| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov2 is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === funnel_ is now known as funnel | ||
| === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars | ||
| === Tristit1a is now known as Tristitia | ||
| dgr_nick | Hi, I have received a message that I created an OAuth token consumer on launchpad, but I do not remember that I did so.. | 09:42 |
|---|---|---|
| === Odd_Blok1 is now known as Odd_Bloke | ||
| ondrej | cjwatson: wow, that's cool! (and kudos to the team that made armhf builds so much faster now) | 10:12 |
| === clivejo_ is now known as clivejo | ||
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| ondrej | cjwatson: by any chance is there a way how to trigger a new architecture rebuild without having to bump a revision and rebuild for all archs? | 12:03 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: has it already been built for that arch, or does the build record not exist yet? | 12:15 |
| ondrej | cjwatson: nope, it hasn't | 12:17 |
| ondrej | cjwatson: I enabled arm64, and now I need to rebuild some deps for the new arch (arm64); new PHP was just released, so it's just a couple of packages, but generally I had the same problem when I enabled armhf | 12:18 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: right, so it's not obvious, but you can use the "Copy packages" UI for that PPA to copy the packages in question over the top of themselves, selecting "Copy existing binaries" | 12:19 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: that will generally be a no-op but it has the useful side-effect of creating the missing build records | 12:19 |
| ondrej | cjwatson: hmm, I tried some combination of this before, but I probably missed this combination :) | 12:21 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: let me know if it doesn't work and I'll have a more detailed look | 12:21 |
| ondrej | cjwatson: cool! it works :), that's a relief | 12:22 |
| cjwatson | excellent | 12:22 |
| ondrej | cjwatson: one more question about "Change the details" -> how does "Build & publish debug symbols" play with dbgsym packages? | 12:23 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: "Build debug symbols" causes dbgsym packages to be built at all; "Publish debug symbols" causes them to be published on ppa.launchpad.net, not just downloadable from LP | 13:05 |
| cjwatson | ondrej: if dbgsym packages are useful to you then you probably just want to check both, although note that they will count towards the archive quota | 13:05 |
| rbanffy | Hi folks. Some time ago I was playing with LP's CSS to make some listings easier do navigate, but I never managed to properly integrate those changes to LP's official CSSs and propose a merge. I'd, however, appreciate input on a Chrome extension I built for playing with that CSS: https://github.com/rbanffy/launchpad_tweaks. | 13:22 |
| rbanffy | If you want to play, you will need to download the source and use developer mode. | 13:23 |
| cjwatson | rbanffy: So, it's actually much harder to review a Chrome extension than it would be if you simply pushed more commits to your branch addressing my review comments there. | 13:23 |
| cjwatson | I'm unlikely to get round to doing anything with a Chrome extension, but I very likely would get round to it if you addressed my review feedback on your branch. | 13:23 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, true, but I couldn't make the other listing (the one you mentioned) look right. | 13:24 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, this allows anyone to test the CSS on top of the live LP site | 13:24 |
| rbanffy | for my patches I was pasting them on top of the live website using the developer tools within the browser. | 13:25 |
| cjwatson | OK, but I guess that will have to be somebody else then. Sorry. | 13:25 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, no problem. I completely understand. | 13:25 |
| cjwatson | I get that it may be an easier way to develop it, but it's not an easy way to review it. :-/ | 13:26 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, once we have a reasonable set of patches (not something that's grafted on top of the live CSS) we can mode on with a proper patch. | 13:26 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, s/mode/move/ | 13:27 |
| cjwatson | rbanffy: I think you said you'd at least addressed some of my comments. Do you think that you could at least push that subset of changes to your branch? | 13:28 |
| rbanffy | cjwatson, certainly. | 13:46 |
| === Pici` is now known as Pici | ||
| === beuno_ is now known as beuni | ||
| === beuni is now known as beuno | ||
| === icey_ is now known as icey | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!