[07:12] <vayan> Can we still find meizu mx4 in Europe ?
[07:49] <MCMic> Is there a gesture for closing the displayed application? I know I can switch by swiping from the right but I need two actions to close it. Is there a shortcut I’m not aware about?
[07:59] <lotuspsychje> http://news.softpedia.com/news/here-s-what-s-new-in-the-ubuntu-touch-ota-9-update-for-ubuntu-phones-499419.shtml
[07:59] <lotuspsychje> lookin good guys!
[08:11] <zzarr> lotuspsychje, very nice, very nice indeed
[08:12] <zzarr> I wonder.... if the MX4 lacks the hardware to output MHL, why is this here? https://github.com/meizuosc/m75/tree/master/mediatek/kernel/drivers/mhl/driver/mhl_tx_drv
[08:13] <lotuspsychje> zzarr: really dont know mate, i have bq myself..
[08:13] <zzarr> no need to tell me that it haven't been updated lately, I can see that my self
[08:15] <zzarr> the reason I'm so interested in connecting my MX4 to an external display is that... yea, it's about 2 3 times faster than my stationary computer
[08:23] <zzarr> I think it's the same with the BQ devices (lacks MHL)
[08:34]  * tathhu needs working bluetooth in nexus7, then it's time to say goodbye for a laptop
[08:35] <tathhu> or that rumored bq tablet..
[08:36] <tathhu> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluetooth-touch/+bug/1502524
[08:49] <robin-hero> sil2100, hi, I read your mail last night, and you wrote there will be no delay for OTA-9, is this mean that the OTA-9 will be release tomorrow?
[08:49] <sil2100> robin-hero: hey! Yes, that is the current expectation :)
[08:50] <robin-hero> thanks, this would be awesome \o/ :)
[09:37] <JamesTait> Good morning all!  Happy Tuesday, and happy Australia Day! 😃
[09:46] <V99> and tomorrow ota :D
[09:54] <lotuspsychje> yayyy
[09:54] <lotuspsychje> you guys rocknroll!
[09:57] <victor_bq> Hi all!
[09:58] <victor_bq> quick question =)
[09:58] <victor_bq> I'm in rc 242
[09:58] <victor_bq> with krillin and I found something strange in camera
[09:59] <victor_bq> in camera settings, when selecting 4:3 and 16:9 MP shown are incorrect
[09:59] <victor_bq> I think
[10:02] <davmor2> victor_bq: will take a look, thanks for highlighting
[10:03] <victor_bq> davmor2 great! Would it be better if I look for it on Launchpad and report it if it's not reported yet¿ :)
[10:05] <teve> on my vegetahd only option available is 16:9 (19.5MP)
[10:06] <victor_bq> that's wrong too
[10:06] <victor_bq> krillin has 8Mpx sensor and vegeta 13Mpx
[10:06] <victor_bq> u're in rc to ?
[10:07] <teve> yep
[10:08] <victor_bq> would be great having that Mpx haha interpolated =)
[10:14] <davmor2> victor_bq: hmmmm so just tested the rc image on krillin, I get too different sized images 2448x4352 and 3168x4224
[10:14] <robin-hero> for me N4 shows 4:3 (8MP) on rc-proposed
[10:20] <davmor2> victor_bq: is it that the MP reported are just incorrect
[10:29] <jibel> Kaleo, ^ do you know why the MPx reported by the camera do not correspond to the resolution of the sensors? (8Mpx and 5Mpx)
[10:29] <jibel> on krillin
[10:30] <Kaleo> jibel, yes
[10:31] <Kaleo> jibel, for krillin there is 2 resolutions for each sensor
[10:31] <Kaleo> jibel, the native one and the "interpolated" one
[10:31] <Kaleo> jibel, the second one is sold by BQ as a feature
[10:31] <Kaleo> jibel, and we made the decision to keep it
[10:31] <jibel> victor_bq, ^ does it answer your question?
[10:33] <jibel> thanks Kaleo
[10:36] <Kaleo> victor_bq, http://www.bq.com/es/aquaris-e4-5 "8Mpx - 13Mpx interpolados (Dual flash y autofocus)"  "5Mpx - 8Mpx interpolados"
[10:36] <Kaleo> victor_bq, maybe it's a little sparsely sourced, if you have more info about it, let me know
[10:39] <davmor2> Kaleo: so one question, 2448x4352 I assume is the 8MP mode if you take only the 1000's but is just of 10MP in reality is that a normal thing? Do the manufacturers just round down?
[10:39] <davmor2> s/of/over
[10:41] <Kaleo> davmor2, where do you get the 2448x4352 ?
[10:42] <victor_bq> Kaleo, the specs about interpolated MPx in E4.5 are only in Android FW as far as I know, as well as the specs in E5
[10:42] <davmor2> Kaleo: from the image data that I took in the different modes
[10:42] <Kaleo> davmor2, I'm going to guess you are using the default settings of the camera, that you did not touch the aspect ratio in the bottom edge panel?
[10:42] <victor_bq> If Ubuntu camera app has MPX interpolated implemented that's ok
[10:43] <Kaleo> davmor2, right, that's 16:9, the default
[10:43] <Kaleo> davmor2, which is unrelated to the announced resolution
[10:43] <davmor2> Kaleo: 2448x4352 and 3168x4224 were the too different sizes in EOG
[10:43] <Kaleo> davmor2, if you select 4:3 in the settings of the camera you'll get the "announced" 13.4MP
[10:43] <davmor2> two even
[10:43] <victor_bq> but the HW camera specs are 8MPx rear and 5 MPx front
[10:43] <victor_bq> for E4.5
[10:44] <Kaleo> victor_bq, right, since we are using part of the Android FW for the camera, I figured we could use the same interpolated resolutions
[10:44] <Kaleo> victor_bq, I'm not sure actually
[10:44] <Kaleo> victor_bq, would need to speak with the BQ engineer that did the interpolation bit
[10:44] <Kaleo> victor_bq, if you have his/her contact
[10:44] <victor_bq> I guess I can get it for you ;)
[10:44] <Kaleo> :=)
[10:45] <victor_bq> give me some minutes =)
[10:45] <Kaleo> davmor2, you see the aspect ratio setting right? you know which one I mean?
[10:47] <davmor2> Kaleo: yes, and 4:3 (13.4MP) which match the interop spec, and then 16:9 (10.4) which doesn't should be 8 and 13 according to the spec right?  But I assume we are giving the resolution that we are receiving from the file ie 10.4 and 13.x right
[10:47] <davmor2> 10.7 even
[10:49] <davmor2> Kaleo: our idea of resolution seems to match the image not the spec given, and on the front camera you have 16:9 (8.3MP) which again is probably correct by the image taken but is in the spec at 5 MP
[10:50] <victor_bq> davmor2, that's make more sense to me now :)
[10:51] <Kaleo> davmor2, no
[10:52] <Kaleo> davmor2, it's way simpler
[10:52] <davmor2> Kaleo: oh okay
[10:52] <Kaleo> davmor2, 4:3 is the native aspect ratio of the back camera sensor
[10:53] <Kaleo> davmor2, the obvious thing to do is to use that sensor at the maximum resolution allowed with an aspect  ratio of 4:3, which should be 8MPx
[10:53] <Kaleo> davmor2, now, because of the interpolation feature, it turns out this max resolution is 13MPx
[10:53] <Kaleo> davmor2, which is exactly what you get today when you set the camera setting to 4:3
[10:53] <davmor2> Kaleo: ah so the 16:9 which is the only mode available on the front camera is in interpolation mode then right
[10:54] <Kaleo> davmor2, and by 13MPx I mean 13.4MPx
[10:54] <Kaleo> davmor2, right
[10:54] <Kaleo> davmor2, now the front camera sensor is a bit peculiar
[10:54] <Kaleo> davmor2, it's native resolution has an aspect ratio of 16:9 IIRC
[10:55] <Kaleo> davmor2, and as you said we use the max resolution available with that aspect ratio, the interporlated resolution
[10:55] <Kaleo> davmor2, now the reason why we sometimes have a second different aspect ratio selected by default
[10:55] <Kaleo> davmor2, is that we want the camera to fill up the entire screen (which in case of BQ's is 16:9)
[10:56] <davmor2> Kaleo: that clears that up then thanks :)
[10:56] <Kaleo> :)à
[10:57] <victor_bq> thanks kaleo for the clarification :)
[10:59] <davmor2> Kaleo: on a plus side our reported MP's match the image sizes so as far as I am concerned we are all good, I just didn't understand the discrepancy between Size reported on site vs actual size :)
[11:00] <Kaleo> davmor2, ah right  :)
[11:01]  * mcphail thinks a camera should take photos in 6:4 ratio by default
[11:04] <davmor2> mcphail: wash you mouth out with soapy water ;)
[11:06] <mcphail> davmor2: I'm serious. Any other resolution for photos is a pain. It's the de facto standard
[11:07] <mcphail> Every print shop and every frame will have a 6" x 4" variant
[11:08] <mcphail> 16x9 is becoming more common, I'll admit, but isn't what your granny would buy
[11:09] <davmor2> mcphail: that's not a 6:4 ratio though, that's a 3:2 ratio :P
[11:09] <mcphail> :)
[11:12] <davmor2> mcphail: and technically 3:2 didn't match the old film ratio either which I'm sure was 4:3 to make it commercially viable for the film and camera industry of the time :)
[11:16] <mcphail> davmor2: no - fame size on 35mm film was 24x36mm I think
[11:16] <mcphail> *frame
[11:18] <mcphail> Same as full-frame digital cameras today
[11:19] <mcphail> cine 35mm was always 4:3, but still was 6:4 (or 3:2 if you must)
[11:38] <sil2100> dpm: ping :)
[11:39] <dpm> hey
[12:53] <davmor2> sneaks up on mzanetti in a different channel and BOO!
[12:53] <mzanetti> :)
[13:04] <sil2100> mariogrip: hey!
[13:15] <mariogrip> sil2100: Hi!
[13:42] <zirafinu> hi every one i am looking for a neat swype keyboard for touchscreens under linux
[13:43] <zirafinu> i heard that ubuntu-touch has one but i am not sure where to find its name
[13:43] <davmor2> zirafinu: ubuntu-keyboard but it isn't swype style yet that is to come
[13:44] <zirafinu> ahh ok sorry to bother you
[14:14] <mardy> davidcalle: hi! I've got a newbie question: how do I build the click for a scope from the command line?
[14:14] <mardy> davidcalle: if I run "make install", all files are installed on /
[14:21] <davidcalle> mardy: I really don't know, I've only used the sdk to work with clicks, pstolowski ? ^
[14:21] <pstolowski> mardy, davidcalle run 'click-buddy' from the top-level dir of the scope source
[14:22]  * mardy tries
[14:23] <davidcalle> Oooh, this is neat
[14:23]  * mardy hugs pstolowski 
[14:25] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: I am lloking to start developing apps for the Ubuntu Phone...I see you use the SDK so I wanted to ping you. Are there any good guides that you know of?
[14:25] <tsimonq2> *looking
[14:27] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: what language are you into?
[14:28] <jgdx> seb128, hey, you around? If I build-dep on libgnome-desktop-3-dev, any way of figuring out what the binary depends on?
[14:28] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: what can I choose from?
[14:28] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: there is a great opportunity right now if you are into JS
[14:28] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: I'm fluent :)
[14:28] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: nice! https://developer.ubuntu.com/showdown/
[14:29] <tsimonq2> Oh! I heard about this!
[14:29] <seb128> jgdx, apt-cache show <binary>?
[14:29] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: (great opportunity in the sense "stuff to win" :) )
[14:29] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: what if I don't have an app idea? :P
[14:29] <tsimonq2> :D
[14:29] <seb128> jgdx, but if you want indirect depends easiest is to install it in a pbuilder or such
[14:30] <jgdx> seb128, rather, I want to know what I am supposed to put in the binary section of debian/control..
[14:30] <jgdx> seb128, installing my uss deb right now produses dependency errors
[14:30] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: there is a live Q&A about this contest on thursday, I'm pretty sure live commenters on IRC will come up with suggestions :)
[14:31] <seb128> jgdx, sorry but I'm not sure to follow
[14:31] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: well I am a teen so for me to participate it would have to be late UTC :)
[14:31] <seb128> jgdx, what sort of errors?
[14:31] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: when is it?
[14:32] <jgdx> seb128, that makes two of us. Let me try again: I've added libgnome-desktop-3-dev as a build dep in System Settings. Trying to install that .deb gives me these [1] errors. [1] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14671976/
[14:32] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: 17 UTC
[14:33] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: blog post incoming today with more details about it. But even if you miss it, it will be recorded.
[14:33] <seb128> jgdx, oh, use apt
[14:33] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: ahh okay, thanks :)
[14:33] <jgdx> seb128, and trying to install libgnome-desktop-3-10 gives another dep error, that I need to install gnome-desktop3-data. I can install both fine, but do both have to be in debian/control for the binary?
[14:33] <seb128> dpkg doesn't resolve depends
[14:33] <seb128> no
[14:33] <seb128> just list what you need
[14:33] <seb128> apt takes care of resolving the depends
[14:34] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: I might participate :D
[14:34] <jgdx> seb128, aah. Thanks, seb. The -dev package deps on all of that.
[14:35] <seb128> jgdx, yw!
[14:35] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: can I put my app on Github while I am working on it, or does it have to be private code? and when does it end?
[14:42] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: sure, that's up to you :) It ends february 29th
[14:42] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: ok, I was just making sure that it wasn't against the rules
[14:43] <edude03> Hello everyone - sorry if this question has been asked a million time, but is it possible to build ubuntu touch on the latest AOSP or does it have to be the 4.2.2 branch?
[14:46] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: can I work with a team?
[14:47] <tsimonq2> davidcalle: as in, is it against the rules?
[15:00] <davidcalle> tsimonq2: sure, it can be a team entry if you are fine with splitting prizes if you win :)
[19:32] <peto> hi, why i cant unlock my N7000? can you help me?
[20:24] <_Sponge> QUESTION: If I buy this Nexus7,2013 4G device and put Ubuntu Touch on it, can I use it as a Wifi Hotspot ? (Noob question)
[20:25] <_Sponge> Here's the device: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Google-Nexus-7-2013-32GB-WiFi-LTE-Black-Unlocked-Android-6-0-1-Marshmallow-/161957511931
[20:27] <_Sponge> popey, ping
[20:32] <_Sponge> still here, waiting.
[20:37] <pmcgowan> _Sponge, yes that should work although suport for that device may not be extended much longer
[20:37] <pmcgowan> official support that is
[20:47] <_Sponge> pmcgowan: Should I wait for the convergence phone for a real 4G wifi Hotspot phone then ? Just to be sure of the support side of things ?
[20:48] <pmcgowan> _Sponge, a newer device would be better as thats near end of life
[20:48] <pmcgowan> and that was always a reference not a true OEM product
[20:51] <_Sponge> pmcgowan: Your probably right as this website :
[20:51] <_Sponge> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/ubuntu-for-devices/devices/
[20:51] <_Sponge> says nothing for "4G" device side of things for the Nexus 7 4G.
[20:52] <_Sponge> (2013)  that is.
[20:54] <_Sponge> pmcgowan:  I'm waiting for the "Mir Integration Launch" when I think 4K phone shall be coming along nicely, I think ...
[20:54] <_Sponge> I shall be a convergence phone,
[20:54] <_Sponge> multi-boot it with Android & Ubuntu ...
[20:55] <_Sponge> and add my Android apps appropriately.
[20:56]  * mcphail thinks life is too short for a dual-boot phone
[21:01] <_Sponge> Do you think the new Phone will run  Android aswell ?
[21:02] <mcphail> I'd hope not. Why would I want precious disk space used by android?
[21:03] <popey> _Sponge, pong
[21:04] <_Sponge> popey, It's pretty much sorted now - just wanna know if the 4G element of the Nexus 7 2013 was fully operational as a wifi hotspot ? yur thoughts ?
[21:04] <mhall119> mariogrip: ping
[21:05] <_Sponge> hi mhall119
[21:05] <mariogrip> mhall119: pong
[21:05] <mhall119> hi _Sponge
[21:05] <popey> _Sponge, don't think we ever enabled 4G on that
[21:05] <popey> hello mhall119
[21:05] <popey> good flight?
[21:05] <_Sponge> mhall119: Did Tuesday's Q&A #ubuntuonair go ahead as planned ?
[21:05] <mariogrip> How was ubucon popey mhall119?
[21:06] <mhall119> mariogrip: would you be available tomorrow for a catchup call with me, dpm and Alfonso at the the normal time?
[21:06] <popey> mariogrip, great! Got your mail, need to digest and reply. sorry I haven't yet
[21:06] <mhall119> popey: yup, how was your flight?
[21:06] <popey> super
[21:06] <mariogrip> mhall119: Yes, that's perfect :)
[21:06] <_Sponge> popey, Someone was saying that support could reach End Of Life soon for that model. Is this correct ?
[21:06] <popey> mariogrip, people liked playing with my One Plus One last week ;)
[21:06] <mhall119> mariogrip: great
[21:07] <popey> _Sponge, which model?
[21:07] <_Sponge> N72013
[21:07] <mariogrip> popey: :D
[21:07] <popey> _Sponge, news to me
[21:07] <_Sponge> ok, fair enough - someone said incorrectly, then.
[21:08] <_Sponge> popey, I can't find the Launchjpad bug to enable 4G on the N7-2013 4G model, couldn't lend a hand finding it could you ?
[21:08] <popey> Not sure there is even a bug for that
[21:08] <_Sponge> thats probably why then.
[21:09] <popey> Looks like it might work actually
[21:09] <popey> https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg06945.html
[21:09] <popey> Don't know if anyone in the company has one of those, so chances are it's not well tested
[21:10] <_Sponge> ok, not sure if it'll get all the OTA updates either, but hey ho.
[21:11] <mhall119> I think we only targeted the wifi version of the N7
[21:11] <_Sponge> Hmmm...
[21:11] <_Sponge> I should raise a bug, I guess, on Launchpad.
[21:12] <mariogrip> mhall119: what's the status on "device alias" implementation?
[21:12] <_Sponge> popey, When, probably shall Mir arrive on an OTA update ?
[21:12] <popey> eh?
[21:13] <popey> Mir is already default on the phone.
[21:13] <_Sponge> Mir on the phone.
[21:13] <_Sponge> oh ok.
[21:13] <_Sponge> sorry :O
[21:15]  * _Sponge pokes popey about snapchat on convergence phone :-)
[21:17] <popey> You'd have to ask snapchat
[21:20] <mhall119> mariogrip: I haven't spoken to sergiusens or slangasek about it since mentioning it to them last week (on account of UbuCon/SCALE)
[21:21] <mariogrip> mhall119: ack
[21:22] <_Sponge> mhall119: Did you ask JonoB. about coming onto the Q&A at the UbuCon.us ?
[21:22] <mhall119> mariogrip: what's the branch you made for ubuntu-device-flash/
[21:23] <mhall119> _Sponge: I barely had a change to talk with him actually, I was hoping to chat about many things and just never had the chance
[21:23] <mariogrip> https://code.launchpad.net/~mariogrip/ubuntu-system-image/device-alias && https://code.launchpad.net/~mariogrip/goget-ubuntu-touch/device-alias
[21:26] <_Sponge> mhall119: Oh nuts.
[21:26]  * _Sponge tutts at mhall119
[21:26] <mhall119> mariogrip: thanks, I've added them both to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goget-ubuntu-touch/+bug/1464754 and also market it as affecting goget-ubuntu-touch
[21:27] <mariogrip> mhall119: ack
[21:28] <mhall119> mariogrip: are you still working on those branches, or are they ready to be proposed for merging?
[21:31] <mariogrip> mhall119: they are ready
[21:34] <mcphail> Apparently we're due a new OTA very soon. I'll be sad to see OTA8.5 go. It has been the most stable smartphone experience I've had since the days of Symbian. Well done ladies/gents.
[21:35] <k1l_> you mean its the windows xp from ubuntu touch? :)
[21:35] <mcphail> ha!
[21:36] <mcphail> k1l_: you know if you say windows xp three times it reinstalls on your computer?
[21:36] <k1l_> hihi
[21:41] <mcphail> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35412892 - and Ubuntu phone sales last year were the biggest in history. Coincidence? I think not ;)
[21:43] <k1l_> hehe
[21:49] <_Sponge> popey, Which is the best Nexus-device that has '4G' support with Ubuntu touch ?
[21:50] <ahoneybun> _Sponge, Nexus 5?
[21:50] <_Sponge> right-oh
[21:52] <ahoneybun> only the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 are supported atm
[21:55] <dobey> _Sponge: nexus 4 has 4g if you use the old radio from before it was disabled
[21:56] <ahoneybun> true
[21:58] <edude03> Does the nexus 5 support convergence with OTA 9?
[21:58] <matv1> _Sponge but you will get poor sound in calls in return if I remember correctly  :)
[21:58] <ahoneybun> I think the N5 has MHL support
[21:59] <edude03> It does
[21:59] <edude03> I guess that's the only way - no miracast or UDL support I guess
[22:05] <dobey> slimport i guess, not mhl
[22:06] <dobey> but nexus 5 is not an officially supported device
[22:06] <dobey> bluetooth doesn't work on it, so it's going to be hard using the slimport adapter with a bt kb/mouse to demo convergence on a nexus 5
[22:09] <edude03> rekt
[22:11] <edude03> hmm dobey what version of UT is bluetooth broken in? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bluetooth/TouchBluez5Testing leads me to believe it might work if I use a nightly
[22:12] <dobey> it's not "broken" exactly
[22:12] <dobey> bluetooth has never worked on the nexus 5
[22:15] <edude03> hm :/
[22:15] <edude03> Seems like Canonical and Partners don't want me to have a UT device
[22:16] <dobey> the nexus 5 has never been an officially supported device.
[22:16] <dobey> the nexus 4 is though
[22:17] <edude03> I know but the nexus 4 is.... 3 years old now?
[22:18] <edude03> I feel like I can't expect much from it / it wouldn't be a good device to demo convergence on
[22:18] <ahoneybun> it is a great device for it I think
[22:18] <edude03> If there was something more modern that I could flash I'd pick it up on my home tonigh
[22:19] <edude03> *tonight
[22:19] <dobey> you mean like all the existing demos that are running on it?
[22:19] <ahoneybun> well all the convergence pics and videos are of the nexus 4 so...
[22:20] <dobey> the nexus 5 is 2.25 years old too
[22:22] <edude03> dobey yeah I know but I can't buy the Meizu MX4 anywhere, the BQ 4.5/5 aren't very powerful either, The N7 is too big, the 1+1 doesn't have HDMI out
[22:22] <edude03> The pickings are extremely thin
[22:22] <dobey> edude03: the bq 4.5/5 and mx4 don't do mhl either
[22:22] <edude03> Right
[22:23] <edude03> I'd buy a MX4 just to play with if I could find it though
[22:24] <dobey> well i've been using a nexus 5 with ubuntu for about 2 years now
[22:24] <ahoneybun> god I need bluetooth in my life too much for that
[22:24] <dobey> official support would be nice, as would bleutooth, but eh, it works pretty well as a phone
[22:25] <edude03> bluetooth is a necessity for convergence apparently though
[22:25] <edude03> Is 16.04 still based on AOSP 4.2.2 by the way?
[22:26] <dobey> i think some people are expecting way more out of having a phone appear on a large screen as a traditional pc interface, than they are going to get
[22:27] <dobey> i guess it's 4.4, but yes, it's still 4.x
[22:27] <dobey> not 5.x yet
[22:27] <edude03> I'm possibly one of them
[22:30] <ahoneybun> the 1+1 port is getting rebased on 5.x I believe
[22:30] <ahoneybun> trying to fix the current issues that way
[22:31] <dobey> ahoneybun: there's general work to make stuff work on 5.x, because 5.x is needed for 64-bit and various other things
[22:32] <ahoneybun> oh
[22:32] <dobey> and i guess the cost of 64-bit chips has come down enough that there's a larger market shift to it happening
[22:42] <edude03> hmm
[22:43] <edude03> I wish the CM porting guide was out
[22:43] <edude03> I'd take a stab at it if I knew where to start
[22:43] <dobey> what CM porting guide?
[22:45] <edude03> Word around the web is that one is coming one day
[22:46] <mcphail> dobey: there is one promised on the AOSP porting guide. Has never appeared, though
[22:47] <dobey> oh, well CM is based on AOSP, so i guess it should be pretty obvious what to do there
[22:47] <dobey> i don't see what good a secondary guide that says to do the exact same stuff, would be
[22:48] <edude03> same deal
[22:49] <edude03> If I had a device that could run a new version of CM or AOSP (like the nexus 6) there isn't a guide that describes how to go from that to UT
[22:52] <dobey> uh, the porting guide describes exactly that
[23:24] <matv1> popey did you say you have a oneplus one running a ut port?
[23:25] <popey> i do
[23:25] <matv1> cool
[23:25] <matv1> who maintains it?
[23:28] <matv1> popey I remember news of it being ported early in 2015. I didnt realize it is still being maintained. Is it up to date?
[23:31] <popey> mariogrip maintains it
[23:34] <mariogrip> matv1: jup, I'm working on getting the android base to 5.1
[23:34] <matv1> mariogrip thats pretty neat.
[23:34] <matv1> where do you have the image hosted?
[23:35] <mariogrip> http://system-image.ubuntu.com/
[23:35] <mariogrip> http://system-image.ubports.com/
[23:35] <dobey> really?
[23:35] <dobey> oh ok
[23:35] <mariogrip> The last one
[23:36] <dobey> yeah, i was going to say :)
[23:36] <mariogrip> Copy pate error :P
[23:36] <mariogrip> Paste*
[23:37] <matv1> mariogrip found it, thanks
[23:39] <matv1> I noticed fairphone 2 has same cpu gpu