[00:22] <OvenWerks> zequence: which version does the about box say?
[00:54] <zequence> OvenWerks: I forget the version. It's on 15.10, which I haven't updated for a while, but I doubt there's been new uploads for ardour on that release
[00:54] <zequence> Ah, let me check with rmadison
[00:55] <zequence> 4.1~dfsg-1build2
[00:55] <zequence> I'll be upgrading to xenial soon
[00:55] <zequence> 4.6 already
[01:22] <OvenWerks> zequence: I do seem to remember a memory leak that was fixed within the past 3 or 4 months.
[11:36] <zequence> OvenWerks: Ok, cool. There are a few other bugs, which don't cause me too much problems, like when adding tracks, they don't always end up where they are supposed and I have to move them down usually
[11:37] <zequence> I've started to do some sidechaining, and though it works, I have a feeling there is something goofy going on with connections, but again, earlier ardour version
[11:37] <zequence> Should upgrade and have a look
[15:38] <zequence> I've set up the stagin site at http://ubuntustudio.zequence.net.
[15:39] <cfhowlett> ???
[15:39] <zequence> cfhowlett: It's for the theme that knome has been working on
[15:39] <zequence> We'll look at if we can use it for Ubuntu Studio
[15:40] <cfhowlett> OK.  but! !!  
[15:40] <zequence> I'm going to switch to it just in a moment
[15:40] <cfhowlett> Officially, is it Ubuntu Studio or Ubuntustudio?  
[15:40] <zequence> cfhowlett: Nothing decided yet. We just want to check it out
[15:40] <zequence> It's Ubuntu Studio. But, the terminal version would be ubuntustudio
[15:41] <cfhowlett> color me confused ...
[15:41] <cfhowlett> cause the wordmarks contradict that
[15:41] <zequence> How is that?
[15:41] <cfhowlett> ubuntustudio
[15:42] <zequence> There have been several variants of the wordmark over the years, and that's jsut playing with graphics
[15:43] <cfhowlett> zequence, agreed, but I thought the whole purpose of the recent redesign was to establish a definitive brand
[15:45] <zequence> Well, it's our latest definitive brand. And it looks good IMO
[15:45] <cfhowlett> agreed.  so then ... Ubuntu Studio ?? not to nitpick but am I missing something here?
[15:46] <zequence> The word Studio is clearly apart from Ubuntu in the graphics where Studio is fatter
[15:46] <zequence> So, I don't read it as ubuntustudio
[15:46] <zequence> I read it as ubuntu STUDIO
[15:46] <cfhowlett> ... ok
[15:46] <zequence> Similar to Ubuntu Gnome https://ubuntugnome.org/
[15:47] <zequence> Zak reduced the distance between the letters to make it look better
[15:53] <zequence> I switched themes, and adapted the theme to use our official blue instead of the Ubuntu orange
[15:53] <zequence> Now, what would be cool is to make it dark
[15:53] <zequence> knome: Nice work on the theme!
[22:16] <cub> I made some updates to the test site http://ubuntustudio.zequence.net/ Next step should be to set up a child theme and try out some colouring
[23:02] <knome> zequence, for all of you dark theme loving folks (including cub who quit very fast), i have pushed a new revision of the theme to github with a dark theme variant - this can be enabled from the customizer
[23:05] <OvenWerks> knome: I think cub reads the back scroll from the archives anyway.