=== heroux_ is now known as heroux === xnox_ is now known as xnox === DarkPlayer_ is now known as DarkPlayer === \b is now known as benonsoftware [06:04] if i build something with sbuild, can you get the results of the build somewhere? [06:19] karstensrage: The debs should be in the directory where you ran sbuild. [06:21] yeah, :) just figured that out [06:21] duh [06:21] can i pass an existing deb thats a dependency of the thing that is going to sbuild? === nickoe_ is now known as nickoe [11:27] Could "Superseded" be an additional MP status? "Rejected" seems a little harsh in this case. [12:10] karstensrage: Recent versions of sbuild in xenial have various --extra-* options to help with that (e.g. --extra-package). [12:10] rbasak: Um, BranchMergeProposalStatus.SUPERSEDED definitely exists ... [12:11] rbasak: I suspect there's just some permission limitation on which statuses you get offered [12:11] Maybe you can only set it if you use resubmit, I forget [12:11] OK, I'll try that. Thanks! [12:12] Yeah, looks like it [12:12] assert new_status != BranchMergeProposalStatus.SUPERSEDED, ( [12:12] 'Superseded is done via an action, not by setting status.') [14:55] cjwatson: I see ARM is no longer admin-only for activation, does this mean those archs are 'stable' for build envs, and we can start throwing builds at those archs? [14:55] or wgrant, or whomever. :) [14:55] * teward didn't see a blog post, but heard from another on Ask Ubuntu it's not user-activateable [14:57] oh, neat [14:58] i also noticed it when fiddling with by xenial-buildtests PPA :P [15:00] teward: we plan to announce it next week or so after doing another round of upgrades [15:01] it's fine until then, we just didn't want to quite throw the whole world at it yet :) [15:01] so it's not a secret but if you could maybe not blog about it or whatever that would be good [15:04] teward: (where did you see that on askubuntu, btw?) [15:15] cjwatson: in the chat - I'll PM you a link [15:17] cjwatson: and I had no intention to blog about it ;) [15:17] * teward is just thorough [15:17] well, it's hard to make unnoticed changes :-) never mind [15:18] ;) [15:18] indeed [15:18] sorry to ask :) [15:18] just being thorough with checking information, 'cause i have a thing about unconfirmed rumors ;) [15:19] teward is indeed thorough :) [15:20] The canonical way to check is the "restricted" flag on https://api.launchpad.net/devel/+processors/armhf etc. [15:20] Hopefully soon we'll flip supports_nonvirtualized to False, which will unify Ubuntu builds onto the same builders [15:21] nice [15:21] +1 to that [15:21] well, it's on irclogs now i guess :P [15:23] heh [15:24] i would have PM'd you directly, cjwatson, but force of habit IRC ettiquite is to not PM without asking, so meh [15:24] anyways... [20:15] hi