[02:12] http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_0fdc957f50e982d0 === rww is now known as rw === rw is now known as rww === \b is now known as benonsoftware [11:35] so, the call for votes is out in the ether :) [11:36] great jobb on that vote set-up cfhowlett :) [11:36] 75 entires!!!! [11:36] yeah. I can't twitter or GPlus it though. Please send it through your channels. [11:38] you mean you don't have any? [11:38] good on you if it is the case :D [11:38] I tried to use the US twitter but couldn't log in. [11:39] ah, its there already [11:39] g-, twatter, facebuck, and diaspora :) [11:39] Just confirmed - it is already on GPlus [11:39] yes [11:40] cool! [12:02] oh, the ubuntu forums maybe :) [12:02] doh! yeah! you got that covered? [12:03] *blush* i completly forgot to announce the contest there.... :facepalmingmyself: but maybe its ok anyways... :/ [12:04] grrr... silly me, generously ranting about mainstream socialmedia, and then i forget the forum :'( [12:07] just posted to Ubuntu Studio forums [12:09] awsome, i'm struggling to get in... [12:10] i don't know how but i've ended up with 2 accounts.. [12:10] one with the gmail that is only active on the forum... [12:11] well.. "how" i know: i registered twice obviously... [12:12] "Hotwheel" at fullscreen = awesome! [12:19] one of my favourite is yours cfhowlett :) i didn't notice before [12:20] LineNovaStudio [12:20] :) [15:17] cfhowlett: sakrecoer_: Just to clarify one thing. The vote for wallpapers is just for which wallpapers are included in the install, right? [15:17] zequence, correct. [15:17] Ah, great. [15:17] the remainder can be packaged for an optional "community wallpapers" package later [15:19] That's a good idea [15:20] one way to leverage community interest [15:20] zequence, sakrecoer_: any news about the theme testing? :) [15:21] When it comes to artwork, it's hard to make that a democratic procedure. [15:21] At the very least, the people making the choices need to have some form of competence and experience [15:21] yeah, I'm watching the voting results. they are ... surprising. BUT the Art Team can choose which ever image they deem appropriate for the default wallpaper [15:21] For things like the default wallpaper, desktop theming, etc [15:22] knome: I haven't touched it since we were in contact the last time. [15:22] you probably should, i've landed this and that [15:23] knome: You fixed the image problem, right? [15:23] And, there's a sidebar now. Let me update it [15:24] zequence, the image problem was never there ;) [15:24] (or you did something wrong) [15:24] or maybe some inline css came in from somewhere [15:30] knome: Oh, great. It has all the stuff we need now [15:31] Ok, I don't still understand the problem with one of the images. But the same image in two different posts is handled differently [15:31] No [15:31] The first one is smaller to begin with [15:31] The images don't shrink [15:31] ..when you make the browser window smaller [15:32] remind me of the url you are having problms at [15:32] http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/ [15:32] Third image [15:33] oh wow, wordpress seems to add some srcset="" now [15:33] don't know if that's what is messing up with it [15:33] the deprecated word/brandmark? [15:34] cfhowlett: No, just images posted in a WP post [15:34] gotch [15:34] When you make the browser window smaller, it would be nice if the images in that post shrunk to the width of the browser window [15:35] Like, when you use a browser in your phone [15:36] I like how the menu is created on the right side, and the logo ends up on the left side in a small window [15:36] OHHH [15:36] the containing div has a specified size [15:38] zequence, do you use firefox and stylish? [15:38] knome: Yep [15:38] for both [15:38] http://paste.ubuntu.com/15016749/ [15:38] this should fix it [15:39] actually you likely don't even need the !important [15:39] yep, that's trye [15:39] *true too [15:40] Yes, that worked. [15:40] great, i'll add that to the theme [15:41] and done [15:41] That pretty much concludes doing all the functional stuff that I personally would need [15:41] I like it! [15:42] goodie :) [15:42] what about the visual side then? [15:42] and are you still wanting a slideshow on the front page? [15:42] No, I don't think we need that. [15:42] But, we'll need to work on the colors a bit [15:43] sure [15:43] i would put it like this: [15:43] Think what I want to do is make the grey a bit darker. That's pretty much it for me. [15:43] since you are the main target for the dark theme, let's just make the dark variant work for you [15:43] and i'm sure other people who want a dark theme will be happy [15:43] oh, one question: [15:44] when using the dark theme, do you think the dark dropdown menus are preferred, or would you actually prefer to keep the dropdowns light as they are regularly? [15:45] knome: I like having them as is [15:45] dark, that is? [15:45] or light? [15:45] you confused me now... [15:46] The menus is the same color as the top bar, in our case blue. I like keeping it that way [15:46] menu* [15:46] noooo [15:46] add a submenu item for a menu item [15:46] Ah [15:46] and make sure you don't get the mobile menu [15:46] so... this is now dark on dark [15:46] is that good, or would you prefer to have it light? [15:47] or do you think it's something that will tear people apart, and that it would be good to offer both alternatives? [15:47] No, I think I prefer having the same color on the menu as the top bar [15:47] It looks really good in blue for us [15:48] i think you are still missing the point :D [15:48] Right, not mobile menus [15:48] Let me check [15:48] well in mobile menu too; the submenu items are shown in dark/light [15:49] but the regular view gives you a better idea what i'm talking about [15:49] Think I would like them in the same color as the top bar, though, but I need to check [15:52] knome: I don't have a strong opinion right now. It looks ok. [15:53] I need to think about it [15:54] zequence, sure. and if the colors feel off, we can modify them too [15:54] knome: No. I do prefer them dark. I was also thinking about perhaps making the have the same color as the top bar [15:54] So, either dark, or in our case bliue [15:54] blue* [15:55] zequence, the border for the submenu bubble is a bit weird imo [15:55] knome: Yes, I noticed that too [15:55] i'll likely revisit that when i'm home tonight or some other day in the next few days [15:55] ok [15:56] but feel free to suggest something else in between [15:56] as i said before, all the dark style related stuff is in css/style-dark.css [15:56] so not too much digging to do if you want to play around with it [15:57] If the menu would have the same color as the top bar, which I think could look nice, there needs to be some horisontal positioning difference in the mobile menu, or something that shows which items are submenus [15:58] i don't think i'd want to change the submenu bg for the mobile style menu [15:58] Could be a difference in the font too. Bold, vs normal [15:58] and i don't think the header color would work too well with the regular view [15:59] I would like to try that, anyway. But, I'll wait until after FF [15:59] the same with the font stuff, then the regular view should have bold/medium for the main items too i think [15:59] (though that's doable imo) [16:00] Alright. Need to jump in the shower [16:00] have fun, but don't get too wet! [16:11] knome: great improvements in mobile size! looks very good! [16:12] thanks, and happy you like them [16:14] the submenu works in grey.. color scheme is delicate. i like how the darker blue on a:active interacts with it... [16:15] it's actually the same blue, you're just seeing weird stuff [16:15] ;) [16:16] right:D my briwser highlughts with green on tap [16:16] browser highlights* [16:17] bbl [16:18] transparent green that is, making it darker. [16:18] ok, i'll take some notes and try some stuff! read you later === rww is now known as ezri