=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
=== tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
=== fabo_ is now known as fabo | ||
=== Guest56535 is now known as MooDoo | ||
=== jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== bladernr_ is now known as bladernr | ||
tyhicks | hello | 16:35 |
---|---|---|
mdeslaur | hi! | 16:35 |
tyhicks | #startmeeting | 16:36 |
meetingology | Meeting started Mon Feb 29 16:36:01 2016 UTC. The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 16:36 |
meetingology | Available commands: action commands idea info link nick | 16:36 |
tyhicks | The meeting agenda can be found at: | 16:36 |
tyhicks | [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting | 16:36 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Announcements | 16:36 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Announcements | ||
tyhicks | Stefan Bader (smb) provided debdiffs for precise-wily for xen | 16:36 |
tyhicks | Thank you for your assistance in keeping Ubuntu users secure! :) | 16:36 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report | 16:36 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Weekly stand-up report | ||
tyhicks | jdstrand: you're up | 16:36 |
jdstrand_ | hey | 16:36 |
jdstrand_ | I'll be following up on the squashfs snap checks this week | 16:37 |
jdstrand_ | that is coming along fine, expect no issues | 16:37 |
jdstrand_ | I'll also be trying to chase down the next work for interfaces (formerlay known as skills formerly known as capabilities) | 16:37 |
jdstrand_ | and an embargoed issue | 16:37 |
jdstrand_ | that's it for me | 16:38 |
jdstrand_ | mdeslaur: you're up | 16:38 |
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
mdeslaur | I'm working on a couple of embargoed issues | 16:38 |
mdeslaur | and I may take on another embargoed issue | 16:38 |
mdeslaur | and after that, I'll do squid3 updates | 16:38 |
mdeslaur | and I'm on triage this week | 16:38 |
mdeslaur | sbeattie: you're up | 16:38 |
sbeattie | I'm in the happy place this week | 16:38 |
sbeattie | I'm focusing on tracking down some remaining gcc pie build failures this week | 16:39 |
sbeattie | I also have an embargoed issue | 16:39 |
sbeattie | I also will likely have some kernel cve tracking things pop up | 16:40 |
sbeattie | that will likely consume my week | 16:40 |
sbeattie | tyhicks: over to you | 16:40 |
tyhicks | I had a question for mdeslaur | 16:40 |
tyhicks | mdeslaur: are you still working on sudo backports to address the time issue | 16:40 |
mdeslaur | no | 16:42 |
tyhicks | ack | 16:42 |
tyhicks | I'm on community this week | 16:42 |
tyhicks | I'm still working on the apparmor_parser patches needed for stacking | 16:42 |
tyhicks | and I'm still trying to get to an eCryptfs bug (LP: #1543633) | 16:42 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1543633 in eCryptfs "Data corruption during parallel file copying with interruptions" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1543633 | 16:42 |
tyhicks | I also have a couple embargoed issues | 16:43 |
tyhicks | sarnold: you're up | 16:43 |
sarnold | i'm on bug triage this week | 16:44 |
sarnold | I've got an embargoed issue to work on | 16:44 |
sarnold | then I return to MIRs for the rest of the week | 16:44 |
sarnold | that's it for me, chrisccoulson? | 16:44 |
tyhicks | sarnold: next MIR up is a re-review of openjpeg | 16:44 |
sarnold | tyhicks: thanks | 16:45 |
tyhicks | np | 16:45 |
chrisccoulson | I'll be preparing Firefox updates this week (for next weeks release), and I still need to get Thunderbird out | 16:45 |
chrisccoulson | Other than that, I'll be focusing on convergence tasks in Oxide, as long as I don't spend time fire-fighting again this week :) | 16:46 |
chrisccoulson | That's me done | 16:46 |
tyhicks | thanks | 16:48 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Highlighted packages | 16:48 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Highlighted packages | ||
tyhicks | The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so. | 16:48 |
tyhicks | See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved. | 16:48 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/kgb.html | 16:48 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery.html | 16:48 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gridengine.html | 16:48 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery2.html | 16:48 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/openstack-trove.html | 16:48 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions | 16:48 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Miscellaneous and Questions | ||
tyhicks | Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss? | 16:48 |
tyhicks | jdstrand, mdeslaur, sbeattie, sarnold, ChrisCoulson: Thanks! | 16:50 |
tyhicks | #endmeeting | 16:50 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 16:50:22 2016 UTC. | 16:50 |
meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-16.36.moin.txt | 16:50 |
sarnold | thanks tyhicks | 16:50 |
mdeslaur | thanks tyhicks! | 16:50 |
sbeattie | tyhicks: thanks! | 16:50 |
=== jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-afk | ||
=== Guest67703 is now known as me_ | ||
=== me_ is now known as med_ | ||
=== jgrimm-afk is now known as jgrimm | ||
=== ljp is now known as lpotter | ||
cyphermox | #startmeeting DMB 2016-02-29 | 19:15 |
meetingology | Meeting started Mon Feb 29 19:15:25 2016 UTC. The chair is cyphermox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 19:15 |
meetingology | Available commands: action commands idea info link nick | 19:15 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: | ||
cyphermox | Welcome to the Developer Membership board meeting :) | 19:15 |
coreycb | o/ | 19:16 |
cyphermox | #voters bdmurray cyphermox xnox infinity stgraber Laney micahg | 19:16 |
meetingology | Warning: Nick not in channel: infinity | 19:16 |
meetingology | Current voters: Laney bdmurray cyphermox infinity micahg stgraber xnox | 19:16 |
cyphermox | ^ ping DMB members :) | 19:16 |
micahg | nice! | 19:16 |
* stgraber waves | 19:16 | |
cyphermox | #topic Review of previous action items | 19:16 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items | ||
* bdmurray waves | 19:17 | |
cyphermox | Has there been any changes to the current only action item listed on the agenda? | 19:17 |
bdmurray | I don't think so. | 19:17 |
cyphermox | right on | 19:18 |
cyphermox | let's keep going | 19:18 |
cyphermox | #topic Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications | 19:18 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications | ||
cyphermox | #subtopic Corey Bryant's openstack package set | 19:18 |
coreycb | Hi all | 19:19 |
coreycb | well, I don't want to jump the gun but I might as well introduce myself | 19:20 |
cyphermox | ah, yes, please do :) | 19:21 |
coreycb | I work primarily on OpenStack packaging, in 2015 I led several stable releases and in 2016 I started leading the new release of OpenStack Mitaka | 19:21 |
coreycb | Last year I was granted per package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev | 19:21 |
coreycb | my application today is combined for core-dev and per-package upload rights to a newly created openstack package set | 19:22 |
coreycb | having per-package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev has been helpful, but I still have to bother jamespage and zul quite a bit for uploads that I can do myself. having additional upload rights would really help streamline my work. | 19:22 |
coreycb | I contribute back to debian quite a bit too, and am a member of pkg-openstack and debian python modules team | 19:23 |
coreycb | I think that's about it for my introduction. for further details, here's my application wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CoreyBryant/CoreDevAndOpenStackApplication | 19:24 |
coreycb | Also here's a list of packages for the openstack package set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15094028/ | 19:25 |
micahg | coreycb: are you aware that core dev offers upload rights to the entire archive? | 19:25 |
micahg | well, except partner | 19:25 |
coreycb | micahg, yes, of course | 19:25 |
coreycb | micahg, I"m hoping for core-dev, but my fallback plan is openstack package set. however, the openstack package set will be useful either way as we have at least one other person right now (and I hope more in the future) who work on openstack packaging who don't yet have rights. | 19:26 |
micahg | ok | 19:27 |
bdmurray | Could you elaborate on what you mean by "improve the efficiency of my workflows through experience, automation, and various tooling efficiencies"? | 19:28 |
coreycb | bdmurray, that's pretty generic, but I'm always learning tricks here and there to make my workflows more efficient | 19:29 |
coreycb | bdmurray, we have quite a few packages to maintain, so whether it's scripting or tips and tricks from other package maitainers, I continually try to improve my process | 19:30 |
bdmurray | so not improvements to ubuntu-dev-tools or anything else? | 19:31 |
coreycb | bdmurray, nothing in particular. although being able to re-run autopkgtests was a nice improvement | 19:31 |
coreycb | bdmurray, also I used to use pbuilder and found sbuild was faster with caching in effect, that's an example. | 19:32 |
bdmurray | okay, I was just idly curious | 19:32 |
cyphermox | coreycb: my concern with your application for that package set is how much stuff it covers that isn't openstack-specific | 19:35 |
coreycb | cyphermox, yes, I was a bit unsure with that to be honest. so I figured I'd put all the deps that I know of and if we need to reduce it then so be it. | 19:35 |
cyphermox | coreycb: tbh, your original list in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2015-December/000880.html seemed like it better covered openstack, and then other build-depends are just a fact of life when maintaining any set of packages | 19:35 |
cyphermox | (though that list might in fact be missing some things too) | 19:36 |
coreycb | cyphermox, I can narrow the list down to openstack-only packages, rather than all openstack dependencies | 19:36 |
cyphermox | yes, if you could | 19:36 |
coreycb | cyphermox, ok I will, after the meeting if that's ok | 19:36 |
cyphermox | I think it's probably missing mostly just python-ceilo*, python-designate*, python-glance* | 19:37 |
cyphermox | hrm | 19:37 |
cyphermox | well, I have nothing against it being refined off-meeting, but that does make the voting complicated | 19:37 |
cyphermox | what do others think? | 19:38 |
coreycb | cyphermox, there are quite a few that are openstack specific, oslo.* the python clients and some more | 19:38 |
cyphermox | coreycb: yep, I see | 19:38 |
cyphermox | let's skip ahead to the other topics then, this would give you time to update the list? | 19:39 |
coreycb | cyphermox, I could prob narrow it down before the end of the meeting if you move to another topic | 19:39 |
coreycb | yes | 19:39 |
stgraber | right, we can't vote on the packageset or on giving you PPU to the set until we agree on a list :) | 19:39 |
coreycb | stgraber, ack | 19:39 |
cyphermox | ok, skipping over to flexiondotorg | 19:39 |
cyphermox | #subtopic flexiondotorg (Martin Wimpress) PPU application for Ubuntu MATE packages | 19:40 |
cyphermox | flexiondotorg: you around? | 19:40 |
cyphermox | looks like maybe not | 19:41 |
cyphermox | #topic Ubuntu Core Developer Applications | 19:41 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Ubuntu Core Developer Applications | ||
cyphermox | #subtopic Phillip Susi's core-dev application | 19:41 |
cyphermox | ... yet no psusi in the channel? | 19:42 |
bdmurray | his application seemed a bit incomplete to me | 19:42 |
cyphermox | I don't know if he's also known by another nick | 19:42 |
cyphermox | let's move on again | 19:42 |
cyphermox | #subtopic Tyler Hicks' core-dev application | 19:42 |
tyhicks | I was set to be on next week's agenda but I am around now | 19:42 |
cyphermox | oh, right | 19:43 |
tyhicks | ah, nice | 19:43 |
tyhicks | I'm happy to go now | 19:43 |
cyphermox | hrm | 19:43 |
cyphermox | technically we usually expect a week's notice IIRC | 19:43 |
sarnold | I wanted to add an endorsement for tyhicks's application but the few times I checked his wikipage was marked "immutable" | 19:44 |
bdmurray | I get a 500 tring to load his application too | 19:44 |
cyphermox | not that I care much for that "rule". does anyone object? | 19:44 |
bdmurray | s/tring/trying/ | 19:44 |
cyphermox | yeah, the wiki is bad today :/ | 19:44 |
tyhicks | the wiki has been bad today | 19:44 |
cyphermox | got the page | 19:44 |
cyphermox | let me pastebinit | 19:44 |
cyphermox | http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246428/ | 19:45 |
tyhicks | I'll do a quick intro | 19:45 |
tyhicks | I'm part of the Ubuntu Security team | 19:45 |
tyhicks | I've been active in the -security pockets for ~4 years now | 19:45 |
tyhicks | I also work on upstream AppArmor and eCryptfs in support of needed Ubuntu features and bug fixes | 19:46 |
tyhicks | I review quite a bit of security related merge proposals that eventually land in Ubuntu, as well | 19:47 |
bdmurray | Your application mentions a "I've introduced few regressions". Do you recall any specific ones? If so how did they happen and how were they resolved? | 19:49 |
tyhicks | good question | 19:49 |
tyhicks | I can't recall a specific regression from a security update but there were a couple | 19:50 |
tyhicks | I treat those with extremly high priority | 19:50 |
tyhicks | the security team tries very hard to not regress users with updates | 19:50 |
tyhicks | after I perform a security update, I closely watch the new bug reports for that source package | 19:50 |
tyhicks | I have a browser keyword that lets me quickly view the bugs for a source package, sorted by when they were opened | 19:51 |
tyhicks | so I check that bug list, several times a day, for approximately a week after I do an update | 19:51 |
tyhicks | I triage all new bug reports to make sure that they're not caused by the security update | 19:52 |
tyhicks | if they are, I would work quickly to figure out the cause and upload a fix | 19:52 |
=== inetpro is now known as inetghost | ||
tyhicks | then I'd release a new Ubuntu Security Notice to explain the regression | 19:52 |
tyhicks | sorry I can't remember a specific regression but that would be how I would address any such regression | 19:53 |
bdmurray | okay, thanks | 19:54 |
bdmurray | sarnold: did you want to say something since it didn't make the wiki? | 19:54 |
sarnold | bdmurray: thanks; I've found tyler to be very helpful over the last several years -- he's always willing to help me solve problems and find the root causes of issues. | 19:55 |
tyhicks | thanks, sarnold :) | 19:55 |
sarnold | tyler does careful, thoughtful work, and very thouroughly tests issues locally before releasing packages or patches | 19:55 |
sarnold | he's also able to ask others for help when necessary :) | 19:56 |
micahg | Hi Tyler, I've noticed that you only appear to have 5 sponsored uploads to the main archive in the last 18 months, is there a reason you're applying now as opposed to earlier when you were seemingly more active in the main archive | 19:56 |
=== inetghost is now known as inetpro | ||
tyhicks | hi micahg | 19:57 |
tyhicks | micahg: I should have applied earlier | 19:57 |
tyhicks | I don't have a reason as to why that didn't happen outside of time | 19:57 |
tyhicks | I grew tired of having to ask others for sponsoring and put my foot down this time around :) | 19:58 |
tyhicks | if my application is approved, I strongly feel like my activity in the main archive will increase | 19:58 |
* jdstrand knows he will-- he'll stop doing the apparmor uploads at the very least ;) | 19:59 | |
jdstrand | hey micahg :) | 19:59 |
jdstrand | too many pronouns | 19:59 |
micahg | hi jdstrand | 19:59 |
jdstrand | I know tyhicks will do more uploads cause I will be doing fewer :) | 19:59 |
tyhicks | that's a good point | 20:00 |
jdstrand | the same for kirk land | 20:00 |
jdstrand | I imagine | 20:00 |
tyhicks | yes | 20:00 |
tyhicks | micahg: does that answer your question? | 20:01 |
micahg | well, partially, if it's mainly 2 (or a handful) packages that you need upload rights to in order to relieve others of the need to upload, wouldn't PPU be more appropriate? | 20:02 |
jdstrand | fwiw, tyhicks is highly active with main between ecryptfs, apparmor, touch and snappy. having him with core-dev will allow him to more effectively work on those projects and the devel release, where he can do security updates rather than having others do them/sponsor them | 20:03 |
tyhicks | it isn't a handful of package that I need upload rights to | 20:03 |
tyhicks | for instance, I'm in the process of updating didiwiki for a security issue as part of my Security Team community work this week | 20:03 |
tyhicks | stable releases are affected as well as Xenial | 20:03 |
tyhicks | being able to upload to the dev release is important since I do security updates in wide range of packages | 20:04 |
micahg | right, but I"m wondering what happened in the last year or so where that work hasn't seemingly been reflected | 20:04 |
* jdstrand always felt that being a member of the security team and able to update anything in a stable release but not (yet) a core-dev to be an odd incongruency | 20:05 | |
bdmurray | tyhicks: were you less active in main recently because you were developing apparmor features? | 20:05 |
micahg | jdstrand: I tend to agree with that :) | 20:05 |
jdstrand | anyway, I don't mean to distract... | 20:05 |
tyhicks | bdmurray: yes - developing apparmor features is one reason my upload count decreased | 20:05 |
micahg | were you not doing community rotations on the security team during that time that required dev release uploadS? | 20:06 |
tyhicks | however, my security upload count didn't decrease: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/tyhicks/CoreDevApplicationSecUploads | 20:06 |
tyhicks | micahg: I've been in and out of the rotations while developing features | 20:06 |
micahg | I've been referencing http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi?render=html&sponsor=&sponsor_search=name&sponsoree=Tyler+Hicks&sponsoree_search=name | 20:10 |
cyphermox | Are we ready to vote? | 20:10 |
tyhicks | ubuntu-sponsorships doesn't cover security uploads which is why I created the extra list | 20:11 |
cyphermox | right, and picking one near the end from the sponsored list shows that (for example), ecryptfs-utils you did changes in, just Dustin claimed the upload/sponsored | 20:12 |
tyhicks | correct | 20:13 |
tyhicks | I believe you're referring to this one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/110-0ubuntu1 | 20:13 |
cyphermox | yep | 20:14 |
cyphermox | #vote grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights | 20:15 |
meetingology | Please vote on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights | 20:15 |
meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) | 20:15 |
cyphermox | +1 | 20:15 |
meetingology | +1 received from cyphermox | 20:15 |
bdmurray | +1 | 20:17 |
meetingology | +1 received from bdmurray | 20:17 |
stgraber | +1 | 20:21 |
meetingology | +1 received from stgraber | 20:21 |
micahg | +1 | 20:22 |
meetingology | +1 received from micahg | 20:22 |
cyphermox | #endvote | 20:22 |
meetingology | Voting ended on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights | 20:22 |
meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:22 |
meetingology | Motion carried | 20:22 |
tyhicks | \o/ | 20:22 |
cyphermox | I'll take care of the LP magic right after the meeting | 20:22 |
cyphermox | coreycb: still around? | 20:23 |
coreycb | yes! | 20:23 |
coreycb | congrats tyhicks! | 20:23 |
cyphermox | bdmurray: do you have time to deal with the packageset? | 20:23 |
coreycb | Here's the new list for the openstack pkg set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:23 |
coreycb | also reminder I'm going for core-dev as well | 20:23 |
cyphermox | yeah | 20:23 |
cyphermox | the meeting is getting pretty long though | 20:24 |
coreycb | I was afraid of that.. | 20:24 |
cyphermox | just trying to make sure we have quorum | 20:24 |
cyphermox | #topic openstack packageset | 20:24 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: openstack packageset | ||
bdmurray | cyphermox: I think we should be fair and finish. | 20:24 |
cyphermox | ah? | 20:24 |
cyphermox | do we have people waiting for a meeting after? | 20:25 |
bdmurray | I mean finish talking about coreycb since we started with him. | 20:25 |
cyphermox | ah, yes | 20:25 |
cyphermox | that's my opinion too | 20:25 |
bdmurray | Perhaps we should address core-dev first though? | 20:26 |
* cyphermox shrugs | 20:26 | |
coreycb | bdmurray, that is fine with me, either way, I appreciate your time on this | 20:26 |
cyphermox | I'd deal with the packageset first tbh, especially since it's fairly straightforward | 20:27 |
bdmurray | okay | 20:27 |
cyphermox | #vote Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:27 |
meetingology | Please vote on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:27 |
meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) | 20:27 |
cyphermox | *package set, that should have read | 20:27 |
stgraber | -1 with that description | 20:27 |
meetingology | -1 with that description received from stgraber | 20:27 |
cyphermox | arf | 20:27 |
stgraber | we need sets to have a description that lets us update them on request | 20:27 |
stgraber | having the description be "some hardcoded list we were handed over" isn't acceptable | 20:28 |
cyphermox | do you have a suggested description? | 20:28 |
cyphermox | I was fine with "openstack packages" | 20:28 |
cyphermox | #endvote | 20:28 |
meetingology | Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:28 |
meetingology | Votes for:0 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0 | 20:28 |
meetingology | Motion denied | 20:28 |
stgraber | upstream openstack components? | 20:28 |
stgraber | clearly "openstack packages" isn't clear enough given that we were provided two different lists one of which was clearly unsuitable | 20:29 |
cyphermox | (vote) Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:29 |
cyphermox | ^ ? | 20:29 |
stgraber | fine with me | 20:29 |
cyphermox | #vote Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:30 |
meetingology | Please vote on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:30 |
meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) | 20:30 |
stgraber | +1 | 20:30 |
meetingology | +1 received from stgraber | 20:30 |
micahg | selenium is the only package in there that looks a bit out of place | 20:30 |
cyphermox | +1 | 20:30 |
meetingology | +1 received from cyphermox | 20:30 |
cyphermox | oh, is there no selenium package? | 20:31 |
coreycb | I'm ok dropping that | 20:31 |
micahg | yeah, I don't see one | 20:31 |
stgraber | oh, well, you kinda have to considering it doesn't exist in the archive :) | 20:31 |
stgraber | There is no current release for this source package in Ubuntu. | 20:31 |
cyphermox | right | 20:31 |
micahg | +1 without selenium | 20:32 |
meetingology | +1 without selenium received from micahg | 20:32 |
coreycb | yes, I'm noticing that ;) | 20:32 |
bdmurray | +1 | 20:32 |
meetingology | +1 received from bdmurray | 20:32 |
cyphermox | #endvote | 20:33 |
meetingology | Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ | 20:33 |
meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:33 |
meetingology | Motion carried | 20:33 |
coreycb | thanks | 20:33 |
cyphermox | how do we normally proceed next? explicit voting on granting coreycb upload rights for the new package set? | 20:33 |
stgraber | let's do coredev first, then ppu | 20:34 |
cyphermox | ok | 20:34 |
stgraber | because if he gets coredev he won't need ppu | 20:34 |
cyphermox | mmkay | 20:34 |
coreycb | sounds good to me | 20:34 |
cyphermox | #vote Corey to be granted core-dev rights | 20:35 |
meetingology | Please vote on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights | 20:35 |
meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) | 20:35 |
stgraber | openstack package set created, ubuntu-openstack-dev team created and configured | 20:37 |
cyphermox | stgraber: thanks | 20:38 |
coreycb | stgraber, thanks | 20:38 |
stgraber | sorry, going back through the application quickly | 20:40 |
coreycb | no problem | 20:40 |
coreycb | one thing I would like to point out is that openstack package PPU rights will be useful, however there are still many dependencies that don't fall under that umbrella, of which core-dev would make my job much easier. | 20:40 |
stgraber | +1 | 20:42 |
meetingology | +1 received from stgraber | 20:42 |
bdmurray | +1 | 20:42 |
meetingology | +1 received from bdmurray | 20:42 |
cyphermox | +1 | 20:44 |
meetingology | +1 received from cyphermox | 20:44 |
cyphermox | micahg: ? | 20:44 |
micahg | looking | 20:44 |
cyphermox | ok, just making sure you were still around :) | 20:45 |
micahg | finally got the wiki to load ;) | 20:45 |
micahg | +1 | 20:45 |
meetingology | +1 received from micahg | 20:45 |
cyphermox | #endvote | 20:45 |
meetingology | Voting ended on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights | 20:45 |
meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:45 |
meetingology | Motion carried | 20:45 |
cyphermox | congrats coreycb | 20:45 |
coreycb | thanks! | 20:45 |
coreycb | thanks for your time too, it was a long meeting today | 20:46 |
jamespage | well done coreycb! | 20:46 |
cyphermox | #topic Next chair | 20:46 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Next chair | ||
cyphermox | I guess it's up to micahg next? | 20:46 |
bdmurray | I think it was supposed to be infinity today | 20:47 |
cyphermox | ah | 20:47 |
cyphermox | well, | 20:47 |
cyphermox | #action infinity to chair next meeting | 20:47 |
meetingology | ACTION: infinity to chair next meeting | 20:47 |
cyphermox | the absent are obviously wrong. | 20:47 |
cyphermox | #topic any other business? | 20:47 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: any other business? | ||
cyphermox | nothing from me | 20:48 |
micahg | election? | 20:48 |
cyphermox | ah, sure | 20:48 |
cyphermox | a new call for nomination was sent by Dimitri 7 days ago. | 20:49 |
cyphermox | it would be nice to have some nominations | 20:50 |
micahg | I think we only received one nomination if I'm caught up on main | 20:50 |
micahg | s/main/mail/ | 20:50 |
cyphermox | I don't see one | 20:51 |
cyphermox | we should extend the deadline and send another call for nominations if we don't have enough | 20:53 |
cyphermox | as I understand it we need 3 at least | 20:54 |
bdmurray | I think we should let people expire to force action! ;-) | 20:54 |
cyphermox | micahg: you want to take care of sending another call? | 20:54 |
micahg | yeah, I guess I can | 20:55 |
cyphermox | two more weeks I guess? | 20:56 |
micahg | well, the terms expire 3/9 (before the next meeting) | 20:56 |
cyphermox | I don't think we'll see enough in one week + 2 days | 20:57 |
cyphermox | we should ask to extend the terms a bit until time X, which would be the end for the call for nomination | 20:58 |
cyphermox | #action micahg to send new call for nominations | 20:58 |
meetingology | ACTION: micahg to send new call for nominations | 20:58 |
cyphermox | I'll be happy to ask TB for term extension for those expiring so we get more nominees | 21:02 |
cyphermox | I think that's enough for the meeting | 21:02 |
cyphermox | stgraber: bdmurray: anything else? | 21:03 |
bdmurray | nope | 21:03 |
cyphermox | #endmeeting | 21:03 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 21:03:51 2016 UTC. | 21:03 |
meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-19.15.moin.txt | 21:03 |
cyphermox | tyhicks: coreycb: you've been added to core-dev. | 21:04 |
coreycb | cyphermox, thank you | 21:04 |
tyhicks | thanks cyphermox - I received the email | 21:04 |
cyphermox | woah, TB all expires in 2 hours :) | 21:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!