[01:24] <jjfrv8> flocculant, or bluesabre, another belated question: what if we get a crash that's the same as an existing bug the that bug is marked Private?
[01:24] <jjfrv8> Do we file another one and mention that it's a duplicate of the private one? Or just reference the private one?
[01:27] <jjfrv8> It's thunar btw. Crashed on same move operation on wily and xenial.
[03:33] <bluesabre> jjfrv8: that's a goooood question, flocculant? :)
=== ubott2 is now known as ubottu
=== DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec
=== ochosi_ is now known as ochosi
=== davmor2_ is now known as davmor2
[10:57] <Akxwi-dave> Morning all.. My ISP dropped yesterday towards the end of the session, so some of my messages didn't get thru to you.
[11:01] <Akxwi-dave> Knome, flocculant. The thunar version I have is 1.6.10.  I have been apt-get update && upgrading but 1.60.10-2 hasn't come down.
[11:01] <Unit193> !info thunar xenial
[11:01] <ubottu> thunar (source: thunar): File Manager for Xfce. In component universe, is optional. Version 1.6.10-2 (xenial), package size 299 kB, installed size 1009 kB
[11:01] <Akxwi-dave> Going to purge the ppa tonight and re-add it
[11:02] <Unit193> Which PPA exactly?  Should be ppa:xubuntu-dev/xubuntu-staging  for the thunar crash fix, which I don't believe works.
[11:02] <Akxwi-dave> and try the testing again.  however as I said yesterday.. I'm not getting any errors on my Thinkpad with thunar version 1.6.10
[11:02] <Akxwi-dave> Hi uit
[11:03] <Akxwi-dave>  yep that's the one
[11:03] <Akxwi-dave> its updated on this vm to 10-2
[11:03] <Akxwi-dave> Unit193,  that it
[11:03] <Akxwi-dave> :-)
[11:04] <Akxwi-dave> was throwing gigs worth of files around on the laptop and it worked fine (1.6.10)
[11:06] <Akxwi-dave> Not sure if this helps.. but the laptop in question was upgraded via "update-manager -d -c " from 15.10 to 16.04
[12:45] <tracker6> bluesabre jjfrv8 - something's up with my bouncer ... re dupe of private bug, iirc you need to get the private removed before reporting a dupe - a bot marks them as dupes and it loses the information you might have added to the report
[12:46] <tracker6> if it's not a bot - then regardless - get the private removed before reporting it :)
[13:29] <jjfrv8> flocculant, I'm not sure what I should do about that private bug. It's 1502732.
[13:30] <jjfrv8> I filed new bug 1540186
[13:30] <ubottu> bug 1540186 in thunar (Ubuntu) "thunar crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1540186
[13:30] <jjfrv8> but I did not reference the private one.
[13:30] <jjfrv8> bbl
[14:47] <ali1234> jjfrv8: i normally go to #ubuntu-bugs and say "i'm trying to report a bug and it says this private bug is a duplicate. could someone please look at it and mark it not private?"
[14:47] <ali1234> you normally have to wait about a day for someone to notice you
[18:16] <krytarik> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2016-February/039159.html
[18:17] <krytarik> ("Fonts-droid has been deprecated and removed, please update your dependency")
[19:31] <akxwi-dave> evening all
[19:32] <akxwi-dave> just an update re: thunar.. purged the ppa and then re added it.. updated to thunar 1.6.10-2
[19:33] <akxwi-dave> confirmed version with dkpg --list.  spent 1 hour  moving various combinations of upto 8 gig around and no thunar crashes
[19:35] <akxwi-dave> on real hardware.. Lenovo E530 Thinkpad...
[19:40] <akxwi-dave> update:- 1.6.10-2ppa1 is the thunar version..  :-)
[22:45] <bluesabre> good evening everybody
[22:48] <bluesabre> krytarik: thanks for that, will look into that tonight if possible
[22:50] <bluesabre> probably the most difficult part of that is transferring existing configs
[22:50] <bluesabre> more and more, it seems like we need some sort of migration framework
[22:51] <knome> mm..
[22:52] <bluesabre> hey knome 
[22:57] <knome> hey seanabre
[22:58] <bluesabre> :\
[22:58] <knome> wut?
[22:59] <bluesabre> nothin pasiome
[22:59] <knome> :)
[23:00] <bluesabre> knome: get a chance to install a php mysql driver?
[23:00] <knome> nah, i STILL haven't been on the desktop machine
[23:00] <knome> slacker as i am..
[23:00] <bluesabre> :D
[23:03] <bluesabre> Noto Sans seems to render slightly differently
[23:03] <knome> than droid? yeah...
[23:04] <bluesabre> might not be so bad, just different
[23:06] <bluesabre> actually, not a fan of it on the desktop initially
[23:06] <bluesabre> seems wide
[23:06] <knome> yeap
[23:06] <knome> and we use droid on the website too
[23:11] <bluesabre> knome: so... do we move to noto, use -fallback, or something else?
[23:11] <bluesabre> might be a discussion to pull ochosi into as well
[23:11] <knome> definitely
[23:14] <ali1234> all buttons and labels are misaligned with noto sans for me, regardless of gtk theme selection
[23:14] <ali1234> http://i.imgur.com/YWQMlGt.png
[23:15] <ali1234> http://i.imgur.com/1Bw9Wxm.png
[23:17] <bluesabre> yeah, something weird with that font
[23:17] <ali1234> ubuntu font actually has the same problem, but to a far lesser extent
[23:50] <Unit193> cyphermox: Hah, going for CC and TB?  Collect them all! ;)  (G'luck.)
[23:51] <cyphermox> ahah, yeah, I applied to be on the technical board
[23:52] <cyphermox> how come this comes up?
[23:53] <Unit193> Reading mail.