[00:04] does juju 2.0 support multi-user environments? [00:04] with permissions? === beisner- is now known as beisner === thumper is now known as thumper-afk === urulama__ is now known as urulama === danilos` is now known as danilos === urulama_ is now known as urulama [13:33] there was a pretty huge charm helpers MP that fundamentally changes charmhelpers.core.host - but abstracts and introduces centos support. https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charm-helpers/charm-helpers/+merge/285044 It looks good to me, but lacks unit tests. I would love to get another set of eyes on this [13:33] if anyone has the time ^ :) [13:33] lazyPower: I looked over it, and it LGTM as far backwards compat [13:34] Denis showed it to me at the charmers summit [13:34] nice [13:34] i didnt want to merge it cart blanch without checking with the openstackers [13:34] lazyPower: I agree [13:34] have one of the openstack charmers review ti as well [15:17] Hi all! [15:18] o/ neiljerram [15:20] Just wondering if anyone has seen a problem like this with the nova-compute charm: [15:20] 2016-02-18 14:54:30 ERROR juju-log FATAL ERROR: Could not determine OpenStack codename for version 12.0.1 [15:20] 2016-02-18 14:54:30 ERROR juju.worker.uniter.operation runhook.go:107 hook "config-changed" failed: exit status 1 [15:50] http://askubuntu.com/questions/727332/how-can-i-use-multiple-cinder-sources [15:50] here's one for you openstackers! === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr [16:18] thedac, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charms/trusty/openstack-dashboard/xenial-support/+merge/286508 [16:18] jamespage: thanks. I'll get that landed [16:31] tinwood: I will make your suggested changes to my keystone MP. Thanks for taking a look. [16:32] thedac, np [17:03] kwmonroe: https://github.com/juju-solutions/charms.reactive/blob/master/bin/charms.reactive.sh#L61 [17:04] fu ftw! [17:20] This is also useful info on layers, and the different types of layers: http://bigdata.juju.solutions/2015-10-29-now-youre-charming-with-layers [17:20] QCC: ^ [17:26] Subordinates are different than layers [17:31] status-set maintenance "Downloading large file ..." [17:31] status-set active "Ready" [17:43] "secondary-namenode unknown" [19:43] 'ello. anyone here who's got access to the juju ci jenkins? [19:43] tvansteenburgh seems to not be around atm [19:44] jose whats up? [19:45] lazyPower: tests on lxc are hitting an error, port 37010 is already in use as a state port and it exits 1 [19:45] jose he's out on vacation next week too. so might b a minute if you wait for tim :) [19:45] uh oh [19:46] jose - have a link for me to hand over as evidence? [19:46] lazyPower: http://juju-ci.vapour.ws:8080/job/charm-bundle-test-lxc/2625/console but will create a pastebin since those expire [19:46] jose - also have you hit this multiple times or just now? [19:46] lazyPower: multiple times, one being in the charmers summit and he insta-fixed it [19:52] jose: I don't remember how to fix it, sadly [19:53] marcoceppi: no worries. just as an idea, maybe there's a bootstrapped env that hasn't been killed? [19:53] thta's the problem [20:01] hi, is there a way to remove a queued action? [20:03] marcoceppi: welp, I ran another test and it's doing fine now :) [20:38] so... http://juju-ci.vapour.ws:8080/job/charm-bundle-test-lxc/2637/console [20:38] that test up there completed ok, and then the CI infrastructure decided to say 'exit 1'! and it failed because of nothing (I could see on the logs). [20:38] anything we know about this bug? [20:44] lazyPower: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15134043/ is the paste I promised :) === scuttlemonkey is now known as scuttle|afk === scuttle|afk is now known as scuttlemonkey === scuttlemonkey is now known as scuttle|afk === scuttle|afk is now known as scuttlemonkey [23:00] this is prob a silly question but does leader election work in juju actions? [23:12] is-leader should be available. [23:12] leader election happens outside of any hooks and makes a status available and calls hooks when a new leader is elected [23:25] jrwren, thanks