tsdgeos | Saviq: you mentioned something about maxwidth/minwidth yesterday on my branch that for the desktop camera | 09:28 |
---|---|---|
tsdgeos | but i can't see maxwidth/minwidth being applied anywhere in the desktop stage | 09:29 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: ↑ you know anything about this? | 09:30 |
pstolowski | Saviq, hey, what's the situation with unity8 landings? can i test & prepare silo 76 for landing? | 09:47 |
Saviq | pstolowski, SDK is going in first with a small u8 landing | 09:49 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, should be in WindowResizeArea | 09:49 |
pstolowski | Saviq, what silo# is that? | 09:51 |
Saviq | pstolowski, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/905 | 09:52 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: ah rihgt, totally failed at grepping | 09:52 |
Saviq | pstolowski, it's at the top of QA's "ready" queue, so hopefully later today - I'd also like to drop https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/993 on them after that | 09:53 |
Saviq | obviously needs a rebuild + quick retest | 09:54 |
pstolowski | Saviq, ack | 09:56 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: ping | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | compare(listView.contentY, -listView.topMargin, "Launcher did not start up with first item unfolded"); | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | in the launcher fails if i add another item to MockLauncherModel | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | in trunk | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | does any of your new branches fix that? | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: lp:~unity-team/unity8/launcher-tests-fail | 12:32 |
Saviq | huhu, looks like autopilot in jenkaas was actually easier than expected | 12:50 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
Saviq | now just to make it go in parallel with qml ones... need a new plugin | 13:01 |
pstolowski | cimi, tsdgeos inline playback broken in single-preview silo 76 | 13:37 |
=== JMulholland_ is now known as JMulholland | ||
pstolowski | cimi, tsdgeos http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15205625/ | 13:37 |
pstolowski | and dash crashes | 13:37 |
tsdgeos | that is weird | 13:37 |
tsdgeos | there's no reason inline playback should be affected at all | 13:38 |
tsdgeos | let me try too | 13:38 |
pstolowski | plus, preview models are destroyed veeery lazily, not sure if we can improve that? | 13:38 |
pstolowski | e.g. i see a model gets destroyed after a few minutes | 13:38 |
tsdgeos | model destroying should be as before approx | 13:39 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, that's possible, i just have never paid attention, now i have a debug message | 13:40 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, don't bother trying the silo.. works after reboot. grr | 13:46 |
tsdgeos | :S | 13:46 |
tsdgeos | k | 13:46 |
pstolowski | something is fishy, but not this silo's fault | 13:47 |
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
cimi | pstolowski, so all good? | 14:08 |
pstolowski | cimi, yeah. there is some flakiness / race though, but i couldn't reproduce. unrelated to the silo amyway. | 14:08 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== alexabreu is now known as alex-abreu | ||
tsdgeos | Saviq: lp:~ci-train-bot/unity8/unity8-ubuntu-xenial-landing-064 has broken tags, can anyone clean them? | 14:52 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, no, we should find where they come from (since we'll need to rebuild) | 14:53 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: i think they come "from the silo" | 14:53 |
tsdgeos | itslef | 14:53 |
tsdgeos | i.e it got reused from old | 14:53 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, train starts branches from scratch and then --overwrites he ones in ~ci-train-bot | 14:53 |
tsdgeos | hmmm | 14:53 |
tsdgeos | ok, let me run my clean branches script | 14:54 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, but overwriting doesn't clear tags | 14:54 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, we might ask them to delete the branches in ~ci-train-bot... | 14:54 |
Saviq | but I'm afraid this will just come back again and again... | 14:54 |
* Saviq wants git | 14:55 | |
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
tsdgeos | ltinkl: test for https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/fixTinyWindows/+merge/287173 ? | 15:25 |
ltinkl | tsdgeos, sure, will add | 15:27 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
tsdgeos | Saviq: mzanetti: ltinkl: you have bad tags | 16:19 |
tsdgeos | http://paste.ubuntu.com/15206969/ | 16:19 |
Saviq | oops | 16:19 |
* ltinkl on it | 16:20 | |
Saviq | that took a while, didn't it :) | 16:20 |
tsdgeos | don't know didn't say much, but since it runs on its own may be | 16:21 |
* tsdgeos times | 16:21 | |
* Saviq cleared | 16:22 | |
=== dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
tsdgeos | pstolowski: ping | 16:27 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, hey | 16:27 |
tsdgeos | pstolowski: how do i "favorite" the apps scope if it magically got unfavorited? | 16:27 |
ltinkl | tsdgeos, ok, tags cleared and a test added (modified the unlock() test to use typeString() instead of clicking the pinpad buttons) | 16:29 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, oh, how did that happen?... gsettings reset com.canonical.Unity.Dash favorite-scopes | 16:29 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, alternatively, gsettings set com.canonical.Unity.Dash favorite-scopes "['scope://clickscope']" | 16:29 |
tsdgeos | pstolowski: i guess at some point i uninstalled it (desktop) | 16:30 |
Saviq | uninstalling anything shouldn't touch the favourites IMO | 16:33 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: i guess the scope isn't there anymore | 16:38 |
tsdgeos | so it can't be a favorite | 16:39 |
pstolowski | hmm i think it should, otherwise this list would grow indefinitely.. upgrade is a different case (which we handle) | 16:39 |
Saviq | how often do you think this would happen? | 16:39 |
Saviq | that someone uninstalls a favourited scope | 16:39 |
Saviq | and what impact does it have if there's even 100 things you need to skip in the list of favourites | 16:40 |
pstolowski | Saviq, i hear you, but keeping a list which cannot be purged feels wrong | 16:43 |
Saviq | pstolowski, that's actually how the launcher items behave | 16:43 |
Saviq | in unity7 and unity8 | 16:43 |
Saviq | pstolowski, you can purge it - gsettings reset | 16:43 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: it feels unexpected that something would be favorited on install | 16:44 |
tsdgeos | if i installed it 1 year ago, favorited and then uninstalled | 16:44 |
Saviq | it wouldn't "be favorited on install" you favorited it 1 year ago | 16:44 |
Saviq | you never said that it's not your favourite now that you uninstalled it ;P | 16:44 |
pstolowski | heh | 16:44 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: i'm just saying it would seem unexpected to me | 16:45 |
tsdgeos | the world is full of people that it's not me | 16:45 |
tsdgeos | :D | 16:45 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, was it unexpected on your launcher? ;) | 16:45 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: yes | 16:46 |
tsdgeos | it would too | 16:46 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: 24 min for the clean branches run :D | 16:46 |
Saviq | well, did you notice it, because that's exactly how it behaves | 16:46 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, nice :) | 16:46 |
Saviq | stress-testing LP are we ;) | 16:46 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: i didn't notice since i have exactly 4 apps in my launcher that i always use and thus would not uninstall and install | 16:47 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, saves my a$$ when I reinstall :) | 16:48 |
Saviq | things on launcher just waiting for me to install them | 16:48 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: so what does it do, it has "wholes"/[x] saying "this used to be an app and is no longer there? | 16:49 |
tsdgeos | or it's not there and appears when you install? | 16:49 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, filters, appears when I install | 16:49 |
tsdgeos | s/wholes/holes | 16:49 |
tsdgeos | k | 16:50 |
tsdgeos | pstolowski: damn i think some changes in the scopes plugin are making the dash code hit this | 16:55 |
tsdgeos | / TODO attach to sectionItem so we can accomodate to it changing its height | 16:55 |
tsdgeos | ^_ ^ | 16:55 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, huh? this is a qml TOODO? | 16:55 |
tsdgeos | nah in the .cpp code | 16:55 |
tsdgeos | it's just that the irc client ate the first / | 16:56 |
Saviq | whoops :) | 16:56 |
tsdgeos | i guess i'll attack that on monday | 16:58 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, hmm i'm not sure what kind of change would that be? | 16:59 |
tsdgeos | pstolowski: it's the smart model updates that now reuse categories | 17:00 |
tsdgeos | so if you happen to reuse a category that had section title to one that hasn't | 17:00 |
tsdgeos | boom | 17:00 |
tsdgeos | breaks | 17:00 |
tsdgeos | because stuff should move up because the category title just disappears | 17:00 |
tsdgeos | -s+ed | 17:00 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, ah.. but that's not new.. landed 2 months ago or so | 17:01 |
pstolowski | tsdgeos, ah, so it's a very specific case, maybe we didn't hit it | 17:01 |
tsdgeos | yeah | 17:02 |
tsdgeos | i can easily reproduce on the desktop unity8-dash now | 17:02 |
tsdgeos | but not on the phone | 17:02 |
tsdgeos | because *things* | 17:02 |
tsdgeos | :D | 17:02 |
cimi | tsdgeos, approved those three branches of yesterday | 17:07 |
cimi | tsdgeos, tx | 17:07 |
tsdgeos | cimi: cool | 17:08 |
* tsdgeos waves eow | 17:08 | |
cimi | so. fast. | 17:09 |
cimi | :D | 17:09 |
cimi | sometimes I wish he was waiting for us to wave back :D | 17:09 |
=== attente_ is now known as attente | ||
=== _stowa_ is now known as _stowa | ||
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== mhall119_ is now known as mhall119 | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
Saviq | mterry, hey, if you're still here, could use your eyes on https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/unity8/autopilot-dep8/+merge/287228 - you can see the test results in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1053 - I'd like to put this into trunk directly so our CI benefits from this straight away | 21:58 |
mterry | Saviq, hey | 21:58 |
mterry | looking | 21:58 |
mterry | Saviq, so the results of the dep8 test are in those "vivid landing-023 excuses.html" lines in the silo? | 22:02 |
Saviq | mterry, yup | 22:02 |
mterry | Saviq, branch makes sense though | 22:02 |
mterry | Saviq, the vivid link brings me to an ubuntu-system-settings page though... | 22:03 |
Saviq | mterry, xenial, sorry | 22:03 |
Saviq | mterry, bug in train | 22:03 |
mterry | Saviq, ah ok | 22:04 |
Saviq | mterry, the silo is xenial only | 22:04 |
mterry | Saviq, ah so it is, hadn't noticed. dep8 is only good for xenial? | 22:04 |
Saviq | mterry, no, this silo is xenial only, didn't want to waste britney's or builders' time | 22:04 |
Saviq | mterry, unfortunately there's no way to SKIP a test based on whether it's touch or not, so the early-exit is the best we can do - also the isolation-machine requirement makes sure that it SKIPs when it's obviously wrong (like chroot or whatnot) | 22:05 |
mterry | Saviq, yeah -- so hard to run outside of the builder | 22:05 |
Saviq | mterry, those never run on builders anyway | 22:06 |
mterry | Saviq, why do some arch's fail? | 22:06 |
mterry | Saviq, right. I guess I meant outside of britney | 22:06 |
Saviq | mterry, outside of i386, amd64, armhf, missing deps | 22:06 |
Saviq | mterry, on armhf, because we've not fixed our tests yet | 22:06 |
Saviq | timing-wise | 22:06 |
mterry | Saviq, well 2 arches is something anyway. Even though armhf would be the real prize | 22:07 |
Saviq | mterry, bug #1550543 | 22:08 |
ubot5` | bug 1550543 in CI Train [cu2d] "Automated tests publish results for disabled target seriee" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1550543 | 22:08 |
mterry | Saviq, so where are these autopilot tests actually running in this setup? The ones at https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-023/excuses.html are skipped because they aren't on the device | 22:09 |
Saviq | mterry, our jenkins | 22:09 |
Saviq | mterry, https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/247/ red because I've busted the jenkins job | 22:10 |
mterry | ah right, because of course britney doesn't have access to devices. I forgot that jenkins was the gatekeeper to thos | 22:10 |
Saviq | mterry, actually red because something failed completely in this case | 22:11 |
Saviq | mterry, https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/243/ a better result | 22:11 |
mterry | Saviq, OK, now I'm caught up with how this works :) | 22:12 |
mterry | Saviq, took me a while to understand what was running what | 22:12 |
Saviq | mterry, our jenkins runs them all - qml tests on amd64; autopilot tests on phones | 22:13 |
Saviq | mterry, britney can only run qml tests | 22:13 |
mterry | right | 22:13 |
Saviq | at least until we make our autopilot runnable under xvfb or something | 22:13 |
mterry | Saviq, but yeah the branch makes sense, let me approve | 22:14 |
mterry | Saviq, allow-stderr seems like such an annoying flag. I feel like it should be default | 22:16 |
mterry | But I get that it's useful to catch surprises | 22:16 |
Saviq | mterry, actually the problem there is set -ex prints on stderr | 22:17 |
Saviq | mterry, and autopilot, too | 22:17 |
mterry | Saviq, yeah -- lots of stuff does all the time is the annoying thing. Only a very strict tool is so careful to keep to stdout | 22:17 |
Saviq | mterry, FWIW we should be able to get rid of that for qmluitests https://unity8-jenkins.ubuntu.com/job/test-0-autopkgtest/248/label=amd64,release=vivid+overlay/artifact/output/qmluitests.sh-stderr | 22:18 |
Saviq | and it actually does show useful stuff | 22:19 |
Saviq | but we'll have to get rid of set -ex, which is kinda useful | 22:20 |
mterry | Saviq, yeah for build warnings. but that might be better done as an isolated "build warnings" dep8 | 22:20 |
Saviq | mterry, oh well, dep8 is too late for build warnings actually ;) | 22:20 |
mterry | Saviq, but failing on build warnings are annoying | 22:20 |
Saviq | mterry, since everything is^Wshould be built by then ;) | 22:20 |
Saviq | ok /me clears silo | 22:21 |
mterry | Saviq, packages that do that always cause problems on gcc upgrades or when some library deprecates some call. Big pain in production | 22:21 |
Saviq | yup | 22:21 |
Saviq | ok let's see how that goes, I can see that arale is complaining already, need to find out what went wrong with the phones | 22:23 |
Saviq | and GAAAH fucking jenkins for trying to re-escape quotes and failing like fuck | 22:25 |
Saviq | hmm looks like krillin and devel-proposed don't mix | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!