=== \b is now known as benonsoftware
[06:45] <dholbach> good morning
[11:40] <czajkowski> Aloha
[11:50]  * dholbach relocates to the office, bbiab
=== mhall119_ is now known as mhall119
[16:35] <jcastro> marcoceppi: reminder wrt. discourse
[16:35] <marcoceppi> jcastro: i saw your PM, it's going to have to wait
[16:35] <jcastro> ack
[16:36] <jcastro> should I just kick something off on the community mailing list or the site itself?
[17:12] <balloons> oO.. discourse
[17:37] <hggdh> wxl: ping re. RT LoCo queue
[17:40] <wxl> hggdh: haven't looked in a couple days. what's up?
[17:40] <hggdh> wxl: I was also going thur this list :-)
[17:40] <wxl> hggdh: again, thanks :)
[17:40] <hggdh> wxl: if you are active there, perhaps we can split the work?
[17:41] <wxl> hggdh: sure. i'm *TRYING* to do at least one a day
[17:41] <hggdh> wxl: OK. I am going from the oldest to the newest
[17:41] <wxl> i've been working mostly on the most recent, so if you want to tackle the old ones, we can meet in the middle XD
[17:41] <wxl> heh great minds think alike
[17:42] <hggdh> my personal view is if a ticket is too old, it is most probably stale, and can be closed. I am still trying to contact the reporters, thou
[17:42] <hggdh> heh
[17:42] <wxl> yeah i think that's wise
[17:42] <wxl> it might be good to give a timeline
[17:42] <wxl> like "you've got 10 days or i'm closing this ticket"
[17:43] <wxl> maybe is less strong language XD
[17:43] <hggdh> I thought about it, and concluded that it is better to ping, wait, like, a week, and then go & close
[17:43]  * wxl nods
[17:44] <wxl> for the oldest that probably makes a lot of sense
[17:44] <hggdh> yeah
[17:44] <hggdh> "new" ones (the newest is about 10 months old) would probably need holding hands, and all
[17:44] <wxl> yep i've already reached out to a couple through the rt system
[17:45] <hggdh> I saw