=== maclin1 is now known as maclin === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks === fabo_ is now known as fabo === Guest56535 is now known as MooDoo === jibel_ is now known as jibel === yofel_ is now known as yofel === yofel_ is now known as yofel === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr [16:35] hello [16:35] hi! [16:36] #startmeeting [16:36] Meeting started Mon Feb 29 16:36:01 2016 UTC. The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [16:36] Available commands: action commands idea info link nick [16:36] The meeting agenda can be found at: [16:36] [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting [16:36] [TOPIC] Announcements === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Announcements [16:36] Stefan Bader (smb) provided debdiffs for precise-wily for xen [16:36] Thank you for your assistance in keeping Ubuntu users secure! :) [16:36] [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Weekly stand-up report [16:36] jdstrand: you're up [16:36] hey [16:37] I'll be following up on the squashfs snap checks this week [16:37] that is coming along fine, expect no issues [16:37] I'll also be trying to chase down the next work for interfaces (formerlay known as skills formerly known as capabilities) [16:37] and an embargoed issue [16:38] that's it for me [16:38] mdeslaur: you're up === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [16:38] I'm working on a couple of embargoed issues [16:38] and I may take on another embargoed issue [16:38] and after that, I'll do squid3 updates [16:38] and I'm on triage this week [16:38] sbeattie: you're up [16:38] I'm in the happy place this week [16:39] I'm focusing on tracking down some remaining gcc pie build failures this week [16:39] I also have an embargoed issue [16:40] I also will likely have some kernel cve tracking things pop up [16:40] that will likely consume my week [16:40] tyhicks: over to you [16:40] I had a question for mdeslaur [16:40] mdeslaur: are you still working on sudo backports to address the time issue [16:42] no [16:42] ack [16:42] I'm on community this week [16:42] I'm still working on the apparmor_parser patches needed for stacking [16:42] and I'm still trying to get to an eCryptfs bug (LP: #1543633) [16:42] Launchpad bug 1543633 in eCryptfs "Data corruption during parallel file copying with interruptions" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1543633 [16:43] I also have a couple embargoed issues [16:43] sarnold: you're up [16:44] i'm on bug triage this week [16:44] I've got an embargoed issue to work on [16:44] then I return to MIRs for the rest of the week [16:44] that's it for me, chrisccoulson? [16:44] sarnold: next MIR up is a re-review of openjpeg [16:45] tyhicks: thanks [16:45] np [16:45] I'll be preparing Firefox updates this week (for next weeks release), and I still need to get Thunderbird out [16:46] Other than that, I'll be focusing on convergence tasks in Oxide, as long as I don't spend time fire-fighting again this week :) [16:46] That's me done [16:48] thanks [16:48] [TOPIC] Highlighted packages === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Highlighted packages [16:48] The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so. [16:48] See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved. [16:48] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/kgb.html [16:48] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery.html [16:48] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gridengine.html [16:48] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gallery2.html [16:48] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/openstack-trove.html [16:48] [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Miscellaneous and Questions [16:48] Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss? [16:50] jdstrand, mdeslaur, sbeattie, sarnold, ChrisCoulson: Thanks! [16:50] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [16:50] Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 16:50:22 2016 UTC. [16:50] Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-16.36.moin.txt [16:50] thanks tyhicks [16:50] thanks tyhicks! [16:50] tyhicks: thanks! === jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-afk === Guest67703 is now known as me_ === me_ is now known as med_ === jgrimm-afk is now known as jgrimm === ljp is now known as lpotter [19:15] #startmeeting DMB 2016-02-29 [19:15] Meeting started Mon Feb 29 19:15:25 2016 UTC. The chair is cyphermox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [19:15] Available commands: action commands idea info link nick === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: [19:15] Welcome to the Developer Membership board meeting :) [19:16] o/ [19:16] #voters bdmurray cyphermox xnox infinity stgraber Laney micahg [19:16] Warning: Nick not in channel: infinity [19:16] Current voters: Laney bdmurray cyphermox infinity micahg stgraber xnox [19:16] ^ ping DMB members :) [19:16] nice! [19:16] * stgraber waves [19:16] #topic Review of previous action items === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items [19:17] * bdmurray waves [19:17] Has there been any changes to the current only action item listed on the agenda? [19:17] I don't think so. [19:18] right on [19:18] let's keep going [19:18] #topic Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications [19:18] #subtopic Corey Bryant's openstack package set [19:19] Hi all [19:20] well, I don't want to jump the gun but I might as well introduce myself [19:21] ah, yes, please do :) [19:21] I work primarily on OpenStack packaging, in 2015 I led several stable releases and in 2016 I started leading the new release of OpenStack Mitaka [19:21] Last year I was granted per package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev [19:22] my application today is combined for core-dev and per-package upload rights to a newly created openstack package set [19:22] having per-package upload rights to ubuntu-server-dev has been helpful, but I still have to bother jamespage and zul quite a bit for uploads that I can do myself. having additional upload rights would really help streamline my work. [19:23] I contribute back to debian quite a bit too, and am a member of pkg-openstack and debian python modules team [19:24] I think that's about it for my introduction. for further details, here's my application wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CoreyBryant/CoreDevAndOpenStackApplication [19:25] Also here's a list of packages for the openstack package set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15094028/ [19:25] coreycb: are you aware that core dev offers upload rights to the entire archive? [19:25] well, except partner [19:25] micahg, yes, of course [19:26] micahg, I"m hoping for core-dev, but my fallback plan is openstack package set. however, the openstack package set will be useful either way as we have at least one other person right now (and I hope more in the future) who work on openstack packaging who don't yet have rights. [19:27] ok [19:28] Could you elaborate on what you mean by "improve the efficiency of my workflows through experience, automation, and various tooling efficiencies"? [19:29] bdmurray, that's pretty generic, but I'm always learning tricks here and there to make my workflows more efficient [19:30] bdmurray, we have quite a few packages to maintain, so whether it's scripting or tips and tricks from other package maitainers, I continually try to improve my process [19:31] so not improvements to ubuntu-dev-tools or anything else? [19:31] bdmurray, nothing in particular. although being able to re-run autopkgtests was a nice improvement [19:32] bdmurray, also I used to use pbuilder and found sbuild was faster with caching in effect, that's an example. [19:32] okay, I was just idly curious [19:35] coreycb: my concern with your application for that package set is how much stuff it covers that isn't openstack-specific [19:35] cyphermox, yes, I was a bit unsure with that to be honest. so I figured I'd put all the deps that I know of and if we need to reduce it then so be it. [19:35] coreycb: tbh, your original list in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2015-December/000880.html seemed like it better covered openstack, and then other build-depends are just a fact of life when maintaining any set of packages [19:36] (though that list might in fact be missing some things too) [19:36] cyphermox, I can narrow the list down to openstack-only packages, rather than all openstack dependencies [19:36] yes, if you could [19:36] cyphermox, ok I will, after the meeting if that's ok [19:37] I think it's probably missing mostly just python-ceilo*, python-designate*, python-glance* [19:37] hrm [19:37] well, I have nothing against it being refined off-meeting, but that does make the voting complicated [19:38] what do others think? [19:38] cyphermox, there are quite a few that are openstack specific, oslo.* the python clients and some more [19:38] coreycb: yep, I see [19:39] let's skip ahead to the other topics then, this would give you time to update the list? [19:39] cyphermox, I could prob narrow it down before the end of the meeting if you move to another topic [19:39] yes [19:39] right, we can't vote on the packageset or on giving you PPU to the set until we agree on a list :) [19:39] stgraber, ack [19:39] ok, skipping over to flexiondotorg [19:40] #subtopic flexiondotorg (Martin Wimpress) PPU application for Ubuntu MATE packages [19:40] flexiondotorg: you around? [19:41] looks like maybe not [19:41] #topic Ubuntu Core Developer Applications === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Ubuntu Core Developer Applications [19:41] #subtopic Phillip Susi's core-dev application [19:42] ... yet no psusi in the channel? [19:42] his application seemed a bit incomplete to me [19:42] I don't know if he's also known by another nick [19:42] let's move on again [19:42] #subtopic Tyler Hicks' core-dev application [19:42] I was set to be on next week's agenda but I am around now [19:43] oh, right [19:43] ah, nice [19:43] I'm happy to go now [19:43] hrm [19:43] technically we usually expect a week's notice IIRC [19:44] I wanted to add an endorsement for tyhicks's application but the few times I checked his wikipage was marked "immutable" [19:44] I get a 500 tring to load his application too [19:44] not that I care much for that "rule". does anyone object? [19:44] s/tring/trying/ [19:44] yeah, the wiki is bad today :/ [19:44] the wiki has been bad today [19:44] got the page [19:44] let me pastebinit [19:45] http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246428/ [19:45] I'll do a quick intro [19:45] I'm part of the Ubuntu Security team [19:45] I've been active in the -security pockets for ~4 years now [19:46] I also work on upstream AppArmor and eCryptfs in support of needed Ubuntu features and bug fixes [19:47] I review quite a bit of security related merge proposals that eventually land in Ubuntu, as well [19:49] Your application mentions a "I've introduced few regressions". Do you recall any specific ones? If so how did they happen and how were they resolved? [19:49] good question [19:50] I can't recall a specific regression from a security update but there were a couple [19:50] I treat those with extremly high priority [19:50] the security team tries very hard to not regress users with updates [19:50] after I perform a security update, I closely watch the new bug reports for that source package [19:51] I have a browser keyword that lets me quickly view the bugs for a source package, sorted by when they were opened [19:51] so I check that bug list, several times a day, for approximately a week after I do an update [19:52] I triage all new bug reports to make sure that they're not caused by the security update [19:52] if they are, I would work quickly to figure out the cause and upload a fix === inetpro is now known as inetghost [19:52] then I'd release a new Ubuntu Security Notice to explain the regression [19:53] sorry I can't remember a specific regression but that would be how I would address any such regression [19:54] okay, thanks [19:54] sarnold: did you want to say something since it didn't make the wiki? [19:55] bdmurray: thanks; I've found tyler to be very helpful over the last several years -- he's always willing to help me solve problems and find the root causes of issues. [19:55] thanks, sarnold :) [19:55] tyler does careful, thoughtful work, and very thouroughly tests issues locally before releasing packages or patches [19:56] he's also able to ask others for help when necessary :) [19:56] Hi Tyler, I've noticed that you only appear to have 5 sponsored uploads to the main archive in the last 18 months, is there a reason you're applying now as opposed to earlier when you were seemingly more active in the main archive === inetghost is now known as inetpro [19:57] hi micahg [19:57] micahg: I should have applied earlier [19:57] I don't have a reason as to why that didn't happen outside of time [19:58] I grew tired of having to ask others for sponsoring and put my foot down this time around :) [19:58] if my application is approved, I strongly feel like my activity in the main archive will increase [19:59] * jdstrand knows he will-- he'll stop doing the apparmor uploads at the very least ;) [19:59] hey micahg :) [19:59] too many pronouns [19:59] hi jdstrand [19:59] I know tyhicks will do more uploads cause I will be doing fewer :) [20:00] that's a good point [20:00] the same for kirk land [20:00] I imagine [20:00] yes [20:01] micahg: does that answer your question? [20:02] well, partially, if it's mainly 2 (or a handful) packages that you need upload rights to in order to relieve others of the need to upload, wouldn't PPU be more appropriate? [20:03] fwiw, tyhicks is highly active with main between ecryptfs, apparmor, touch and snappy. having him with core-dev will allow him to more effectively work on those projects and the devel release, where he can do security updates rather than having others do them/sponsor them [20:03] it isn't a handful of package that I need upload rights to [20:03] for instance, I'm in the process of updating didiwiki for a security issue as part of my Security Team community work this week [20:03] stable releases are affected as well as Xenial [20:04] being able to upload to the dev release is important since I do security updates in wide range of packages [20:04] right, but I"m wondering what happened in the last year or so where that work hasn't seemingly been reflected [20:05] * jdstrand always felt that being a member of the security team and able to update anything in a stable release but not (yet) a core-dev to be an odd incongruency [20:05] tyhicks: were you less active in main recently because you were developing apparmor features? [20:05] jdstrand: I tend to agree with that :) [20:05] anyway, I don't mean to distract... [20:05] bdmurray: yes - developing apparmor features is one reason my upload count decreased [20:06] were you not doing community rotations on the security team during that time that required dev release uploadS? [20:06] however, my security upload count didn't decrease: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/tyhicks/CoreDevApplicationSecUploads [20:06] micahg: I've been in and out of the rotations while developing features [20:10] I've been referencing http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi?render=html&sponsor=&sponsor_search=name&sponsoree=Tyler+Hicks&sponsoree_search=name [20:10] Are we ready to vote? [20:11] ubuntu-sponsorships doesn't cover security uploads which is why I created the extra list [20:12] right, and picking one near the end from the sponsored list shows that (for example), ecryptfs-utils you did changes in, just Dustin claimed the upload/sponsored [20:13] correct [20:13] I believe you're referring to this one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/110-0ubuntu1 [20:14] yep [20:15] #vote grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights [20:15] Please vote on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights [20:15] Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) [20:15] +1 [20:15] +1 received from cyphermox [20:17] +1 [20:17] +1 received from bdmurray [20:21] +1 [20:21] +1 received from stgraber [20:22] +1 [20:22] +1 received from micahg [20:22] #endvote [20:22] Voting ended on: grant Tyler Hicks core-dev rights [20:22] Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 [20:22] Motion carried [20:22] \o/ [20:22] I'll take care of the LP magic right after the meeting [20:23] coreycb: still around? [20:23] yes! [20:23] congrats tyhicks! [20:23] bdmurray: do you have time to deal with the packageset? [20:23] Here's the new list for the openstack pkg set: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:23] also reminder I'm going for core-dev as well [20:23] yeah [20:24] the meeting is getting pretty long though [20:24] I was afraid of that.. [20:24] just trying to make sure we have quorum [20:24] #topic openstack packageset === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: openstack packageset [20:24] cyphermox: I think we should be fair and finish. [20:24] ah? [20:25] do we have people waiting for a meeting after? [20:25] I mean finish talking about coreycb since we started with him. [20:25] ah, yes [20:25] that's my opinion too [20:26] Perhaps we should address core-dev first though? [20:26] * cyphermox shrugs [20:26] bdmurray, that is fine with me, either way, I appreciate your time on this [20:27] I'd deal with the packageset first tbh, especially since it's fairly straightforward [20:27] okay [20:27] #vote Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:27] Please vote on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:27] Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) [20:27] *package set, that should have read [20:27] -1 with that description [20:27] -1 with that description received from stgraber [20:27] arf [20:27] we need sets to have a description that lets us update them on request [20:28] having the description be "some hardcoded list we were handed over" isn't acceptable [20:28] do you have a suggested description? [20:28] I was fine with "openstack packages" [20:28] #endvote [20:28] Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package from the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:28] Votes for:0 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0 [20:28] Motion denied [20:28] upstream openstack components? [20:29] clearly "openstack packages" isn't clear enough given that we were provided two different lists one of which was clearly unsuitable [20:29] (vote) Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:29] ^ ? [20:29] fine with me [20:30] #vote Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:30] Please vote on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:30] Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) [20:30] +1 [20:30] +1 received from stgraber [20:30] selenium is the only package in there that looks a bit out of place [20:30] +1 [20:30] +1 received from cyphermox [20:31] oh, is there no selenium package? [20:31] I'm ok dropping that [20:31] yeah, I don't see one [20:31] oh, well, you kinda have to considering it doesn't exist in the archive :) [20:31] There is no current release for this source package in Ubuntu. [20:31] right [20:32] +1 without selenium [20:32] +1 without selenium received from micahg [20:32] yes, I'm noticing that ;) [20:32] +1 [20:32] +1 received from bdmurray [20:33] #endvote [20:33] Voting ended on: Creating the openstack package set (upstream openstack components) starting with the revised list from coreycb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15246586/ [20:33] Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 [20:33] Motion carried [20:33] thanks [20:33] how do we normally proceed next? explicit voting on granting coreycb upload rights for the new package set? [20:34] let's do coredev first, then ppu [20:34] ok [20:34] because if he gets coredev he won't need ppu [20:34] mmkay [20:34] sounds good to me [20:35] #vote Corey to be granted core-dev rights [20:35] Please vote on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights [20:35] Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) [20:37] openstack package set created, ubuntu-openstack-dev team created and configured [20:38] stgraber: thanks [20:38] stgraber, thanks [20:40] sorry, going back through the application quickly [20:40] no problem [20:40] one thing I would like to point out is that openstack package PPU rights will be useful, however there are still many dependencies that don't fall under that umbrella, of which core-dev would make my job much easier. [20:42] +1 [20:42] +1 received from stgraber [20:42] +1 [20:42] +1 received from bdmurray [20:44] +1 [20:44] +1 received from cyphermox [20:44] micahg: ? [20:44] looking [20:45] ok, just making sure you were still around :) [20:45] finally got the wiki to load ;) [20:45] +1 [20:45] +1 received from micahg [20:45] #endvote [20:45] Voting ended on: Corey to be granted core-dev rights [20:45] Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 [20:45] Motion carried [20:45] congrats coreycb [20:45] thanks! [20:46] thanks for your time too, it was a long meeting today [20:46] well done coreycb! [20:46] #topic Next chair === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: Next chair [20:46] I guess it's up to micahg next? [20:47] I think it was supposed to be infinity today [20:47] ah [20:47] well, [20:47] #action infinity to chair next meeting [20:47] ACTION: infinity to chair next meeting [20:47] the absent are obviously wrong. [20:47] #topic any other business? === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB 2016-02-29 Meeting | Current topic: any other business? [20:48] nothing from me [20:48] election? [20:48] ah, sure [20:49] a new call for nomination was sent by Dimitri 7 days ago. [20:50] it would be nice to have some nominations [20:50] I think we only received one nomination if I'm caught up on main [20:50] s/main/mail/ [20:51] I don't see one [20:53] we should extend the deadline and send another call for nominations if we don't have enough [20:54] as I understand it we need 3 at least [20:54] I think we should let people expire to force action! ;-) [20:54] micahg: you want to take care of sending another call? [20:55] yeah, I guess I can [20:56] two more weeks I guess? [20:56] well, the terms expire 3/9 (before the next meeting) [20:57] I don't think we'll see enough in one week + 2 days [20:58] we should ask to extend the terms a bit until time X, which would be the end for the call for nomination [20:58] #action micahg to send new call for nominations [20:58] ACTION: micahg to send new call for nominations [21:02] I'll be happy to ask TB for term extension for those expiring so we get more nominees [21:02] I think that's enough for the meeting [21:03] stgraber: bdmurray: anything else? [21:03] nope [21:03] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [21:03] Meeting ended Mon Feb 29 21:03:51 2016 UTC. [21:03] Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-02-29-19.15.moin.txt [21:04] tyhicks: coreycb: you've been added to core-dev. [21:04] cyphermox, thank you [21:04] thanks cyphermox - I received the email [21:05] woah, TB all expires in 2 hours :)