| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| faenil | Saviq: so, turns out this vivid+overlayppa laptop doesn't boot into Unity8 because it was missing EGL_PLATFORM=mir | 11:56 |
|---|---|---|
| faenil | which seems to not be usually needed | 11:57 |
| faenil | so either some hw requires that env var, or there's another miissing pkg | 11:57 |
| faenil | that makes that env var useless | 11:57 |
| Saviq | faenil, interesting, still a #ubuntu-mir topic, though :) | 12:00 |
| * Saviq has no idea what EGL_PLATFORM=mir means :P | 12:01 | |
| faenil | Saviq: pfff, being pushed over here and there :D | 12:02 |
| Saviq | faenil, you're a hot potato, what can I say ;) | 12:02 |
| Saviq | faenil, but the thing says "mir", that must be a hint :D | 12:02 |
| faenil | Saviq: that I am indeed | 12:02 |
| faenil | Saviq: I didn't know about ubuntu-mir, sorry | 12:03 |
| Saviq | faenil, nw | 12:03 |
| Saviq | faenil, so you got it working after all? | 12:03 |
| faenil | Saviq: yes, it was just that damn env var...well now, I have the problem that the dash doesn't show apps with newer frameworks because the system doesn't have new frameworks | 12:04 |
| faenil | even more fun on the horizon! | 12:04 |
| Saviq | faenil, why wouldn't it have new frameworks? vivid+overlay == rc-proposed? | 12:09 |
| faenil | Saviq: because they're seeded in the ubuntu-touch seed | 12:10 |
| faenil | so desktop doesn't get them :( | 12:10 |
| faenil | which makes me wonder how people are supposed to test unity8 on desktop without them... | 12:10 |
| Saviq | faenil, oh well, looks like it's time for ubuntu-converged... | 12:10 |
| Saviq | seed | 12:10 |
| faenil | Saviq: it is indeed... | 12:11 |
| faenil | I'm puzzled :| | 12:12 |
| faenil | Saviq: do you if unity dash filters apps if the system doesn't have one framework? | 12:13 |
| Saviq | faenil, click scope does | 12:13 |
| faenil | well, click scope yeah | 12:13 |
| faenil | ok, so it's that... | 12:13 |
| Saviq | faenil, it sends the available framework to the store when querying | 12:13 |
| Saviq | faenil, but | 12:13 |
| faenil | I see.. | 12:13 |
| faenil | makes sense, just breaks my plans :) | 12:13 |
| Saviq | what about the packagekit deb vs. click backend? did you manage to solve that? | 12:13 |
| faenil | I'll just install the frameworks stuff | 12:13 |
| faenil | no I'm using click install --user=<user> --allow-unauthenticated | 12:14 |
| faenil | works ok on xenial | 12:14 |
| Saviq | faenil, right, so why do you care about the store? to download into ~/.cache/* | 12:14 |
| Saviq | ? | 12:14 |
| faenil | no I don't care about the store, I care that I installed dekko with --force-missing-frameworks | 12:15 |
| faenil | and now it doesn't show in the apps scope | 12:15 |
| Saviq | faenil, aah, right :) | 12:15 |
| faenil | :P | 12:15 |
| Saviq | faenil, that I don't know if it does, but anyway, yes, frameworks should be installed | 12:15 |
| faenil | (although I think Calendar shows on Xenial even if xenial doesn't have 15.04.3) | 12:16 |
| faenil | so I don't know if it's a bug or a feature :D | 12:16 |
| faenil | Saviq: my simple qml app doesn't run, says "qmlscene: failed to check version of file 'share/qml/blabla/Main.qml", could not open... | 12:38 |
| faenil | any idea? | 12:38 |
| faenil | I just took a working app | 12:38 |
| faenil | and downgraded the framework | 12:38 |
| faenil | so that it would show on vivid apps scope | 12:38 |
| faenil | can that break it? | 12:39 |
| faenil | (in that way) | 12:39 |
| Saviq | faenil, doubt it, pastebin full output? | 12:40 |
| faenil | there's also QIBusPlatformInputContext: invalid bus | 12:40 |
| faenil | Saviq: nothing interesting oherwise, the usual stuff.. | 12:40 |
| faenil | oh also "QSocketNotified: Can only be used with threads started with QThread" | 12:41 |
| faenil | notifier* | 12:41 |
| faenil | UbuntuKeyboardInfo - socket error | 12:41 |
| faenil | I wonder if that can cause a qml file error though, I don't think so :/ | 12:42 |
| Saviq | faenil, that last one is from unity8.log 'innit? | 12:42 |
| faenil | yeah | 12:43 |
| faenil | was having a look there as well | 12:43 |
| Saviq | faenil, did it actually say "share/qml/blabla/Main.qml"? ;) | 12:44 |
| faenil | I've never seen "failed to check version of file" before... | 12:44 |
| faenil | well s/blabla/nameoftheproject | 12:44 |
| Saviq | faenil, check if the file it mentions exists? | 12:44 |
| faenil | it does | 12:44 |
| faenil | if the path is relative to app's folder, that is | 12:44 |
| Saviq | faenil, and if you run qmlscene yourself? | 12:44 |
| faenil | Saviq: what did I need aside from desktop file hint? | 12:47 |
| Saviq | faenil, just that | 12:48 |
| Saviq | faenil, assuming you're doing that from the terminal | 12:48 |
| Saviq | faenil, if from VT or something, a bit more | 12:48 |
| faenil | I don't have terminal, it requires newer framework :P | 12:48 |
| faenil | so it doesn't show in apps scope | 12:48 |
| Saviq | faenil, well just install it | 12:49 |
| Saviq | why wouldn't you | 12:49 |
| Saviq | I mean newer framework | 12:49 |
| faenil | yeah, let's do it | 12:49 |
| faenil | I think I just forgot in the chaos | 12:49 |
| faenil | do you know the pkgname already? | 12:49 |
| core_t | faenil, https://launchpad.net/~vthompson/+archive/ubuntu/ppa | 12:50 |
| faenil | core_t: ? | 12:50 |
| core_t | you can install the terminal from there | 12:50 |
| faenil | core_t: the frameworks pkg | 12:50 |
| core_t | oh | 12:51 |
| faenil | core_t: terminal requires 15.04.3 fw | 12:51 |
| faenil | it won't show if I don't install new fw | 12:51 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| tsdgeos | mterry: see my comment on your MR | 15:07 |
| tsdgeos | in gerrit | 15:07 |
| tsdgeos | your code may need adapting | 15:07 |
| mterry | tsdgeos, yeah I'm noticing | 15:08 |
| tsdgeos | but i think the comment from Tor is mostly bogus | 15:08 |
| mterry | tsdgeos, yeah that code snippet you posted seems like a more conservative version of my patch | 15:10 |
| mterry | tsdgeos, I had forgotten about keyboard layouts that use Alt | 15:10 |
| Saviq | also Alt != AltGr | 15:12 |
| Saviq | mterry, tsdgeos ↑ | 15:12 |
| tsdgeos | yes | 15:12 |
| Saviq | you won't get Alt at all on the event IIUC | 15:12 |
| tsdgeos | but still if they are arguing for "logic is wrong" | 15:12 |
| tsdgeos | i think using the same code that has been deployed for a long time makes snese | 15:12 |
| tsdgeos | less battles to fight | 15:12 |
| Saviq | ;) | 15:13 |
| mterry | tsdgeos, naw now they just want to change that old code | 15:20 |
| tsdgeos | no words | 15:20 |
| mterry | tsdgeos, Saviq: but... I can change my patch in the silo to be the more conservative version. At least that way we get our fix in a way that doesn't break any other layouts. And we can see what Qt wants to do in the general case? | 15:21 |
| Saviq | mterry, let's fix proper, use shortcuts for shortcuts | 15:22 |
| tsdgeos | that's bullshit btw | 15:22 |
| tsdgeos | if they change that code in qwdiget | 15:22 |
| tsdgeos | 95.67% of the people is going to get their code broken | 15:22 |
| Saviq | meh, ours won't :P | 15:23 |
| Saviq | because we'll be using shortcuts | 15:23 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, we may argue on the upcoming change for that, then | 15:23 |
| mterry | Saviq, ok... so drop the qtdeclarative stuff from the silo then. I can look at what it would take to switch webbrowser-app, but that's not likely to be an ota9.5 thing | 15:25 |
| Saviq | mterry, I'm punting to oSoMoN as we speak ;) | 15:25 |
| mterry | Saviq, great | 15:25 |
| Saviq | oSoMoN, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1537782/comments/10 | 15:26 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1537782 in Canonical System Image "Modifier ignored when pressing a key if TextInput has active focus" [High,In progress] | 15:26 |
| oSoMoN | Saviq, seen your comment, thanks. I’ll look into this new Shortcut thing, but not an OTA9.5 thing anyway | 15:58 |
| Saviq | oSoMoN, you'll need to go QShortcut for vivid, though | 15:59 |
| Saviq | oSoMoN, yeah, sry about that, we only just got feedback today | 15:59 |
| oSoMoN | no worries | 15:59 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| tedg | mterry: So I have a full libertine setup now, but still don't have apps launching. | 16:39 |
| tedg | mterry: The only error I'm seeing right now is an incorrect icon. | 16:39 |
| tedg | mterry: Will qtmir/unity reject an app for a bad icon? | 16:39 |
| mterry | tedg, no | 16:39 |
| mterry | tedg, same error with busted appId? | 16:39 |
| tedg | mterry, no, it looks pretty clean there https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/CtsHvTEc/ | 16:41 |
| mterry | tedg, qtmir.applications: Application::Application - appId= "test-xenial_sakura" | 16:41 |
| mterry | tedg, that's the line that yesterday had only sakura | 16:42 |
| mterry | So that's better... | 16:42 |
| mterry | tedg, do clicks and legacy apps work? | 16:42 |
| tedg | mterry, yeah, still getting xmir rejected though https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/wYiYpnxI/ | 16:42 |
| tedg | Legacy apps do, I don't have any clicks installed. | 16:43 |
| mterry | tedg, no clicks?! camera-app? | 16:43 |
| tedg | No, this is on my laptop | 16:43 |
| mterry | tedg, ah | 16:43 |
| * tedg isn't *that* into selfies ;-) | 16:43 | |
| mterry | tedg, no one believes you :) | 16:43 |
| mterry | tedg, well... I would expect to see a REJECTED message in unity8.log if we were doing the normal rejection of a surface request | 16:44 |
| mterry | tedg, although, I don't see ApplicationManager::authorizeSession in that lo | 16:45 |
| mterry | *log | 16:45 |
| tedg | Hmm, I might know what it is. I think we might be not readding the 0.0 in the case of short ids going to long ids on libertine apps. | 16:46 |
| mterry | tedg, you might need the whole USC / phone infrastructure for this to work as expected | 16:46 |
| mterry | ok | 16:46 |
| tedg | Only checking click for getting version numbers. | 16:46 |
| === pat_ is now known as Guest30437 | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!