[07:08] <kubuntu_> hi team.  I'm looking for the script to build the kubuntu ISO.  I've checked the kde wiki and a few other places, but no luck. :-( Can anybody point me in the right direction?
[07:12] <valorie> like your own custom ISO?
[07:13] <valorie> !iso
[07:13] <valorie> hmmm
[07:13] <valorie> !custom
[07:13] <valorie> mmm
[07:14] <kubuntu_> valorie: well, I would start with building the 15.10 install / live CD with the default settings / packages, but would then look to customize some of the settings and packages...  I'm assuming there's a build script to create the ISO, but I can't find it...
[07:15] <valorie> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomization
[07:15] <valorie> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomization
[10:26] <blaze> is something wrong with the launchpad lately?
[10:28] <blaze> packages are waiting for being published for at least 3 hours
[10:28] <blaze> that means something is wrong definitely
[12:25] <BluesKaj> Hi folks
[12:26] <clivejo> hi BluesKaj
[12:27] <BluesKaj> hi clivejo
[12:38] <BluesKaj> large upgrade today, 114 upgraded and all is well :-)
[12:58] <clivejo> sitter: is there any way to get a package to "jump" the queue on KCI?
[13:10] <sitter> clivejo: nope
[13:11] <clivejo> just have to wait then ?
[13:12] <clivejo> sitter: what is it doing at the minute?
[13:12] <clivejo> mgmt_tooling?
[13:14] <sitter> deploying a new tooling revision
[13:15] <clivejo> is that something you started?
[13:15] <sitter> it automatically starts when someone from bluesystems pushes new tooling
[13:17] <bshah> just wondering: would it make sense to split out kci tooling and nci/mci/dci tooling? or kci also uses same stuff?
[13:20] <sitter> bshah: same stuff
[13:20] <bshah> okay
[13:20] <sitter> only the actual binaries are different (since they use launchpad etc)
[13:20] <sitter> and even that only holds true for ci-tooling for the most part
[15:35] <clivejo> sitter: Im trying to get libkolab to build on KCI, the last attempt failed due to dput "15:19:04 Unable to negotiate with 91.189.95.83: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie-hellman-group1-sha1"
[15:35] <clivejo> any idea what happened?
[15:36] <sitter> kolab phab probably still drunk
[15:36] <clivejo> seems to have built the source ok this time
[15:37] <clivejo> http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_libkolab/3/console
[15:37] <clivejo> it was failing over patches that no longer apply
[15:40] <clivejo> log in is wrong
[15:40] <clivejo> 15:16:58 D: FQDN: ppa.launchpad.net
[15:40] <clivejo> 15:16:58 D: Login: kubuntu-ci-bot
[15:40] <clivejo> ?
[15:41] <sitter> sgclark: ping
[15:41] <clivejo> there are a lot failing over bad login
[15:42] <sitter> that'd be odd
[15:44] <sitter> debug3: channel 0: status: The following connections are open:
[15:44] <sitter>   #0 client-session (t4 r0 i3/0 o3/0 fd -1/-1 cc -1)
[15:44] <sitter> clivejo: authenticates just fine
[15:44] <clivejo> why does the console say it failed twice?
[15:44] <sitter> launchpad problem maybe?
[15:44] <sitter> it authenticates *now*
[15:44] <clivejo> cantor seems to be the same - http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_stable_cantor/39/consoleFull
[15:44] <sitter> doesn't mean it worked when that job ran
[15:45] <clivejo> Ill queue a rebuild
[15:45] <clivejo> maybe just intermittent thing
[15:47] <clivejo> sitter: also, why when there at 97 in the queue is it only using 5 out of 16 slots?
[15:47] <sgclark> sitter: pong
[15:48] <sitter> sgclark: does build.kde use a docker swarm?
[15:48] <sitter> and if so how do you send workspaces to the swarm?
[15:48] <sgclark> sitter: only on sandbox atm. But it will yes.
[15:49] <sgclark> sitter: bcooksley set it up.
[15:49] <sitter> sgclark: do you have any pointers to code?
[15:49] <sitter> I can't wrap my head around workspace exchange without substantial IO overhead on both ends xD
[15:49] <sgclark> I do not sorry.
[15:49] <sitter> will have to hunt down ben I guess
[15:50] <sitter> clivejo: it uploads just fine with exactly the same arguments. I think it was a launchpad problem TBH
[15:51] <clivejo> hummm KCI is doing mgmt_docker again :/
[15:51] <sitter> clivejo: see if you find all other jobs doing it. but as it stands right now I think this are problems on launchpad
[15:52] <sitter> which is not too surprising considering there are still publishing delays apparently
[15:52] <sitter> so something isn't right on their end
[15:55] <clivejo> sitter: They were doing maintenance earlier on, but I thought things had been resolved
[15:55] <clivejo> maybe some knock on problems
[15:57] <clivejo> its just failed again!!
[15:59] <sitter> maybe ssh in xenial is broken xD
[16:00] <clivejo> failed again :(
[16:00] <BluesKaj> ssh on my lan works here on Xenial
[16:00] <marco-parillo> Good news everybody: I have been afraid to try a fresh Xenial install since I had heard of problems with the installer, but things just went very smoothly this morning in a VM.
[16:01] <clivejo> sitter: Ill trigger the wily build then :)
[16:02] <BluesKaj> think the installer bug was fixed , used a daily on Sat to reinstall after a I got into a mees on friday's upgrade
[16:02] <clivejo> who fixed the installer?
[16:03] <BluesKaj> I tried the image I had  DL'd earlier and the ubuniquity kept crasheing , but anwer image worked fien
[16:03] <BluesKaj> ubiquity even 
[16:04] <BluesKaj> damn KB keeps tricking my fingers :-)
[16:04] <clivejo> sitter: I think you might be on to something, a lot of the xenial builds triggered today are failing with the same error!
[16:04] <sgclark> is there an email list for the kubuntu-council?
[16:06] <clivejo> sgclark: kubuntu-council@lists.launchpad.net ?
[16:07] <sgclark> thanks
[16:09] <sitter> clivejo: http://www.openssh.com/legacy.html
[16:10] <sitter> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/blog/category/launchpad.html
[16:11] <clivejo> sitter: thanks, cjwatson has just replied in #launchpad and is on the case
[16:14] <clivejo> sitter: are you guys working on the tooling? I see mgmt_tooling in the queue again
[16:14] <sitter> always
[16:14] <clivejo> its only been about 10 mins from the last time it run :/
[16:16] <clivejo> sitter: apparently its fixed now :)
[16:16] <clivejo> Ill queue libkolab again!
[16:16]  * clivejo crosses fingers
[16:17] <sitter> debug3: channel 0: status: The following connections are open:
[16:17] <sitter>   #0 client-session (t4 r0 i3/0 o3/0 fd -1/-1 cc -1)
[16:17] <sitter> can confirm
[16:17] <sitter> should work again
[16:53] <sgclark> sitter: why do we have utopic? 'Merging kubuntu_unstable into kubuntu_unstable_utopic.' (konsole) and how do we delete?
[16:53] <clivejo> sgclark: Ive been asking maxy to remove those
[16:55] <BluesKaj> does 15.10 have the new 4.4 kernel available yet?
[17:01]  * clivejo is getting impatient with KCI
[17:12] <blaze> BluesKaj: why it should? new major versions are only available for lts releases to enable new hw support
[17:13] <BluesKaj> blaze, I'm not asking why. I'm asking if it is, simple.
[17:14] <blaze> well, the answer is no
[17:14] <BluesKaj> ok
[17:19] <blaze> BluesKaj: maybe this is what you want http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
[17:23] <BluesKaj> blaze, thanks , but I'm trying solve problem for a 15.10 user who seems to be using an older kernel . Since I'm on 16.04 I've forgotten what the current default kernel is for 15.10
[17:33] <BluesKaj> 4.2 it is and no kernel upgrades in sight
[18:01] <sgclark> clivejo: libkface still needs a symbols refresh
[18:05] <sgclark> and libkipi
[18:20] <snele> BluesKaj: I use mainline kernels for years without problems http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/?C=N;O=D
[18:21] <BluesKaj> snele, I'm not looking for a kernel , but thanks anyway ;-)
[18:23] <snele>  <BluesKaj> does 15.10 have the new 4.4 kernel available yet?
[18:23] <snele> yes I am very late :D
[18:28] <BluesKaj> snele, I'm on 16.04 , this was meant for some guy who was looking for a kernel upgrade because he thought 4.4 was available for 15.10
[18:38] <sgclark> yofel: I am getting down to the last few that I need your help on. I have made notes in the kubuntu-ninjas notepad, whenever you have time to look. I am distracted next several days trying to get a gig that pays $. But available with pings. Thanks!
[19:29] <ovidiu-florin> 14.04.4 got out right?
[19:35] <clivejo> ovidiu-florin: I believe so
[19:47] <ovidiu-florin> clivejo: when?
[19:47] <ovidiu-florin> there was no release announcement on our part
[19:47] <ovidiu-florin> I didn't know
[19:48] <ovidiu-florin> when was the release?
[19:49] <clivejo> ovidiu-florin: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2016-February/000205.html
[19:50] <Mirv> Noskcaj: not currently, 3.7 is the next one where there are interesting upstreamings regarding Ubuntu SDK development. 3.6 would need FFe and checking how much work getting qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu with it would be.
[19:51] <Mirv> we were a bit hoping for 3.7 beta before FF but it didn't happen so 3.7 is definitely xenial+1
[20:00] <Noskcaj> Mirv, ok, thanks
[21:07] <clivejo> yofel sgclark: Im trying to get libkolab fixed up, but the new libkolab deps on libcalendaring
[21:08] <sgclark> ok, that is what is holding up kdepim-runtime. 
[21:08] <clivejo> yup
[21:08] <sgclark> but the rest of the problem bits we need yofels mad skillz to help with.
[21:09] <clivejo> I have it packaged here - https://launchpad.net/~kolab/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/8970940
[21:09] <sgclark> but we are looking good mostly
[21:09] <clivejo> but dunno what to do about it
[21:09] <clivejo> can I move that package into apps staging?
[21:10] <sgclark> yes *copy* it into staging
[21:10] <clivejo> how does one do that?!?
[21:11] <clivejo> also need to build a new version of libkolab
[21:11] <sgclark> view all packages and to the right side should be a copy and delete packages option
[21:11] <clivejo> 2.0
[21:13] <clivejo> sgclark: can I add a git repo on debian?
[21:15] <sgclark> clivejo: I do not have authority there sorry
[21:32] <ovidiu-florin> clivejo: ok, but that's Ubuntu
[23:33] <valorie> did that FFE paperwork get filed?
[23:34] <valorie> also, I was going to update https://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Plasma/InstallingNext
[23:34] <valorie> but I wonder if we should just remove ourselves from that, or point to the dailies?
[23:35] <valorie> or will we release a Xenial beta I can point to there?
[23:37] <valorie> the ci images are described there: '''Live Image of Kubuntu Vivid with Packages from Git''' The [http://files.kde.org/snapshots/ Weekly Live Image], updated every Friday with latest source from Git to run a full system from a USB disk.  Based on Kubuntu 15.04, Vivid.
[23:40] <valorie> in snapshots there is a Plasma Wayland image
[23:43] <valorie> shadeslayer: at the bottom of that page, liveCD section, you have a neon ISO
[23:43] <valorie> I assume that just can be removed, since it is a dead link?
[23:47] <valorie> eh, replaced with: '''Live Image of Kubuntu Wily with Packages from Git''' The [http://files.kde.org/snapshots/ Weekly Live Image], updated  with latest source from Git to run a full system from a USB disk.  Based on Kubuntu 15.10, Wily.