[08:02] <dholbach> good morning
[08:11] <unlaudable> morning
[08:12] <unlaudable> dholbach, ... the creator of byobu?
[08:12] <dholbach> no, I'm afraid not :)
[08:13] <dholbach> Dustin Kirkland might be the guy you want to talk to. :)
[08:29] <unlaudable> of course ... :D have my D's confused...
[11:50] <ngaio> I'm a Python application developer. I've been reading the documentation on packaging a Python application for Debian & Ubuntu, as well as writing a proper setup.py. My application is written in PyQt, hosted on launchpad, and uses gettext and the launchpad translation service. I'm overwhelmed by the complex interface between the various python installers (setuptools, distlib, etc.), and what's required by distros, such as man page installation. Is there
[11:50] <ngaio> an exemplary PyQt application that I can use to model my work on?
[12:06] <ngaio> sorry I just had connection problems
[12:37] <justin_time> Hi, I'm trying to update the tomahawk package and I'm not so familiar with the ubuntu sponsoring process. I would be really happy, if someone could help me and please check my bugreport (LP: #1487729) if this sponsoring request is correct and what I have to do next.
[12:37] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1487729 in tomahawk (Ubuntu) "Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
[12:49] <dholbach> justin_time, looks good AFAICS
[12:51] <justin_time> dholbach: ok, thanks for checking! Is there a chance that this request will be reviewed before FeatureFreeze?
[12:51] <dholbach> yeah, I guess so :)
[12:53] <justin_time> ok, thank you for your help!
=== barry` is now known as barry_
=== barry_ is now known as barry
[14:53] <bregma> dholbach, what's my next step for #1541417 ?
[14:55] <dholbach> I thought somebody else would take a look in the meantime....
[14:55] <dholbach> looking
[14:55] <teward> well
[14:56] <teward> it's assigned to someone so maybe they're going to look at it?
[14:56] <teward> dholbach: does the assignment there mean "that person is working on it, nobody else needs to" yet?  At least for some of the other developer process bugs i've seen, the assignee tends to indicate someone is working on it and nobody else needs to poke :)
[14:57]  * teward lurks
[14:57] <teward> s/yet//
[14:57]  * bregma has gotten awfully rusty at Ubuntu packaging
[14:57] <dholbach> teward, I don't think there's a hard and fast rule for that
[14:58] <dholbach> some use it for "who's working on all the code", some use it to show "who's reviewing it now"
[14:58] <teward> indeed.  i know for MIR it was used for 'who's reviewing', at least for nginx's MIR
[14:59] <teward> but was curious :)
[15:16] <dholbach> bregma, uploaded
[15:17] <bregma> dholbach, thanks for your time
=== Noskcaj_ is now known as Noskcaj