[08:26] <pstolowski> moring trainguards! may i ask for help with ^ ?
[08:26] <pstolowski> * morning
[08:29] <sil2100_> pstolowski: on it!
[08:35] <Mirv> nice to get one of the unity8 landings landed, so many of them in queue
[08:47] <sil2100> cjwatson: hey! Do you have teh power to drop a package from vivid's UNAPPROVED queue? No need for it to linger there, it got published by accident
[08:48] <sil2100> cjwatson: there's oxide-qt in the queue
[09:08] <robru> holy jesus you people are really abusing the unity8 silos
[09:08] <sil2100> There's a lot of experimental silos + some for MWC
[09:09] <robru> when I implemented the conflicting silo logic I was envisioning 2 or 3 at a time, this is 7.
[09:16] <robru> excuse me, 10 unity8 silos, because I can count good.
[09:16] <robru> that's literally 12% of all silos being used for unity8.
[10:36] <cjwatson> sil2100: would "accidentally published to vivid-proposed rather than to ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay" be a correct rejection message?
[10:51] <sil2100> cjwatson: yes :)
[11:00] <cjwatson> sil2100: rejected
[11:00] <sil2100> cjwatson: thanks!
[11:17] <abeato_> citrain, for some reason armhf has not builf for https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-037/+packages , is that due to lack of resources?
[11:28] <oSoMoN> trainguards: packages in silo 70 failed to build, and there are no build logs available for me to check why, are there known issues with LP ?
[11:29]  * abeato_ wrongly used citrain instead of trainguards in previous message :D ^^
[11:29] <sil2100> oSoMoN: hey! Looks like there are build failures there with logs
[11:30] <sil2100> abeato_: let me take a quick look
[11:30] <abeato_> sil2100, thanks
[11:30] <sil2100> abeato_: might be that the armhf builders are busy, but the approx build start message does make me worry
[11:31] <abeato_> sil2100, hmm, but it has built for other archs
[11:31] <sil2100> cjwatson: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-037/+build/9048257 <- do you know what this might mean? It just says 'Start '
[11:31] <sil2100> abeato_: not all archs are built by the same builders :)
[11:32] <abeato_> sure
[11:32] <sil2100> oSoMoN: from what I see in the logs it's some network error or something in the PPA itself, a lot of E: Failed to fetch ...
[11:37] <oSoMoN> sil2100, thanks, I’ll trigger a forced rebuild to see if that goes away
[12:00] <cjwatson> sil2100: seems to have been given back?
[12:00] <cjwatson> so can't see what the problem was
[12:01] <cjwatson> sil2100: ppa.launchpad.net was a bit sad earlier today due to using the wrong I/O scheduler following a reboot for the glibc getaddrinfo vulnerability, so it could well have been that
[12:03] <bzoltan> Mirv:  what should I do to merge this - https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1022
[12:04] <sil2100> cjwatson: might be, thanks!
[12:06] <Mirv> bzoltan: I can handle it, but there's a vivid build too so I guess it should be dual landing?
[12:07] <bzoltan> Mirv:  sorry for the confusion. I have made a Vivid build, soi can copy the ready package to the SDK PPA from the silo
[12:24] <Saviq> rvr, shouldn't https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1013 be QA: Failed?
[12:24] <rvr> Saviq: I think so
[12:25] <Saviq> rvr, can you please mark it so? thanks
[12:25] <rvr> Saviq: Probably alesage forgot
[12:25] <rvr> Saviq: Done
[12:57]  * sil2100 off to lunch
[15:32] <boiko> kenvandine: would you mind checking the packaging changes on silo 20?
[15:32] <kenvandine> boiko, sure
[15:32] <boiko> kenvandine: thanks!
[15:48] <kenvandine> boiko, published
[15:50] <jibel> Elleo, silo 28 approved but it's rebuilding for some reason.
[15:51] <jibel> sil2100, for silo 28 ubuntu-keyboard-japanese must be added to the deps of ubuntu-touch
[15:51] <Elleo> jibel: thanks, not sure why it's rebuilding :/
[16:02] <sil2100> jibel, Elleo: hm, you mean added to the seeds?
[16:09] <Elleo> sil2100: yep, that package will need adding to the seed
[16:34] <boiko> kenvandine: thanks
[18:55] <robru> sil2100: skip meeting without Steve?