| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
| davmor2 | I CAN HAZ AN INSTALL \o/ | 10:19 |
|---|---|---|
| davmor2 | Now to try with 3rd party drivers installed checked | 10:19 |
| === jamie3 is now known as jamie1 | ||
| wxl | we should change the "passed with no bugs" button to say "testcase succeeded" XD | 19:44 |
| flocculant | well | 19:45 |
| flocculant | I guess the thing is how pragmatic people are | 19:46 |
| flocculant | vbox should cause a testcase to fail shouldn't it | 19:47 |
| flocculant | but people pass the test because vbox | 19:47 |
| wxl | i meant more that there's nothing that has no bugs! | 19:49 |
| flocculant | yea | 19:49 |
| flocculant | but then if it has bugs - testcase didn't succeed :p | 19:49 |
| wxl | what if the bug is that the slideshow is out of date? XD | 19:50 |
| flocculant | the trouble I have mostly is people add their pet bugs to the tracker - when a testcase doesn't even come anywhere close to even thinking about the possibility of asking about *it* | 19:50 |
| flocculant | like a install - that gets some bug about unetbootin or the like added to it ... | 19:50 |
| wxl | well i think it's valuable to report bugs— as many as possible, but that doesn't mean a failed testcase | 19:51 |
| wxl | i know i saw those | 19:51 |
| wxl | and i'm pretty much ignoring them :) | 19:51 |
| flocculant | :) | 19:51 |
| wxl | but i will do everything i can to encourage people to report bugs everywhere they can! | 19:51 |
| flocculant | I think it's valuable to report bugs too | 19:51 |
| flocculant | perhaps there should be some education about things like it | 19:51 |
| flocculant | don't fail a test - if the test itself succeeded - you can add bugs, but don't fail it | 19:52 |
| flocculant | I've passed things with critical bugs | 19:52 |
| wxl | maybe there should be a section for pet bugs XD | 19:52 |
| flocculant | :) | 19:53 |
| flocculant | we're going to have to undo a bunch of tracker changes - defects is still fubar | 19:53 |
| flocculant | balloons: I've got nowhere working out what to do with the MP we were looking to undo - given up for the moment | 20:01 |
| flocculant | after a week using the tracker I have just reported bug 1549956 | 20:01 |
| ubot5` | bug 1549956 in Ubuntu QA Website "Changes to the way bugs are shown in tracker testcase" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1549956 | 20:01 |
| balloons | flocculant, ohh. Sorry to hear that | 20:01 |
| flocculant | balloons: probably shouldn't have looked when I did tbh :p | 20:01 |
| balloons | flocculant, what would you like to do next? | 20:01 |
| flocculant | after a week running beta 1 for the flavours - forget all about the tracker for a few days :D | 20:02 |
| balloons | :-) | 20:06 |
| wxl | where do i even see the list of bugs? i couldn't find it | 20:06 |
| flocculant | wxl at the bottom | 20:07 |
| wxl | weord o dpm | 20:08 |
| wxl | ugh | 20:08 |
| wxl | i don't see it | 20:08 |
| flocculant | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/113243/testcases/1628/results | 20:08 |
| wxl | oh maybe i do | 20:08 |
| flocculant | scroll down | 20:08 |
| wxl | per testcase | 20:08 |
| flocculant | yea - same as it ever was - just not icons you have to mouseover | 20:09 |
| wxl | i still wish i could see all the ones that affect a particular milestone product | 20:09 |
| wxl | like Lubuntu Xenial Beta 1 has the following bugs and it shows which it testcase it was reported against | 20:09 |
| flocculant | right | 20:10 |
| flocculant | personally I'd rather bugs on xubuntu between x and y - I can choose to include milestones, either side of milestones, excluding milestones | 20:10 |
| wxl | yes i'd like that too | 20:11 |
| balloons | "like Lubuntu Xenial Beta 1 has the following bugs and it shows which it testcase it was reported against " interesting the linking to testcase | 20:30 |
| balloons | I don't think that's a filed bug | 20:30 |
| flocculant | balloons: bug 1375456 | 20:35 |
| ubot5` | bug 1375456 in Ubuntu QA Website "no way to subscribe to daily reports for a particular product" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1375456 | 20:35 |
| tsimonq2 | balloons: is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/RequiredTests accurate? | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!