[00:00] <nacc> slangasek: looking
[00:07] <nacc> slangasek: which version?
[00:07] <slangasek> nacc: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-guzzlehttp/5.3.0-1build1/+build/9039999
[00:11] <nacc> slangasek: simplest thing might be to sync 6.1.1-1 from experimental, but not sure
[00:11] <nacc> slangasek: sorry, i'm looking into if we can get the 5.3.0 tests to work
[00:12] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: all tests passed!
[00:12] <nacc> nicely done :)
[00:12] <nacc> slangasek: --^ fyi that will fix the adt failures for php7
[00:17] <nacc> slangasek: fwiw, 6.1.1-1 builds & runs tests cleanly against xenial w/o modification
[00:17] <Pharaoh_Atem> nacc: Woo!
[00:17] <nacc> slangasek: i'm not sure if it's worth us carrying a delta on an older version of the module, but i can do it if that's the better way given FF
[00:19] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: you'll probably need to file a bug, as the ubuntu package now has a delta -- can you handle that and cc me? and let me know when debian publishes? we can carry the delta and then hopefully sync -- is that roughly how it should work maintenance-wise, slangasek? this is a set of changes to debian's tests that we also need to pass the adt tests for src:php7.0
[00:19] <slangasek> nacc: would prefer us just taking the upstream fix; if you can file a pro-forma FFe bug against the package I'll sign off on it and sync from experimental
[00:19] <Pharaoh_Atem> I don't know how to do that, but I will be submitting the patches to Ondrej
[00:19] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: if you can file the bug, i'll deal with the rest of it, just don't want to lose track -- feel free to assign to me
[00:22] <nacc> slangasek: is there anything special i need to do for the FFe (this'd be my first)? special tags, etc
[00:22] <nacc> slangasek: looking at the wiki as we speak, as well
[00:22] <slangasek> nacc: explain why ("because it's needed for compatibility with php7"), subscribe ubuntu-release
[00:23] <slangasek> nacc: normally you want to also provide analysis of the upstream changes and justification for any risks; since we've only just missed FF and this is a sync from experimental, I'm happy to waive that requirement
[00:23] <nacc> slangasek: right, that's what i was just reading
[00:23] <nacc> makes sense, thanks!
[00:25] <Pharaoh_Atem> slangasek: I was just going to email Ondrej with a simplified set of the patches to apply
[00:25] <Pharaoh_Atem> and cc nacc about it
[00:25] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: i think his answers were for my questions
[00:25] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: i'd appreciate it if you could at least file the bug
[00:25] <Pharaoh_Atem> where and how do I do that
[00:25] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: launchpad
[00:26] <nacc> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0
[00:26] <Pharaoh_Atem> okay
[00:26] <Pharaoh_Atem> is it alright if I simplify the patches for him and send it to him?
[00:27] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: yeah, of course
[00:27] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: i just don't want to lose track
[00:28] <nacc> slangasek: LP #1547729
[00:46] <nacc> slangasek: still trying to figure out php-zeta-base
[00:46]  * slangasek nods
[00:46] <nacc> slangasek: i'm out next monday, but will get back to it first thing
[00:46] <nacc> i think i've fixed up anything other than php-zeta-base you and pitti hit overnight
[00:47] <slangasek> nacc: do you mind checking on the other uploads to see whether any have gotten stuck in dep-wait and require attention?
[00:47] <slangasek> once we have a handle on those I can batch up the next set of rebuild uploads
[00:47] <nacc> slangasek: sure -- what's the URL again (sorry not yet on the top of my head)
[00:47] <slangasek> nacc: ah... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/$sourcepkgname
[00:47] <slangasek> then drill down from there
[00:48] <nacc> slangasek: ok, need to run out quickly, but will do that when i get back
[00:51] <sarnold> nacc: it's quite handy to set up firefox keyword search for that, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/%s
[00:52] <sarnold> nacc: we've got a few other useful ones noted https://wiki.canonical.com/UbuntuEngineering/Security/Tips
[00:52] <slangasek> sarnold: huh, keyword searches work for you? they broke for me a while ago and I filed a bug on firefox but got no response
[00:53] <sarnold> slangasek: yeah; but I use pentadactyl so it might be something they've gone to some effort to continue supporting if firefox broke them..
[00:54] <nacc> sarnold: super nice! i'll have to add those
[00:54] <nacc> sarnold: yeah all the urls are super handy to have at hand
[00:54] <nacc> slangasek: ok, looks like all are good except the known php-zeta-{console-tools (depwait on base),base} and php-guzzlehttp
[00:56] <slangasek> sarnold: turns out they work now, but last time I tried to migrate from the old-style extensions to keyword-based bookmarks they were broken. Neat, that'll save me time again, thanks :)
[00:56] <slangasek> nacc: excellent!
[00:56] <sarnold> slangasek: woo :)
[00:57] <sarnold> yeah if these were to stop working I'd be pretty cranky
[00:58] <rlaager> Is Xenial expected to ship with zfsutils-linux on the server install CD?
[00:59] <sarnold> hey rlaager :) probably
[00:59] <Pharaoh_Atem> nacc: so do I just call this bug "Request to sync with Debian after application of patches" or what?
[01:02] <Pharaoh_Atem> nacc: I sent the email to Ondrej and cc'd you and Robie
[01:03] <sarnold> rlaager: interesting, it looks like it isn't currently set to ship on the CD; more details about what goes on the images and how is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SeedManagement
[01:05] <sarnold> rlaager: oh, of course, that's blocked on -me- finishing the security review first. jeeze. good thing it's friday afternoon.
[01:06] <rlaager> sarnold: So would it need to be in the Ship or Install seed?
[01:07] <sarnold> rlaager: i'm not sure which one, I thought of 'standard' or 'boot' on the first time through the introduction on that page..
[01:08] <Pharaoh_Atem> nacc: I cannot assign it to you: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0/+bug/1547738
[01:08] <rlaager> sarnold: I was assuming that standard is more-or-less equivalent to ubuntu-standard, and I'm not sure it needs to, or even should, be there.
[01:09] <rlaager> sarnold: I suppose installer, given that the next step would be installer support?
[01:10] <sarnold> rlaager: I don't know if installer support is planned for 16.04 or not; the foundations team is stretched pretty thin as it is. I know debian just grew support for it, there might be enough there worth stealing..
[01:12] <rlaager> sarnold: Sure, if installer support isn't possible for 16.04, that's fine. Getting the tools on the CD is a big step in that direction, though. It would allow the by-hand installation process to be greatly simplified. Instead of having to run debootstrap and do everything by hand, it would probably be possible to use most of the standard installer.
[01:13] <sarnold> rlaager: yeah, and since the image hasn't fit on a CD in ages anyway probably there aren't real space limitations to keep it out of the images
[01:16] <slangasek> we are not supporting root on ZFS
[01:16] <slangasek> so there's no particular benefit to having the tools on the install media; just install them afterward
[01:18] <Pharaoh_Atem> nacc: if you would please assign yourself to the php7.0 bug I just made, that'd be A+
[01:19] <rlaager> slangasek: Just because Ubuntu as a project isn't supporting root on ZFS doesn't mean you can't make small changes to make it easier for others (like me) who are interested in doing that.
[01:23] <rlaager> The thing to remember is that the server installer (unlike the Live CD) doesn't allow us to just `apt-get install zfsutils-linux`.
[01:37] <rlaager> sarnold: Good luck with the security review. I'll keep doing the best I can to build instructions for the root on ZFS case with whatever ships.
[01:58] <nacc> Pharaoh_Atem: done
[01:58]  * nacc -> long weekend
[02:32] <Logan> kyrofa: FYI http://bugs.debian.org/815205
[03:38] <slangasek> rlaager: on the contrary; since we don't support root on ZFS, we have a definite interest in avoiding making changes that give users a false impression of its supportability
[03:45] <sarnold> slangasek: he's left :/ he's still in #zfsonlinux however
[04:19] <slangasek> sarnold: ah, indeed :)
[12:38] <mitya57> Mirv, I pushed the qtbase dbustray patches to master branch.
[15:14] <kyrofa> Logan, I appreciate your looking into that, thank you!