[19:34] <balloons> flocculant, are you saying I should just mark this won't fix? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1532840
[19:34] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1532840 in Ubuntu QA Website "'Bugs to look for' table only displays on active results, when logged in" [Undecided,New]
[19:41] <dkessel> nuclearbob: we wondered if there is any update on the reporting issue for the ubiquity autotests yesterday. Is there?
[19:41] <flocculant> balloons: in my mind I'd say yes
[19:42] <flocculant> balloons: why do we need to see archive detail? it's either current or of no importance
[19:42] <nuclearbob> dkessel: there isn't at present. I'm working on getting the automated iso tests in better shape right now
[19:43] <flocculant> balloons: if it's current - then it should be on today's results - enough that old bugs get shown as having affected
[19:44] <flocculant> and especially my second point - what's the use in showing a bug that appeared today (example) on an archive from last year?
[19:44] <flocculant> if we're trying to deal with the tracker - then information presented to testers should be of use to them
[19:44] <balloons> flocculant, I'll put it as won't fix -- if anyone else has a similar complaint we can re-open
[19:44] <flocculant> yep - wfm
[19:44] <balloons> no one else is voicing any opposition, so ;-)
[19:45] <flocculant> :)
[19:45] <balloons> that might be the first time I 'won't fix' to my own bug
[19:45] <flocculant> I'm a bit 'aaaah' atm - but ploughing through the website bugs and trying to sort them out a bit is on my list
[19:46] <flocculant> as is February's hack at testcase stuff
[19:46] <flocculant> hi dkessel nuclearbob :)
[19:46] <nuclearbob> flocculant: howdy
[19:47] <dkessel> Hey flocculant :)
[19:47] <flocculant> balloons dkessel nuclearbob - one thing that has just occured to me ...
[19:48] <flocculant> what actual difference is there in Ubuntu or flavourbuntu as far as this testing goes?
[19:49] <flocculant> perhaps from this angle it reads better - if Ubuntu fails - do all flavours actually fail at the same point? with the same thing?
[19:49] <flocculant> if that's the case then ...
[19:49] <balloons> trying to fix the top20 -> top100 link.. and some other little things
[19:49] <balloons> I think I got'em
[19:49] <flocculant> \o/
[19:49] <nuclearbob> flocculant: ubuntu testing is running on qa hardware, but since the flavor testing isn't publishing right, I can't tell you whether flavors fail at the same time
[19:49] <flocculant> heh
[19:50] <balloons> anyone volunteer to do a summary of all the changes that have happened? It would be a wonderful writeup to share with everyone
[19:50] <balloons> wxl? tsimonq2? flocculant? dkessel?
[19:50] <balloons> lol, I'll just keep naming names till one sticks :-)
[19:50] <flocculant> nuclearbob: I just wondered - because if that *was* the case, then flavours would just need to read the ubuntu published item
[19:50] <teward> lol
[19:50] <flocculant> balloons: ha ha ha
[19:50] <wxl> random pings! omg it's like being on #freenode
[19:51] <nuclearbob> flocculant: yeah
[19:51] <wxl> you're trying to get all the recent changes to ubuntu quality summed up in a blog, balloons ?
[19:52] <flocculant> nuclearbob: though actually now I think about it - xubuntu draws the desktop that the try/install dialogue sits on with feh - so I guess that'd be enough difference
[19:52] <flocculant> (I think that's correct - it stopped us getting a black background to the try/install choice)
[19:53] <balloons> wxl, yes. In particular the tracker changes
[19:53] <flocculant> balloons: \o/
[19:53] <flocculant> I can excuse myself - no blog :D
[19:54] <balloons> mailing list post works too -- but we like pictures!
[19:54] <wxl> balloons: oh yeah that's what i meant. is this only gci tasks? are all of the changes tracked somewhere? cuz if they are, i can do it, i think :)
[19:54] <wxl> balloons: and/or help tsimonq2 do it :) but he's got a membership meeting tomorrow, so maybe not. you coming, btw?
[19:54] <balloons> wxl, yes.. the changelog for the project should jog your memory nicely. We should have the bugs fixed listed in there too
[19:55] <wxl> balloons: count me in then.
[19:55] <flocculant> I can try and sort a bug fixed list today
[19:55] <balloons> wxl, tsimonq2, yea I can be there for him. Which timeslot are you going in on? ohh -- I see @ 22:00
[19:55] <wxl> flocculant: awesome!
[19:56] <balloons> wxl, thank you much! If you need help grokking anything, let me know.
[19:56] <wxl> balloons: i got him working on a project that may help with that. trying to figure out a way to provide a summary of qa activity within a certain stretch of time. you know, to show consistency.
[19:56] <balloons> so top100 link should work, can you confirm?
[19:56] <balloons> ahh, that sounds like right up this alley then
[19:57] <wxl> balloons: totes. ideally it'll be a python script, but maybe we could throw it on the tracker, too, as quality rather than quantity is always preferable :)
[19:57] <flocculant> balloons: ack - works
[19:57] <wxl> balloons: we were discussing the problems with the top 100 list and that kind of led to it
[20:00] <balloons> I am all for such ideas -- go for it
[20:00] <wxl> balloons: sounds good. he may be in touch later today about it
[20:02] <wxl> tsimonq2: read above. balloons is more than willing to help you with that project i gave you :)
[20:09] <flocculant> balloons: mmm
[20:09] <flocculant> houston we have a problem ...
[20:09] <flocculant> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects
[20:10] <flocculant> only showing me the rather pointless list of xenial alpha2 bugs :)
[20:10] <balloons> wait -- we just SPOKE about this!
[20:10] <flocculant> what?
[20:10] <flocculant> no we didn't
[20:10] <balloons> lol, that was my bug
[20:11] <flocculant> well
[20:11] <balloons> or maybe the bug was poorly worded -- but essentially that's what I was crying foul over
[20:11] <flocculant> I read your bug as something COMPLETELY different
[20:11] <balloons> ahh
[20:11] <balloons> well, what do you want on that page?
[20:11] <balloons> I expect the other active milestones to also show any bugs
[20:11] <flocculant> eg - why would I be the slightest bit interested in old stuff :p
[20:12] <flocculant> I expect ALL active milestones to show bugs
[20:12] <flocculant> I expect ALL inactive milestones to wander off into the mists of time :)
[20:12] <balloons> right -- so we agree. And also my bug report sucks apparently
[20:13] <flocculant> balloons: you pointed me at something completely different :)
[20:13] <balloons> ohh I see now
[20:13] <flocculant> you linked to specific old builds and the bug lists - I see no need to see anything there
[20:14] <balloons> I guess I never reported the defects page
[20:14] <balloons> but I did notice it, and thought that bug was it
[20:14] <flocculant> ok
[20:14] <balloons> anyways, we need a proper bug for it and a fix too ;-)
[20:14] <flocculant> I'll let you get away with [20:10:39] <balloons> wait -- we just SPOKE about this! then :p
[20:14] <flocculant> I'll report that now
[20:14] <flocculant> in English :D
[20:16] <flocculant> balloons: bug 1541586
[20:16] <ubot5`> bug 1541586 in Ubuntu QA Website "Defect summary missing active milestones" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1541586
[20:20] <flocculant> wxl: you seen bug 1540003 ?
[20:20] <ubot5`> bug 1540003 in Ubuntu Manual Tests "[Lubuntu] Test cases for Release Upgrades" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1540003
[20:21] <wxl> flocculant: yeah i pointed that out to him. he's working on it. :)
[20:22] <flocculant> wxl: tsimonq2 is on your release team?
[20:22] <wxl> flocculant: he's been helping out extensively, yes
[20:23] <flocculant> wxl: maybe - but is he in the lubuntu release team on LP - if not he'll not be fixing that
[20:23] <wxl> flocculant: ah, well, we might need to make him on it :)
[20:23] <flocculant> needs specific access to the tracker admin side to fix it afaik
[20:23] <flocculant> hence - my @wxl on that bug :)
[20:24] <wxl> flocculant: well, it's in my inbox but yes thank you for pointing it out :)
[20:24] <flocculant> ok - not meaning to rabbit on about it - but I tend to corral the testcase bugs ;)
[20:24] <flocculant> manual
[20:25] <flocculant> by rabbit on I mean I want to get the list down to one page :p
[21:14] <flocculant> balloons: do we know which commit caused the defect list issue?
[21:15] <balloons> flocculant, yes -- the changes made to that page included it I believe
[21:16] <flocculant> ok - so not a major issue, where it's hidden away
[21:16] <flocculant> says me - when any code thing would be a major issue ;)
[21:33] <balloons> flocculant, :-) Yea, it slipped in during the frenzy of updates
[21:33] <balloons> really should have caught it, but I agree it's not super critical. So we can fix it now
[22:07] <tsimonq2> *YAWN* been sick with something, just now got a chance to be online
[22:07] <wxl> still sick? :( did you drink liquids like i told you, young man???? ;)
[22:08] <wxl> wasn't it you, balloons, who referred to the "ubunflu?" XD
[22:08] <tsimonq2> wxl: yeah I'm getting better
[22:08] <wxl> tsimonq2: glad to hear it. keep maintaining yourself.
[22:08] <tsimonq2> anyways, be back soon to look at what you people have been rambling about XD
[22:17] <tsimonq2> balloons: haven't gotten down all the way in backlogs but I would be open to whipping something up for the changes over the weekend to throw somewhere :)
[22:21] <tsimonq2> flocculant: lol I wouldn't mind the same "rabbiting" for the test case bugs XD
[23:15] <tsimonq2> balloons: does the tracker have api docs?