[16:35] <tyhicks> hello
[16:35] <mdeslaur> hi!
[16:36] <tyhicks> #startmeeting
[16:36] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Feb 29 16:36:01 2016 UTC.  The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:36] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:36] <tyhicks> The meeting agenda can be found at:
[16:36] <tyhicks> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting
[16:36] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Announcements
[16:36] <tyhicks> Stefan Bader (smb) provided debdiffs for precise-wily for xen
[16:36] <tyhicks> Thank you for your assistance in keeping Ubuntu users secure! :)
[16:36] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report
[16:36] <tyhicks> jdstrand: you're up
[16:36] <jdstrand_> hey
[16:37] <jdstrand_> I'll be following up on the squashfs snap checks this week
[16:37] <jdstrand_> that is coming along fine, expect no issues
[16:37] <jdstrand_> I'll also be trying to chase down the next work for interfaces (formerlay known as skills formerly known as capabilities)
[16:37] <jdstrand_> and an embargoed issue
[16:38] <jdstrand_> that's it for me
[16:38] <jdstrand_> mdeslaur: you're up
[16:38] <mdeslaur> I'm working on a couple of embargoed issues
[16:38] <mdeslaur> and I may take on another embargoed issue
[16:38] <mdeslaur> and after that, I'll do squid3 updates
[16:38] <mdeslaur> and I'm on triage this week
[16:38] <mdeslaur> sbeattie: you're up
[16:38] <sbeattie> I'm in the happy place this week
[16:39] <sbeattie> I'm focusing on tracking down some remaining gcc pie build failures this week
[16:39] <sbeattie> I also have an embargoed issue
[16:40] <sbeattie> I also will likely have some kernel cve tracking things pop up
[16:40] <sbeattie> that will likely consume my week
[16:40] <sbeattie> tyhicks: over to you
[16:40] <tyhicks> I had a question for mdeslaur
[16:40] <tyhicks> mdeslaur: are you still working on sudo backports to address the time issue
[16:42] <mdeslaur> no
[16:42] <tyhicks> ack
[16:42] <tyhicks> I'm on community this week
[16:42] <tyhicks> I'm still working on the apparmor_parser patches needed for stacking
[16:42] <tyhicks> and I'm still trying to get to an eCryptfs bug (LP: #1543633)
[16:43] <tyhicks> I also have a couple embargoed issues
[16:43] <tyhicks> sarnold: you're up
[16:44] <sarnold> i'm on bug triage this week
[16:44] <sarnold> I've got an embargoed issue to work on
[16:44] <sarnold> then I return to MIRs for the rest of the week
[16:44] <sarnold> that's it for me, chrisccoulson?
[16:44] <tyhicks> sarnold: next MIR up is a re-review of openjpeg
[16:45] <sarnold> tyhicks: thanks
[16:45] <tyhicks> np
[16:45] <chrisccoulson> I'll be preparing Firefox updates this week (for next weeks release), and I still need to get Thunderbird out
[16:46] <chrisccoulson> Other than that, I'll be focusing on convergence tasks in Oxide, as long as I don't spend time fire-fighting again this week :)
[16:46] <chrisccoulson> That's me done
[16:48] <tyhicks> thanks
[16:48] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Highlighted packages
[16:48] <tyhicks> The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so.
[16:48] <tyhicks> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved.
[16:48] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/kgb.html
[16:48] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery.html
[16:48] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gridengine.html
[16:48] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery2.html
[16:48] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/openstack-trove.html
[16:48] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions
[16:48] <tyhicks> Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss?
[16:50] <tyhicks> jdstrand, mdeslaur, sbeattie, sarnold, ChrisCoulson: Thanks!
[16:50] <tyhicks> #endmeeting
[16:50] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 16:50:22 2016 UTC.
[16:50] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-16.36.moin.txt
[16:50] <sarnold> thanks tyhicks
[16:50] <mdeslaur> thanks tyhicks!
[16:50] <sbeattie> tyhicks: thanks!
[19:15] <cyphermox> #startmeeting DMB 2016-02-29
[19:15] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Feb 29 19:15:25 2016 UTC.  The chair is cyphermox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[19:15] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[19:15] <cyphermox> Welcome to the Developer Membership board meeting :)
[19:16] <coreycb> o/
[19:16] <cyphermox> #voters bdmurray cyphermox xnox infinity stgraber Laney micahg
[19:16] <meetingology> Warning: Nick not in channel: infinity
[19:16] <meetingology> Current voters: Laney bdmurray cyphermox infinity micahg stgraber xnox
[19:16] <cyphermox> ^ ping DMB members :)
[19:16] <micahg> nice!
[19:16]  * stgraber waves
[19:16] <cyphermox> #topic Review of previous action items
[19:17]  * bdmurray waves
[19:17] <cyphermox> Has there been any changes to the current only action item listed on the agenda?
[19:17] <bdmurray> I don't think so.
[19:18] <cyphermox> right on
[19:18] <cyphermox> let's keep going
[19:18] <cyphermox> #topic Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications
[19:18] <cyphermox> #subtopic Corey Bryant's openstack package set
[19:19] <coreycb> Hi all
[19:20] <coreycb> well, I don't want to jump the gun but I might as well introduce myself
[19:21] <cyphermox> ah, yes, please do :)
[19:21] <coreycb> I work primarily on OpenStack packaging, in 2015 I led several stable releases and in 2016 I started leading the new release of OpenStack Mitaka
[19:21] <coreycb> Last year I was granted per package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev
[19:22] <coreycb> my application today is combined for core-dev and per-package upload rights to a newly created openstack package set
[19:22] <coreycb> having per-package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev has been helpful, but I still have to bother jamespage and zul quite a bit for uploads that I can do myself.  having additional upload rights would really help streamline my work.
[19:23] <coreycb> I contribute back to debian quite a bit too, and am a member of pkg-openstack and debian python modules team
[19:24] <coreycb> I think that's about it for my introduction.  for further details, here's my application wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CoreyBryant/CoreDevAndOpenStackApplication
[19:25] <coreycb> Also here's a list of packages for the openstack package set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15094028/
[19:25] <micahg> coreycb: are you aware that core dev offers upload rights to the entire archive?
[19:25] <micahg> well, except partner
[19:25] <coreycb> micahg, yes, of course
[19:26] <coreycb> micahg, I"m hoping for core-dev, but my fallback plan is openstack package set.  however, the openstack package set will be useful either way as we have at least one other person right now (and I hope more in the future) who work on openstack packaging who don't yet have rights.
[19:27] <micahg> ok
[19:28] <bdmurray> Could you elaborate on what you mean by "improve the efficiency of my workflows through experience, automation, and various tooling efficiencies"?
[19:29] <coreycb> bdmurray, that's pretty generic, but I'm always learning tricks here and there to make my workflows more efficient
[19:30] <coreycb> bdmurray, we have quite a few packages to maintain, so whether it's scripting or tips and tricks from other package maitainers, I continually try to improve my process
[19:31] <bdmurray> so not improvements to ubuntu-dev-tools or anything else?
[19:31] <coreycb> bdmurray, nothing in particular.  although being able to re-run autopkgtests was a nice improvement
[19:32] <coreycb> bdmurray, also I used to use pbuilder and found sbuild was faster with caching in effect, that's an example.
[19:32] <bdmurray> okay, I was just idly curious
[19:35] <cyphermox> coreycb: my concern with your application for that package set is how much stuff it covers that isn't openstack-specific
[19:35] <coreycb> cyphermox, yes, I was a bit unsure with that to be honest.  so I figured I'd put all the deps that I know of and if we need to reduce it then so be it.
[19:35] <cyphermox> coreycb: tbh, your original list in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2015-December/000880.html seemed like it better covered openstack, and then other build-depends are just a fact of life when maintaining any set of packages
[19:36] <cyphermox> (though that list might in fact be missing some things too)
[19:36] <coreycb> cyphermox, I can narrow the list down to openstack-only packages, rather than all openstack dependencies
[19:36] <cyphermox> yes, if you could
[19:36] <coreycb> cyphermox, ok I will, after the meeting if that's ok
[19:37] <cyphermox> I think it's probably missing mostly just python-ceilo*, python-designate*, python-glance*
[19:37] <cyphermox> hrm
[19:37] <cyphermox> well, I have nothing against it being refined off-meeting, but that does make the voting complicated
[19:38] <cyphermox> what do others think?
[19:38] <coreycb> cyphermox, there are quite a few that are openstack specific, oslo.*  the python clients and some more
[19:38] <cyphermox> coreycb: yep, I see
[19:39] <cyphermox> let's skip ahead to the other topics then, this would give you time to update the list?
[19:39] <coreycb> cyphermox, I could prob narrow it down before the end of the meeting if you move to another topic
[19:39] <coreycb> yes
[19:39] <stgraber> right, we can't vote on the packageset or on giving you PPU to the set until we agree on a list :)
[19:39] <coreycb> stgraber, ack
[19:39] <cyphermox> ok, skipping over to flexiondotorg
[19:40] <cyphermox> #subtopic flexiondotorg (Martin Wimpress) PPU application for Ubuntu MATE packages
[19:40] <cyphermox> flexiondotorg: you around?
[19:41] <cyphermox> looks like maybe not
[19:41] <cyphermox> #topic Ubuntu Core Developer Applications
[19:41] <cyphermox> #subtopic Phillip Susi's core-dev application
[19:42] <cyphermox> ... yet no psusi in the channel?
[19:42] <bdmurray> his application seemed a bit incomplete to me
[19:42] <cyphermox> I don't know if he's also known by another nick
[19:42] <cyphermox> let's move on again
[19:42] <cyphermox> #subtopic Tyler Hicks' core-dev application
[19:42] <tyhicks> I was set to be on next week's agenda but I am around now
[19:43] <cyphermox> oh, right
[19:43] <tyhicks> ah, nice
[19:43] <tyhicks> I'm happy to go now
[19:43] <cyphermox> hrm
[19:43] <cyphermox> technically we usually expect a week's notice IIRC
[19:44] <sarnold> I wanted to add an endorsement for tyhicks's application but the few times I checked his wikipage was marked "immutable"
[19:44] <bdmurray> I get a 500 tring to load his application too
[19:44] <cyphermox> not that I care much for that "rule". does anyone object?
[19:44] <bdmurray> s/tring/trying/
[19:44] <cyphermox> yeah, the wiki is bad today :/
[19:44] <tyhicks> the wiki has been bad today
[19:44] <cyphermox> got the page
[19:44] <cyphermox> let me pastebinit
[19:45] <cyphermox> http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246428/
[19:45] <tyhicks> I'll do a quick intro
[19:45] <tyhicks> I'm part of the Ubuntu Security team
[19:45] <tyhicks> I've been active in the -security pockets for ~4 years now
[19:46] <tyhicks> I also work on upstream AppArmor and eCryptfs in support of needed Ubuntu features and bug fixes
[19:47] <tyhicks> I review quite a bit of security related merge proposals that eventually land in Ubuntu, as well
[19:49] <bdmurray> Your application mentions a "I've introduced few regressions". Do you recall any specific ones? If so how did they happen and how were they resolved?
[19:49] <tyhicks> good question
[19:50] <tyhicks> I can't recall a specific regression from a security update but there were a couple
[19:50] <tyhicks> I treat those with extremly high priority
[19:50] <tyhicks> the security team tries very hard to not regress users with updates
[19:50] <tyhicks> after I perform a security update, I closely watch the new bug reports for that source package
[19:51] <tyhicks> I have a browser keyword that lets me quickly view the bugs for a source package, sorted by when they were opened
[19:51] <tyhicks> so I check that bug list, several times a day, for approximately a week after I do an update
[19:52] <tyhicks> I triage all new bug reports to make sure that they're not caused by the security update
[19:52] <tyhicks> if they are, I would work quickly to figure out the cause and upload a fix
[19:52] <tyhicks> then I'd release a new Ubuntu Security Notice to explain the regression
[19:53] <tyhicks> sorry I can't remember a specific regression but that would be how I would address any such regression
[19:54] <bdmurray> okay, thanks
[19:54] <bdmurray> sarnold: did you want to say something since it didn't make the wiki?
[19:55] <sarnold> bdmurray: thanks; I've found tyler to be very helpful over the last several years -- he's always willing to help me solve problems and find the root causes of issues.
[19:55] <tyhicks> thanks, sarnold :)
[19:55] <sarnold> tyler does careful, thoughtful work, and very thouroughly tests issues locally before releasing packages or patches
[19:56] <sarnold> he's also able to ask others for help when necessary :)
[19:56] <micahg> Hi Tyler, I've noticed that you only appear to have 5 sponsored uploads to the main archive in the last 18 months, is there a reason you're applying now as opposed to earlier when you were seemingly more active in the main archive
[19:57] <tyhicks> hi micahg
[19:57] <tyhicks> micahg: I should have applied earlier
[19:57] <tyhicks> I don't have a reason as to why that didn't happen outside of time
[19:58] <tyhicks> I grew tired of having to ask others for sponsoring and put my foot down this time around :)
[19:58] <tyhicks> if my application is approved, I strongly feel like my activity in the main archive will increase
[19:59]  * jdstrand knows he will-- he'll stop doing the apparmor uploads at the very least ;)
[19:59] <jdstrand> hey micahg :)
[19:59] <jdstrand> too many pronouns
[19:59] <micahg> hi jdstrand
[19:59] <jdstrand> I know tyhicks will do more uploads cause I will be doing fewer :)
[20:00] <tyhicks> that's a good point
[20:00] <jdstrand> the same for kirk land
[20:00] <jdstrand> I imagine
[20:00] <tyhicks> yes
[20:01] <tyhicks> micahg: does that answer your question?
[20:02] <micahg> well, partially, if it's mainly 2 (or a handful) packages that you need upload rights to in order to relieve others of the need to upload, wouldn't PPU be more appropriate?
[20:03] <jdstrand> fwiw, tyhicks is highly active with main between ecryptfs, apparmor, touch and snappy. having him with core-dev will allow him to more effectively work on those projects and the devel release, where he can do security updates rather than having others do them/sponsor them
[20:03] <tyhicks> it isn't a handful of package that I need upload rights to
[20:03] <tyhicks> for instance, I'm in the process of updating didiwiki for a security issue as part of my Security Team community work this week
[20:03] <tyhicks> stable releases are affected as well as Xenial
[20:04] <tyhicks> being able to upload to the dev release is important since I do security updates in wide range of packages
[20:04] <micahg> right, but I"m wondering what happened in the last year or so where that work hasn't seemingly been reflected
[20:05]  * jdstrand always felt that being a member of the security team and able to update anything in a stable release but not (yet) a core-dev to be an odd incongruency
[20:05] <bdmurray> tyhicks: were you less active in main recently because you were developing apparmor features?
[20:05] <micahg> jdstrand: I tend to agree with that :)
[20:05] <jdstrand> anyway, I don't mean to distract...
[20:05] <tyhicks> bdmurray: yes - developing apparmor features is one reason my upload count decreased
[20:06] <micahg> were you not doing community rotations on the security team during that time that required dev release uploadS?
[20:06] <tyhicks> however, my security upload count didn't decrease: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/tyhicks/CoreDevApplicationSecUploads
[20:06] <tyhicks> micahg: I've been in and out of the rotations while developing features
[20:10] <micahg> I've been referencing http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi?render=html&sponsor=&sponsor_search=name&sponsoree=Tyler+Hicks&sponsoree_search=name
[20:10] <cyphermox> Are we ready to vote?
[20:11] <tyhicks> ubuntu-sponsorships doesn't cover security uploads which is why I created the extra list
[20:12] <cyphermox> right, and picking one near the end from the sponsored list shows that (for example), ecryptfs-utils you did changes in, just Dustin claimed the upload/sponsored
[20:13] <tyhicks> correct
[20:13] <tyhicks> I believe you're referring to this one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/110-0ubuntu1
[20:14] <cyphermox> yep
[20:15] <cyphermox> #vote grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights
[20:15] <meetingology> Please vote on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights
[20:15] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[20:15] <cyphermox> +1
[20:15] <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
[20:17] <bdmurray> +1
[20:17] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[20:21] <stgraber> +1
[20:21] <meetingology> +1 received from stgraber
[20:22] <micahg> +1
[20:22] <meetingology> +1 received from micahg
[20:22] <cyphermox> #endvote
[20:22] <meetingology> Voting ended on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights
[20:22] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[20:22] <meetingology> Motion carried
[20:22] <tyhicks>  \o/
[20:22] <cyphermox> I'll take care of the LP magic right after the meeting
[20:23] <cyphermox> coreycb: still around?
[20:23] <coreycb> yes!
[20:23] <coreycb> congrats tyhicks!
[20:23] <cyphermox> bdmurray: do you have time to deal with the packageset?
[20:23] <coreycb> Here's the new list for the openstack pkg set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:23] <coreycb> also reminder I'm going for core-dev as well
[20:23] <cyphermox> yeah
[20:24] <cyphermox> the meeting is getting pretty long though
[20:24] <coreycb> I was afraid of that..
[20:24] <cyphermox> just trying to make sure we have quorum
[20:24] <cyphermox> #topic openstack packageset
[20:24] <bdmurray> cyphermox: I think we should be fair and finish.
[20:24] <cyphermox> ah?
[20:25] <cyphermox> do we have people waiting for a meeting after?
[20:25] <bdmurray> I mean finish talking about coreycb since we started with him.
[20:25] <cyphermox> ah, yes
[20:25] <cyphermox> that's my opinion too
[20:26] <bdmurray> Perhaps we should address core-dev first though?
[20:26]  * cyphermox shrugs
[20:26] <coreycb> bdmurray, that is fine with me, either way, I appreciate your time on this
[20:27] <cyphermox> I'd deal with the packageset first tbh, especially since it's fairly straightforward
[20:27] <bdmurray> okay
[20:27] <cyphermox> #vote Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:27] <meetingology> Please vote on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:27] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[20:27] <cyphermox> *package set, that should have read
[20:27] <stgraber> -1 with that description
[20:27] <meetingology> -1 with that description received from stgraber
[20:27] <cyphermox> arf
[20:27] <stgraber> we need sets to have a description that lets us update them on request
[20:28] <stgraber> having the description be "some hardcoded list we were handed over" isn't acceptable
[20:28] <cyphermox> do you have a suggested description?
[20:28] <cyphermox> I was fine with "openstack packages"
[20:28] <cyphermox> #endvote
[20:28] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:28] <meetingology> Votes for:0 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0
[20:28] <meetingology> Motion denied
[20:28] <stgraber> upstream openstack components?
[20:29] <stgraber> clearly "openstack packages" isn't clear enough given that we were provided two different lists one of which was clearly unsuitable
[20:29] <cyphermox> (vote) Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:29] <cyphermox> ^ ?
[20:29] <stgraber> fine with me
[20:30] <cyphermox> #vote Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:30] <meetingology> Please vote on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:30] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[20:30] <stgraber> +1
[20:30] <meetingology> +1 received from stgraber
[20:30] <micahg> selenium is the only package in there that looks a bit out of place
[20:30] <cyphermox> +1
[20:30] <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
[20:31] <cyphermox> oh, is there no selenium package?
[20:31] <coreycb> I'm ok dropping that
[20:31] <micahg> yeah, I don't see one
[20:31] <stgraber> oh, well, you kinda have to considering it doesn't exist in the archive :)
[20:31] <stgraber> There is no current release for this source package in Ubuntu.
[20:31] <cyphermox> right
[20:32] <micahg> +1 without selenium
[20:32] <meetingology> +1 without selenium received from micahg
[20:32] <coreycb> yes, I'm noticing that ;)
[20:32] <bdmurray> +1
[20:32] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[20:33] <cyphermox> #endvote
[20:33] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/
[20:33] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[20:33] <meetingology> Motion carried
[20:33] <coreycb> thanks
[20:33] <cyphermox> how do we normally proceed next? explicit voting on granting coreycb upload rights for the new package set?
[20:34] <stgraber> let's do coredev first, then ppu
[20:34] <cyphermox> ok
[20:34] <stgraber> because if he gets coredev he won't need ppu
[20:34] <cyphermox> mmkay
[20:34] <coreycb> sounds good to me
[20:35] <cyphermox> #vote Corey to be granted core-dev rights
[20:35] <meetingology> Please vote on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights
[20:35] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[20:37] <stgraber> openstack package set created, ubuntu-openstack-dev team created and configured
[20:38] <cyphermox> stgraber: thanks
[20:38] <coreycb> stgraber, thanks
[20:40] <stgraber> sorry, going back through the application quickly
[20:40] <coreycb> no problem
[20:40] <coreycb> one thing I would like to point out is that openstack package PPU rights will be useful, however there are still many dependencies that don't fall under that umbrella, of which core-dev would make my job much easier.
[20:42] <stgraber> +1
[20:42] <meetingology> +1 received from stgraber
[20:42] <bdmurray> +1
[20:42] <meetingology> +1 received from bdmurray
[20:44] <cyphermox> +1
[20:44] <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
[20:44] <cyphermox> micahg: ?
[20:44] <micahg> looking
[20:45] <cyphermox> ok, just making sure you were still around :)
[20:45] <micahg> finally got the wiki to load ;)
[20:45] <micahg> +1
[20:45] <meetingology> +1 received from micahg
[20:45] <cyphermox> #endvote
[20:45] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights
[20:45] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[20:45] <meetingology> Motion carried
[20:45] <cyphermox> congrats coreycb
[20:45] <coreycb> thanks!
[20:46] <coreycb> thanks for your time too, it was a long meeting today
[20:46] <jamespage> well done coreycb!
[20:46] <cyphermox> #topic Next chair
[20:46] <cyphermox> I guess it's up to micahg next?
[20:47] <bdmurray> I think it was supposed to be infinity today
[20:47] <cyphermox> ah
[20:47] <cyphermox> well,
[20:47] <cyphermox> #action infinity to chair next meeting
[20:47] <meetingology> ACTION: infinity to chair next meeting
[20:47] <cyphermox> the absent are obviously wrong.
[20:47] <cyphermox> #topic any other business?
[20:48] <cyphermox> nothing from me
[20:48] <micahg> election?
[20:48] <cyphermox> ah, sure
[20:49] <cyphermox> a new call for nomination was sent by Dimitri 7 days ago.
[20:50] <cyphermox> it would be nice to have some nominations
[20:50] <micahg> I think we only received one nomination if I'm caught up on main
[20:50] <micahg> s/main/mail/
[20:51] <cyphermox> I don't see one
[20:53] <cyphermox> we should extend the deadline and send another call for nominations if we don't have enough
[20:54] <cyphermox> as I understand it we need 3 at least
[20:54] <bdmurray> I think we should let people expire to force action! ;-)
[20:54] <cyphermox> micahg: you want to take care of sending another call?
[20:55] <micahg> yeah, I guess I can
[20:56] <cyphermox> two more weeks I guess?
[20:56] <micahg> well, the terms expire 3/9 (before the next meeting)
[20:57] <cyphermox> I don't think we'll see enough in one week + 2 days
[20:58] <cyphermox> we should ask to extend the terms a bit until time X, which would be the end for the call for nomination
[20:58] <cyphermox> #action micahg to send new call for nominations
[20:58] <meetingology> ACTION: micahg to send new call for nominations
[21:02] <cyphermox> I'll be happy to ask TB for term extension for those expiring so we get more nominees
[21:02] <cyphermox> I think that's enough for the meeting
[21:03] <cyphermox> stgraber: bdmurray: anything else?
[21:03] <bdmurray> nope
[21:03] <cyphermox> #endmeeting
[21:03] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 21:03:51 2016 UTC.
[21:03] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-19.15.moin.txt
[21:04] <cyphermox> tyhicks: coreycb: you've been added to core-dev.
[21:04] <coreycb> cyphermox, thank you
[21:04] <tyhicks> thanks cyphermox - I received the email
[21:05] <cyphermox> woah, TB all expires in 2 hours :)