[02:58] <bluesabre> flocculant: pushed catfish 1.4.0 to https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/xubuntu-staging
[02:58] <bluesabre> flocculant: care to kick the tires before I work on getting it into xenial?
[02:59] <bluesabre> knome: should I request font feedback on -devel or -users ML?
[02:59] <knome> DEVEL please
[02:59] <bluesabre> hehe
[03:00] <bluesabre> "Why not X-font?"
[03:01] <knome> comic sans plzz
[03:02] <Unit193> :D
[03:02] <Unit193> knome: Set terminal to that, all people on IRC really look like idiots then.
[03:03] <knome> well, let's think if i need to do that to make people look idiots considering the channels i'm in
[03:03] <knome> hmmm...
[03:03] <knome> just kidding, you're all fantastic
[03:11] <bluesabre> :D
[03:11] <bluesabre> knome: need the [TEAM] tag or no?
[03:11] <knome> i guess the feedback is mostly open to all
[03:12] <bluesabre> k
[03:12] <knome> i would like to get sensible feedback about the legibility in that size etc. from people outside the team too
[03:12] <knome> not sure if that's a sensible wish though
[03:12] <bluesabre> knome: http://pad.ubuntu.com/lySO0nj0D4 ?
[03:13] <knome> sec..
[03:13] <bluesabre> knome: I'm using 10 for all my sizes, but that's because my resolution is high and eyes are going bad :D
[03:14] <knome> yeah, it's a bit different with high resolutions
[03:14] <Unit193> bluesabre: My eyes are crap.
[03:14] <knome> and DPI affects it too of course
[03:15] <bluesabre> yes
[03:15] <knome> basically if you can have a big DPI, bigger font sizes are more OK
[03:21] <knome> fine with what's on the pad
[03:22] <bluesabre> oh dang, got mixed up with the channels
[03:23] <knome> :D
[03:23] <bluesabre> thanks knome
[03:23] <knome> np
[03:23] <bluesabre> sending that out
[03:23] <knome> cheers
[03:24] <bluesabre> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2016-February/011040.html
[04:53] <Noskcaj> bluesabre, Any chance you could put the new catfish in debian?
[08:12] <flocculant> bluesabre: mmm - still see the oddity with custom dates (but that's not marked Fixed anyway) but this
[08:13] <flocculant> updatedb reads /mnt - directory audio/j has Jane in it - catfish doesn't see it http://i.imgur.com/OIpxt0U.png
[08:13] <flocculant> locate find's it fine
[08:15] <flocculant> mmm
[08:15] <flocculant> but if I go *to* j in thunar and 'Find in this folder' it does ... 
[08:16] <flocculant> oh 
[08:16] <flocculant> bluesabre: sorry - if I have custom date set it doesn't - so that's working fine :p
[08:17] <flocculant> note to self - drink first cup of tea before *anything* 
[08:32] <flocculant> after that first cup - it all seems fine with the exception of custom date
[08:43] <flocculant> bluesabre: ignore all of that ...
[09:11] <flocculant> bluesabre: ok - starting again ... 
[09:11] <flocculant> still see the custom date issue
[09:12] <flocculant> also seeing some bizarre results from either using right click menu/or double click on result - bug1547807 
[09:12] <flocculant> bug 1547807
[09:12] <flocculant> description is 'one' issue I saw 
[09:12] <flocculant> screencast attached to it
[13:03] <bluesabre> flocculant: awwww, didn't check the catfish (Ubuntu) bugs
[13:03] <bluesabre> flocculant: marked them as affecting the project too, will fix those soon
[13:05] <flocculant> I get confused about more than one package when they're both in LP ... 
[13:06] <bluesabre> yeah
[13:06] <bluesabre> at least a few of those are easy fixes
[13:06] <flocculant> bluesabre: also - pretty sure that the bug I found today is new
[13:06] <bluesabre> which one?
[13:07] <flocculant> the one I reported today bug 1547807
[13:07] <bluesabre> that's been mentioned in the past, always forgot about it since no bug was ever filed
[13:08] <flocculant> oh right - never noticed it in the past - but at least there is a bug now :)
[13:08] <bluesabre> thanks
[13:09] <bluesabre> will probably try to get a 1.4.1 out this weekend then before attempting to send to archive
[13:09] <flocculant> ok
[13:09] <bluesabre> flocculant: thanks a lot for checking it out for me, big help!
[13:10] <flocculant> yw - at least I can do this :)
[13:56] <jjfrv8> bluesabre, re the noto font - I agree with you that 9 pt is a little small for hi-res displays, but 10 doesn't look good either, at least in T-bird, e.g.
[13:57] <jjfrv8> on a highlighted line, the font is not centered vertically and some characters overhang at the bottom: http://en.zimagez.com/zimage/noto-9vs10.php
[14:08] <bluesabre> jjfrv8: interesting observation
[14:08] <bluesabre> that might be a bug in the font itself, or in Thunderbird's rendering of it
[14:08] <bluesabre> very unusual
[14:10] <jjfrv8> Well the droid font is not centered in T-bird either, but at least I can use 9pt, which doesn't overhang, because it looks larger.
[14:10] <jjfrv8> Otherwise, the noto is not bad looking and I'll probably get used to it :)
[14:23] <bluesabre> thanks for the feedback jjfrv8 :D
[14:24] <jjfrv8> welcome
[15:51] <`qq> some noto font feedback.
[15:51] <`qq> it is very close to droid sans, i'd reckon most users won't notice
[15:52] <`qq> but when i installed fonts-noto, it installed a ton of fonts noto for different scripts
[15:52] <`qq> too many really
[15:53] <`qq> coudln't find fonts-noto-mono
[15:53] <`qq> and lastly it does take more horiz space than droid sans
[15:53] <`qq> not much, but one can tell
[15:54] <`qq> it's a good choice. not sure how the team could have done better. 
[15:54] <`qq> +1 from me
[20:08] <branau> ~Afternoon, everyone!
[20:08] <SwissBot> hi branau
[20:09] <branau> Question for the team: how are the contest submissions for the wallpapers going to be voted on?
[20:10] <Unit193> ubottu: random wallpaper1 wallpaper2 wallpaper3 wallpaper4 wallpaper5 wallpaper6
[20:12] <flocculant> branau: that depends I guess on how many, whether there's enough time (you'll remember I'm cycnical :D )
[20:12] <flocculant> I'd plump for civs probably 
[20:12] <Unit193> I'm also cynical and slightly trollish.  Honestly, either civs or artwork team.
[20:12] <_Sponge> Whats the flickr group, then ?
[20:13] <flocculant> no idea 
[20:13] <branau> I just ask because I've developed an upvote/downvote plugin that we could use for it
[20:13] <flocculant> mmm
[20:13] <branau> You can see a live example of it on floornews.org (be warned though, it's a very political site haha)
[20:13] <flocculant> branau: well that's what we wanted PoC for :)
[20:14] <flocculant> personally I'd like a list and then something to vote for them on/with
[20:14] <branau> flocculant the PoC is for tomorrow right?
[20:15] <flocculant> with civs you can have a list of 5 billion things - but if you actually only want to vote for 1 - put it to 1 and the other's get marked at 4,999,999,999 :)
[20:15] <flocculant> branau: ack
[20:15] <_Sponge> I checked out floornews.org & you have to log-in to vote.
[20:16] <_Sponge> What does ack mean ?
[20:16] <flocculant> acknowledge
[20:16] <_Sponge> so its not a TLA , then.
[20:16] <flocculant> omg amewican politics 
[20:17] <flocculant> _Sponge: nope 
[20:18] <branau> flocculant: The list would be good, I'm guessing we'd like to organize from most popular to least popular? 
[20:18] <branau> I've never heard of civs though
[20:19] <flocculant> http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/
[20:20] <flocculant> http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_0fdc957f50e982d0
[20:20] <flocculant> for a recent example :D
[20:21] <branau> flocculant: wouldn't that involve a lot of manual data entry though?
[20:21] <flocculant> only a list of people who can vote and the things to vote on
[20:22] <flocculant> I've done it bunch of times for different things
[20:23] <branau> flocculant, alright, sounds good. I'll try to get an in-house voting system set up for the PoC that I'll be shooting your way tomorrow so you can decide on which you like better
[20:24] <flocculant> awesome sauce
[21:18] <knome> branau, or rather on this channel :)
[21:18] <Unit193> Did you read logs, knome
[21:18] <Unit193> ?
[21:19] <knome> no
[21:19] <knome> but i'll go do that now
[21:35] <flocculant> knome: what on this channel? 
[21:37] <knome> flocculant, see q on -off
[21:37] <flocculant> ohh I see :p