[00:08] <k1l_> which kiddie did #WIKIPEDIA-EN ban now?
[00:09] <bazhang> someone who has leet typing skills
[01:42] <elky> i suppose we should get that personal info taken out of the logs...
[01:44] <elky> nhandler: you might want to keep an eye on the guy
[01:45] <nhandler> elky: Ack. Thanks. I'm about to head out from $work, but I'll keep an eye on them
[01:45] <elky> you can probably also redirect to someone who's around but hiding too :P
[03:31] <elky> what the actual...
[08:16] <jackbrown> I want to report this guy http://i.imgur.com/2DkKznJ.jpg
[08:18] <Flannel> jackbrown: Thanks.
[08:19] <jackbrown> :)
[10:54] <k1l> hi jackbrown
[10:55] <jackbrown> hi k1l
[10:55] <k1l> how can we help you?
[10:58] <jackbrown> I don't need any help I already reported a scammer if you scroll this channel k1l
[10:58] <k1l> jackbrown: ah ok. if that is sorted already please part this channel. (see /topic)
[10:59] <jackbrown> k1l:  part? you mean leave?  sorry english isn't my 1st languate
[10:59] <jackbrown> k1l: *language
[10:59] <k1l> yeah. its a team channel. but you are free to come back if there is another issue
[10:59] <jackbrown> ok k1l thanks for helping!! have a good day
[10:59] <k1l> you too
[12:23] <k1l> and i just unmuted them after having a pm to make them read the guidelines
[12:59] <k1l> i would like to see idoru now k-lining that spammer using different open proxies :/
[13:03] <Unit193> idoru is long gone, it'd be sigyn anyway.  And they block a boat load of 'em, but you know the thing about blacklists...
[13:19] <Myrtti> I'm sure niko would appreciate your contribution to the code to make the open proxy detection better
[13:20] <Myrtti> on Sigyn
[13:21] <Myrtti> well not sigyn but anyway
[13:23] <Myrtti> not saying that the only way make things better is to code it, but staff is trying it's best and it's a gentle balance that needs to be struck between security and usability
[13:24] <Unit193> Myrtti: Right, and it's not like you can find every open proxy on the internet, or detect them.
[13:25] <Myrtti> Unit193: well, yes
[13:26] <Myrtti> I know it's very annoying he's using open proxies, but what you're seeing in #ubuntu is quite small in comparison to what it's like on #freenode - you can rest assured that the staff has every reason to make the proxy detection the best possible
[13:34] <Pricey> If you have any details on how you know that host is an open proxy, popping them in my /msg would be awesome.
[13:44] <Pricey> Looks like it's just a mobile network.
[13:51] <k1l> he used some mobile network ip on the first time. but he joined with several other ips after that he got banned
[13:51] <k1l> like this: 178.162.208.141
[13:52] <k1l> the leaseweb servers are used by some free vpn/proxy websites.
[13:59] <Pricey> Understood, but we could say that about any hosting provider really.
[13:59] <Pricey> It might be a start if you could identify the vpn/proxy website?
[14:03] <ikonia> didn't LJL have functionality in the floodboots that either parsed a proxy list, or polled the list for open proxies
[14:08] <k1l> yeah, i heared of some users beeing redirected to -unregged (?) and then had to answer a questions or such.   but i never experienced that
[14:45] <Pici> sigh
[15:23] <phunyguy> ^
[15:24] <phunyguy> Quick ops triggers with no effort at catalyzing.  Fun.
[15:42] <Pici> exactly
[17:34] <phunyguy> @login
[19:43] <zebe> poluck spamming hate messagens
[19:43] <lazybones_> k, getting abuse from "poluck"
[19:43] <lazybones_> wastold to report here :)
[19:43] <zebe> same
[19:44] <k1l> hi. poluck is already banned from #ubuntu. please report in #freenode now since we cant do anymore and freenode staff needs to handle it now
[19:45] <lazybones_> I`m using Xchat, how do i set up to ignore him?
[19:45] <k1l> /ignore nickname
[19:48] <lazybones_> got him thanx, had to add his ip also??
[22:03] <ilhami> why am I banned from #ubuntu-touch?
[22:05] <k1l> because you are a known malicious user and were malicious in that channel too.
[22:05] <ilhami> No I wasn't.
[22:05] <ilhami> Stop lying.
[22:05] <ilhami> Where is the founder of Ubuntu?
[22:05] <ilhami> #ubuntu
[22:05] <k1l> ilhami: we are past that nonsense. you were given a lot of 2nd chances and every time you made trouble again.
[22:06] <ilhami>  why the heck does ubuntu touch not allow apps running in the background beside Canonical's own apps?
[22:06] <ilhami> can you tell me this?
[22:07] <ilhami> and will this change in the future?
[22:07] <k1l> no, this is not a technical support channel.
[22:08] <ilhami> if you ban me from there, where am I going to ask? and when you lack developers, why do you think it's smart to exclude me from the community? that's sad.
[22:09] <k1l> ilhami: dont blame others for your actions and behaviour. you have proven to be a malicious user in several different irc channels since 2013.
[22:10] <ilhami> do you even know what the word malicious mean?
[22:11] <ilhami> let me in the #ubuntu-touch channel. I don't care about the other ones.
[22:12] <k1l> no. they got a mailing list. maybe you try it there as a new start.
[22:12] <ilhami> link?
[22:12] <ilhami> isn't there a forum of some kind?
[22:14] <k1l> if  looking for the mailinglist is too much effort for your trolling, than i think this is a fair deal.
[22:14] <ilhami> what?
[22:14] <ilhami> I hope you get some serious beating man... I hope bazhang beats you some day k1l :)
[22:15] <ilhami> you are the most oppressive OP on IRC ever
[22:15] <k1l> ok, i think we are done here. please part this channel since the bans will not be removed.
[22:16] <ilhami> evil person.
[22:18] <ilhami> http://www.ubuntu.com/phone/features
[22:18] <ilhami> there is a bug here btw
[22:18] <ilhami> check the word beautifully how it's aligned under the video lol
[22:20] <ilhami> you really need to sort out the thing with notifications.. That is so vital to a smartphone.
[22:25] <valorie> k1l: <3
[23:48] <Unit193> Someone might want to look into that last #ubuntu ban.
[23:49] <k1l> *!*@gateway/shell/elitebnc/* ?
[23:49] <rww> second time it's done that now
[23:49] <Unit193> Second time someone lost ident.
[23:49] <rww> stupid shell host
[23:49] <rww> yeah
[23:49] <rww> tempted to ban *!~*@gateway/shell/elitebnc/*
[23:52] <rww> (someone explain why this is a bad idea or i'ma do it)
[23:53] <Unit193> "Because filling up the banlist!"? :P
[23:53] <Unit193> DO it!
[23:53] <rww> lel
[23:53] <k1l> bantracker is astonishingly small for elitebnc bans
[23:56] <rww> @comment 71351 bans elitebnc users when elitebnc's identd breaks. without this set, Drone` gets mad and bans without the ~ limitation, meaning they're still banned when the identd is fixed. if complaints from users, consider removal.