[13:39] <sakrecoer_> seem i've gotten rusty on the test-case proceedure... looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ContributingTestcases/ManualStyleGuide#Testcase_Naming the qsynth testcase has got a number in the branch... should i disregard the prefixed number anyways?
[13:40] <sakrecoer_> the qsynth testcase in the branch is a template...
[14:22] <knome> sakrecoer_, testcases do not need numbering/ID's (unless you want to have some)
[14:22] <knome> oh wait
[14:22] <knome> in the *branch*
[14:22] <knome> if it's a new test, don't add an ID
[14:23] <knome> it's going to be the testcase ID on the tracker, and that is unknown for now
[14:35] <sakrecoer_> thanks knome, i opted for following the instructions as they are: i did not add a test-case number prefix 
[15:22] <sakrecoer_> knome: following that readme, in appearance>menu, there is a link to home, but it wont display...
[15:23] <sakrecoer_> knome: oh, found how to fix it...
[17:11] <tracker5> sakrecoer_: you merged fix for qsynth against
[17:12] <tracker5> new testcase instead of changing the 1675
[17:12] <tracker5> _qsynth one
[17:12] <tracker5> my bouncer is screwed - this is flocculant :D
[17:13] <sakrecoer_> hi tracker5/flocculant! how do i fix it?
[17:13] <sakrecoer_> haha
[17:14] <sakrecoer_> did i merge it...? gah.. thought i just did a merge request..
[17:16] <flocculant> hi sakrecoer_ 
[17:16] <sakrecoer_> \o/ flocculant !
[17:17] <sakrecoer_> you want me to put the ID number back in the file name and push again?
[17:17] <flocculant> no - there is already one there with 1675_Qsysnth
[17:17] <flocculant> lose your new one - edit the 1675 one then push it please :)
[17:17] <sakrecoer_> yeah, i saw that and asked arround, but non-one answered, so i figured i just follow the instruction on the page..
[17:18] <sakrecoer_> sure!
[17:23] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: should i just do bzr push lp:~sakrecoer/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-1538228
[17:23] <sakrecoer_> and link it again? 
[17:23] <flocculant> yep should do the job
[17:30] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: fixd :)
[17:34] <flocculant> okey doke - all done now
[17:34] <flocculant> off again now - laters
[17:35] <sakrecoer_> o/ ~
[18:51] <krytarik> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2016-February/039159.html ("Fonts-droid has been deprecated and removed, please update your dependency")
[18:52] <sakrecoer_> krytarik: oh... droid font is one of the few things i awlays change after install..
[18:55] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer_: what does xubuntu use as default? Does it look ok? Maybe just use that.
[18:56] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer_: zequence has been trying to move in the direction of keeping the Studio-xubuntu delta as small as possible.
[18:57] <sakrecoer_> OvenWerks: can't remember right now. perhaps xubuntu uses droid too...
[18:58] <sakrecoer_> OvenWerks: "studio-xubuntu delta"...? what is that?
[18:58] <OvenWerks> the difference between one and the other. Delta normally means that.
[18:58] <sakrecoer_> i think it is a good practice! I realy like xubuntu's art-direction
[18:59] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer_: they also have more manpower, so they tend to keep thing up to date
[18:59] <sakrecoer_> xubuntu even customize their mailing-list subscription page: attention to detail <3
[19:00] <OvenWerks> knome: Do you know what the default font is in xubuntu?
[19:02] <sakrecoer_> looks like it is droid on the screenshots
[19:02] <sakrecoer_> http://xubuntu.org/screenshots/1404_customize/
[19:03] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer_: thats old now though. if droid is not being kept up they may have changed... or the package name may have just changed.
[19:04] <krytarik> OvenWerks: I just posted the same in #xubuntu-devel, ftm. :P
[19:05] <sakrecoer_> thanks krytarik :) 14.04 seem to have droid in the window titles and deja-sans for text... but i'm just guessing from some screenshots..
[19:06] <OvenWerks> http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/fonts-droid doesn't say anything about it being removed for X
[19:11] <krytarik> OvenWerks: https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fonts-android/news/20151215T110021Z.html
[19:13] <OvenWerks> So change the package to fonts-droid-fallback
[19:13] <sakrecoer_> "The name noto is to convey the idea that Google’s goal is to see “no more tofu”."
[19:13] <OvenWerks> package name has changed
[19:16] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer_: I would still like to know what xubuntu is doing with this as the new package sounds like it may be less all inclusive.
[19:18] <sakrecoer_> OvenWerks: Yeah, lets see what they say :) Noto seems to be very inclusive tho... https://www.google.com/get/noto/ but yeah... its a google creation..
[19:19] <OvenWerks> lets use "Park Avenue"  ;)
[19:20] <sakrecoer_> :D