[06:04] <karstensrage> if i build something with sbuild, can you get the results of the build somewhere?
[06:19] <wgrant> karstensrage: The debs should be in the directory where you ran sbuild.
[06:21] <karstensrage> yeah, :) just figured that out
[06:21] <karstensrage> duh
[06:21] <karstensrage> can i pass an existing deb thats a dependency of the thing that is going to sbuild?
[11:27] <rbasak> Could "Superseded" be an additional MP status? "Rejected" seems a little harsh in this case.
[12:10] <cjwatson> karstensrage: Recent versions of sbuild in xenial have various --extra-* options to help with that (e.g. --extra-package).
[12:10] <cjwatson> rbasak: Um, BranchMergeProposalStatus.SUPERSEDED definitely exists ...
[12:11] <cjwatson> rbasak: I suspect there's just some permission limitation on which statuses you get offered
[12:11] <cjwatson> Maybe you can only set it if you use resubmit, I forget
[12:11] <rbasak> OK, I'll try that. Thanks!
[12:12] <cjwatson> Yeah, looks like it
[12:12] <cjwatson>         assert new_status != BranchMergeProposalStatus.SUPERSEDED, (
[12:12] <cjwatson>             'Superseded is done via an action, not by setting status.')
[14:55] <teward> cjwatson: I see ARM is no longer admin-only for activation, does this mean those archs are 'stable' for build envs, and we can start throwing builds at those archs?
[14:55] <teward> or wgrant, or whomever.  :)
[14:55]  * teward didn't see a blog post, but heard from another on Ask Ubuntu it's not user-activateable
[14:57] <dobey> oh, neat
[14:58] <teward> i also noticed it when fiddling with by xenial-buildtests PPA :P
[15:00] <cjwatson> teward: we plan to announce it next week or so after doing another round of upgrades
[15:01] <cjwatson> it's fine until then, we just didn't want to quite throw the whole world at it yet :)
[15:01] <cjwatson> so it's not a secret but if you could maybe not blog about it or whatever that would be good
[15:04] <cjwatson> teward: (where did you see that on askubuntu, btw?)
[15:15] <teward> cjwatson: in the chat - I'll PM you a link
[15:17] <teward> cjwatson: and I had no intention to blog about it ;)
[15:17]  * teward is just thorough
[15:17] <cjwatson> well, it's hard to make unnoticed changes :-)  never mind
[15:18] <teward> ;)
[15:18] <teward> indeed
[15:18] <teward> sorry to ask :)
[15:18] <teward> just being thorough with checking information, 'cause i have a thing about unconfirmed rumors ;)
[15:19] <rbasak> teward is indeed thorough :)
[15:20] <cjwatson> The canonical way to check is the "restricted" flag on https://api.launchpad.net/devel/+processors/armhf etc.
[15:20] <cjwatson> Hopefully soon we'll flip supports_nonvirtualized to False, which will unify Ubuntu builds onto the same builders
[15:21] <dobey> nice
[15:21] <teward> +1 to that
[15:21] <dobey> well, it's on irclogs now i guess :P
[15:23] <teward> heh
[15:24] <teward> i would have PM'd you directly, cjwatson, but force of habit IRC ettiquite is to not PM without asking, so meh
[15:24] <teward> anyways...
[20:15] <Ormu> hi