| === bogdanteleaga_ is now known as bogdanteleaga | ||
| === natefinch_ is now known as natefinch | ||
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| === bcsaller_ is now known as bcsaller | ||
| === mup_ is now known as mup | ||
| === marlinc_ is now known as marlinc | ||
| === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars | ||
| === sarnold_ is now known as sarnold | ||
| === root_ is now known as metsuke | ||
| === Tristit1a is now known as Tristitia | ||
| === bradm_ is now known as bradm | ||
| jamespage | gnuoy, could you take a run through the verified of theses: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:charmhelpers-resync | 09:37 |
|---|---|---|
| gnuoy | sure | 09:39 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, n-gateway and n-openvswitch have relations to n-api right? | 09:40 |
| gnuoy | right | 09:41 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, I'm supposed +1 the workflows on those as well, right? | 09:42 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, yeah so +2 review and +1 workflow | 09:42 |
| gnuoy | ack | 09:42 |
| === dooferlad_ is now known as dooferlad | ||
| jamespage | gnuoy, beisner: I've just raised a project-config change that should fix bug tracking for the charms as well - its currently not functional | 09:46 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, lets book some time to discuss v3 and get it swinging | 09:49 |
| jamespage | I have some ideas of what might be up... | 09:49 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, ta | 09:51 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, just looking at these - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bug/1545886 | 09:52 |
| mup | Bug #1545886: need to support vni_range option for ml2 plugin <openstack> <sts> <neutron-api (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by xtrusia> <neutron-gateway | 09:52 |
| mup | (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by xtrusia> <neutron-openvswitch (Juju Charms Collection):In Progress by xtrusia> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1545886> | 09:52 |
| jamespage | I think that in fact we only need to set those in the plugin for neutron-api, not all of the agent locations but I'm not 100% sure | 09:52 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, I would expect to only have to set then for neutron-api | 09:53 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, yeah - I think thats true | 09:53 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, let me dig a little | 09:53 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, Do i still need to mark nbugs fix committed or do I sit back and let gerrit do it? | 09:57 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, for now please do manually | 09:57 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, hopefully my proposed change will fix that | 09:58 |
| gnuoy | ack | 09:58 |
| === Odd_Blok1 is now known as Odd_Bloke | ||
| jamespage | gnuoy, beisner: http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits&project_type=all&company=canonical&release=all | 10:14 |
| gnuoy | nice | 10:15 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, and - http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits&project_type=all&release=all | 10:15 |
| jamespage | commits not reviews but meh - we don't get metrics on those | 10:15 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, lets do it | 10:17 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, http://paste.ubuntu.com/15272811/ | 10:36 |
| tinwood | gnuoy, jamespage: is there an easy way to determine the github repo for a OS charm? e.g. in my case I'm looking for keystone. | 10:39 |
| tinwood | I'm guessing it's this one: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charm-keystone | 10:41 |
| sparkieg` | anyone else seeing invisible text in the Search field on https://jujucharms.com/docs/ ? | 10:42 |
| evilnickveitch | sparkieg`, yes, it has been an issue for a while now - I believe it is being worked on | 10:44 |
| === sparkieg` is now known as sparkiegeek | ||
| sparkiegeek | evilnickveitch: ok | 10:44 |
| evilnickveitch | it is annoying! there are too many pages of docs not to have working search! | 10:45 |
| sparkiegeek | evilnickveitch: +1 | 10:45 |
| sparkiegeek | evilnickveitch: the search is ... non intuitive too | 10:45 |
| Muntaner | hello guys! I'm having a problem. My environment was going well, but all of a sudden when I try to deploy a new service, it stays in the state "Waiting for agent initialization to finish" forever. How can I diagnose? | 10:46 |
| Muntaner | (I use Juju on an openstack all-in-one installation) | 10:46 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, http://paste.ubuntu.com/15272863/ | 10:54 |
| jamespage | tinwood, yes it is | 10:54 |
| tinwood | thanks jamespage | 10:54 |
| jamespage | Muntaner, take a look in /var/log/juju on machine 0 | 11:58 |
| Muntaner | jamespage, too late! I destroyed the environment, bootstraped it again and works. Weird | 12:09 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, hey - when you did the last release of charms to stable branches, I think you did some 'at the point of release' type changes | 12:10 |
| Muntaner | jamespage, I thinks it is related to the security groups of openstack... when I delete and create a VM, the sec group created for that VM remains and does not get deleted into openstack | 12:11 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, update charmhelper location, that sort of thing? | 12:24 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, yah | 12:30 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, that + update amulet branches to point at stable branches | 12:35 |
| jamespage | tvansteenburgh, dpb1_: I know we're not really focussing on deployer any longer but https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/juju-deployer/git-branch-support/+merge/287929 would help us out in the short term... | 12:59 |
| beisner | jamespage, woah, the stackalytics thing! | 13:19 |
| marcoceppi | jamespage: love it | 13:24 |
| tvansteenburgh | jamespage: i can get that deployer merge released today | 13:50 |
| jamespage | tvansteenburgh, that would be great - are you OK with the syntax? | 13:54 |
| jamespage | I think that longer term we'll just be deploying from the charm-store but this works us through the interim... | 13:54 |
| tvansteenburgh | jamespage: i just merged this yesterday https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/juju-deployer/add-refspecs/+merge/287829 | 13:55 |
| jamespage | beisner, I have a few reviews that I'd like the full amulet suite run against - is that a manual kickoff atm? | 13:55 |
| tvansteenburgh | jamespage: but it looks like your change can coexist with that | 13:55 |
| jamespage | tvansteenburgh, it would appear so | 13:55 |
| tvansteenburgh | jamespage: so yeah, lgtm. will let you know when it's released | 13:56 |
| beisner | jamespage, it is. i'll be focusing on the gate job integration and the artifact public linking now that we're in a good place. will send you info shortly. | 13:57 |
| jamespage | tvansteenburgh, awesome - thankyou | 13:58 |
| jamespage | beisner, I fixed up the single deploy for swift-storage - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287156/ | 14:02 |
| jamespage | if you'd like to review, that will unblock other reviews inflight I think | 14:03 |
| beisner | jamespage, ah good. i suspect there may be a few of those. | 14:06 |
| jamespage | beisner, yes... | 14:06 |
| jamespage | my resync flushed out a few... | 14:06 |
| beisner | jamespage, was it the setup_storage bit that was tripping? | 14:08 |
| jamespage | beisner, basically with no explicit config, there are no block devices found, so the perms changes at the end of setup_storage error out as /srv/node never gets created... | 14:09 |
| beisner | yah ok | 14:09 |
| beisner | jamespage, so this is valuable to eek out. i think each charm should deploy to a blocked state instead of an error state, when deployed with its defaults. | 14:11 |
| jamespage | beisner, and that would be a valid test ? | 14:16 |
| jamespage | beisner, ok that does make sense... | 14:17 |
| beisner | jamespage, so it tests the user experience a bit, in that if i've just added a charm, and it has deployed before i add configs, i don't have to jump through resolved/retry manual steps. | 14:17 |
| === beuno_ is now known as beuni | ||
| === beuni is now known as beuno | ||
| === jrwren_ is now known as jrwren | ||
| tvansteenburgh | frankban: when you have time can you add juju-deployer-0.6.4 (on pypi) to the juju/stable ppa? | 14:21 |
| frankban | tvansteenburgh: oh sorry yes | 14:22 |
| sparkiegeek | tvansteenburgh: what makes it stable? how much testing has it undergone? | 14:22 |
| tvansteenburgh | sparkiegeek: aside from my own, and the testing of the patch submitters, none | 14:24 |
| sparkiegeek | tvansteenburgh: can I suggest proposed is a better place for it, at least for now? | 14:26 |
| tvansteenburgh | sparkiegeek: sure. frankban, juju/proposed instead please | 14:27 |
| tvansteenburgh | which i guess is actually juju/devel? | 14:28 |
| dpb1_ | tvansteenburgh: is lp:python-jujuclient not getting any updates? ahasenack has had ppas building from there forever. | 14:29 |
| dpb1_ | tvansteenburgh: lp:juju-deployer rather. | 14:29 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb1_: yeah that's where updates are happening, which ppas are getting updates? | 14:29 |
| * dpb1_ gets links | 14:29 | |
| dpb1_ | https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/python-jujuclient and https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/juju-deployer-daily | 14:30 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb1_: ok, that's good to know. so if ppl want latest tell them to install from there? | 14:32 |
| dpb1_ | yup | 14:32 |
| dpb1_ | tvansteenburgh: it's where I pull from on all my machines | 14:32 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb1_: do those builds ever graduate to juju/stable? | 14:32 |
| frankban | tvansteenburgh, dpb1_: sounds great, can we just copy those when a deployer needs to be updated in stable ppa? | 14:32 |
| sparkiegeek | note the failures in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/245134994/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-amd64.juju-deployer_0.6.1~bzr165~48~ubuntu15.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 14:33 |
| dpb1_ | frankban: tvansteenburgh: there is no workflow: it's always been just ping frank or marco to copy to /stable | 14:33 |
| sparkiegeek | the test is trying to reach out to reviews.openstack.org and failing | 14:33 |
| marcoceppi | well, I never copy binaries to stable, so that's mostly a frank thing | 14:33 |
| marcoceppi | I prefer rebuilding | 14:34 |
| tvansteenburgh | dpb1_: yes, it's always been a "by request" thing | 14:34 |
| frankban | marcoceppi: if we already have a working deb that has been tested, why not just copy it over? | 14:35 |
| beisner | fwiw, with openstack package flow, we build for staging, then rebuild for proposed. then it's a binary copy to release it. that way your release binary is identical to the thing that was tested in proposed. | 14:36 |
| beisner | also, woot! for that deployer daily build ppa. :-) | 14:37 |
| sparkiegeek | beisner: note the FTBFS errors though | 14:38 |
| tvansteenburgh | what is FTBFS | 14:39 |
| beisner | fail to build from source | 14:39 |
| tvansteenburgh | ack, i will address that. i didn't realize the build host didn't have egress https access | 14:39 |
| tvansteenburgh | i did run all the tests before releasing | 14:40 |
| beisner | tvansteenburgh, ah yes i see jorge's added test is the thing there. | 14:42 |
| tvansteenburgh | beisner: yeah, i'm gonna ask him to fix | 14:42 |
| beisner | tvansteenburgh, yah, not sure that test should actually reach out. | 14:47 |
| tvansteenburgh | agree, asked for a mock | 14:47 |
| tvansteenburgh | or just a straight unit test | 14:48 |
| beisner | right. anyway, cool stuff. we're all about the refspec now. thanks for the bits. | 14:48 |
| === lazypower_ is now known as lazyPower | ||
| === rcj` is now known as rcj | ||
| magicaltrout | http://www.meteoriteconsulting.com/spinning-up-pentaho-data-integrations-quickly-with-juju/ <- those card things fsck-ing rock | 14:59 |
| lazyPower | haha! | 15:00 |
| lazyPower | yeah they do! | 15:00 |
| magicaltrout | better fix the icon | 15:01 |
| beisner | jamespage, should we take that swift-storage fixup through the full deal before +2? | 15:05 |
| jamespage | beisner, meh | 15:05 |
| jamespage | beisner, its a fairly innocuious change | 15:05 |
| beisner | jamespage, ack, i'm good with it | 15:05 |
| magicaltrout | there's a bug in the cards lazyPower, who's the boss? | 15:08 |
| lazyPower | magicaltrout - https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/jujucharms.com/issues/ <- that board is | 15:08 |
| magicaltrout | cool | 15:09 |
| beisner | icey_, your test update expects one or more ceph-osd processes, whereas we were previously expecting exactly 2. is that intentional? | 15:13 |
| icey_ | beisner: yes, although it's not ideal; to make the tests repeatably passable in a given deployement, it has to either do that or ebe able to expect 2 OR 3 OSD processes to be running | 15:14 |
| === icey_ is now known as icey | ||
| beisner | we could plumb that helper to take a list type, then specify [2, 3 | 15:15 |
| beisner | ] | 15:15 |
| beisner | bahh new keyboard still improving my experience here ;-) | 15:15 |
| icey | beisner: same, I think my fingers are *nearly* used to this keyboard :); I like the idea of that helper being able to take a list | 15:17 |
| icey | beisner: what's the timeline to get a openstack contrib charmhelper change landed? | 15:17 |
| lazyPower | if its anything like charmhelpers.core.host mods - > a month | 15:18 |
| beisner | icey, lazyPower - yah the core c-h stuff is likely to be more sensitive than a test helper. we can usually land test helpers quickly. | 15:19 |
| lazyPower | i'm just salty that i'm still asking for help with the same merge and received nothing in response, thats all :) | 15:20 |
| lazyPower | https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charm-helpers/charm-helpers/+merge/285044 <-- really needs some love if anyone has the spare cycles to go +1 that for me | 15:20 |
| beisner | lazyPower, ha! where be it? | 15:20 |
| jacekn | is https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 on somebody's radar? It should be trivial review now. Do I need to do anything for it to appear in the review queue? | 15:21 |
| mup | Bug #1538573: New collectd subordinate charm <Juju Charms Collection:In Progress> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1538573> | 15:21 |
| rick_h__ | cory_fu: do you recall the name of the dev from neo4j at the charmer's summit for merlijn's email to the list? | 15:38 |
| magicaltrout | just google, loud neo4j dev who is canadian but lives in sweeden | 15:39 |
| magicaltrout | -e | 15:39 |
| rick_h__ | lol | 15:39 |
| rick_h__ | first result: "Ask HN: Who is hiring? (January 2016)" | 15:39 |
| lazyPower | steven | 15:40 |
| lazyPower | steven fisher i think? | 15:40 |
| lazyPower | i follow him on twitter | 15:40 |
| magicaltrout | steven.baker@neotechnology.com, | 15:40 |
| lazyPower | thats it | 15:40 |
| lazyPower | srbaker | 15:40 |
| rick_h__ | <3 ty | 15:40 |
| magicaltrout | thanks to jcastro for not bcc'ing the emails in his mailshot;) | 15:40 |
| rick_h__ | <3 | 15:40 |
| rick_h__ | found it and the charm | 15:40 |
| * marcoceppi sighs | 15:41 | |
| * magicaltrout cracks out the ear plugs and hides the alcohol | 15:43 | |
| jcastro | the sign up sheet was publically, technically, that's like a bcc. /me runs. | 15:43 |
| lazyPower | magicaltrout that takes all teh fun out of thursday | 15:43 |
| magicaltrout | hehe | 15:43 |
| jcastro | not like a bcc I should say | 15:43 |
| icey | anybody have issues on xenial running `charm build`? I just got `TypeError: write() argument 1 must be unicode, not str` the moment it got to the first interface to process | 15:45 |
| rick_h__ | jcastro: what's the topic for the next charm hangout? | 15:45 |
| rick_h__ | jcastro: can/should I join? | 15:45 |
| marcoceppi | rick_h__: it's an open office hours, all are welcome | 15:46 |
| jcastro | rick_h__: it's almost always open ended | 15:46 |
| jcastro | if you have something to show, show | 15:46 |
| rick_h__ | jcastro: can you toss me an invite to the calendar and I'll show up please? | 15:47 |
| lazyPower | icey - errr | 15:47 |
| lazyPower | icey - are you using charm from marco's ppa? | 15:47 |
| === jhobbs_ is now known as jhobbs | ||
| icey | probably not, let me dig up that email; just installed ubuntu on this machine on Monday so it's pretty fresh :) | 15:48 |
| lazyPower | ok, i'm not sure that will fix anything | 15:48 |
| lazyPower | but its worth a shot to get started | 15:48 |
| lazyPower | it has all the road-to-2.0 fixes in there | 15:48 |
| marcoceppi | lazyPower: road-to-2.0 is now master | 15:49 |
| marcoceppi | as an fyi | 15:49 |
| jacekn | kjackal: hey. Thanks for feedback on collectd layer. I think it should be ready to go now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 | 15:49 |
| mup | Bug #1538573: New collectd subordinate charm <Juju Charms Collection:In Progress> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1538573> | 15:49 |
| jcastro | rick_h__: done | 15:49 |
| lazyPower | well | 15:49 |
| lazyPower | its built from FYI-Master apparently | 15:49 |
| lazyPower | :P | 15:49 |
| icey | lazy I'm on 1.11.1, do you have a link to marco's PPA? | 15:49 |
| rick_h__ | jcastro: <3 ty much | 15:49 |
| kjackal | jacekn thank you | 15:50 |
| icey | nevermind lazyPower: ppa:marcoceppi/charm-tools-2.0 | 15:51 |
| lazyPower | https://launchpad.net/~marcoceppi/+archive/ubuntu/charm-tools-2.0 | 15:51 |
| lazyPower | ye | 15:51 |
| icey | BAM nope | 15:52 |
| icey | same exact error | 15:52 |
| icey | given that xenial is targeting python3, shouldn't charm tools see about updating :) | 15:53 |
| marcoceppi | icey: i got you | 15:53 |
| marcoceppi | https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/pull/119 | 15:53 |
| marcoceppi | icey: alpha1 build is being released as I type | 15:53 |
| icey | three cheers for marcoceppi! | 15:54 |
| lazyPower | icey - its almost like we were expecting you :) | 15:54 |
| jamespage | beisner, can you workflow +1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287156/ as well please | 15:54 |
| lazyPower | we are devx, expect us | 15:54 |
| lazyPower | jamespage o/ heyo | 15:54 |
| jamespage | lazyPower, ola | 15:54 |
| lazyPower | jamespage - friendly ping to get this back on your roadmap - https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charm-helpers/charm-helpers | 15:55 |
| jamespage | lazyPower, yup | 15:55 |
| jamespage | on my list still | 15:55 |
| lazyPower | same bat time same bat channel next week? | 15:55 |
| nagyz | hey guys a quick question | 16:08 |
| nagyz | if I specify nodes in my juju-deployer config like this: | 16:08 |
| nagyz | '0': constraints: name=xxx blahblah | 16:08 |
| nagyz | should it always pick that node from MAAS? | 16:08 |
| nagyz | because currently it looks like it ignores the name actually and just picks based on the tag | 16:08 |
| lazyPower | nagyz - you're looking for tags | 16:08 |
| lazyPower | --constraints="tags=bootstrap" for example | 16:09 |
| nagyz | yes, I know them, but in my juju-deployer config I'd like to pin the charms to nodes | 16:09 |
| lazyPower | i'm not sure you can use names as a constraint | 16:09 |
| lazyPower | afaik its only ever supported tags | 16:09 |
| nagyz | it doesn't complain that it would be invalid... :) | 16:09 |
| rick_h__ | lazyPower: nagyz no, i think you need to add maas tags and use the tags as constraints | 16:09 |
| nagyz | ok let me rerwite it and test it | 16:10 |
| nagyz | cheers | 16:10 |
| lazyPower | cheers nagyz | 16:10 |
| nagyz | wait, one more thing: will the machine constraints I specify in the config override the constrainst I specified when bootstrapping? | 16:10 |
| lazyPower | yeah, nice thing for you to expect in 2.0 | 16:11 |
| lazyPower | you get boostrap constraints, and you get model constraints | 16:11 |
| nagyz | ok so I'm on the latest stable atm :) | 16:11 |
| nagyz | so they get applied after the boostrap constraints in 1.25? | 16:11 |
| lazyPower | yeah if you bootstrap with --constraints=tags=bootstrap | 16:11 |
| nagyz | so if I have tags=a and then in the juju-deployer config I have tags=b, will it pick a node that has a and b? | 16:11 |
| lazyPower | all machines launched after the fact will try to launch with --tags=bootstrap | 16:11 |
| lazyPower | you can clear it, or change it, its not catastrophic | 16:11 |
| nagyz | yes, that's the behaviour we're seeing | 16:11 |
| lazyPower | just a minor annoyance | 16:12 |
| nagyz | so how could I pin different services to different tags? would that even work now then? | 16:12 |
| nagyz | let's say I clear the global constraints after bootstrapping | 16:12 |
| lazyPower | if you clear globals and have --constraints=tags=abc per unit, they will apply those units constraints when the bundle gets deployed | 16:12 |
| lazyPower | sorry, il mean per charm | 16:13 |
| nagyz | I currently list the constraints per machine listed in the yaml - and then for each charm I explicitly bind it to a machine id like --to '5' | 16:13 |
| nagyz | is that not a good thing? | 16:13 |
| lazyPower | thats fine, it makes the bundle a bit brittle | 16:13 |
| nagyz | (based on wolsen's tokyo demo yaml :P) | 16:13 |
| lazyPower | but with how we're modeling networking, storage, etc. i'm sure we'll see more bundles like that start to crop up | 16:14 |
| nagyz | ok let me give it a try | 16:15 |
| nagyz | if I have globals set, they will ALWAYS override local constraints, right? | 16:29 |
| nagyz | or are they getting an "AND" inbetween? | 16:29 |
| magicaltrout | aahh cory_fu I knew there was a reason for me piping the hookenv stuff through leader_set..... whilst it will get set, if someone changes it, it wont trigger a restart | 16:31 |
| cory_fu | magicaltrout: Ah, that's true | 16:32 |
| cory_fu | @when_any('leadership.changed', 'config.changed.foo') would be useful there | 16:32 |
| cory_fu | I should cut a release of charms.reactive so that's available | 16:32 |
| aisrael | marcoceppi: tvansteenburgh: This item shouldn't be in the queue (it got merged yesterday): http://review.juju.solutions/review/2429 | 16:37 |
| nagyz | lazyPower, do you have a second? | 16:39 |
| nagyz | lazyPower, it doesn't work as expected... :-) | 16:39 |
| nagyz | this is the yaml that we're running with juju-deployer: http://pastebin.com/4BVd32L1 | 16:40 |
| nagyz | but for example haproxy gets put on machine "2", while the config says it should go in 3,4,5 | 16:40 |
| nagyz | what did we screw up? :-) | 16:40 |
| lazyPower | thats...what? | 16:41 |
| lazyPower | it clearly says -to '2' | 16:41 |
| lazyPower | i mean - '3' | 16:41 |
| nagyz | haproxy: (the very last) lists -3, -4, -5 | 16:41 |
| nagyz | yep | 16:41 |
| nagyz | juju status shows (while the deployer is running): machine: "2" | 16:42 |
| nagyz | plus it requests a bunch of machines from maas | 16:42 |
| lazyPower | yeah something went awry here | 16:42 |
| nagyz | not just the ones we've listed in the yaml | 16:42 |
| tinwood | thedac, gnuoy: quick question: if I want to run an action inside a unit (juju ssh unit/n ; then "run an action") is there anything I need to set up re: ENV to get it to work? I need to see the stacktrace that's blowing up on my keystone charm! | 16:42 |
| lazyPower | tinwood - you can juju debug-hooks on that unit, then execute teh actin | 16:42 |
| lazyPower | dbug-hooks will trap the action tinwood | 16:43 |
| tinwood | even for an action? | 16:43 |
| lazyPower | nagyz - i'm thinking through this and its not obvious to me why this is the case :( | 16:43 |
| tinwood | ok. will try. ta! | 16:43 |
| lazyPower | tinwood - yep, actions run in an anonymous hook context | 16:43 |
| * thedac learned something too | 16:43 | |
| nagyz | lazyPower, I'm happy to try any suggestion. | 16:43 |
| nagyz | the debug tells me this: | 16:44 |
| nagyz | 2016-03-03 16:33:03 [INFO] deployer.import: Deploying service haproxy using cs:trusty/haproxy | 16:44 |
| nagyz | 2016-03-03 16:33:03 [ERROR] deployer.deploy: Service haproxy to be deployed with non-existent service 3 | 16:44 |
| nagyz | maybe that's why? | 16:44 |
| lazyPower | its trying to co-locate with a service huh? | 16:44 |
| lazyPower | remove the quotes around the number's declaring the machines? (not even sure this will have any effect) | 16:44 |
| nagyz | the problem is for every retry I need to destroy the env and then rebootstrap... | 16:45 |
| nagyz | takes a while. | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | i understand | 16:45 |
| nagyz | what does it mean by non-existent service 3? I mean the machines are not "services", are they? | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | you may have some success dropping that bundle on the store gui and inspecting machine view | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | i think the 'string' is getting interpolated as a service name | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | deploy supports the following syntax | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | to: - 'wordpress/0' | 16:45 |
| lazyPower | i think its getting confused and trying to colo with a service named 3, so it spins up a machine expecting a parent service to be deployed there | 16:46 |
| nagyz | ok let me remove the quotes.. :) | 16:46 |
| lazyPower | s/parent/principal | 16:46 |
| jacekn | kjackal: so is setting charm review bug status to "New" something I should have done after my reply? Or you prefer for charmers to do it themselves? | 16:47 |
| lazyPower | jcastro - move it to fix-committed | 16:48 |
| lazyPower | jacekn ^ | 16:48 |
| kjackal | Thank you lazyPower | 16:48 |
| lazyPower | we dont move status to anything other than tog et them out of the queue after we've replied :) | 16:48 |
| jacekn | alright, good to know thanks | 16:49 |
| tvansteenburgh | lazyPower, nagyz: i don't think machine placement works for v3 bundles | 16:50 |
| lazyPower | ah that would explain it too | 16:50 |
| rick_h__ | tvansteenburgh: lazyPower right, it was added in v4 | 16:52 |
| lazyPower | nagyz - might want to hold off on that re-test | 16:52 |
| lazyPower | sounds like we've found the blocker | 16:52 |
| rick_h__ | lazyPower: how is it a v3 bundle? We don't do those in the store for a while any more? | 16:52 |
| rick_h__ | lazyPower: are we sure it's the old format? | 16:53 |
| lazyPower | well this is a labeled bundle | 16:53 |
| lazyPower | thats by definition the v3 format right? | 16:53 |
| lazyPower | rick_h__ http://pastebin.com/4BVd32L1 | 16:53 |
| rick_h__ | lazyPower: k, just checking | 16:53 |
| rick_h__ | lazyPower: right, remove that, dedent one level and try again? | 16:54 |
| lazyPower | nagyz - the good news is the format change is super simple to make, delete that openstack: key at teh top and fix the indentation now that we've removed the parent key and you'r ein a v4 bundle | 16:54 |
| lazyPower | nagyz - give a v4 bundle a go, and lets see if you get better results | 16:54 |
| nagyz | oh that's how I started out | 16:57 |
| nagyz | but I had to add the openstack: at the beginning to actually be able to make juju-deploy parse it... | 16:57 |
| rick_h__ | nagyz: juju-deployer should take a v4 bundle. The team updated it to use it | 16:58 |
| nagyz | it was complaining about not getting any deployment names | 16:58 |
| nagyz | that's why we added openstack: at the top | 16:58 |
| rick_h__ | nagyz: if you have a problem without it let us know and we can look into what's not happy. https://github.com/juju/charmstore/blob/v4/docs/bundles.md | 16:58 |
| rick_h__ | nagyz: ^ has the docs/description of the v4 vs v3 and what changed | 16:59 |
| nagyz | looking at it. | 16:59 |
| jamespage | beisner, does uosci understand which pxc test to run yet? | 17:01 |
| Gil | Can etcd and flannel be installed on the same physical node? I want to put etcd & flannel on physical node 2, then add a unit of flannel to phys node 3. Will it work ok? | 17:03 |
| lazyPower | Gil - sure can | 17:04 |
| lazyPower | Gil - which flannel charm are you using? | 17:04 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: what version of deployer are you using? | 17:04 |
| beisner | jamespage, checking.. | 17:05 |
| lazyPower | brb | 17:05 |
| beisner | jamespage, yes: "Automatically selected test: ./tests/10-deploy_test.py" | 17:06 |
| jamespage | beisner, \o/ | 17:06 |
| jamespage | oh wait - I think it was an amulet test failure nm | 17:06 |
| nagyz | tvansteenburgh, I've got it via pip install | 17:09 |
| nagyz | as the stable ppa doesn't have the 0.4 package | 17:09 |
| nagyz | (based on readthedocs there is 0.4, right?) | 17:10 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: 0.6.4 is latest on pypi | 17:10 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: if you're on 0.4.x then you probably don't have the v4 support | 17:10 |
| nagyz | well I just did pip install | 17:11 |
| nagyz | that I assume gets the latest :) | 17:12 |
| nagyz | there is no -v or --version | 17:12 |
| nagyz | ok I'm on 0.6.3 | 17:12 |
| nagyz | according to pip list :) | 17:13 |
| tvansteenburgh | k, should be fine then | 17:13 |
| nagyz | ok, changed the bundle to v4, running now | 17:13 |
| nagyz | so what I specify as machine '0' in my bundle actually becomes '1', right? | 17:18 |
| nagyz | I should just skip declaring '0'? | 17:18 |
| nagyz | right now I have 0,1,2 declared with a storage tag and then now according to juju status 0 is the juju bootstrap node, 1 became storage and 2 become a controller which I only list for 3,4,5... | 17:18 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: the machine keys that you define in the machines section of your bundle do not necessarily map to actual machine numbers | 17:24 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: for that reason, yes, it is best to not use '0' in your machines definition | 17:25 |
| tvansteenburgh | to avoid confusion | 17:25 |
| nagyz | cheers | 17:29 |
| jamespage | beisner, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287082/ is looking better now as well | 17:32 |
| beisner | jamespage, ready to land that? lgtm | 17:34 |
| jamespage | beisner, +1 | 17:34 |
| jamespage | can you do the honours? | 17:34 |
| beisner | jamespage, yep | 17:34 |
| jamespage | beisner, a little tidy here as well - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287848/ | 17:35 |
| jamespage | just template rollups and removal | 17:35 |
| jamespage | amazing how much old stuff we lug around.... | 17:35 |
| beisner | yah, that should be a safe landing too, jamespage | 17:39 |
| jamespage | lovely | 17:41 |
| lkraider | Can juju be deployed to third party account with external_id access? | 17:54 |
| lkraider | (in AWS) | 17:54 |
| aisrael | How long should it take for updated charms to be ingested into the store? | 18:01 |
| lazyPower | longest case: an hour and 20 minutes | 18:13 |
| lazyPower | lkraider - not sure what you mean | 18:14 |
| lazyPower | external_id access? | 18:14 |
| lkraider | @lazyPower - I have an IAM user that was granted to another AWS account through a Role (assumeRole permission). To use that I in aws_cli need to set external_id in ~/.aws/config | 18:15 |
| lazyPower | ah, i dont know that we support that. i would most def. poke the mailing list about it though | 18:16 |
| lkraider | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/userguide/cli-roles.html#cli-roles-xaccount | 18:16 |
| lazyPower | someone who's more versed in that specific case may be able to chime in and prove me wrong | 18:16 |
| lkraider | @lazyPower another question: does juju support user that has MFA enabled? | 18:17 |
| lazyPower | not that i'm aware of. the IAM credentials you would give juju assumes that i has all the required permissions, and there's no interactive way for it to prompt you for the MFA credentials | 18:17 |
| lazyPower | s/that i has/that it has/ | 18:18 |
| lkraider | thanks | 18:18 |
| lazyPower | np lkraider - sorry i wasn't full of good news for your questions :/ | 18:18 |
| ChrisHolcombe | i'm a bit confused about something with magic mock | 19:15 |
| ChrisHolcombe | i'm trying to mock hookenv.config() and while config('source') works properly config.previous('source') does not. | 19:16 |
| lazyPower | ChrisHolcombe - it creates another mock | 19:28 |
| lazyPower | and now that i've said that, i realize how nebulous the question and answer both were | 19:29 |
| lazyPower | ChrisHolcombe - give me another go at what you're seeing vs what you're trying to do | 19:30 |
| ChrisHolcombe | lazyPower, yeah i think i get that but i've also done this: self.config.previous.return_value = "blah" | 19:30 |
| ChrisHolcombe | lazyPower, so i'm wondering. how do i mock config.previous | 19:30 |
| icey | beisner: do you think you can weigh in on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287446/ one more time? jamespage has given it the +1 but wants your +2 for the tests | 19:30 |
| lazyPower | ah common misconcenception. self.config.return_value.previous.return_value="blah" | 19:30 |
| lazyPower | i think that'll get you sorted ChrisHolcombe ^ | 19:30 |
| ChrisHolcombe | lazyPower, omg .. ugh | 19:30 |
| lazyPower | i could be wrong, but i recall having ot do something like that with like filepointers | 19:31 |
| lazyPower | i forget the exact formula for when that works but give it a go, if it works yay | 19:31 |
| lazyPower | if not, i call schenanigans | 19:31 |
| beisner | icey, see comment. i didn't -1 it, but one lil misspelling. if you want to bump that one more time, i'll watch for it. | 19:34 |
| icey | beisner: I'll make that one right quick | 19:36 |
| ChrisHolcombe | lazyPower, you're correct in that it's making another mock but i can't figure out how to get it to return the right thing :) | 19:36 |
| icey | beisner: pushed, pending jenkins | 19:37 |
| beisner | icey, thx sir | 19:38 |
| icey | for a change to c-h, should it be on LP? | 19:38 |
| lazyPower | icey yep | 19:38 |
| lazyPower | charm-helpers head is still up on launchpad in /charm-helpers | 19:38 |
| nagyz | lazyPower tvansteenburgh so I retested it, changed my bundle to v4 format, now it looks much better, except that somehow 6 becomes a compute, 7 becomes a controller yet my deployment descriptor clearly specifies it differently | 20:04 |
| nagyz | let me repastebin both | 20:04 |
| nagyz | lazyPower tvansteenburgh my v4 deployer bundle: http://pastebin.com/CY2kDma2, and the status output (clipped, but visible): http://pastebin.com/rGq7BUDH | 20:06 |
| nagyz | 6 gets compute 7 gets controller and I don't get why | 20:07 |
| magicaltrout | i see Mark is keynoting ApacheCon US this time | 20:11 |
| magicaltrout | he's been promoted to the big time ;) | 20:11 |
| rick_h__ | cargonza: ping | 20:15 |
| cargonza | hi | 20:15 |
| rick_h__ | cargonza: got a sec please? | 20:15 |
| cargonza | sure | 20:16 |
| rick_h__ | https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/rick?authuser=1 cargonza | 20:16 |
| * magicaltrout messed up his ApacheCon submission and instead of 3 presentations, has 1 presenation and 2 - 2 hour tutorials..... | 20:20 | |
| magicaltrout | arse | 20:20 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: same reason as before, there's no guarantee that the labels for the machines in your bundle will match up to the actual machine numbers | 20:22 |
| rick_h__ | nagyz: bundles are meant to be 'self contained' so they can be reused by others. So it's machine 0, within that bundle. | 20:24 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: deployer asks juju for the correct number of machines with the specs you want, but it can't tell juju "make it this number" | 20:24 |
| icey | beisner: build failed because of a timeout :( http://logs.openstack.org/46/287446/5/check/gate-charm-ceph-osd-python27/326d4fb/console.html | 20:30 |
| marcoceppi | magicaltrout: sounds like fun! ;) | 20:31 |
| beisner | icey, ha! upstream test timed out. comment back on your review with: recheck | 20:31 |
| magicaltrout | well marcoceppi at least with 2 hours, I'll get to demo a crap load more Juju stuff to pad it out :P | 20:31 |
| icey | also beisner, I'm about to push a change for c-h that adds test coverage for the pid checking method, as well as support for lists :-D | 20:32 |
| magicaltrout | "hello gang, we're doing data management, so to get started and fake distrubuted-ness we're going to install juju and spin up some nodes" | 20:32 |
| beisner | icey, coolio | 20:32 |
| magicaltrout | also my presentation is at 5:10pm, i'm normally in the bar by then... how rude | 20:33 |
| magicaltrout | maybe i'll just do the presentation in the bar.... | 20:33 |
| marcoceppi | magicaltrout: we'll have to bring the bar to the presentation | 20:33 |
| magicaltrout | aye, sounds like a plan | 20:34 |
| icey | bam beisner: https://code.launchpad.net/~chris.macnaughton/charm-helpers/pids-can-be-a-list/+merge/288014 ; once again, I make a 5 line change with 33 lines of tests to support it :) | 20:35 |
| beisner | icey, imho, as it should be ;-) | 20:36 |
| icey | I'm happy with it :) | 20:36 |
| icey | there were no tests covering that function at all, now there's a test covering all of the accepted types :-D | 20:36 |
| marcoceppi | I love how declarative the branch is, it's so assertive and sassy like "pids can be a list too, DAD" | 20:37 |
| beisner | icey, but where are the tests for your tests that test the test you updated as a helper to another test to test the feature that you really just want to land? | 20:37 |
| icey | :) | 20:38 |
| beisner | fwiw i'm still laughing over here, marcoceppi | 20:41 |
| icey | I laughed out loud as well marcoceppi | 20:41 |
| icey | beisner: I just can't catch a break today: http://10.245.162.36:8080/job/test_charm_amulet_smoke/78/console | 20:44 |
| icey | Failed to fetch http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/main/i18n/Translation-en Hash Sum mismatch | 20:45 |
| beisner | icey, apt repo glitch | 20:53 |
| icey | yeah, build retrying (again) | 20:53 |
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| magicaltrout | duuuh | 21:10 |
| magicaltrout | there should be a big fat warning sign if you're in a repository charm directory building your charm instead of the development directory :P | 21:10 |
| magicaltrout | or maybe i should just build in the right place | 21:11 |
| lazyPower | actually | 21:21 |
| lazyPower | thats really good feedback magicaltrout - i've been bit by that | 21:21 |
| lazyPower | and the manifest being present in cwd is a pretty large identifier that you're doing something wrong.... | 21:21 |
| magicaltrout | hehe i think i did 4 updates before realising what i was doing :) | 21:21 |
| nagyz | tvansteenburgh, of course it could, it just doesn't do it. | 21:22 |
| nagyz | tvansteenburgh, but more importantly, will the mappings still work? eg if I map haproxy to 4, but the controller becomes machine 6, will it install haproxy to 6? | 21:23 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: yes, it will install services to the correct machines | 21:25 |
| nagyz | ok, thanks. I'll let it run through then we'll see :-) | 21:26 |
| nagyz | but I think it's confusing that if I map a machine to 3 and it gets to 6... | 21:26 |
| nagyz | while juju could very well deploy the machines in order | 21:26 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: actually, i see another possible cause for what's happening | 21:28 |
| nagyz | happy to experiment :) | 21:28 |
| nagyz | and to rewrite the bundle to be better | 21:28 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: deployer iterates over the machines defs in the bundle, requesting juju to create them one at a time. but...dictionaries aren't ordered | 21:29 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: so it's possible this could be fixed by sorting the machine keys first | 21:29 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: it'd be a change to deployer, no the bundle | 21:30 |
| nagyz | depending on what people use as keys. can the dict keys only be numbers in this case (for machines)? | 21:31 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: it's not required they be ints, but that's the convention | 21:32 |
| nagyz | so the bundle should just work as-is then, right? | 21:33 |
| nagyz | regardless of the numbers juju status tells me. | 21:33 |
| tvansteenburgh | nagyz: yes | 21:34 |
| nagyz | alrightly, let me run it through | 21:35 |
| tvansteenburgh | run it through with a broadsword | 21:35 |
| nagyz | maybe the wrong expression ;-) | 21:36 |
| tvansteenburgh | lol | 21:36 |
| icey | wolsen: took care of your comments on ceph-osd | 22:02 |
| wolsen | icey: awesome thanks | 22:02 |
| wolsen | icey: doh, still typo - search for notr in config.yaml | 22:03 |
| icey | haha not anymore! | 22:03 |
| wolsen | haha | 22:07 |
| === thumper-afk is now known as thumper | ||
| nagyz | all my lxc containers are stuck in agent-state: pending... is there a docu on how to debug it? :) | 22:19 |
| nagyz | after ssh I do see them starting up, running dhclient, but as I don't have DHCP on the network that will fail. is it possible to manually assign IPs to them via the deployment config? | 22:19 |
| nagyz | ok, it deployed \o/ | 23:26 |
| nagyz | I'll do the more complex stuff tomorrow, thanks for all the help guys! | 23:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!