=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr
[10:19] <davmor2> I CAN HAZ AN INSTALL \o/
[10:19] <davmor2> Now to try with 3rd party drivers installed checked
=== jamie3 is now known as jamie1
[19:44] <wxl> we should change the "passed with no bugs" button to say "testcase succeeded" XD
[19:45] <flocculant> well
[19:46] <flocculant> I guess the thing is how pragmatic people are
[19:47] <flocculant> vbox should cause a testcase to fail shouldn't it
[19:47] <flocculant> but people pass the test because vbox
[19:49] <wxl> i meant more that there's nothing that has no bugs!
[19:49] <flocculant> yea
[19:49] <flocculant> but then if it has bugs - testcase didn't succeed :p
[19:50] <wxl> what if the bug is that the slideshow is out of date? XD
[19:50] <flocculant> the trouble I have mostly is people add their pet bugs to the tracker - when a testcase doesn't even come anywhere close to even thinking about the possibility of asking about *it*
[19:50] <flocculant> like a install - that gets some bug about unetbootin or the like added to it ...
[19:51] <wxl> well i think it's valuable to report bugs— as many as possible, but that doesn't mean a failed testcase
[19:51] <wxl> i know i saw those
[19:51] <wxl> and i'm pretty much ignoring them :)
[19:51] <flocculant> :)
[19:51] <wxl> but i will do everything i can to encourage people to report bugs everywhere they can!
[19:51] <flocculant> I think it's valuable to report bugs too
[19:51] <flocculant> perhaps there should be some education about things like it
[19:52] <flocculant> don't fail a test - if the test itself succeeded - you can add bugs, but don't fail it
[19:52] <flocculant> I've passed things with critical bugs
[19:52] <wxl> maybe there should be a section for pet bugs XD
[19:53] <flocculant> :)
[19:53] <flocculant> we're going to have to undo a bunch of tracker changes - defects is still fubar
[20:01] <flocculant> balloons: I've got nowhere working out what to do with the MP we were looking to undo - given up for the moment
[20:01] <flocculant> after a week using the tracker I have just reported bug 1549956
[20:01] <ubot5`> bug 1549956 in Ubuntu QA Website "Changes to the way bugs are shown in tracker testcase" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1549956
[20:01] <balloons> flocculant, ohh. Sorry to hear that
[20:01] <flocculant> balloons: probably shouldn't have looked when I did tbh :p
[20:01] <balloons> flocculant, what would you like to do next?
[20:02] <flocculant> after a week running beta 1 for the flavours - forget all about the tracker for a few days :D
[20:06] <balloons> :-)
[20:06] <wxl> where do i even see the list of bugs? i couldn't find it
[20:07] <flocculant> wxl at the bottom
[20:08] <wxl> weord o dpm
[20:08] <wxl> ugh
[20:08] <wxl> i don't see it
[20:08] <flocculant> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/113243/testcases/1628/results
[20:08] <wxl> oh maybe i do
[20:08] <flocculant> scroll down
[20:08] <wxl> per testcase
[20:09] <flocculant> yea - same as it ever was - just not icons you have to mouseover
[20:09] <wxl> i still wish i could see all the ones that affect a particular milestone product
[20:09] <wxl> like Lubuntu Xenial Beta 1 has the following bugs and it shows which it testcase it was reported against
[20:10] <flocculant> right
[20:10] <flocculant> personally I'd rather bugs on xubuntu between x and y - I can choose to include milestones, either side of milestones, excluding milestones
[20:11] <wxl> yes i'd like that too
[20:30] <balloons> "like Lubuntu Xenial Beta 1 has the following bugs and it shows which it testcase it was reported against " interesting the linking to testcase
[20:30] <balloons> I don't think that's a filed bug
[20:35] <flocculant> balloons: bug 1375456
[20:35] <ubot5`> bug 1375456 in Ubuntu QA Website "no way to subscribe to daily reports for a particular product" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1375456
[23:29] <tsimonq2> balloons: is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/RequiredTests accurate?