[08:53] <oSoMoN> Mirv, are we planning on upgrading to Qt 5.5 in the stable overlay PPA? (and if so, when?)
[09:02] <Mirv> oSoMoN: there has been no pressure toward that. it'd probably require critical bugs that can only be fixed in that way. I've silo 028 prepared to an extent for the possibility, but for now it's more likely that upgrade to 5.5 will only happen when switching from vivid to xenial.
[09:03] <Mirv> oSoMoN: since focus is on vivid, we haven't had that much development exposure to xenial related problems and so there maybe risks lurking around
[09:03] <oSoMoN> Mirv, I don’t think that qualifies as a critical bug, however there is bug #1537782 that requires Qt 5.5 to be fixed (just FYI)
[09:03] <ubot5`> bug 1537782 in Canonical System Image "Need to use (Q)Shortcuts instead of Keys.onPressed for shortcuts" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537782
[09:04] <Mirv> oSoMoN: is it somehow harder to backport than the other features and bug fixes we've backported to our 5.4?
[09:04] <Mirv> oSoMoN: we've features from 5.6 and 5.7 in our 5.4 :)
[09:05] <oSoMoN> Mirv, I don’t know, I haven’t looked into it
[09:05] <Mirv> right, so backport is the first option always
[09:06] <Mirv> oSoMoN: is it that the QShortcut is not usable even though mterry says it's also an option in addition to 5.5's QML Shortcut? is it just a need to use C++ side for that?
[09:06] <Mirv> I read it like QShortcut would already be in 5.4 and only QML Shortcut in 5.5
[09:07] <Mirv> oSoMoN: it looks to me it's in 5.3 already http://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-5.3/qshortcut.html
[09:07] <oSoMoN> Mirv, yeah, I’d need to look into how feasible it is to use QShortcut and expose it to QML
[09:08] <Mirv> oSoMoN: another option is indeed to look how big a backport QML Shortcut would be
[09:09] <oSoMoN> Mirv, I’ll look into the QShortcut option first, and will let you know if it turns out not to work
[09:10] <Mirv> oSoMoN: ok!
[09:33] <JamesTait> Good morning all!  Happy Thursday, and happy Create a Vacuum Day! 😃
[11:32] <tsimonq2> :D JamesTait
[12:25] <shadeslayer> ogra_: ping
[12:25] <shadeslayer> ogra_: When trying to include a new image for E5 on the plasma phone stuffs, I get https://paste.kde.org/pciduvxkg
[12:26] <ogra_> shadeslayer, looks to me like your initrd isnt in gzip format
[12:26] <bshah> ogra_: initrd is supposed to be from device tarball right?
[12:26] <ogra_> yeah
[12:27] <bshah> we are pulling it from ubuntu system-image server
[12:27] <bshah> so sounds bit odd
[12:28] <bshah> ogra_: relavant part: file_device = remote-system-image;https://system-image.ubuntu.com/;devel-proposed;device;keyring=archive-master
[12:29] <bshah> oh.. sounds like our config is kinda outdated
[12:30] <bshah> or maybe note
[12:30] <ogra_> note that i havent worked on the phone for over a year, perhaps sil2100 is your better choice for questions if it comes to system-image stuff
[12:30] <shadeslayer> ogra_: ack
[12:30] <shadeslayer> sil2100: ^^ could you please advise ? :)
[12:30]  * ogra_ would check what the format of your initrd file is there and actually check if the system-image server you have set up even supports that
[12:31] <shadeslayer>  file /tmp/tmpovpN8w/img/initrd.img
[12:31] <shadeslayer> /tmp/tmpovpN8w/img/initrd.img: data
[12:31] <ogra_> (i would assume we use xz for size reasons )
[12:31] <shadeslayer> is what I see
[13:19] <Alexander_> Hi
[14:14] <shadeslayer> ogra_: https://i.imgur.com/hK6ekee.jpg and then https://i.imgur.com/85AzePk.jpg
[14:14] <shadeslayer> ogra_: but hey, it installs and boots and runs :)
[14:15] <ogra_> shadeslayer, you should really work on your default avatar icon ... "sad face" ;)
[14:15] <shadeslayer> that's not a sad face xD
[14:15] <bshah> is not sad face :p
[14:15] <ogra_> well ... sad cyclope i should say
[14:16] <shadeslayer> lol
[14:16] <bshah> eh
[14:16]  * bshah googles
[14:16] <ogra_> but awesome nontheless !
[14:16] <ogra_> congrats
[14:17] <shadeslayer> :D
[14:17] <shadeslayer> thanks
[14:17] <ogra_> s/cyclope//cyclops/
[14:23] <charles> jgdx, pmcgowan, for bug #1533835 I've got a simple MP for indicator-location to call the "settings:///location" uri requested in-ticket
[14:24] <ubot5`> bug 1533835 in indicator-location (Ubuntu) "Support direct access to the location panel" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1533835
[14:24] <charles> jgdx, is there a branch of systems-settings to go to the right page when that uri is called?
[14:37] <jgdx> charles, not yet, but I'll let you know
[14:41] <matv1> lpotter hi regarding your email about XHR. Thanks for looking into that! So I read that you´re confirming my finding?
[14:48] <matv1> lpotter I was wondering though why 2 other people are reporting it was working for them currently
[14:54] <charles> jgdx, sounds good, thanks
[15:23] <mhall119> mariogrip: were you able to finish building the Ubuntu 15.04 parts for the fairphone?
[15:24] <mhall119> and are you still having the same Mir problems with it?
[15:42] <sil2100> shadeslayer: hey!
[15:42] <shadeslayer> sil2100: halo!
[15:42] <sil2100> shadeslayer: sorry, was AFK (I'm a bit sick this week)
[15:42] <shadeslayer> no problem :)
[15:42] <sil2100> shadeslayer: is your question still valid?
[15:42] <shadeslayer> somewhat I think
[15:42] <shadeslayer> bshah: ^^
[15:42] <shadeslayer> IIRC we're still having problems with gpg checks, on system image and on the phone
[15:43] <shadeslayer> ( I currently touch /etc/system-image/skip-gpg-verification to get the image to install )
[15:43] <shadeslayer> serverside, bshah knows more
[15:43] <bshah> sil2100: so we pull device image for e5 from system-image.ubuntu.com, and somehow it fails to sign device image locally
[15:44] <bshah> locally as in on our server
[15:45] <bshah> I am not sure what I am missing.. I remember doing something to solve this for nexus channel.. but not exactly what
[15:45] <bshah> sil2100: error
[15:46] <bshah> 2016-02-04 12:45:31,238 INFO Publishing new image '1' (ubuntu=20160124.061258,keyring=archive-master,version=1) with 4 files.
[15:46] <bshah> Traceback (most recent call last):
[15:46] <bshah>   File "./bin/import-images", line 276, in <module>
[15:46] <bshah>     version_detail=",".join(environment['version_detail']))
[15:46] <bshah>   File "/home/ubuntu/kubuntu/system-image/bin/../lib/systemimage/tree.py", line 831, in create_image
[15:46] <sil2100> Oh, a traceback
[15:46] <bshah>     "%s.asc" % abspath)
[15:46] <bshah> Exception: The GPG file signature doesn't exists:
[15:46] <bshah> /home/ubuntu/kubuntu/system-image/www/pool/device-6eb6ef54acd77c22d48fa4118535cfbd7f776d687d9355f48d7f32f1e4a0812f.tar.xz.asc
[15:47] <bshah> it is entierly possible that our system-image server is outdated and may need update :p
[15:48] <sil2100> bshah: let me take a deeper look - in theory that *might* be the issue, but let me take a look at that - it should just work frankly as I ran a local server on my laptop last week pulling in tarballs from a remote system-image (with the same generator)
[15:48] <sil2100> One moment ;)
[15:48] <bshah> it works for nexus channel but not e5 channel..
[15:49] <sil2100> bshah: your generator is using 'devel-proposed', right?
[15:49] <bshah> yes
[15:49] <bshah> exact config line :
[15:49] <bshah> ile_device = remote-system-image;https://system-image.ubuntu.com/;devel-proposed;device;keyring=archive-master
[15:50] <sil2100> Since currently that's a redirect to ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed/ubuntu - just an idea that maybe redirects aren't too well handled in this case
[15:50] <sil2100> But anyway, that's just an idea, let me dig into that
[16:29] <bshah> sil2100: I am going off to sleep now, though if you need any other information for this feel free to poke me.
[16:30] <bshah> (though please leave message in query, bouncer may eat up messages in channel :p)
[16:31] <maskorx> hello, I have an BQ Aquaris E4.5 Ubuntu touch edition, and so far I got every OTA update right on time or 1 day late, but the recent OTA-9 still did not arrive on my phone, can anybody help out, who should I contact or anything?
[16:34] <sil2100> bshah: sure, I'm in a meeting right now, will follow up on PM ;)
[16:34] <maskorx> you will help me?
[16:40] <pmcgowan> oh where did he go
[16:41] <dobey> pmcgowan: lovely lack of patience, eh? :)
[16:43] <pmcgowan> dobey, always feel bad when that happens
[16:45] <dobey> pmcgowan: i can't feel bad for people who come on irc and can't practice patience, but at least it didn't end with pointless insults being thrown :)
[16:46] <pmcgowan> lol
[16:46] <pmcgowan> right
[16:47] <dobey> i wish it only took 3 minutes to get an answer from some people, but unfortunately the earth isn't flat and we aren't all in the same wake/sleep cycles
[17:24] <mcphail> Given the lack of discussion on here, I presume the Phoronix article saying Canonical has "announced" a bq tablet is typical speculative sloppy journalism from Michael?
[17:25] <seb128> mcphail, https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/02/04/canonical-reinvents-the-personal-mobile-computing-experience/
[17:27] <ahayzen> mcphail, http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/02/bq-m10-ubuntu-tablet-everything-you-need-to-know :-)
[17:27] <mcphail> seb128: nice. Thanks! There wasn't any source link inthe article. Very exciting!
[17:28] <mcphail> ahayzen: omgubuntu are as unreliable as Phoronix when it comes to news. Seeing the official announcement is more reasurring ;)
[17:28] <ahayzen> mcphail, but there are loads of photos :-) hehe
[17:28] <mcphail> ha!
[17:30] <mariogrip> A ubuntu tablet? me want one :D That's awesome!
[17:41] <tathhu> Also.. minihdmi :o
[17:41]  * tathhu wants
[17:56] <tathhu> .. scopes in landscape? :P
[19:38] <k1l> anyone made a ubuntu touch rom for the HP touchpad? :)
[19:48] <tathhu> Does E5 support USB-OTG?
[19:48] <anpok> hm the E4.5 did
[19:49] <anpok> never had an E5.. but afaik only the display is different..
[19:49] <dobey> E5 is pretty much same hardware as E4.5
[19:49] <tathhu> thanks
[19:49] <tathhu> <3
[19:50] <dobey> minor differences like display and device name, afaik
[20:57] <maxvanceffer> Hi to all, can somebody help me how i can determine header height ?
[20:58] <maxvanceffer> spent 3 hours to debug all vars on runtime...  and uderstood that header is worsest part of sdk
[20:59] <dobey> maxvanceffer: you might want to ask in #ubuntu-app-devel instead
[21:18] <maxvanceffer> dobey thanks for point me to the right channel
[21:18] <dobey> sure
[23:49] <shibboleth> What are the major caveats in trying to use touch on a Nexus 5/hammerhead?