[14:16] <knome> bluesabre, i've been using Noto 9 since yesterday, and while it isn't bad, it's a bit meh...
[14:19] <knome> bluesabre, i'm trying the wc app next, let's see if i run out of time or not before i get to try it for realz
[14:21] <knome> bluesabre, actually, i would say the replacement would need to be Noto Sans 9, because then we get to keep the line-height at par with Droid Sans 10
[14:21] <knome> bluesabre, Noto 9 is already much wider than Droid 10 anyway...
[14:21] <knome> and for that matter, Noto still looks more "cramped" than Droid, so it's definitely getting worse with Noto..
[14:21] <knome> another potential substitute is the Ubuntu font
[14:32] <knome> bluesabre, sent a comment to the issue; still not fixy
[17:00] <flocculant> knome: and that font has issues
[17:03] <flocculant> ochosi: when you're about #u-desktop from (UK) 16:21 - fair bit about usc and gs 
[17:07] <flocculant> bluesabre: could you leave an answer on bug 1294600
[20:06] <knome> flocculant, what kind of issues?
[20:07] <flocculant> bug 1525150 bug 1521210 bug 1520772
[20:17] <flocculant> knome: and I checked those again recently, still the same here
[20:20] <knome> right
[20:20] <flocculant> well - I check when I see an update/grade to the package(s) 
[20:21] <knome> yep
[20:21] <flocculant> as with anything else I know I've reported
[20:22] <flocculant> talking of which doesn't appear to be anything happening with the fop problem
[20:22] <flocculant> btw
[20:22] <knome> right
[20:48] <ochosi> flocculant: thanks, read up on that
[20:48] <ochosi> so yeah, we'll see how things play out for u-desktop and follow their decision
[20:48] <ochosi> unless g-s feels broken ofc
[20:50] <flocculant> ochosi: yep
[20:50] <flocculant> though if I read it right - then we'll be ok to carry on as is
[20:53] <flocculant> not appearing too positive currently
[20:55] <ochosi> yeah, some very basic issues it seems
[20:57] <flocculant> yup
[20:57] <flocculant> ochosi: how's things anyway - don't catch up much lately - busy busy busy I assume :)
[21:00] <ochosi> yeah, well i was @fosdem on the weekend
[21:00] <ochosi> and during the week i was working
[21:00] <ochosi> so it's been pretty intense
[21:00] <flocculant> oh right - was that good? 
[21:00] <ochosi> other than that i'm doing fine :)
[21:00] <ochosi> yeah, it was really nice
[21:00] <ochosi> even got to see sabdfl
[21:00] <flocculant> yea I know work is a bit different for you now :)
[21:01] <flocculant> nice one 
[21:01] <ochosi> and actually many other interesting talks
[21:01] <flocculant> cool
[21:01] <ochosi> also met ofourdan and kalikiana and larsu
[21:02] <flocculant> 2 I have heard of (1 of them I see on irc) 
[21:03] <flocculant> never heard of kalikiana
[21:06] <ochosi> rly?
[21:06] <ochosi> midori author
[21:06] <ochosi> previously also wrote postler, of which parts turned into geary
[21:06] <ochosi> and now he's working on ubuntu touch/convergence
[21:06] <flocculant> that'll be why probably - tried midori a couple of times and then ignored it
[21:07] <flocculant> and if he's involved with touch/convergence that's something I tend to shy away from tbh
[21:09] <ochosi> anyway, lovely chap, knome knows him too
[21:09] <flocculant> :)
[21:09] <flocculant> not many people aren't to be honest - lovely chap(esses)'s that is :)
[21:13] <ochosi> well, i try to remain optimistic
[21:14] <flocculant> you have too :)
[22:16] <knome> either i've been able to avoid the non-lovely chaps, but most of the people i've been involved with more deeply have been nice chaps