[03:13] <bluesabre> evening all
[03:14] <Unit193> Howdy.
[03:14] <bluesabre> hey Unit193
[03:14] <bluesabre> quick on the response there :)
[07:13] <flocculant> jjfrv8: don't see galaxy - see breeze here both live/install reported to bug 1548647
[07:14] <flocculant> ochosi bluesabre ^^ - I think -artwork is the right package - that at least is where I can see LO theme in the changelog :)
[07:14] <flocculant> Nairwolf: welcome back - read the backlog - seen your tracker report - thanks :)
[07:16] <Nairwolf> flocculant, that's nothing ;)
[07:16] <Nairwolf> thank you for your help with zsync ;)
[07:16] <flocculant> that's nothing ;)
[07:17] <Nairwolf> I hope being able to help xubuntu more often, now ;)
[07:17] <flocculant> that's great :)
[10:30] <Akxwi-dave> Bluesabre.. Got some font feedback for you... been using it for the past 5 days... After a few days you cant tell the difference.. I have it on desktop  @ 1920x1080 and laptop on 1366x768 and looks good.
[10:31] <Akxwi-dave> Noto-san on gui and noto-mono on term..  all at 9 ..
[10:36] <bluesabre> Akxwi-dave: great, good to hear
[10:38] <bluesabre> flocculant: surprised that we are even installing breeze. ochosi and I need to work on our theme upstream in libreoffice so we can have them handle the packaging and fix weird issues like that
[11:52] <knome> bluesabre, ping
[11:59] <knome> pleia2, requesting contest.xubuntu.org
[12:30] <bluesabre> knome: hey
[12:31] <flocculant> hi bluesabre 
[12:31] <bluesabre> hey flocculant
[12:32] <bluesabre> flocculant: nearly got the catfish clicking sorted... not sure how it became such a mess, but lets blame changes in GTK ;)
[12:32] <flocculant> yea
[12:33] <flocculant> obviously I blamed that mentally anyway :D
[12:36] <bluesabre> flocculant: I'll likely be trying to get this uploaded, as well as the font changes on Thursday after b1 isos are up
[12:36] <flocculant> ok :)
[12:36] <flocculant> there's going to definitely be 1 rebuild - probably more ... 
[12:37] <flocculant> currently ubiquity crashes in flames if hardware includes a battery :)
[12:37] <bluesabre> yiiiiiikes
[12:37] <flocculant> figuratively speaking - not exploding batteries :D
[12:38]  * bluesabre breathes a sigh of relief
[12:38] <flocculant> :)
[12:39] <flocculant> if it was that bad I'd have m/list(s) +website + anything else I could think of :)
[12:45] <bluesabre> :D
[13:05] <Akxwi-dave> Think I'll leave the iso testing off my laptop then.. :-)
[15:47] <pleia2> knome: great
[20:19] <genii> oooo
[20:54] <pleia2> aiming for wednesday, mar 2nd at 17UTC for our next meeting, will anyone be around? :D
[20:54] <knome> wednesdays are a bit bad for me
[20:55] <knome> at least at that time i can't promise to be available
[20:55] <pleia2> thursday better?
[20:55] <knome> yep, wed has the only blocker
[20:55] <pleia2> ok, the 3rd then
[20:55] <knome> wfm
[20:56] <Unit193> My client will be connected, I may even read backlog.
[20:57] <pleia2> alright, good enough for me
[20:57] <knome> lol
[20:57] <knome> not very high standards then
[20:57] <pleia2> :P
[20:59] <ochosi> i'll do my best, can't promise anything though unfortunately
[21:00] <knome> ochosi, we know "your best"
[21:00] <ochosi> thanks :)
[21:00] <Unit193> Yeah, have his client break and disappear a few days before. :---D
[21:01] <knome> ochosi, not "you're best"
[22:25] <Nairwolf> hi
[22:25] <Nairwolf> is it still necessary to do test with the daily iso, or can I use the beta version ? 
[22:25] <Nairwolf> with zsync the iso is different
[22:34] <knome> depends which milestone you are reporting tests against
[22:34] <knome> currently, we are testing beta1
[22:34] <knome> but please note that the beta1 images might get updated too
[22:34] <Nairwolf> ah ;)
[22:34] <knome> so make sure you have the latest beta1 image
[22:35] <Nairwolf> what is the difference between beta1 umage updated and the daily build ? 
[22:36] <knome> beta - or any other milestone - is essentially a snapshot of the daily ISOs
[22:37] <Nairwolf> ok
[22:37] <knome> so theoretically on the first day of the milestone testing the image is the same
[22:37] <knome> but in an ideal situation, the milestone image would not change until the release of the milestone
[22:37] <Nairwolf> ok, so I have the same iso in fact
[22:37] <bluesabre> knome: poke
[22:38] <Nairwolf> ok, why it has changed ?
[22:38] <knome> no, because in real life, bugs happen and they are fixed and ISOs are updated
[22:38] <knome> so whenever zsync tells you you need to get new data, you need to.
[22:38] <knome> bluesabre, i'll poke you back in 15ish
[22:38] <bluesabre> knome: okie doke
[22:39] <Nairwolf> sorry, I don't understand
[22:39] <Nairwolf> you
[22:39] <Nairwolf> Yesterday, I downloaded the beta iso, and now, I've updated it with zsync
[22:39] <knome> then you have what you should.
[22:40] <Nairwolf> the correct beta image is here ? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds
[22:40] <knome> but you also need to make sure with zsync if it has been updated
[22:40] <knome> s/also/always/
[22:40] <Nairwolf> yes
[22:40] <Nairwolf> i've done that
[22:40] <knome> ...so what's the question?
[22:42] <Nairwolf> my first question was "is it more important to test the daily iso or to test again the beta 1". But I didn't know that the beta1 image has changed, so, I'm going to test it again ;)
[22:43] <knome> whenever there is a milestone iso, that
[22:44] <Nairwolf> that ? 
[22:44] <Nairwolf> Sorry, my english isn't perfect, I don't understand you...
[22:45] <knome> whenever we have a milestone iso, it is the priority to test the milestone iso
[22:45] <Nairwolf> okay, I didn't know that
[22:46] <Nairwolf> and how could I know that the beta 1 was updated ? 
[22:46] <Nairwolf> (sorry for being annoying with my questions, I'm a newbie in QA)
[22:47] <knome> you know the beta1 (or any image) is updated by running the zsync command
[22:47] <Nairwolf> ok
[22:47] <knome> or the ISO version mentioned on the page you posted
[22:47] <knome> (basically if it's different than it was before, it's updated)
[22:47] <Nairwolf> I thought I've missed a mail or something like that
[22:50] <knome> sometimes it's specifically announced if it includes a very important update
[22:50] <knome> sometimes all flavor ISOs are updated because a common bug has been found
[22:50] <knome> in those cases the respin/update might not have a specific mention
[22:52] <Nairwolf> ok, isn't because of the ubiquity bug ? 
[22:53] <Nairwolf> oh.... I can't boot on my usb key... 
[22:53] <Nairwolf> Have you ever seen a message like that "No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found!" and I have this prompt "boot: _"
[22:54] <knome> this time it might be of the ubiquity bug - that would be a common bug - but i don't know, i haven't tested the beta
[22:54] <flocculant> bluesabre: just so you know - upower still causing issues - I did us a rebuild - still an issue
[22:54] <flocculant> hi knome :)
[22:55] <flocculant> pleia2: 5pm is goodish for me - I should be about 
[22:55] <knome> hey flocculant 
[22:55] <pleia2> flocculant: great, thanks :)
[22:56] <Nairwolf> hi flocculant ;)
[22:56] <Nairwolf> ok, thank you knome ;)
[22:56] <flocculant> hey Nairwolf :)
[22:57] <flocculant> Nairwolf: if you are not sure if image is current - zsync it - it will say it has 100% and no need to download 
[22:57] <flocculant> or words to that effect
[23:03] <Nairwolf> ok, thank you flocculant for your advices ;)
[23:03] <flocculant> no problem
[23:04] <flocculant> ftr it says "Read xenial-desktop-amd64.iso. Target 100.0% complete."
[23:06] <Nairwolf> yes, I've understood that, but firstly, I went to the daily iso, and I thought it's a new daily build and it's normal
[23:08] <flocculant> Nairwolf: for all intents and purposes the milestone and the daily are one and the same
[23:08] <Nairwolf> ok
[23:13] <flexiondotorg_> flocculant, Wha?
[23:14] <flocculant> not important - net split after freenode shenanigans - just 3 of us in here :)
[23:14] <bluesabre> o/
[23:15] <flocculant> hi bluesabre 
[23:17] <bluesabre> hey flocculant
[23:17] <knome> flocculant, not always :)
[23:19] <knome> bluesabre, ok, so your turn to test my "app" ;)
[23:19] <knome> http://temp.knome.fi/xubuntu/wallpaper-contest/xubuntu-wallpaper-contest.tar.gz
[23:19] <flocculant> cya tomorrow peeps
[23:19] <knome> nighty flocculant 
[23:19] <bluesabre> cya flocculant
[23:20] <knome> bluesabre, hint: it's a wordpress plugin
[23:22] <bluesabre> knome: ah
[23:23]  * bluesabre installs wordpress on his laptop
[23:24]  * cjbayliss hopes he didn't read that right
[23:24] <knome> which one?
[23:30] <bluesabre> knome: so, plugin installed
[23:30] <bluesabre> now what?
[23:30] <knome> bluesabre, see the sidebar
[23:30] <knome> bluesabre, in admin, that is
[23:30] <bluesabre> aha
[23:30] <knome> it should be more or less self-explanatory at this point
[23:30] <knome> voting and vote results are visible currently for admins
[23:31] <bluesabre> knome: cool, seems to work
[23:31] <Nairwolf> looks like there is still the bug with ubiquity and batterie....
[23:32] <knome> Nairwolf, then link that to your test report
[23:32] <bluesabre> knome: yup, painless
[23:32] <knome> bluesabre, good :)
[23:32] <Nairwolf> yes
[23:32] <knome> we should get the marketing wheels rolling then!
[23:32] <knome> (we almost have a new subdomain for this too)
[23:32] <bluesabre> knome: great :D
[23:33] <knome> also, probably sensible to check the terms too
[23:33] <knome> and add stuff there as needed
[23:33] <bluesabre> already reading
[23:33] <knome> and a final check on an openid/launchpad enabled site to make sure everything goes smoothly there
[23:33] <knome> it's mostly copied from the old terms page
[23:33] <pleia2> "almost"!
[23:34] <knome> pleia2, well, ticket is sent, IS has confirmed they understand what we're saying
[23:34] <knome> (eg. not talking gobbledigook)
[23:34] <pleia2> I know :)
[23:34] <knome> but of course, you know everything ;)
[23:38] <bluesabre> brb
[23:42] <knome> pleia2, you might want to take a look at the plugin as well
[23:48] <Nairwolf> guys, I'm doing this testcase : http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds/113180/testcases/1300/results and I have a strange "error"
[23:48] <Nairwolf> Failed to create a swap space
[23:48] <Nairwolf> Do you think it's a bug, or is it something with my computer ?