[03:15] <tjbiddle> Hi all. Trying to setup NAT. Every guide I come across seems like all directions are being run on the machine that's running NAT; but what do I configure on the client to make sure it points at that machine? Running through: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Router currently.
[03:23] <patdk-lap> nothing
[03:26] <tjbiddle> patdk-lap: What do you mean nothing? How is ClientA, ClientB, ClientC supposed to know that ServerA is it's NAT if I don't specify some sort of configuration?
[03:27] <teward> downstream you specify the gateway
[03:27] <teward> if you configure DHCP on the router point that does NAT right, it'll automatically configure downstream clients from the ssytem to know to go through that gateway
[03:27] <teward> (that's the case for all systems connected to routers, even the local VMs on my computers or my hypervisor)
[03:29] <teward> and where it doesn't, you configure the gateway on the clients yourself (for static connections and such)
[08:03] <lordievader> Good morning.
[09:36] <pitastrudl> hi, im trying to setup smokeping on ubuntu 14.04 vps, im getting a "/etc/init.d/smokeping: 117: /etc/init.d/smokeping: logger: not found
[09:36] <pitastrudl> " error
[12:44] <kettlecooked>  Our office server (Ubuntu Server 14.04) with software RAID (2 mirrored disks) will not boot anymore, safe mode says the raid array is degraded. Where do I start to fix this problem? I want to un-degrade it :)
[12:46] <lordievader> Start with checking the disks I'd say.
[12:49] <kettlecooked> lordievader, do you have a suggestion on how? Physically they seem OK, and they show up properly in BIOS/boot
[12:49] <kettlecooked> (I have very little disk managing experience sorry :( )
[12:51] <kettlecooked> lordievader, did you mean fsck?
[12:52] <lordievader> Among, things. Yes.
[12:54] <kettlecooked> will try to do that
[14:00] <dholbach> hiya
[14:01] <dholbach> could somebody from the server and cloud teams please take a look at http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/
[14:01] <dholbach> and help review and resolve some of these requests?
[14:45] <teward> is there an ubuntu server image already prepared, maybe on the cloud images, for VMware based systems?
[14:56] <poohbear82> port 8080 is listening and ufw is disabled, yet connection is refused in the browser. what could it be
[15:07] <poohbear82> anyone?
[15:08] <poohbear82> port 8080 is listening and ufw is disabled, yet connection is refused in the browser. what could it be?
[15:15] <teward> poohbear82: is this behind a router, or on an EC2 instance?
[15:17] <poohbear82> teward, virtual machines
[15:18] <teward> poohbear82: are they on a NAT'd connection, or connected right to a network, or what/
[15:19] <teward> if they're NAT'd you need to portforward on wherever that NAT is handled
[15:19] <teward> (so in VBox, edit the NAT network's port forwarding rules)
[15:19] <poohbear82> teward, I'm not really sure, doesn't port 8080 go to port 8080 of the vbox if no forwarding is set up by default?
[15:20] <teward> poohbear82: are you using the NAT VBox item?
[15:20] <poohbear82> teward, i just looked, it is NAT
[15:20] <poohbear82> don't know what you mean by item
[15:21] <teward> "item" means the connection type in the VM
[15:21] <teward> poohbear82: the way NAT works is like a router
[15:21] <teward> so depending on where you're trying to get to the VM from depends on the settings in the NAT you have to set up (port forwarding)
[15:22] <teward> if it's from the host system that's running VBox, then you enter the IP the VM has directly with port 8080; if it's from your local network outside the host system running VBox you have to have NAT port forwarding done in VBox to make sure it port forwards, and have to make sure the host system knows to send inbound traffic to that VM for that port
[15:22] <poohbear82> teward, sorry, they are connected to internal network
[15:22] <teward> poohbear82: through a "Bridged Network" or a "NAT" type virtual network interface on the VM itself?
[15:24] <poohbear82> ok here is the setup: i have 2 clients, and one server. They are running plone. Plone server is running on the server. Client1 is able to connect to server on port 8100. it should also serve on 8080.WHen i try to connect to 8080 in the browser it says connection refused.
[15:24] <poohbear82> in can ping each box from another
[15:24] <poohbear82> telnet says connection refused however
[15:24] <poohbear82> nmap says port 8080 is open
[15:24] <poohbear82> netstat says it is listening on 8080
[15:25] <teward> then it sounds like Plone isn't listening on 8080 as well
[15:25] <poohbear82> it is listening though and ready to accept requests
[16:12] <smoser> cyphermox, have you looked at bug 1539329
[16:12] <smoser> do you have any more info on that ?
[16:24] <cyphermox> smoser: I looked a little, but I didn't figure it out yet. I'm busy on other things for now
[16:24] <cyphermox> in the meantime you can add standard to your preseed
[16:26] <smoser> well, yes. i'm just very hesitant to do that. as the reason that i care here is that a test is failing because (indirectly) standard is not installed.
[16:27] <smoser> so , modifying that test case to insist that it *is* installed is kind of explicitly fixing the test case to test true = true
[16:59] <cyphermox> smoser: fwiw, when I run installs here, I do get standard installed
[17:00] <cyphermox> or at least, as far as I saw on ppc64el, and I think on amd64 too
[17:01] <cyphermox> lemme check this install again, I can't remember
[17:01] <cyphermox> ok, so that was the server iso from 2016-01-11
[17:02] <cyphermox> smoser: yeah, the ubuntu-standard package is installed
[17:03] <cyphermox> smoser: could you check if on wily 'tasksel --list-tasks' lists standard? I'm not sure if it should, but it doesn't on xenial. maybe that's relevant
[17:04] <cyphermox> when I ran d-i though, at the point where I reached the tasksel step it showed me the list of tasks I could install and standard was already selected
[17:04] <patdk-wk> I only have ubuntu-minimal installed on all my machines
[17:04]  * patdk-wk did select minimal install though
[20:13] <LifeLibertyHappi> how do i ping the short name of a host instead of the FQDN.  without manually adding to host file
[20:13] <teward> !crosspost | LifeLibertyHappi
[20:14] <YamakasY> he guys anyone compiled varnish vmods on ubuntu ? my source folder is wrong every time
[20:14] <sarnold> LifeLibertyHappi: see the 'search' and 'domain' entries in resolv.conf(5)
[20:15] <LifeLibertyHappi> thanks sarnold
[20:16] <YamakasY> I did before but I know I had difficulties
[20:45] <gQuigs> trying to track down a package that's supposed to be in libery-proposed
[20:45] <teward> 'libery-proposed' - sounds like it's not Ubuntu, gQuigs?
[20:45] <gQuigs> neutron 2:7.0.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0,  with a fresh instance installing the cloud archive -proposed only get's 2:7.0.0-0ubuntu1~cloud0
[20:46] <gQuigs> teward: sorry, Ubuntu Cloud Archive Liberty-proposed
[20:46] <teward> ah :)
[20:47] <gQuigs> this says it should be there - http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/cloud-archive/liberty_versions.html,  but my install and this - http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-proposed/liberty/main/binary-amd64/Packages says it isn't
[20:59] <gQuigs> I see the hold up might be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+bug/1530913
[20:59] <gQuigs> still doesn't explain the differing version numbers though
[21:13] <gQuigs> jamespage:  cinder, glance, neutron, and keystone have all been in wily-proposed since the 8th per bug 1530913..  did tests fail on them?
[21:18] <alreece45> Anyone have any odd tempermental issues with TCP and ubuntu servers?
[21:19] <teward> alreece45: that's a fairly vauge question, i have never seen any issues with TCP and any of my Ubuntu servers
[21:19] <teward> unless there's an issue at the datacenters with the data routing or something
[21:19] <gQuigs> alreece45: there was a fairly weird bug that just came though with a certain amount of TCP traffic, servers would be unresponsive
[21:19] <gQuigs> don't rememebr where I read that... but it's fixed now
[21:20] <alreece45> teward: well... it seems to be a very vague problem. it ignores packets from both of debian workstations... while other systems work fine (UDP/ICMP also work fine)
[21:21] <alreece45> and there's not that much traffic on the server, and this is the second server it has occured on...
[21:27] <alreece45> would there be a better place/way to ask about that?
[21:38] <alreece45> Looks to be some issue with tcp_fastopen being enabled...
[21:47] <alreece45> or not...
[23:18] <theslow1_> hey everyone, I'm having some trouble with an upstrart script
[23:19] <theslow1_> running init-checkconfig, everything is fine, but when trying to start using: service unicorn-app start
[23:19] <theslow1_> status: Unknown job: unicorn-app
[23:20] <sarnold> ls -l /etc/init/unicorn-app.conf
[23:22] <sarnold> theslow1_: I think that can also happen if you're using a GUI environment with upstart-managed session configuration; in which case maybe try initctl --system start unicorn-app
[23:23] <theslow1_> https://dpaste.de/gg5u
[23:25] <theslow1_> vandorjw@DEV1:/etc/init$ ls -l /etc/init/unicorn-app.conf
[23:25] <theslow1_> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 63 Feb  1 23:01 /etc/init/unicorn-app.conf -> /app/configuration/app1/appserver/unicorn.conf
[23:25] <theslow1_> its a headless server
[23:25] <theslow1_> there is no GUI
[23:26] <sarnold> how about ls -l on the target?
[23:27] <theslow1_> vandorjw@DEV1:/app/configuration/app1/appserver$ ls -l
[23:27] <theslow1_> total 4
[23:27] <theslow1_> -rwxrwxr-x 1 vandorjw vandorjw 910 Feb  1 23:14 unicorn.conf
[23:28] <sarnold> theslow1_: okay, two theories, and I'll be honest that I don't like either one very much. (a) maybe the symlink -target- has to be named unicorn-app.conf rather than just unicorn.conf. (b) maybe the file has to owned root:root with 644 or similarly resitrctive permissions.
[23:29] <theslow1_> I'll try both
[23:33] <theslow1_> I killed the symlink and copied the file over
[23:34] <theslow1_> not it tesll me, job failed to start
[23:34] <theslow1_> at least I can debug now