[06:12] <lotuspsychje> http://news.softpedia.com/news/fairphone-2-ubuntu-touch-port-is-in-the-making-here-s-what-works-500105.shtml
[06:12] <lotuspsychje> nice!
[08:28] <slvn_> Hello ! I tried to install ubuntu on Nexus10 (manta). I see there are recent images (https://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed/ubuntu/manta/)  but it could boot afterward.
[08:28] <slvn_> is this meant to be working ?
[08:36] <powerewop> guys who can answer me where i missed? zte t82, oem unlocked, device is in recovery mode now ubuntu-device-flash touch --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable/ubuntu --bootstrap
[08:36] <powerewop>  2016/02/09 11:33:05 Expecting the device to be in the bootloader... waiting
[08:37] <bshah> powerewop: reboot in bootloader mode
[08:37] <bshah> or fastboot as they say it
[08:38] <powerewop> if i'm booting in bootloader mode screen not works, just is dark
[08:38] <powerewop> will it work correctly?
[08:39] <powerewop> well, i'll try...
[08:40] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: does the zte t82 have a port ready for touch?
[08:41] <powerewop> actually, idk..
[08:41] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: its not wise to install ubuntu touch on a device not really supported...
[08:41] <lotuspsychje> !devices | powerewop
[08:41] <ubot5`> powerewop: You can find the full list of devices, official images, community images, and works in progress at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
[08:41] <powerewop> i thought i thought Touch may be user at all devices
[08:42] <lotuspsychje> no yet mate
[08:42] <powerewop> :(
[08:42] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: you can search the XDA forums to see if your device has a working project?
[08:42] <powerewop> phone in bootloader mode now, but still waiting
[08:42] <powerewop> yeah, i'll check everything now :D
[08:42] <powerewop> thanks, guys
[08:43] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: you can buy a nexus4 or a bq 4.5 if you like ubuntu touch
[08:45] <powerewop> i don't know about like i Touch or not yet, but i love ubuntu :) well, ZTE isn't in list of supported devices...
[08:48] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: sell your device and buy a bq :p
[08:48] <powerewop> i like zte, thank you :)
[08:49] <powerewop> how long ubuntu will come free for all devices?
[08:49] <bshah> Hello, while installing android-tools-adbd I am having strange error: invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/android-tools-adbd not found.
[08:49] <powerewop> adb, not adbd
[08:49] <powerewop> android-tools-adb
[08:49] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: developers working hard, its not easy to just port devices like that, but your free to try the porting guid yourself
[08:50] <powerewop> am i understand right, port is port for repository connect or what is it?
[08:50] <bshah> powerewop: http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/android-tools-adbd
[08:50] <powerewop> ugh..
[08:51] <bshah> well, anyway.. while searching for this I found out that ogra_ had similar problem 2ish years back :D but no solution
[08:51] <bshah> http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/android-tools-adbd
[08:51] <bshah> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/05/28/%23ubuntu-devel.txt
[08:51] <lotuspsychje> powerewop: porting a device is to make a working image for a device, see topic
[08:52] <bshah> any idea what to do?
[08:52] <powerewop> ah... ok, sry
[09:24] <tathhu> morn
[09:32] <JamesTait> Good morning all!  Happy Tuesday, and happy Pancake Day! 🙌
[11:39] <teve> Hi, I tried here maps and it asked if I'd like to use updated version of maps. pressed ok and after that here app crashes every time.
[11:41] <teve> error in webapp-container: malloc smallbin double linked list corrupted
[11:42] <teve> vegetahd, rc r248
[12:24] <lardman> slvn_: I'd be interested to hear how you get on as I was planning to flash a Manta image later today
[12:29] <slvn_> lardman, ... I first start to see a mail/new about ubuports and see that the "nexus10" port was refresh. I start to flash my nexus with it. but it did not work. Then, I also look on the official devel-proposed and I saw there was need images built ! I try them. and it didn't work either.
[12:30] <slvn_> But, since I saw many images on the official server, I wonder whether the image were broken, of if I just fail flashing my nexus10
[12:30] <slvn_> s/need/recent/
[12:30] <lardman> The spreadsheet giving status of Nexus devices indicates that 20140821 is working
[12:30] <lardman> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Irz35QJOfvXKtUFx5a4TjktUcwc0ubKTfHz8KZzPM6Y/edit#gid=0
[12:31] <lardman> but that's quite old....
[12:31] <slvn_> yep, I now, but they are old. I just wondering if they would be some new images. especially with latest mir api's.
[12:32] <lardman> Is there a maintainer for the Manta I wonder? It's one of the officially supported devices I think
[12:33] <tathhu> Not anymore AFAU
[12:33] <lardman> tathhu: ah I see
[12:35] <lardman> tathhu: Can you remember vaguely when it was dropped? I'd be interested to know what the latest working build setup is
[12:37] <tathhu> Like a week ago I saw something about manta images @ ubuntu-phone ML
[12:37] <lardman> ah, I must have searched that list for tilapia rather than manta, /me goes to look again
[12:39] <tathhu> :P
[12:41] <lardman> hmm, can't see any posts with manta in the title all the way back to mid-Cotober
[12:41] <lardman> October even
[12:41] <lardman> I'll do some Googling
[12:42] <svij> lardman: https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg17857.html
[12:42] <svij> "We're also slowly preparing for the removal of the no-longer supported
[12:42] <svij> manta images from our official system-image servers."
[12:43] <lardman> svij: Thanks
[12:43] <svij> np
[12:47] <lardman> UB Ports it is then, is this the right channel in that case? I see the forum link is down on the wiki main page
[12:52] <lardman> nm, link from site main page works
[12:57] <jgdx> mzanetti, ping
[12:58] <mzanetti> jgdx, hi there
[12:58] <tathhu> pongero
[12:58] <jgdx> mzanetti, hey, I'm trying to port [1] to USS but it's not working well. [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/update-inputinfo/+merge/273248
[12:59] <mzanetti> jgdx, why/what?
[12:59] <jgdx> mzanetti, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15001145/
[12:59] <mzanetti> jgdx, you should not need to port that to USS
[13:00] <jgdx> mzanetti, how so=?
[13:00] <mzanetti> Mirv, when will the inputinfo patch land on the phone?
[13:00] <mzanetti> jgdx, because this will be part of QSystemInfo
[13:00] <jgdx> yeah, but eventually, right?
[13:00] <mzanetti> jgdx, rather soon, I think
[13:00] <jgdx> today? :p
[13:01] <mzanetti> Mirv will know
[13:01] <mzanetti> jgdx, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/763
[13:02] <jgdx> mzanetti, cheers!
[13:17] <Mirv> mzanetti: when someone tells me "it's good, please land it". my latest info from zsombi was that it doesn't work because of apparmor blockings, and a mir backend for providing the info for the Qt API would be needed
[13:17] <Mirv> mzanetti: but unconfined it's supposedly working as is
[13:17] <mzanetti> Mirv, well, it would work for unity8 and systemsettings
[13:17] <Mirv> jgdx: ^
[13:17] <mzanetti> but yeah, for zsombi's use case it might be a bit of a problem atm
[13:18] <Mirv> mzanetti: in that case I could finish the silo with one more final build and set it off towards QA. have you tested either unity8 or systemsettings with it, does it bring what's needed?
[13:19] <zsombi> Mirv: mzanetti: talking about the device info API?
[13:21] <mzanetti> yes
[13:22] <mzanetti> Mirv, I'll give another review asap. I'll ping you
[13:23] <Mirv> zsombi: yes
[13:23] <Mirv> mzanetti: ok!
[13:24] <zsombi> Mirv: mzanetti: the thing is that even if it doesn't work for UITK, it'd do the job on X apps, right? So we coudl also use it full featured once the Mir adaptation is done by lpotter
[13:27] <mzanetti> zsombi, yeah, also works for unity8 and systemsettings, given both are unconfined
[13:55] <CheeryLee> Congratulate me, guys! I did last_kmsg.
[13:56] <CheeryLee> This is CONFIG_SEC_LOG_LAST_KMSG flag in kernel defconfig.
[13:56] <jgdx> Mirv, are there any docs for the 5.5 systeminfo?
[14:24] <jgdx> lpotter, hey, I'm looking at qsysteminfo and I'm unsure how to assert what type a device is? Using this example: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15001992/
[14:27] <jgdx> Mirv, that would be my only comment on the silo ^
[14:28] <sil2100> ogra_: hey! Do you know if the ./update script in ubuntu-touch-meta uses -proposed?
[14:28] <sil2100> ogra_: I just wanted to update the seeds as per what's in -proposed and it didn't fetch the package I wanted during update
[14:29] <sil2100> ogra_: do you know if it's ok to manually modify the seeds in this case?
[14:30] <ogra_> sil2100, hmm, i dont think it does
[14:31] <ogra_> (and i wouldnt know how to make it work)
[15:00] <Mirv> jgdx: regarding inputinfo part, not at this point, the patch is all code https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/101049/15//ALL,unified
[15:01] <Mirv> jgdx: you might want to exchange experiences with zsombi who was successfully using it
[15:03] <zsombi> jgdx: happy to help :)
[15:06] <jgdx> Mirv, thx!
[15:07] <jgdx> zsombi, cool :) It's basic really, how do I get only Mouse devices from a DeviceManager? I've been using this [1], but I'm not having any luck. [1] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15001992/
[15:09] <zsombi> jgdx: hmm... I've been using it from cpp, and it works there like charm
[15:10] <zsombi> jgdx: see here https://code.launchpad.net/~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/device_detection/+merge/284282
[15:11] <jgdx> zsombi, right. Good to know—most likely pebkac. Thanks!
[15:11] <zsombi> jgdx: so the deviceAdded signal is sthing you don't get triggered at all?
[15:12] <jgdx> zsombi, it triggers, and I have a device and device.properties.type, but I'm unsure how to assert the type
[15:13] <zsombi> jgdx: the type is an enum, so you simply use == :)
[15:13] <zsombi> jgdx: you are trying to check whether the flag is set :)
[15:14] <jgdx> zsombi, that's actually code from the example folder in that silo
[15:14] <jgdx> zsombi, okay, I'll try that! Thank you
[15:15] <zsombi> jgdx: it's weird... the type is an enum, the filter is a flag. check the cpp code I have
[15:17] <jgdx> indeed
[16:37] <lotuspsychje> !devices | OerHeks
[16:37] <ubot5`> OerHeks: You can find the full list of devices, official images, community images, and works in progress at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
[16:48] <CheeryLee> Guys, where is system.img live on my device?
[16:49] <CheeryLee> In /data?
[16:53] <TheOneLaw> hi cheery looks like we are all very alone here.
[16:54] <CheeryLee> Very. :D
[16:54] <TheOneLaw> what kind of hardware are you looking into ? I am guessing this makes a big difference..
[16:58] <CheeryLee> Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1. I have system image, but when I drop it into /data initrd write the error: Couldn't find a system partition
[16:58] <CheeryLee> It causes kernel panic
[16:59] <TheOneLaw> aha - you are one of the heroes who actually do things.
[17:00] <TheOneLaw> I believe you need to write the img file into existence, but I would need to go back and check. I use a BQ E5 so my life is easy
[17:00] <CheeryLee> Yep. I'am almost built it.
[17:01] <TheOneLaw> i am curious enough to go look, back in a bit.
[17:01] <rhopp> is there any installation guide to change samsung 10.1 gt n8010 from android to ubuntu?
[17:01] <CheeryLee> Oh, yep
[17:01] <CheeryLee> Just check wiki devices page.
[17:02] <CheeryLee> Our device has Ubuntu Touch build made by mamenyaka.
[17:03] <rhopp> sorry, but i only find a guide for sony nexus - does it also work for samsung?
[17:03] <CheeryLee> Yep. I'm currently working on N8000 build.
[17:04] <CheeryLee> If everything will be ok, I will work on N8010
[17:05] <rhopp> does it mean, that i schould wait?
[17:07] <CheeryLee> Now -- doesn't. I would see qualitative system.
[17:07] <CheeryLee> And all stuff must working.
[17:10] <rhopp> so i understand, that it's better to wait until there is a final build for Samsung n8010. is it right?
[17:11] <CheeryLee> Ur right
[17:11] <rhopp> thank's and by
[17:35] <TheOneLaw> @CheeryLee  it has been awhile since I did anything like that but I thought you were flashing the image, more than simply copying it. But that is why I gave up sideloading long ago.
[17:50] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: I use rootstock script from the porting guide.
[17:56] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: do you have another way?
[18:10] <TheOneLaw> CheeryLee - you mean like this: $ ./rootstock-touch-install vivid-preinstalled-touch-armhf.tar.gz out/target/product/mako/system.img ?
[18:10] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: Yep
[18:26] <TheOneLaw> CheeryLee it looks like you are flashing two items: the tar.gz and also the system.img - correect ?
[18:29] <TheOneLaw> CheeryLee - I find this on the launchpad source site: ./rootstock-touch-install ./trusty-trusty-preinstalled-touch-armhf.tar.gz ./system.img (assumes both files in the current directory)
[18:29] <CheeryLee> Yep
[18:32] <TheOneLaw> This means what it is doing is writing the file system (tar.gz) and then painting it with the contents of system.img -- I guess the question is what happens when you do that ?
[18:33] <Robert_Zenz> Is somebody else having trouble with the battery display? My (up to date) Aquaris 4.5 is reporting 91%, I charged it last Thursday. That has started a few months ago.
[18:36] <mimecar> hi
[18:36] <TheOneLaw> Robert_Zenz :  my BQ E5 (OTA-9) is doing okay but no guarantees about an E4.5. I do know it is always much better to turn off wifi unless you are actually using it.
[18:37] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: Everything is OK - the system image writes to /data directory.
[18:37] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: I think there is problem in touch script in initramfs.
[18:38] <mcphail> Robert_Zenz: I've had some battery oddity in the past on my 4.5, but things seem OK just now. I was wondering if a charge to less than 100% confuses the battery stats, but I have never got around to investigating
[18:39] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: But now after editing touch script I get uncempression error while kernel is booting. That's really funny.
[18:40] <CheeryLee> Guys, how about battery life in Ubuntu? Worse then Android?
[18:40] <Robert_Zenz> mcphail, well, I have drained and recharged it completely multiple times (mostly because It drops off *very* fast below 60% or so).
[18:41] <Robert_Zenz> CheeryLee, my Aquaris 4.5, with WLAN/Bluetooth/GPS turned off lasts for roughy one and a half week on standby.
[18:42] <CheeryLee> Hmm, it's tempting.
[18:42] <mcphail> CheeryLee: I charge my phone every night, but I suspect i could charge it twice a week.
[18:43] <mcphail> Old habits die hard
[19:04] <kenvandine> barry, can you have a look at bug 1508081
[19:04] <ubot5`> bug 1508081 in ubuntu-download-manager (Ubuntu) "Fails to receive OTA updates" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1508081
[19:04] <kenvandine> barry, allowOverGSM should really only be set on auto downloads too
[19:05] <kenvandine> but we need a way to override that to force a download
[19:10] <TheOneLaw> CheeryLee - I gotta go now, but it sounds like your problem is simple but probably very difficult to locate inside your system.img - maybe a bad write version. good luck !
[19:10] <CheeryLee> TheOneLaw: I wiil find. Thanks!
[19:11] <TheOneLaw> mcphail and Robert_Zenz - always charge as often as you can otherwise you lose (gradually) capacity. good night all.
[20:28] <barry> kenvandine: are you saying that when 'wifi-only' is set, you still want to allow downloads over gsm?
[20:35] <kenvandine> barry, yes
[20:36] <kenvandine> but not automatically
[20:36] <kenvandine> only when the user clicks download in the UI
[20:36] <barry> kenvandine: then i think that has to set auto_download != 1
[20:36] <kenvandine> no... different thing
[20:37] <kenvandine> auto_download is if it should download automatically when it's found
[20:37] <kenvandine> right now if on gsm, the download gets created with allOverGsm false
[20:37] <kenvandine> so udm doesn't download it
[20:37] <kenvandine> we want to be able to change that property on the download after it's created
[20:38] <kenvandine> and changing auto_download persists
[20:38] <barry> kenvandine: that can't be done through the si client
[20:38] <kenvandine> this is for one time
[20:38] <kenvandine> right... we need to :)
[20:38] <barry> once the group download is started, si is out of the picture until it receives signals from udm
[20:38] <barry> no, i mean, afaik, there's no way to communicate what you want to udm
[20:38] <kenvandine> you should be able to change the property in udm though
[20:39] <kenvandine> Elleo, ^^
[20:39] <kenvandine> i think you can
[20:39] <barry> on an existing group download?
[20:39] <kenvandine> and if you can't, we can get Elleo to implement that
[20:39] <kenvandine> a group download?
[20:39] <kenvandine> it's a single download right?
[20:39] <barry> kenvandine: but then, why not have system setting change that itself?
[20:39] <barry> no, it's always a group download
[20:40] <kenvandine> because we don't have access to the download in udm
[20:40] <kenvandine> it's owned by s-i-d
[20:41] <kenvandine> Elleo is probably gone for the day now, but he can probably explain better
[20:41] <barry> ok.  i have lots of questions, and i'm kind of skeptical frankly
[20:41] <kenvandine> :)
[20:41] <barry> but we can certainly talk about it
[20:41] <barry> :)
[20:42] <kenvandine> right now there's no way to download the update if it was created without wifi if you set to auto download on wifi
[20:42] <kenvandine> we need to be able to manually click "Download anyway" type button to download
[20:43] <barry> you could of course cancel the existing download and restart it while not on wifi-only.  maybe not pretty but it's doable today
[20:43] <kenvandine> and because of other bugs, udm often doesn't know if you connect to wifi after
[20:43] <barry> oh, i know about that ;)
[20:44] <kenvandine> that's a different bug though, which makes this worse
[20:44] <kenvandine> cancel and start again would be ok, but i don't want to change the auto_download setting before restarting it
[20:44] <kenvandine> since that's a persistent setting
[20:45] <kenvandine> if we want a one-time, really download over gsm update, we can't right now
[20:46] <kenvandine> barry, anyway, think about it and lets sync up with Elleo in the morning
[20:46] <barry> the semantics of auto_download have morphed several times in the past.  it's unfortunate, because i never thought it should be kept in si in the first place, but that horse has left the barn
[20:47] <dobey> kenvandine: huh? you're saying s-i updates can't happen over gsm?
[20:47] <kenvandine> dobey, not if you've set it to auto download over wifi
[20:47] <barry> dobey: they can't happen over gsm if it's set to wifi-only
[20:47] <dobey> kenvandine: but it certainly does work
[20:47] <barry> you really want a wifi-only-wink-wink-nudge-nudge
[20:48] <kenvandine> but that wifi-only setting is for auto downloads, shouldn't be for manual downloads
[20:48] <dobey> because i don't have wifi enabled on my phone, and system-settings is set to "on wifi" for "auto download"
[20:48] <dobey> and i haven't had any problems installing updates
[20:48] <pmcgowan> kenvandine, I had that bug and I set all the devices to autodownload never
[20:48] <dobey> iirc, it even auto-downloads on gsm forme
[20:48] <pmcgowan> but thats probably the network status thingy
[20:48] <barry> pmcgowan: right, that will work too because that does not set gsm=False
[20:49] <kenvandine> dobey, not app updates
[20:49] <barry> gsm=false is only set when wifi-only is set
[20:49] <kenvandine> dobey, it shouldn't
[20:49] <dobey> kenvandine: app updates never auto download do they?
[20:49] <kenvandine> nope
[20:49] <dobey> right
[20:49] <dobey> so what's the problem? :)
[20:50] <kenvandine> system-updates when auto download on wifi only, we have no way to force them to download
[20:50] <kenvandine> if the download gets created but doesn't start
[20:50] <barry> kenvandine: the way i'm looking at the code, allow_gsm is not tied at all to the group download.  it's entirely owned by the interface.  so i think settings could flip the gsm flag
[20:51] <kenvandine> if we have the download object i guess
[20:51] <barry> in fact, we force allow gsm=false when we create the group download because of a bug in python-dbus.  it's only later that we set the gsm flag on the iface based on that setting
[20:52] <barry> kenvandine: it looks to me like you don't need the group download object, just the interface
[20:52] <kenvandine> currently we never talk directly to udm for system updates
[20:52] <kenvandine> and i guess the download id
[20:53]  * kenvandine isn't familiar with udm
[20:53] <barry> nope, we don't have any of that.  all we do is iface.allowGSMDownload(allow_gsm)
[20:53] <kenvandine> the id my be in the object path or something, don't know
[20:53] <kenvandine> haven't looked
[20:54] <barry> so there's nothing that only si has to flip the gsm flag
[20:54] <kenvandine> but that's a property on the individual download
[20:54] <kenvandine> not globally
[20:54] <barry> kenvandine: what i'm saying is that afaict, it *is* global
[20:54] <kenvandine> i hope not
[20:55] <kenvandine> toggling that could then mess up browser downloads :)
[20:55] <kenvandine> it a property on the download object
[20:55]  * kenvandine isn't talking dbus API... just udm cpp api
[20:55] <barry> kenvandine: ok, i'll review the code more closely, and we can talk about it tomorrow
[20:56] <kenvandine> yeah, Elleo understands this stuff much better than i do
[20:56] <barry> cool.  then we'll talk about it then
[20:56] <kenvandine> barry, thx
[20:56] <barry> cheers
[21:19] <ahoneybun> does anyone have the problem of text overflowing into the Tab?
[21:19] <ahoneybun> but only on devices not in the SDK
[21:48] <ahoneybun> mm the SDK is telling me that PageHeader is not a type
[21:48] <ahoneybun> ahayzen, any ideas?
[21:52] <ahoneybun> mhall119, pin
[22:21] <ahoneybun> how do I know if it is the framework version being wrong?
[22:28] <mariogrip> mhall119: ping
[22:30] <ahoneybun> hey mariogrip
[22:30] <mariogrip> ahoneybun: Hey :)
[22:44] <matv1> what's the ubuntu-pd channel for?
[22:54] <genii> !pd
[22:58] <k1l_> talking about irc channel?
[23:07] <matv1> it is a release channel for ubuntu touch apparently
[23:11] <matv1> was wondering what is in it specifically.
[23:15] <k1l_> d-p would be devel-proposed
[23:16] <matv1> omg yes of course. haha i should be in bed it seems
[23:17] <matv1> thnks k1l_
[23:34] <_Sponge> nhaines: New video looks s'well. Not sure if everyone bis picking it up from your LJ page (?)
[23:34] <_Sponge> http://nhaines.livejournal.com/69721.html
[23:35] <nhaines> _Sponge: Thanks.  It's actually mirroed on Planet Ubuntu, which is where I presume people will read it.
[23:36] <_Sponge> fair enough.
[23:39] <_Sponge> nhaines: Just as an aside. Community-thingy : I'm still waiting for Josee from ubuntu onair to update the Calendar to reflect weekly Q&A that /should/ be below on Tues. Could you prompt him, next time to see a stickie ?
[23:40] <_Sponge> http://ubuntuonair.com/calendar/
[23:40] <_Sponge> No worries if your busy at the moment.
[23:41] <nhaines> I've sent jose a reminder.
[23:41] <_Sponge> cheers.
[23:49] <_Sponge> nhaines: Quick query, if you've a sec (just say IDK if not) ?
[23:50] <_Sponge> What channel should I be on to ask about fingerprint readers for laptops ?
[23:51] <nhaines> _Sponge: presumably #ubuntu, but I can save you time and just tell you that none of them work.
[23:51] <n1cky> I'm asking again because my buffer was too short to see if there was a reply. I'm noticing a lot of curl 404's when running my initial phablet-dev-bootstrap, is that safe to ignore?
[23:51] <nhaines> There's a model or two that you can use software to construct an image from scanned data, but I don't think there's anything that does anything useful about that.
[23:51] <_Sponge> Note: this bis for a package for Ubuntu distro, not a flavour #elementary as it happens.
[23:52] <nhaines> Still #ubuntu
[23:56] <_Sponge> nhaines: This is the story so far .. http://postimg.org/image/w52myz0gf/