[08:26] moring trainguards! may i ask for help with ^ ? [08:26] * morning [08:29] pstolowski: on it! === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 [08:35] nice to get one of the unity8 landings landed, so many of them in queue [08:47] cjwatson: hey! Do you have teh power to drop a package from vivid's UNAPPROVED queue? No need for it to linger there, it got published by accident [08:48] cjwatson: there's oxide-qt in the queue [09:08] holy jesus you people are really abusing the unity8 silos [09:08] There's a lot of experimental silos + some for MWC [09:09] when I implemented the conflicting silo logic I was envisioning 2 or 3 at a time, this is 7. [09:16] excuse me, 10 unity8 silos, because I can count good. [09:16] that's literally 12% of all silos being used for unity8. [10:36] sil2100: would "accidentally published to vivid-proposed rather than to ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay" be a correct rejection message? [10:51] cjwatson: yes :) [11:00] sil2100: rejected [11:00] cjwatson: thanks! [11:17] citrain, for some reason armhf has not builf for https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-037/+packages , is that due to lack of resources? [11:28] trainguards: packages in silo 70 failed to build, and there are no build logs available for me to check why, are there known issues with LP ? [11:29] * abeato_ wrongly used citrain instead of trainguards in previous message :D ^^ [11:29] oSoMoN: hey! Looks like there are build failures there with logs [11:30] abeato_: let me take a quick look [11:30] sil2100, thanks [11:30] abeato_: might be that the armhf builders are busy, but the approx build start message does make me worry [11:31] sil2100, hmm, but it has built for other archs [11:31] cjwatson: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-037/+build/9048257 <- do you know what this might mean? It just says 'Start ' [11:31] abeato_: not all archs are built by the same builders :) [11:32] sure [11:32] oSoMoN: from what I see in the logs it's some network error or something in the PPA itself, a lot of E: Failed to fetch ... [11:37] sil2100, thanks, I’ll trigger a forced rebuild to see if that goes away [12:00] sil2100: seems to have been given back? [12:00] so can't see what the problem was [12:01] sil2100: ppa.launchpad.net was a bit sad earlier today due to using the wrong I/O scheduler following a reboot for the glibc getaddrinfo vulnerability, so it could well have been that [12:03] Mirv: what should I do to merge this - https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1022 [12:04] cjwatson: might be, thanks! [12:06] bzoltan: I can handle it, but there's a vivid build too so I guess it should be dual landing? [12:07] Mirv: sorry for the confusion. I have made a Vivid build, soi can copy the ready package to the SDK PPA from the silo [12:24] rvr, shouldn't https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1013 be QA: Failed? [12:24] Saviq: I think so [12:25] rvr, can you please mark it so? thanks [12:25] Saviq: Probably alesage forgot [12:25] Saviq: Done === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:57] * sil2100 off to lunch === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch === joc_ is now known as joc|away === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [15:32] kenvandine: would you mind checking the packaging changes on silo 20? [15:32] boiko, sure [15:32] kenvandine: thanks! [15:48] boiko, published [15:50] Elleo, silo 28 approved but it's rebuilding for some reason. [15:51] sil2100, for silo 28 ubuntu-keyboard-japanese must be added to the deps of ubuntu-touch [15:51] jibel: thanks, not sure why it's rebuilding :/ [16:02] jibel, Elleo: hm, you mean added to the seeds? [16:09] sil2100: yep, that package will need adding to the seed [16:34] kenvandine: thanks === greyback__ is now known as greyback === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [18:55] sil2100: skip meeting without Steve? === karni is now known as karni-afk === karni-afk is now known as karni