaleo | jibel, the native one and the "interpolated" one | 10:31 |
| Kaleo | jibel, the second one is sold by BQ as a feature | 10:31 |
| Kaleo | jibel, and we made the decision to keep it | 10:31 |
| jibel | victor_bq, ^ does it answer your question? | 10:31 |
| jibel | thanks Kaleo | 10:33 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, http://www.bq.com/es/aquaris-e4-5 "8Mpx - 13Mpx interpolados (Dual flash y autofocus)" "5Mpx - 8Mpx interpolados" | 10:36 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, maybe it's a little sparsely sourced, if you have more info about it, let me know | 10:36 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: so one question, 2448x4352 I assume is the 8MP mode if you take only the 1000's but is just of 10MP in reality is that a normal thing? Do the manufacturers just round down? | 10:39 |
| davmor2 | s/of/over | 10:39 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, where do you get the 2448x4352 ? | 10:41 |
| victor_bq | Kaleo, the specs about interpolated MPx in E4.5 are only in Android FW as far as I know, as well as the specs in E5 | 10:42 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: from the image data that I took in the different modes | 10:42 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, I'm going to guess you are using the default settings of the camera, that you did not touch the aspect ratio in the bottom edge panel? | 10:42 |
| victor_bq | If Ubuntu camera app has MPX interpolated implemented that's ok | 10:42 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, right, that's 16:9, the default | 10:43 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, which is unrelated to the announced resolution | 10:43 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: 2448x4352 and 3168x4224 were the too different sizes in EOG | 10:43 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, if you select 4:3 in the settings of the camera you'll get the "announced" 13.4MP | 10:43 |
| davmor2 | two even | 10:43 |
| victor_bq | but the HW camera specs are 8MPx rear and 5 MPx front | 10:43 |
| victor_bq | for E4.5 | 10:43 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, right, since we are using part of the Android FW for the camera, I figured we could use the same interpolated resolutions | 10:44 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, I'm not sure actually | 10:44 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, would need to speak with the BQ engineer that did the interpolation bit | 10:44 |
| Kaleo | victor_bq, if you have his/her contact | 10:44 |
| victor_bq | I guess I can get it for you ;) | 10:44 |
| Kaleo | :=) | 10:44 |
| victor_bq | give me some minutes =) | 10:45 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, you see the aspect ratio setting right? you know which one I mean? | 10:45 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: yes, and 4:3 (13.4MP) which match the interop spec, and then 16:9 (10.4) which doesn't should be 8 and 13 according to the spec right? But I assume we are giving the resolution that we are receiving from the file ie 10.4 and 13.x right | 10:47 |
| davmor2 | 10.7 even | 10:47 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: our idea of resolution seems to match the image not the spec given, and on the front camera you have 16:9 (8.3MP) which again is probably correct by the image taken but is in the spec at 5 MP | 10:49 |
| victor_bq | davmor2, that's make more sense to me now :) | 10:50 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, no | 10:51 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, it's way simpler | 10:52 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: oh okay | 10:52 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, 4:3 is the native aspect ratio of the back camera sensor | 10:52 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, the obvious thing to do is to use that sensor at the maximum resolution allowed with an aspect ratio of 4:3, which should be 8MPx | 10:53 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, now, because of the interpolation feature, it turns out this max resolution is 13MPx | 10:53 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, which is exactly what you get today when you set the camera setting to 4:3 | 10:53 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: ah so the 16:9 which is the only mode available on the front camera is in interpolation mode then right | 10:53 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, and by 13MPx I mean 13.4MPx | 10:54 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, right | 10:54 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, now the front camera sensor is a bit peculiar | 10:54 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, it's native resolution has an aspect ratio of 16:9 IIRC | 10:54 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, and as you said we use the max resolution available with that aspect ratio, the interporlated resolution | 10:55 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, now the reason why we sometimes have a second different aspect ratio selected by default | 10:55 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, is that we want the camera to fill up the entire screen (which in case of BQ's is 16:9) | 10:55 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: that clears that up then thanks :) | 10:56 |
| Kaleo | :)à | 10:56 |
| victor_bq | thanks kaleo for the clarification :) | 10:57 |
| davmor2 | Kaleo: on a plus side our reported MP's match the image sizes so as far as I am concerned we are all good, I just didn't understand the discrepancy between Size reported on site vs actual size :) | 10:59 |
| Kaleo | davmor2, ah right :) | 11:00 |
| * mcphail thinks a camera should take photos in 6:4 ratio by default | 11:01 | |
| davmor2 | mcphail: wash you mouth out with soapy water ;) | 11:04 |
| mcphail | davmor2: I'm serious. Any other resolution for photos is a pain. It's the de facto standard | 11:06 |
| mcphail | Every print shop and every frame will have a 6" x 4" variant | 11:07 |
| mcphail | 16x9 is becoming more common, I'll admit, but isn't what your granny would buy | 11:08 |
| davmor2 | mcphail: that's not a 6:4 ratio though, that's a 3:2 ratio :P | 11:09 |
| mcphail | :) | 11:09 |
| davmor2 | mcphail: and technically 3:2 didn't match the old film ratio either which I'm sure was 4:3 to make it commercially viable for the film and camera industry of the time :) | 11:12 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| mcphail | davmor2: no - fame size on 35mm film was 24x36mm I think | 11:16 |
| mcphail | *frame | 11:16 |
| mcphail | Same as full-frame digital cameras today | 11:18 |
| mcphail | cine 35mm was always 4:3, but still was 6:4 (or 3:2 if you must) | 11:19 |
| sil2100 | dpm: ping :) | 11:38 |
| dpm | hey | 11:39 |
| davmor2 | sneaks up on mzanetti in a different channel and BOO! | 12:53 |
| mzanetti | :) | 12:53 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| sil2100 | mariogrip: hey! | 13:04 |
| mariogrip | sil2100: Hi! | 13:15 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| zirafinu | hi every one i am looking for a neat swype keyboard for touchscreens under linux | 13:42 |
| zirafinu | i heard that ubuntu-touch has one but i am not sure where to find its name | 13:43 |
| davmor2 | zirafinu: ubuntu-keyboard but it isn't swype style yet that is to come | 13:43 |
| zirafinu | ahh ok sorry to bother you | 13:44 |
| mardy | davidcalle: hi! I've got a newbie question: how do I build the click for a scope from the command line? | 14:14 |
| mardy | davidcalle: if I run "make install", all files are installed on / | 14:14 |
| davidcalle | mardy: I really don't know, I've only used the sdk to work with clicks, pstolowski ? ^ | 14:21 |
| pstolowski | mardy, davidcalle run 'click-buddy' from the top-level dir of the scope source | 14:21 |
| * mardy tries | 14:22 | |
| davidcalle | Oooh, this is neat | 14:23 |
| * mardy hugs pstolowski | 14:23 | |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: I am lloking to start developing apps for the Ubuntu Phone...I see you use the SDK so I wanted to ping you. Are there any good guides that you know of? | 14:25 |
| tsimonq2 | *looking | 14:25 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: what language are you into? | 14:27 |
| jgdx | seb128, hey, you around? If I build-dep on libgnome-desktop-3-dev, any way of figuring out what the binary depends on? | 14:28 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: what can I choose from? | 14:28 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: there is a great opportunity right now if you are into JS | 14:28 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: I'm fluent :) | 14:28 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: nice! https://developer.ubuntu.com/showdown/ | 14:28 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh! I heard about this! | 14:29 |
| seb128 | jgdx, apt-cache show <binary>? | 14:29 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: (great opportunity in the sense "stuff to win" :) ) | 14:29 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: what if I don't have an app idea? :P | 14:29 |
| tsimonq2 | :D | 14:29 |
| seb128 | jgdx, but if you want indirect depends easiest is to install it in a pbuilder or such | 14:29 |
| jgdx | seb128, rather, I want to know what I am supposed to put in the binary section of debian/control.. | 14:30 |
| jgdx | seb128, installing my uss deb right now produses dependency errors | 14:30 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: there is a live Q&A about this contest on thursday, I'm pretty sure live commenters on IRC will come up with suggestions :) | 14:30 |
| seb128 | jgdx, sorry but I'm not sure to follow | 14:31 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: well I am a teen so for me to participate it would have to be late UTC :) | 14:31 |
| seb128 | jgdx, what sort of errors? | 14:31 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: when is it? | 14:31 |
| jgdx | seb128, that makes two of us. Let me try again: I've added libgnome-desktop-3-dev as a build dep in System Settings. Trying to install that .deb gives me these [1] errors. [1] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14671976/ | 14:32 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: 17 UTC | 14:32 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: blog post incoming today with more details about it. But even if you miss it, it will be recorded. | 14:33 |
| seb128 | jgdx, oh, use apt | 14:33 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: ahh okay, thanks :) | 14:33 |
| jgdx | seb128, and trying to install libgnome-desktop-3-10 gives another dep error, that I need to install gnome-desktop3-data. I can install both fine, but do both have to be in debian/control for the binary? | 14:33 |
| seb128 | dpkg doesn't resolve depends | 14:33 |
| seb128 | no | 14:33 |
| seb128 | just list what you need | 14:33 |
| seb128 | apt takes care of resolving the depends | 14:33 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: I might participate :D | 14:34 |
| jgdx | seb128, aah. Thanks, seb. The -dev package deps on all of that. | 14:34 |
| seb128 | jgdx, yw! | 14:35 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: can I put my app on Github while I am working on it, or does it have to be private code? and when does it end? | 14:35 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: sure, that's up to you :) It ends february 29th | 14:42 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: ok, I was just making sure that it wasn't against the rules | 14:42 |
| edude03 | Hello everyone - sorry if this question has been asked a million time, but is it possible to build ubuntu touch on the latest AOSP or does it have to be the 4.2.2 branch? | 14:43 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: can I work with a team? | 14:46 |
| tsimonq2 | davidcalle: as in, is it against the rules? | 14:47 |
| davidcalle | tsimonq2: sure, it can be a team entry if you are fine with splitting prizes if you win :) | 15:00 |
| === boiko__ is now known as boiko | ||
| peto | hi, why i cant unlock my N7000? can you help me? | 19:32 |
| _Sponge | QUESTION: If I buy this Nexus7,2013 4G device and put Ubuntu Touch on it, can I use it as a Wifi Hotspot ? (Noob question) | 20:24 |
| _Sponge | Here's the device: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Google-Nexus-7-2013-32GB-WiFi-LTE-Black-Unlocked-Android-6-0-1-Marshmallow-/161957511931 | 20:25 |
| _Sponge | popey, ping | 20:27 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| _Sponge | still here, waiting. | 20:32 |
| pmcgowan | _Sponge, yes that should work although suport for that device may not be extended much longer | 20:37 |
| pmcgowan | official support that is | 20:37 |
| _Sponge | pmcgowan: Should I wait for the convergence phone for a real 4G wifi Hotspot phone then ? Just to be sure of the support side of things ? | 20:47 |
| pmcgowan | _Sponge, a newer device would be better as thats near end of life | 20:48 |
| pmcgowan | and that was always a reference not a true OEM product | 20:48 |
| _Sponge | pmcgowan: Your probably right as this website : | 20:51 |
| _Sponge | https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/ubuntu-for-devices/devices/ | 20:51 |
| _Sponge | says nothing for "4G" device side of things for the Nexus 7 4G. | 20:51 |
| _Sponge | (2013) that is. | 20:52 |
| _Sponge | pmcgowan: I'm waiting for the "Mir Integration Launch" when I think 4K phone shall be coming along nicely, I think ... | 20:54 |
| _Sponge | I shall be a convergence phone, | 20:54 |
| _Sponge | multi-boot it with Android & Ubuntu ... | 20:54 |
| _Sponge | and add my Android apps appropriately. | 20:55 |
| * mcphail thinks life is too short for a dual-boot phone | 20:56 | |
| _Sponge | Do you think the new Phone will run Android aswell ? | 21:01 |
| mcphail | I'd hope not. Why would I want precious disk space used by android? | 21:02 |
| popey | _Sponge, pong | 21:03 |
| _Sponge | popey, It's pretty much sorted now - just wanna know if the 4G element of the Nexus 7 2013 was fully operational as a wifi hotspot ? yur thoughts ? | 21:04 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: ping | 21:04 |
| _Sponge | hi mhall119 | 21:05 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: pong | 21:05 |
| mhall119 | hi _Sponge | 21:05 |
| popey | _Sponge, don't think we ever enabled 4G on that | 21:05 |
| popey | hello mhall119 | 21:05 |
| popey | good flight? | 21:05 |
| _Sponge | mhall119: Did Tuesday's Q&A #ubuntuonair go ahead as planned ? | 21:05 |
| mariogrip | How was ubucon popey mhall119? | 21:05 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: would you be available tomorrow for a catchup call with me, dpm and Alfonso at the the normal time? | 21:06 |
| popey | mariogrip, great! Got your mail, need to digest and reply. sorry I haven't yet | 21:06 |
| mhall119 | popey: yup, how was your flight? | 21:06 |
| popey | super | 21:06 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: Yes, that's perfect :) | 21:06 |
| _Sponge | popey, Someone was saying that support could reach End Of Life soon for that model. Is this correct ? | 21:06 |
| popey | mariogrip, people liked playing with my One Plus One last week ;) | 21:06 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: great | 21:06 |
| popey | _Sponge, which model? | 21:07 |
| _Sponge | N72013 | 21:07 |
| mariogrip | popey: :D | 21:07 |
| popey | _Sponge, news to me | 21:07 |
| _Sponge | ok, fair enough - someone said incorrectly, then. | 21:07 |
| _Sponge | popey, I can't find the Launchjpad bug to enable 4G on the N7-2013 4G model, couldn't lend a hand finding it could you ? | 21:08 |
| popey | Not sure there is even a bug for that | 21:08 |
| _Sponge | thats probably why then. | 21:08 |
| popey | Looks like it might work actually | 21:09 |
| popey | https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg06945.html | 21:09 |
| popey | Don't know if anyone in the company has one of those, so chances are it's not well tested | 21:09 |
| _Sponge | ok, not sure if it'll get all the OTA updates either, but hey ho. | 21:10 |
| mhall119 | I think we only targeted the wifi version of the N7 | 21:11 |
| _Sponge | Hmmm... | 21:11 |
| _Sponge | I should raise a bug, I guess, on Launchpad. | 21:11 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: what's the status on "device alias" implementation? | 21:12 |
| _Sponge | popey, When, probably shall Mir arrive on an OTA update ? | 21:12 |
| popey | eh? | 21:12 |
| popey | Mir is already default on the phone. | 21:13 |
| _Sponge | Mir on the phone. | 21:13 |
| _Sponge | oh ok. | 21:13 |
| _Sponge | sorry :O | 21:13 |
| * _Sponge pokes popey about snapchat on convergence phone :-) | 21:15 | |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| popey | You'd have to ask snapchat | 21:17 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: I haven't spoken to sergiusens or slangasek about it since mentioning it to them last week (on account of UbuCon/SCALE) | 21:20 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: ack | 21:21 |
| _Sponge | mhall119: Did you ask JonoB. about coming onto the Q&A at the UbuCon.us ? | 21:22 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: what's the branch you made for ubuntu-device-flash/ | 21:22 |
| mhall119 | _Sponge: I barely had a change to talk with him actually, I was hoping to chat about many things and just never had the chance | 21:23 |
| mariogrip | https://code.launchpad.net/~mariogrip/ubuntu-system-image/device-alias && https://code.launchpad.net/~mariogrip/goget-ubuntu-touch/device-alias | 21:23 |
| _Sponge | mhall119: Oh nuts. | 21:26 |
| * _Sponge tutts at mhall119 | 21:26 | |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: thanks, I've added them both to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goget-ubuntu-touch/+bug/1464754 and also market it as affecting goget-ubuntu-touch | 21:26 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1464754 in goget-ubuntu-touch (Ubuntu) "Support for Device aliases" [Undecided,New] | 21:26 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: ack | 21:27 |
| mhall119 | mariogrip: are you still working on those branches, or are they ready to be proposed for merging? | 21:28 |
| mariogrip | mhall119: they are ready | 21:31 |
| mcphail | Apparently we're due a new OTA very soon. I'll be sad to see OTA8.5 go. It has been the most stable smartphone experience I've had since the days of Symbian. Well done ladies/gents. | 21:34 |
| k1l_ | you mean its the windows xp from ubuntu touch? :) | 21:35 |
| mcphail | ha! | 21:35 |
| mcphail | k1l_: you know if you say windows xp three times it reinstalls on your computer? | 21:36 |
| k1l_ | hihi | 21:36 |
| mcphail | http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35412892 - and Ubuntu phone sales last year were the biggest in history. Coincidence? I think not ;) | 21:41 |
| k1l_ | hehe | 21:43 |
| _Sponge | popey, Which is the best Nexus-device that has '4G' support with Ubuntu touch ? | 21:49 |
| ahoneybun | _Sponge, Nexus 5? | 21:50 |
| _Sponge | right-oh | 21:50 |
| ahoneybun | only the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 are supported atm | 21:52 |
| dobey | _Sponge: nexus 4 has 4g if you use the old radio from before it was disabled | 21:55 |
| ahoneybun | true | 21:56 |
| edude03 | Does the nexus 5 support convergence with OTA 9? | 21:58 |
| matv1 | _Sponge but you will get poor sound in calls in return if I remember correctly :) | 21:58 |
| ahoneybun | I think the N5 has MHL support | 21:58 |
| edude03 | It does | 21:59 |
| edude03 | I guess that's the only way - no miracast or UDL support I guess | 21:59 |
| dobey | slimport i guess, not mhl | 22:05 |
| dobey | but nexus 5 is not an officially supported device | 22:06 |
| dobey | bluetooth doesn't work on it, so it's going to be hard using the slimport adapter with a bt kb/mouse to demo convergence on a nexus 5 | 22:06 |
| edude03 | rekt | 22:09 |
| edude03 | hmm dobey what version of UT is bluetooth broken in? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bluetooth/TouchBluez5Testing leads me to believe it might work if I use a nightly | 22:11 |
| dobey | it's not "broken" exactly | 22:12 |
| dobey | bluetooth has never worked on the nexus 5 | 22:12 |
| edude03 | hm :/ | 22:15 |
| edude03 | Seems like Canonical and Partners don't want me to have a UT device | 22:15 |
| dobey | the nexus 5 has never been an officially supported device. | 22:16 |
| dobey | the nexus 4 is though | 22:16 |
| edude03 | I know but the nexus 4 is.... 3 years old now? | 22:17 |
| edude03 | I feel like I can't expect much from it / it wouldn't be a good device to demo convergence on | 22:18 |
| ahoneybun | it is a great device for it I think | 22:18 |
| edude03 | If there was something more modern that I could flash I'd pick it up on my home tonigh | 22:18 |
| edude03 | *tonight | 22:19 |
| dobey | you mean like all the existing demos that are running on it? | 22:19 |
| ahoneybun | well all the convergence pics and videos are of the nexus 4 so... | 22:19 |
| dobey | the nexus 5 is 2.25 years old too | 22:20 |
| edude03 | dobey yeah I know but I can't buy the Meizu MX4 anywhere, the BQ 4.5/5 aren't very powerful either, The N7 is too big, the 1+1 doesn't have HDMI out | 22:22 |
| edude03 | The pickings are extremely thin | 22:22 |
| dobey | edude03: the bq 4.5/5 and mx4 don't do mhl either | 22:22 |
| edude03 | Right | 22:22 |
| edude03 | I'd buy a MX4 just to play with if I could find it though | 22:23 |
| dobey | well i've been using a nexus 5 with ubuntu for about 2 years now | 22:24 |
| ahoneybun | god I need bluetooth in my life too much for that | 22:24 |
| dobey | official support would be nice, as would bleutooth, but eh, it works pretty well as a phone | 22:24 |
| edude03 | bluetooth is a necessity for convergence apparently though | 22:25 |
| edude03 | Is 16.04 still based on AOSP 4.2.2 by the way? | 22:25 |
| dobey | i think some people are expecting way more out of having a phone appear on a large screen as a traditional pc interface, than they are going to get | 22:26 |
| dobey | i guess it's 4.4, but yes, it's still 4.x | 22:27 |
| dobey | not 5.x yet | 22:27 |
| edude03 | I'm possibly one of them | 22:27 |
| ahoneybun | the 1+1 port is getting rebased on 5.x I believe | 22:30 |
| ahoneybun | trying to fix the current issues that way | 22:30 |
| dobey | ahoneybun: there's general work to make stuff work on 5.x, because 5.x is needed for 64-bit and various other things | 22:31 |
| ahoneybun | oh | 22:32 |
| dobey | and i guess the cost of 64-bit chips has come down enough that there's a larger market shift to it happening | 22:32 |
| edude03 | hmm | 22:42 |
| edude03 | I wish the CM porting guide was out | 22:43 |
| edude03 | I'd take a stab at it if I knew where to start | 22:43 |
| dobey | what CM porting guide? | 22:43 |
| edude03 | Word around the web is that one is coming one day | 22:45 |
| mcphail | dobey: there is one promised on the AOSP porting guide. Has never appeared, though | 22:46 |
| dobey | oh, well CM is based on AOSP, so i guess it should be pretty obvious what to do there | 22:47 |
| dobey | i don't see what good a secondary guide that says to do the exact same stuff, would be | 22:47 |
| edude03 | same deal | 22:48 |
| edude03 | If I had a device that could run a new version of CM or AOSP (like the nexus 6) there isn't a guide that describes how to go from that to UT | 22:49 |
| dobey | uh, the porting guide describes exactly that | 22:52 |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
| matv1 | popey did you say you have a oneplus one running a ut port? | 23:24 |
| popey | i do | 23:25 |
| matv1 | cool | 23:25 |
| matv1 | who maintains it? | 23:25 |
| matv1 | popey I remember news of it being ported early in 2015. I didnt realize it is still being maintained. Is it up to date? | 23:28 |
| popey | mariogrip maintains it | 23:31 |
| mariogrip | matv1: jup, I'm working on getting the android base to 5.1 | 23:34 |
| matv1 | mariogrip thats pretty neat. | 23:34 |
| matv1 | where do you have the image hosted? | 23:34 |
| mariogrip | http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ | 23:35 |
| mariogrip | http://system-image.ubports.com/ | 23:35 |
| dobey | really? | 23:35 |
| dobey | oh ok | 23:35 |
| mariogrip | The last one | 23:35 |
| dobey | yeah, i was going to say :) | 23:36 |
| mariogrip | Copy pate error :P | 23:36 |
| mariogrip | Paste* | 23:36 |
| matv1 | mariogrip found it, thanks | 23:37 |
| matv1 | I noticed fairphone 2 has same cpu gpu | 23:39 |
| === jonas1 is now known as jgdx | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!