/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/02/01/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars
=== davmor2_ is now known as davmor2
Saviqjibel, hey, what's the verdict on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/877 - will you guys be testing it for OTA9.5 or not? (/me lost in when was the image supposed to be spinned)09:16
jibelSaviq, it's in the list of updates to land when it's ready.09:20
jibelSaviq, the image was supposed to be ready Friday night but there are still lot of landings in the pipe for today09:20
Saviqjibel, it won't show up in your "QA Ready" queue automagically, I mentioned on Friday that we've one last flaky test that Britney marked a Regression now09:21
Saviqbut I would rather not block that silo on that, if possible - it's our first silo that has Pass elsewhere anyway09:22
Saviqjibel, would you be willing to overlook the Britney result (since there's no way to restart...), we'll have a fix for the test with the next silo09:26
sil2100hm, right, no retry button in the train version of Britney09:26
sil2100morphis: hey! You back again with us? :) We'd need silo 45 ready for QA today and, of course, the bluetooth issues on mako solved09:29
morphissil2100: hey, yeah, I am back :-)09:30
morphissil2100: then let me approve silo 4509:30
jibelSaviq,the failure is with unity8 and the new gsettings-ubuntu-touch-schemas. Are you sure it's a flaky test?09:31
morphissil2100: you have a bug url for the mako bluetooth issue?09:32
jibelsil2100, google don't like me today09:33
Saviqjibel, yes, see it passed on xenial, and it's known to be flaky09:34
Saviqwe've even a fix for it in that silo, but apparently not enough09:34
sil2100morphis: sure, LP: #153956609:34
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1530807 in indicator-bluetooth (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1539566 Bluetooth cannot be activated on Nexus 7" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153080709:34
sil2100jibel: we're waiting, no worries ;)09:34
morphissil2100: which is a indicator bug ...09:35
morphisassigned to charles09:35
sil2100hmm, ok, this changed, my last understanding was: "introduced by hybris"09:35
morphissil2100: who said that?09:42
sil2100morphis: ok, so it seems someone mistakingly duped the bug09:47
sil2100morphis: this is the right one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/153956609:47
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1539566 in Canonical System Image "Bluetooth dead on mako and flo." [Critical,New]09:47
morphissil2100: I see09:48
jibelSaviq, is bug 1536714 as part of silo 19?09:48
ubot5`bug 1536714 in Canonical System Image "Fix the user login experience on the greeter" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153671409:48
morphissil2100: on it09:51
jibelSaviq, ^ FYI, I forced 'ready for qa'10:06
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson
=== ogra_` is now known as ogra_
morphissil2100: ping10:33
sil2100morphis: pong10:38
morphissil2100: looks like silo 12 isn't really landed yet10:38
morphisMPs aren't merged etc.10:38
sil2100Oh?10:38
sil2100Ok, it's blocked in -proposed10:39
morphissil2100: where can I see that?10:39
sil2100http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#libhybris <- kwin, as we discussed10:39
morphissil2100: yes, so we're blocked on them dropping the dependency?10:39
sil2100Yeah, I guess we'd need them to upload that ASAP10:40
sil2100I could force-merge the silo now, but this needs to be resolved anyway10:40
morphissil2100: I need to do another MP for bluetooth-touch10:41
morphisI can just mark the other MP as prerequisite10:41
morphissil2100: ok, that not-merged MP prevents me now from generating a new package in another silo as it wants the version we released to the overlay ppa already in the changelog10:52
sil2100morphis: could you poke the kwin guys to fix that ASAP?10:53
sil2100I mean, we don't have to wait for them to do that, but I want the package to be unblocked as soon as possible10:53
morphissil2100: I did already over in #kubuntu-devel10:53
morphissil2100: but no sign yet10:54
sil2100Ok, if you'll be the guard of this happening, I'll force-merge the silo as it's critical for us, but I don't want hybris to be blocked in -proposed for too long10:54
sil2100morphis: did you check the autopkgtest output to make sure that this is the reason for the failure?10:56
morphissil2100: basically kwin fails to compile its hybris support10:57
sil2100Ok, yeah, saw complile failures, but if it's the hybris bits then ok10:57
sil2100Force merging10:59
sil2100Arghhh11:01
sil2100morphis: could you make phablet-team or something similar the owner of lp:bluetooth-touch ?11:02
morphissil2100: sure11:02
morphissil2100: done11:02
sil2100morphis: hm, I still see lp:bluetooth-touch is under your LP name, you'd have to change the branch's membership11:03
sil2100morphis: so 'change branch details' and maybe ownership there would help11:04
sil2100Since the train needs to have access to the branch11:04
morphissil2100: really?11:05
morphisI though it is just lp:bluetooth-touch11:05
sil2100morphis: the alias is lp:bluetooth-touch, but currently the branch is lp:~morphis/bluetooth-touch/trunk11:06
morphisah11:06
sil2100So only you can upload to it11:06
morphischanged that11:06
morphishttps://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/bluetooth-touch/trunk11:06
sil2100\o/11:06
sil2100THanks, let me re-run the force merge11:06
morphissil2100: ok11:08
sil2100morphis: all should be merged and landed11:12
morphissil2100: awesome!11:13
MirvI guess someone correctly handled my mistaken xenial builds in 012 from 3h ago by deleting them, maybe it was train and no-one even noticed :)11:13
MirvI should have uploaded them to the 01111:14
Mirvit really looks to me excellent timing and sil2100 didn't notice the last three lines at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-012-3-merge-clean/2/console and even train didn't notice them before deleting them :)11:15
sil2100uh oh ;)11:16
sil2100During merge and clean no publishings happen anyway11:16
sil2100The silo was published last week, it just didn't migrate - so no risk was involved and the train just removed those packages11:17
Mirvright it do, and I was puzzled when I noticed I had used wrong dput and the silo was even empty when I looked there11:19
sil2100hah11:19
Saviqjibel, no, that bug is not part of it11:47
jibelSaviq, it is still planned for this OTA?11:48
jibelit's the last remaining critical for 9.511:49
Saviqjibel, not on my side, but I've been trying to find out how to set GECOS for the phablet user11:49
Saviqjibel, but nobody seems to know where does the user creation happen...11:49
Saviqsomewhere during image build, that I know11:49
Saviqbut wasn't able to find out where exactly, and what to change11:49
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== lool- is now known as lool
jibelSaviq, there apparently http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/trunk/view/head:/live-build/ubuntu-touch/hooks/01-setup_user.chroot11:54
jibelthis hook is executed during the creation of the rootfs11:55
sil2100We didn't modify those parts recently11:57
sil2100At least I don't remember seeing that modified11:57
Saviqsil2100, well, yeah, we should, we need GECOS on the user :)11:58
Saviqto say something different than "phablet"11:58
Saviqsil2100, as per bug #153671411:58
ubot5`bug 1536714 in Canonical System Image "Fix the user login experience on the greeter" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153671411:58
sil2100hm, ok11:59
sil2100I'll take a look at this bug, but do we know the details of what exactly should it include for phablet?12:00
Saviqsil2100, "Ubuntu" afaict, let me confirm12:01
Saviqjibel, sil2100, I tried setting GECOS here and realized there's something missing in the middle as well, still getting just the user name on the greeter12:12
Saviqso we need to investigate that12:12
sil2100Saviq: ok12:12
Saviqbut it should be set nevertheless12:12
SaviqI mean to Ubuntu, for now12:12
sil2100I can push the changes to the GECOS if needed (just need to know what design wants to be visible there) on the livecd-rootfs side12:13
=== kyrofa_ is now known as kyrofa
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
=== ssweeny` is now known as ssweeny
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
morphissil2100: ping14:10
sil2100morphis: pong14:10
morphissil2100: when we land silo 45 which has vivid/xenial packages for pulseaudio, can we wait with the xenial one a bit more than with the vivid one?14:11
sil2100morphis: you mean, not releasing it along with the silo?14:11
morphisif that is possible14:13
morphissil2100: I know that davmor2 doesn't want me to touch the silo until he is done with testing but we have to do another change for xenial before we can land it14:13
sil2100morphis: hm, that might be hard, it's possible but only if we remove the xenial packages from the silo...14:13
sil2100morphis: but, we can always publish those manually to vivid14:14
sil2100By manually copying14:14
sil2100So hm, I guess we could do that14:14
morphisdavmor2: you already started testing silo 45?14:16
davmor2morphis: I'm not no I already have my hands full with 24 and 1914:19
morphisdavmor2: ok14:20
morphissil2100: then we might not need that if I get the pulse package fixed in time :-)14:20
sil2100Phew ;)14:20
sil2100Well, we can do it with the manual copies, but I prefer to do full releases as then all the proper history is recorded14:21
rvroSoMoN: ping14:23
oSoMoNrvr, pong14:23
rvroSoMoN: I'm testing silo 14... When opening a new tab, top sites and bookmarks are not highlighted by default.14:23
oSoMoNrvr, is that with a narrow layout or wide one?14:24
rvroSoMoN: Wide14:24
rvroSoMoN: See screenshot here https://trello.com/c/bJLXKx8T/2715-925-ubuntu-landing-014-webbrowser-app-osomon14:24
oSoMoNrvr, right, that’s because the address bar has focus by default, which is expected, but if you press the Down arrow key, it should focus the view below14:25
rvroSoMoN: Ahh, let me see14:26
oSoMoNrvr, bug #1539176 is about making the selection highlight more prominent, it’s not about focusing the new tab view by default14:27
ubot5`bug 1539176 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "highlighting of selected item not visible with external monitor" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153917614:27
rvroSoMoN: Ok14:27
rvroSoMoN: Then, approving the silo. Everything else seems ok.14:27
sil2100Woo14:30
jgdxltinkl, hey, any luck chasing down the merge conflicts in silo 51?14:43
ltinkljgdx, working on it (the MPs are under review, I had to throw on more into the mix)14:43
jgdxltinkl, okay, great.14:46
oSoMoNrvr, thanks!14:55
oSoMoNtrainguards: the packaging changes in silo 14 were already approved by jdstrand, so it should be good to publish (see https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/webbrowser-app/bottom-edge-mouse/+merge/284283)14:57
MirvoSoMoN: ok14:58
Mirvfound the approval too15:00
sil2100Look good anyway15:00
morphissil2100: ok, fixed silo 45, we can now land it for both15:43
seb128charles, the indicator publication  failed https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-046-2-publish/10/console15:45
seb1282016-02-01 15:35:28,969 ERROR Publish failed: Unexpected upload at destination.15:45
seb128I guess I can override the no change upload from La_ney15:46
Saviqsil2100, jibel, Bug #1536714 is between unity8 and livecd-rootfs then: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/livecd-rootfs/ubuntu-real-name/+merge/284637 https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/display-real-name/+merge/28463516:07
ubot5`bug 1536714 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Fix the user login experience on the greeter" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153671416:07
Saviqjibel, so unless you guys fail silo 15 (please don't!) we'll have to land post-9.516:08
Saviqor well, if you fail silo 15 I assume it'd be post-9.5 anyway :P16:08
mterrySaviq, :(16:14
Saviqmterry, j/k, it's not looking bad16:15
rvrmorphis: Hi16:39
rvrmorphis: I'm testing pulseaudio (silo 45)16:39
morphisrvr: oh good16:39
rvrmorphis: This test case fails, both in OTA9 and with the silo, so no regression. Is it known? "turn the bluetooth device off. The audio from music-app should automatically move to the internal speaker"16:40
morphisrvr: ota9 means you installed the silo not on rc-proposed?16:41
rvrmorphis: Right, OTA9 means "stable" :)16:41
rvrmorphis: I have my own krillin for personal use, and just checked16:41
ltinkljgdx, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/938 building16:42
morphisrvr: so you have a A2DP speaker or a headset connected, right?16:42
rvrmorphis: Right16:42
rvrmorphis: The audio is placed correctly in the bluetooth speaker16:43
rvrmorphis: But when it's switched off, track doesn't continue to be played in the device16:43
rvrIt stops16:44
morphisrvr: ah16:44
morphisthat is known16:44
morphisits the same also for HFP when you do calls16:44
morphisrvr: but can't find the bug currently16:45
morphisrvr: but if you play the track again its played from the speaker?16:45
morphisthe internal one I mean16:45
rvrmorphis: Yes, if I tap "play" it continues playing in the device16:45
morphisgood16:45
morphisthen yes, that is a known thing16:46
rvrOk16:46
morphisbut would be good if you can file another bug, I will mark it as duplicated if I find the original one16:46
morphisbut its nothing easy to fix as it requires a bigger rework of the actual routing to move streams properly16:46
rvrDoing it16:47
jgdxltinkl, cool!16:48
rvrmorphis: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/154047816:51
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1540478 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "Audio not automatically moved to the internal speaker" [Undecided,New]16:51
morphisrvr: thanks16:54
jgdx:(17:05
=== infinity_ is now known as infinity
sil2100rvr, davmor2, jibel: just double confirming - the unity8 silo is good to go, right?17:11
jibelsil2100, yes, davmor2 is filing bug reports for the issues he found17:12
sil2100ACK17:12
davmor2silo 24 and silo 19 are both good to go, but there will be some ota 10 blocking bugs for the issues I found17:12
davmor2sil2100: ^17:12
sil2100morphis: could we get https://code.launchpad.net/~morphis/bluetooth-touch/fix-lp1539566/+merge/284575 approved?17:12
sil2100ARGH17:15
sil2100The unity8 silo seems to have some issues17:15
sil2100Saviq: on the first sight of it, looks like the qtmir landing of silo 19 is reverting the latest version of qtmir from the archive (the one that went out with mir 0.19)17:16
sil2100Saviq: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-019-2-publish/1/artifact/qtmir_xenial_packaging_changes.diff17:16
sil2100Why is that so?17:16
Saviqsil2100, ARGH indeed17:16
sil2100Saviq: did you guys rebuild after mir got merged?17:17
Saviqsil2100, there's no qtmir in that silo17:17
sil2100Oh, even weirder17:17
Saviqsil2100, there was, however17:17
sil2100Yeah, the train probably took the last one deleted from the PPA17:17
Saviqsil2100, so it's likely just confused17:18
sil2100Saviq: ok, so no qtmir is required by this landing, right?17:18
Saviqsil2100, nope17:18
sil2100hmm, ok,17:18
sil2100Fingers crossed it won't publish the deleted one then17:18
sil2100Saviq: anyway, thanks for clearing it up, didn't expect the diffs will be out of sync with the contents of the silo17:20
rvrHmm17:22
Saviq;)17:22
Saviqfingers crossed indeed17:22
rvrsil2100: I can't set silo 45 to approved17:22
sil2100rvr: it's probably because the autopkgtests are still starting17:25
sil2100Saviq: ...so far so good!17:25
jibelsil2100, no, they ran earlier today:  2016-02-01 16:10:31 +0100 (britney-bot) britney_signoff: Approved17:26
sil2100Strange17:26
jibelbut the lander and automated signoff disappeared17:26
jibelsil2100, it seems the silo has been rebuilt17:26
sil2100Ah17:27
sil2100Yes, the xenial bits17:27
sil2100Re-running diff_only17:27
Saviqsil2100, thanks!17:31
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray
dobeyhmm17:57
dobeyis there a google calendar, or an ics file somewhere on-line, with the ota freeze dates in it?17:57
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD
pmcgowandobey, good idea I will add them to the UES calendar18:05
dobeypmcgowan: well, a separate public calendar might be nice, but sure :)18:07
pmcgowandobey, yeah, can check that18:09
sil2100robru, slangasek: I won't be around for today's meeting, I'm a bit flu-ish today and would like to lay down for a while18:58
slangaseksil2100: saw your decline, and have cancelled the meeting - thanks, feel better soon!18:59
robrusil2100: take care19:02
bfillerrobru: any idea what happened to silo 23? stuff in the ppa is not from the silo20:30
bfillerrobru: should be u-d-m and nuntium20:30
robrubfiller: what ticket are you looking at? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/944 looks right to me20:31
bfillerrobru: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/86620:31
robrubfiller: abandoned jan 27th20:31
bfillerrobru: damn20:32
robrubfiller: by michael sheldon20:32
bfillerrobru: thanks, will check with him20:32
robrubfiller: you're welcome20:33
Elleobfiller: sorry, thought that just had the udm changes in, not the nuntium ones20:43
Elleobfiller: which we'd decided to leave alone since the retry logic was moving to nuntium20:43
bfillerElleo: no worries20:44
Saviqrobru, hey, can you please recycle the unity-scope-click regression http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#unity8 (not sure you're able to, requires Ubuntu upload rights...)21:58
robruSaviq: yeah, no, I can't21:59
robrusorry21:59
Saviqnow who do I bug about this then21:59
robruSaviq: any core dev21:59
* Saviq rolls a dice at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/+members#active22:01
=== _salem` is now known as _salem
robruMirv: still around? I just rolled out the fix for britney hints, and the log claims that it ran with hints: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-023/excuses.html but this still looks the same / many regressions. can you double check?22:57
robruMirv: oh you can see "but forced by" in the excuses so i guess that means hints are working22:58
michitrainguards: I have a question… https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/91123:05
michiThis one has passed testing but isn’t showing as having passed.23:06
robrumichi: what, you mean qa? I'm seeing Approved/Approved/Ready23:07
michirobru: Ah...23:08
michiSo “Ready” means “Approved”?23:08
michiAs in “ready for publication”?23:08
michirobru: I thought “Ready” meant “Ready for QA testing"23:08
michiBut it’s passed testing: https://trello.com/b/AE3swczu/qa-testing-requests-for-questions-ping-ubuntu-qa-on-ubuntu-ci-eng23:09
robrumichi: ready means ready for qa testing, yes.23:09
robrumichi: I guess whoever approved it forgot to set the ticket23:09
michiOK, so no misunderstanding then.23:09
michirobru: This is weird.23:09
michiNow the card is back to “Ready for testing” in Trello.23:10
michiEarlier, I found it in the “Passed” column23:10
robrumichi: yeah that's where I see it as well23:10
robrumichi: maybe it was a mistake? ask a qa person23:10
michiOK, so maybe it was accidentally moved.23:10
michiYes.23:10
michiMy apologies for the noise.23:10
robruno worries23:10
robrubrb23:20
sil2100^ overriding that, critical landing... eh, need to talk with morphis about those23:42
sil2100o/23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!