cjwatson | robru: I'm working on the unity bzr issues | 01:10 |
---|---|---|
cjwatson | branch surgery | 01:10 |
robru | cjwatson: oh cool. What was wrong with it? Never seen that before on any project | 01:26 |
cjwatson | robru: branch corrupted due to not entirely known root causes, possibly botched recovery from an uncommit failure and related to stacking issues | 01:28 |
robru | Huh | 01:28 |
cjwatson | robru: but lp:unity was/is corrupted as well, I'm working on reconciling it | 01:28 |
robru | cjwatson: yeah the "readonly transport" bit was particularly confusing as it's the same transport everything else uses | 01:29 |
cjwatson | yeah that's just misleading | 01:29 |
cjwatson | but really, this is going to happen from time to time with bzr and the root causes are unlikely to be fixed | 01:29 |
cjwatson | train needs some git | 01:29 |
robru | cjwatson: yeah we have a bug for that unfortunately it might take a while | 01:30 |
cjwatson | sure | 01:30 |
robru | It's not a drop in replacement, train has a lot of bzr knowledge | 01:30 |
cjwatson | doesn't surprise me | 01:30 |
robru | Including building with "bzr bd", sigh | 01:31 |
robru | cjwatson: i don't suppose anybody's made a "git bd" yet ;-) | 01:31 |
cjwatson | git-buildpackage | 01:31 |
robru | Ooh? | 01:31 |
cjwatson | I mean it's not like it gains much | 01:31 |
cjwatson | for your purposes, you could just build the thing with dpkg-buildpackage assuming we don't do ridiculous split branch things for git | 01:32 |
cjwatson | but gbp *can* I think cope with having a packaging-only tree | 01:33 |
cjwatson | dunno, I never use that mode since git has way better tools for dealing with patches anyway | 01:33 |
robru | cjwatson: not sure what you mean by split branch but we do split packaging (build orig.tar by dropping debian/ from source tree) | 01:33 |
cjwatson | I mean that | 01:34 |
robru | Right | 01:34 |
cjwatson | but in part it's to cope with bzr not having as good tools | 01:34 |
robru | cjwatson: oh yeah and the best part is that we have train users commit bzr bd specific bits to their source trees | 01:34 |
cjwatson | like with git you can just have a branch in the repository that holds your pristine-tar metadata, etc. | 01:34 |
cjwatson | sure, any switch would involve tree migrations | 01:34 |
robru | True | 01:35 |
robru | Lots to think about, and other priorities too. I'm trying to do ephemeral PPAs first then git after | 01:35 |
cjwatson | right. I just want to avoid the situation down the line a year or two when we have weird data corruption in toolsets we totally depend on that nobody knows how to fix any more | 01:36 |
cjwatson | thanks, lag, your insertion of a stray character in the middle of the words "data corruption" was apposite | 01:37 |
robru | cjwatson: yeah for sure. I doubt it'll be a whole year before i get git in there | 01:37 |
cjwatson | cool | 01:37 |
Mirv | robru: do you happen to have any visibility on why some silo autopkgtests seem to be aabaout eternally in progress? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-023/excuses.html the main autopkgtests page does not show any queue | 06:37 |
robru | Mirv: something looks really wrong with that running.shtml, it's very short and there's not a single entry for any silo at all. You should ping pitti about that | 06:40 |
robru | Mirv: one thing to be aware of is that silo britney runs currently take an hour due to high load, so there's some possibility that if a test just finished, depending on the timing it could take bileto up to 2 hours to notice | 06:41 |
Mirv | robru: ok | 07:01 |
Mirv | robru: that has been there for 5 days or so | 07:02 |
robru | Hmmmmmmm | 07:02 |
Mirv | the silo untouched | 07:02 |
Mirv | I managed to now get the failing tests to pass by rerunning but there are some of those blues in there | 07:02 |
Mirv | but some of the blue ones also yesterday turned green | 07:02 |
robru | Mirv: yeah you need pitti to dig into that, all i can tell you is that britney is running | 07:02 |
robru | Not what it's doing | 07:02 |
Mirv | robru: thank you! | 07:03 |
robru | Yw | 07:03 |
Saviq | jibel, morning, Allan was unable to get adb on frieza re: silo 57 https://trello.com/c/IaTmnfWq/2748-963-ubuntu-landing-057-unity8-qtmir-saviq - how can we continue? I confirmed this to work on my laptop and on nexus7 FWIW | 09:40 |
jibel | rvr, can you take 57? ^ | 09:46 |
pete-woods | trainguards: hey guys, the (frustratingly "always failed") downstream autopkgtests for silo 70 have been running for like a whole day now | 09:57 |
pete-woods | is there any way I can just push past this part of the process? | 09:57 |
rvr | jibel: Yup | 10:11 |
Mirv | robru: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-023/excuses.html says now finally valid candidate but the ticket still says Failed | 10:16 |
Mirv | robru: not sure how it parses the results (or reparses or not reparses), maybe the overrides are not considered and it "greps for Regression"? | 10:17 |
robru | pete-woods: pls email me, I'll fix it so it doesn't block on those, for now just ping qa to move it along | 10:17 |
Mirv | this would be the final hurdle in this two week long "get a working silo into QA queue" quest (since I still don't see silo 023 manually inserted to Trello) | 10:17 |
robru | Mirv: yes it greps for REGRESSION, exactly | 10:19 |
Mirv | but meanwhile the train has gotten a lot better so it's worth the wait | 10:19 |
Mirv | robru: may instead grep for "Not considered"? | 10:19 |
pete-woods | robru: do you mean "please have emailed me yesterday?" as I guess you already know now? | 10:19 |
Mirv | pete-woods: I guess robert means "please insert an item to my to-do queue while I'm way past bedtime and might forget" :) | 10:20 |
pete-woods | ah, yeah, he's on the wrong tz | 10:20 |
pete-woods | go to bed! | 10:20 |
Mirv | "wrong" :D | 10:20 |
robru | pete-woods: yeah what Mirv said, 2am here | 10:21 |
robru | pete-woods: I fixed this once but had to revert for other reasons, can fix it again, it's literally two characters difference in one line of code | 10:22 |
pete-woods | FWIW, I don't mean to complain about this tool, you've done an astounding one-man job where others have failed | 10:22 |
robru | pete-woods: though you and Mirv are complaining about the same thing here | 10:22 |
pete-woods | this is literally the first time it's ever done something annoying | 10:22 |
Mirv | pete-woods: +1 to that | 10:22 |
robru | pete-woods: Haha thanks. Pitti deserves most credit for autopkgtests I just connected the dots | 10:23 |
pete-woods | well I'm less keen on the implementation side of autopkgtests to be honest, as they all just seem to fail for me | 10:23 |
pete-woods | making me needlessly wait for failures | 10:23 |
pete-woods | but maybe that'll get better | 10:24 |
pete-woods | "all" is probably a bit dramatic :) | 10:25 |
robru | Mirv: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/bileto/view/head:/britney/iterate.py#L101 I guess I'll just drop the check for REGRESSION as it already checks for "Not considered" so I guess that's redundant. Will fix within 12 hrs ;-) | 10:25 |
Mirv | robru: cool! :) | 10:33 |
sil2100 | michi: moving here so that we don't spam the -release channel - I don't even know where the generic-lander nodes are actually running normally | 11:06 |
sil2100 | michi: and webops said they have no knowledge and no access besides to the power switches | 11:06 |
michi | that’s wonderful :( | 11:07 |
michi | So, where are the people who do know? | 11:07 |
michi | I would have thought that Evan and Francis should know. | 11:07 |
davmor2 | michi: and both states side timezones right | 11:09 |
michi | davmor2: I think so :( | 11:10 |
michi | So, it might another two or three hours. | 11:10 |
michi | davmor2, sil2100: will you guys be around long enough to ping someone? | 11:10 |
michi | It’s getting a little late Down Under... | 11:10 |
sil2100 | michi: yeah, will try to get this pushed further... | 11:10 |
davmor2 | sil2100: I will be but I don't care about it or understand the issue so might be better for you to push :) | 11:11 |
michi | thanks guys! | 11:12 |
michi | We need s-jenkins to limp along for a few more weeks. | 11:13 |
michi | We are trying hard to migrate our stuff over to jenkaas. | 11:13 |
michi | but there are around 30 projects to migrate. | 11:13 |
michi | And it took nearly four weeks for us to even get our jenkaas provisioned... | 11:13 |
sil2100 | Yeah, I know what you mean | 11:13 |
sil2100 | The tarball team has ~8 projects and they can't really get them working yet | 11:13 |
Mirv | we've managed to disable all our s-jenkins jobs a few weeks ago, and have a little more features now than what we used to have in s-jenkins | 11:22 |
Mirv | some hard work, though, was needed | 11:23 |
Mirv | davmor2: jibel: I still haven't gotten a clear idea if you plan to test silo 23 because of my pleas when it's good to review OTA-10 landings, since I don't see it manually inserted into the Trello queue. it's a pre-requirement for SDK OTA-10 bug fix so time is getting a bit short for them to work on their stuff on top of it. | 11:56 |
Mirv | davmor2: jibel: if you don't have time for it today, then it should be ok because the last fix to train + britney is going to go in late today and then it would appear finally automatically into the QA queue, but the silo has been ready for over a week now like communicated earlier. | 11:57 |
Mirv | it has been good to get the train robust, it will help in the next Qt landings | 11:58 |
jibel | Mirv, I'll force the creation of the card but we won't have time today | 12:00 |
Mirv | jibel: ok if you don't have time today anyway then no need as it _should_ appear when robert applies one more fix to train code in the evening | 12:04 |
Mirv | I can reping tomorrow if there's still an issue | 12:05 |
pstolowski | jibel, hello! can we get silo 64 ack'ed and landed as a matter of urgency? no code change, only temporarily disabled abi check (full explanation in the description https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/983) | 12:05 |
jibel | pstolowski, Hey, sure, not sure when though, we'll do our best. | 12:09 |
pstolowski | jibel, ack, thanks. this currently blocks builds for our entire scopes stack | 12:13 |
jibel | pstolowski, I understand, I'll prioritize the request but there are already lot of urgent things to land | 12:14 |
pstolowski | jibel, understood, ty | 12:15 |
davmor2 | jibel, john-mcaleely, morphis: 15 passed | 12:17 |
jibel | davmor2, Excellent \o/ | 12:23 |
jibel | davmor2, very good job! | 12:23 |
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
Mirv | hmmph | 12:35 |
morphis | davmor2: awesome! | 12:54 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
john-mcaleely | davmor2, \o/ | 13:26 |
Saviq | trainguards, I can has publish on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/963 please? | 13:26 |
sil2100 | Looking | 13:28 |
Mirv | looked already | 13:29 |
sil2100 | Oh, timo is on it ;) | 13:29 |
sil2100 | Thanks! | 13:29 |
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
Saviq | omg now that's a busy britney... | 14:28 |
pstolowski | hey trainguards, what does 'automated signoff: failed' for silo 64 mean? | 14:47 |
jibel | pstolowski, it means there are some failures in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/vivid/landing-064/excuses.html | 14:53 |
jibel | pstolowski, http://paste.ubuntu.com/15002165/ fails on amd64 and i386 | 14:54 |
pstolowski | jibel, this is a flakiness in scope harness, unrelated to anything in silo 64 | 14:55 |
dobey | jibel, pstolowski: we can't land unity-scopes-api by itself | 14:56 |
dobey | pstolowski: it's not entirely unrelated | 14:56 |
pstolowski | dobey, ? | 14:58 |
dobey | pstolowski: jsoncpp broke ABI | 14:58 |
pstolowski | dobey, but jsoncpp is internal to scopes-api, we don't expose it.. so should be enough to rebuild unity-scopes-api? | 14:59 |
dobey | pstolowski: no, because it can't link to one jsoncpp and then the scopes link to a differnt jsoncpp; stuff will just crash | 15:00 |
pstolowski | dobey, btw, that error with games department in click scope is not new, i saw it when i looked at the flaky scopeharness tests a week ago | 15:01 |
pstolowski | dobey, ah.. i didn't know click scope links to jsoncpp | 15:01 |
dobey | pstolowski: yes i know that. but on xenial stuff is going to break much worse | 15:01 |
dobey | pstolowski: mediascanner does too | 15:01 |
rvr | jgdx: ping | 15:01 |
pstolowski | dobey, won't do any harm to do no-change rebuilds in same silo? | 15:02 |
dobey | pstolowski: well we already have some other silos. it's better to reduce number of silos and no-change rebuilds if we can. | 15:03 |
pstolowski | dobey, i'd prefer to keep features in separate silos | 15:04 |
dobey | pstolowski: you mean the mediascanner thing? | 15:04 |
pstolowski | dobey, one silo (filters) is for user testing... the other needs design ack etc. | 15:04 |
dobey | pstolowski: anyway, since my day is just getting started now, let me do some consolidation of the silos here and get this landed | 15:05 |
pstolowski | dobey, yes, mediascanner thing | 15:05 |
dobey | i'll make an empty MP for mediascanner since it doesn't have a small silo with only a simple bug fix already | 15:05 |
pstolowski | dobey, only silo 24 and 64 should land, please don't consolidate the others | 15:06 |
dobey | pstolowski: and my unity-scope-click silo which is only bug fixes | 15:07 |
jgdx | rvr, pong | 15:11 |
rvr | jgdx: Hi | 15:11 |
rvr | jgdx: I'm testing silo 21 | 15:12 |
rvr | jgdx: The background looks wrong in not-windowed mode on the tablet | 15:12 |
rvr | jgdx: http://people.canonical.com/~vrruiz/system-settings-background-landscape.jpg | 15:12 |
rvr | jgdx: In windowed mode, looks fine, the background is displayed with the landscape ratio | 15:13 |
jgdx | rvr, I think you want to talk to ken about that. kenvandine was anything changed in the USS background panel? ^ | 15:16 |
dobey | pstolowski: ok, i merged things into the silo where i already had unity-scope-click, and abandoned 64 and 24; and 37 is now rebuilding | 15:18 |
rvr | jgdx: Oh, probably | 15:18 |
rvr | kenvandine: ^ | 15:18 |
pstolowski | dobey, great, thanks for that! | 15:19 |
kenvandine | rvr, we haven't changed anything | 15:20 |
kenvandine | rvr, that url gives a 404 | 15:20 |
dobey | hopefully it rebuilds fine now as-is | 15:20 |
rvr | kenvandine: Yeah, removed, uploading to private server, one moment | 15:21 |
kenvandine | ok | 15:21 |
rvr | kenvandine: https://chinstrap.canonical.com/~vrruiz/system-settings-background-landscape.jpg | 15:22 |
kenvandine | rvr 404 there too | 15:22 |
kenvandine | chinstrap redirects to private-fileshare | 15:23 |
rvr | Weird | 15:23 |
pmcgowan | kenvandine, you might need the vpn on | 15:24 |
kenvandine | i've gotten to private-fileshare before | 15:25 |
kenvandine | and am now, just getting a 404 | 15:25 |
kenvandine | https://private-fileshare.canonical.com/~vrruiz/system-settings-background-landscape.jpg | 15:25 |
rvr | kenvandine: Can you ssh to chinstrap? | 15:26 |
kenvandine | yup | 15:26 |
kenvandine | wtf | 15:27 |
kenvandine | rvr so there is some diagram showing there? | 15:27 |
rvr | kenvandine: If you ssh, the file is in /home/vrruiz/ | 15:27 |
kenvandine | rvr, and that's on the app switcher? | 15:27 |
kenvandine | i got the file | 15:28 |
kenvandine | the background we set in system-settings is only used for the greeter | 15:28 |
kenvandine | so what you're seeing shouldn't have anything to do with that | 15:28 |
rvr | kenvandine: So, the description of the silo is that it's a fix for landscape, and in windowed mode, the background has a landscape ratio | 15:29 |
kenvandine | no, nothing to do with landscape | 15:29 |
rvr | kenvandine: But when system settings is in the side panel, this large background is shown | 15:29 |
kenvandine | it sets a fixed width to be used in windowed mode | 15:29 |
kenvandine | yeah, but that isn't from settings | 15:30 |
kenvandine | i don't see that on my flo | 15:30 |
rvr | kenvandine: Background Ensure default for images is landscape | 15:30 |
kenvandine | i see the app scope | 15:30 |
rvr | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1541588 | 15:30 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1541588 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "[System Settings] Changes needed for the UI on a tablet device" [Critical,In progress] | 15:30 |
kenvandine | oh, that part isn't fixed :) | 15:30 |
kenvandine | that's not in the silo | 15:31 |
rvr | kenvandine: https://trello.com/c/8xdSGk8F/2747-969-ubuntu-landing-021-ubuntu-system-settings-kenvandine | 15:31 |
kenvandine | we tackled what we could in that bug | 15:31 |
rvr | Bug #1541588: [System Settings] Changes needed for the UI on a tablet device | 15:31 |
rvr | Bug #1542050: don't allow window to be resized (not the shell doesn't handle this properly yet) | 15:31 |
ubot5` | bug 1542050 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "don't allow window to be resized" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1542050 | 15:31 |
kenvandine | since settings doesn't do any resizing or cropping we didn't do that | 15:31 |
kenvandine | that should be "note the shell..." | 15:32 |
kenvandine | rvr, what you are seeing is very strange, must be a shell bug | 15:32 |
kenvandine | settings doesn't touch that, it only sets the background to be used for the greeter | 15:32 |
kenvandine | rvr, the only things changed are listed in the testplan | 15:35 |
rvr | kenvandine: Take a look to the other screenshot that I shared in /home/vrruiz/ | 15:35 |
kenvandine | rvr, what's really odd in your screenshot is the image is not only displayed behind the app but over top of it | 15:36 |
kenvandine | rvr filename? | 15:36 |
rvr | kenvandine: system-settings-background-landscape-2.jpg | 15:36 |
kenvandine | so it looks like rendered artifacts | 15:36 |
kenvandine | is that a pdf or something that's being showed? like some quick start guide? | 15:37 |
rvr | kenvandine: So I expected to see landscape background in both modes (panel and windowed) | 15:37 |
kenvandine | yeah, but that's not something we've worked on | 15:37 |
rvr | kenvandine: That's a photo with krillin :P | 15:38 |
kenvandine | and i think we need some design guidance there, because what do when in phone mode but later connected to an external display? | 15:38 |
kenvandine | we need to use different images i think | 15:38 |
rvr | kenvandine: So that part wasn't changed with the silo, right? | 15:39 |
kenvandine | right | 15:39 |
rvr | Ok, I'll fill a bug | 15:39 |
kenvandine | only what's listed in the testplan section | 15:39 |
kenvandine | rvr, i'm more concerned with that krillin image being displayed there... why is that? | 15:39 |
kenvandine | rvr, about the fixed width, unity8 doesn't honor that yet so you'll still be able to make it wider in windowed mode on the tablet | 15:40 |
kenvandine | but on the desktop you can confirm it doesn't | 15:40 |
rvr | kenvandine: Ok, I'm just testing in the tablet. | 15:41 |
rvr | kenvandine: Max/minimized worked, no regressions | 15:41 |
kenvandine | cool | 15:41 |
kenvandine | when it's fixed in unity8 you won't be able to maximize it | 15:42 |
rvr | kenvandine: By the way, I can still launch mobile data panel from the indicator network, although it only shows the spinner. | 15:44 |
kenvandine | yeah | 15:44 |
kenvandine | that needs a fix in the indicator | 15:44 |
kenvandine | rvr, there's a indicator-network task for the bug | 15:45 |
rvr | kenvandine: I was about to search for it, thanks! | 15:45 |
kenvandine | np | 15:45 |
rvr | Ok, now I will take a look to the silo with krillin | 15:45 |
kenvandine | cool | 15:45 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 15:46 |
alex-abreu | trainguards could you retry britney for unity8 aptests https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-016/excuses.html ? | 15:56 |
sil2100 | alex-abreu: the unity8 parts? | 15:58 |
alex-abreu | sil2100, yes pls | 15:58 |
sil2100 | alex-abreu: retried the failed unity8 test | 15:59 |
sil2100 | :) | 15:59 |
alex-abreu | thx | 15:59 |
sil2100 | yw | 15:59 |
Trevinho | robru, sil2100: any reason why https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-025/excuses.html states unity8, although it's unity7? | 16:25 |
Mirv | Trevinho: unity or part of it is reverse dependency of unity8, thus autopkgtest for u8 are run | 16:27 |
Trevinho | mh, okkk | 16:27 |
dobey | go go gadget britney | 17:51 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
dobey | aaaand now i have to rebuild my other silo yet again | 18:10 |
robru | Mirv: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/bileto/revision/418#britney/iterate.py ok next britney run should have correct results ;-) | 19:30 |
* robru sees silo 80 in use | 20:42 | |
robru | "are you shitting me?!" | 20:42 |
* robru forgot for a sec that they're assigned in random order | 20:42 | |
sil2100 | hah, I see you had a moment of horror | 20:51 |
robru | yes, my heart jumped | 20:52 |
robru | brb | 20:53 |
dobey | what the heck | 21:07 |
dobey | oh i guess kenvandine's silo hasn't quite landed yet | 21:08 |
kenvandine | dobey, need me to force merge it? | 21:11 |
dobey | kenvandine: probably not. seems like it should go through fine once britney passes it | 21:11 |
kenvandine | yeah | 21:11 |
kenvandine | if it's holding you up building something i can merge it | 21:11 |
dobey | well it's not the only thing being slow that's annoying me right now, so no worries :) | 21:12 |
dobey | i'll just have to wait another 6 hours after that lands, for the autopkgtests for my other silo, anyway | 21:12 |
dobey | and then probably bug qa to ignore the failed tests again | 21:13 |
kenvandine | good times | 21:13 |
dobey | maybe i should just go watch another episode of star trek | 21:14 |
robru | dobey: I landed the fix that makes it ignore ALWAYSFAILED so hopefully you'll be waiting slightly less | 21:26 |
dobey | robru: cool | 21:33 |
dobey | robru: proposed-migration still waits for the always failed to complete though, right? | 21:34 |
robru | dobey: no? if the package only has RUNNING-ALWAYSFAIL and no RUNNING, it's marked as Valid candidate. | 21:35 |
dobey | hmm, ok | 21:37 |
dobey | oh ffs | 21:45 |
dobey | the britney queue on xenial is bonkers | 21:45 |
dobey | thanks perl and python-numpy and qt | 21:47 |
dobey | this probably won't even be finished by the time i'm back on-line tomorrow :( | 21:47 |
robru | yikes | 21:49 |
dobey | robru: yeah, and some of them are probably going to just fail anyway, until silo 37 lands | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!