[00:33] <arosales> hello, is there a version of the juju-gui that I could try that works with juju 2.0 alpha2?
[00:33]  * arosales tried deploying cs:~yellow/trusty/juju-gui but that also looks like it hangs on log in
[00:33] <hatch> arosales: only with a custom juju-core branch 
[00:34]  * arosales completely fine with custom branches :-)
[00:34] <hatch> the tip of the GUI supports about 50% of the functionality but the charm hasn't yet been updated to work with 2.0
[00:34] <arosales> hatch: ok so suggestion at this point is to back up to alpha1 or 1.25?
[00:35] <arosales> this is for a demo on stage at IBM interconnect next week, so I don't want it to blow up but using 2.0 would be nice
[00:35] <hatch> arosales: yes unfortunately the core api was only finalized earlier this week
[00:35] <hatch> yeah don't use 2.0 for that :)
[00:35] <arosales> understood, and I know you guys are working hard on that
[00:35] <arosales> 1.25 is dead to me
[00:35] <arosales> :-)
[00:35] <hatch> 2.0.3 version of the gui on 1.25 is quite stable - no one has had any complaints there _yet_ :D
[00:36]  * arosales slouches shoulders and installs 1.25
[00:36] <arosales> thanks hatch 
[00:36] <hatch> :) sorry arosales check back this time next week, we should have a beta gui 2.1.0 for you
[00:38] <arosales> hatch: no worries at all :-)
[00:38] <arosales> appreciate the replies here
[00:41] <hatch> no problem
[15:44] <jcastro> http://askubuntu.com/questions/732498/juju-local-charm-deploy-using-juju-gui-problem
[15:44] <jcastro> fresh bounty on this one!
[15:45] <hatch> jcastro: I already answered him
[15:45] <hatch> oh woops I didn't add the link :)
[15:45] <hatch> https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/1349
[15:45] <jcastro> give me a good answer so it's documented to help the next person
[15:45] <hatch> I'll add the comment to the issue
[15:45] <hatch> er
[15:45] <hatch> question
[15:46] <hatch> I don't have an 'answer'
[15:47] <hatch> jcastro: there :) answered
[15:49] <hatch> jcastro: sorry we're just too busy trying to get 2.0 support to spend time investigating this issue atm 
[15:49] <jcastro> no worries