[02:32] <Anthony-L> hi
[02:32] <Anthony-L> trisk?
[02:33] <tsimonq2> hello Anthony-L
[02:33] <Anthony-L> pm me please
[02:33] <tsimonq2> Anthony-L: yep :)
[02:34] <Anthony-L> how'd you do that?
[02:34] <tsimonq2> Anthony-L: Ctrl + N and Ctrl + P to navigate
[02:35] <mijk> I can't get my radeon 3650 to work in xenial
[02:35] <mijk> I've tried reinstalling the radeon driver, I can't run Xorg -configure
[02:36] <mijk> xrandr --listproviders shows that I'm using I'm using the radeon module
[02:36] <mijk> I can't run glxinfo, it tells me unable to start swrast_dri.so
[05:03] <extraymond> Hi! I noticed that fglrx has been removed from the repo, I'm wondering what's the reason behind this. Any regression or plan change?
[05:43] <Anthony-L> hello, i need help. I'm trying to laucnh a video game. it's tell ing me, "could not find required OpenGL entry point 'glGetError'! Either your video car is unsupported, or your OpenGL driver needs to be updated."
[05:57] <Anthony-L> anyone?
[06:24] <dax> extraymond: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseNotes#fglrx
[06:25] <dax> extraymond: "(tjaalton) there will not be updates any more, incompatible with new X.org ABI, free driver is good enough now" ~ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+publishinghistory
[06:25] <dax> first i heard of this. i'm not a fan of fglrx personally at all, but this seems... bold
[06:28] <dax> although if it doesn't support current Xorg ABI, not a whole lot of other options
[06:50] <extraymond> Anthony-L:  Wouldn't this makes professinal users end up having no options?
[06:51] <extraymond> Sorry taggin wrong person. I mean dax
[06:54] <dax> *shrug* depends on whether you think radeon and amdgpu are options i guess
[07:50] <CryptoSiD> https://zero.mikaela.info/?760d2e364412b659#A5sE956hXzPECK2D1zsxoOcAdYlgFaZ06guApQVhhAQ=
[07:50] <CryptoSiD> i really hope ubuntu gonna do the same soon
[07:50] <CryptoSiD> having ping and ping6 is pretty useless, unified ping FTW.
[07:56] <dax> Debian import freeze for 16.04 was in February, so I'd guess it'll be merged in 16.10.
[10:17] <zaggynl> will 16.04 have zfs in installation wizard? can I install OS on ZFS and use snapshotting?
[10:19] <MonkeyDust> !zfs
[11:03] <k1l_> iirc its not included in the installer so far
[11:55] <lordievader> Good afternoon.
[12:18] <BluesKaj> 'Morning folks
[12:38] <lotuspsychje> shafox: you can see schedule in topic mate
[12:38] <lotuspsychje> shafox: you will be able to upgrade from 15.10 also yes
[14:54] <Element9> hi! i'm having a problem connecting to network using wired connection. i tried rebooting and setting "managed" to true in NetworkManager.conf
[15:04] <alteregoa> there is a issue with apt ownership
[15:05] <alteregoa> it needs to be in the group root
[15:05] <alteregoa> tested on a vanilla beta 16.04 1
[15:05] <lordievader> What do you mean?
[15:06] <alteregoa> the installer have no rights to start services and stuff
[15:06] <alteregoa> even if you use sudo
[15:06] <alteregoa> i post the log later
[15:06]  * lordievader never had a problem with apt starting services
[15:07] <lordievader> Apt is way to eager to start services imo.
[15:23] <alteregoa> is it possible in the future to add build scripts for any source package, so the people are able to build machine optimized code automatically? a binary - source distribution hybrid
[15:25] <genii> alteregoa: That has already existed for a long time, it's called apt-build
[15:26] <alteregoa> fascinating
[15:34] <alteregoa> great hug to those developers
[17:34] <extraymond> dax, thx for the heads up! Any bug entry about this one? I think not able to use opencl or advanced feature from the graphic card is a total setback, not to mention we're on a LTS build, where enterprise users might find this very dissapointing.
[17:36] <jonascj> HI all. Ubuntu 16 daily builds, is it available as a minimal image?
[17:36] <jonascj> I am hunting for the debian text based installer and I was told it is used in the minimal images
[17:37] <genii> !minimal
[17:38] <jonascj> genii: right, so can I do this with Ubuntu 16 pre releases?
[17:38] <jonascj> Or can I mimic what the minimal image does with the full images (i.e. switch tty during installation and launch ./text-installer or whatever)?
[17:39] <jonascj> what I am after is the text based installer since it should offer more advanced options than the normal gui based one. Specifically I am looking for btrfs subvol options during install
[17:41] <genii> jonascj: The Xenial minimal installer is at the same path convention as the ones in regular release listed at the URL bit gives. Just use xenial instead of wily for instance in the download path for the minimal iso
[17:42] <genii> Not sure if any of the installers have btrfs, but you could try.
[17:43] <jonascj> THe gui installer lets you choose btrfs but not which subvols should be used for what, so it always create a fresh btrfs filesystem for you. I'll find out if the installers support it or not, I am just looking for help on getting to the text based installer :)
[17:45] <jonascj> Close to unbelievable that http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso exist when it is not listed under http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[18:28] <dax> if extraymond comes back and I don't notice, the bug they're looking for is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1541369
[19:55] <jonascj> Do you guys believe this is a Xenial mini disk image: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso  ?
[19:55] <huayra> is there a point on upgrading to zenial from trusty now?
[19:56] <huayra> i tried the update-manager -d path, but it did not work
[19:56] <jonascj> is that a question for all or a question to me?
[19:57] <jonascj> For me I am just fooling around, wanted a newer btrfs than 14.04 had, and wanted to see what the mini text installer offered in terms of btrfs options, so for me, yes.
[19:57] <jonascj> If someone in general wanted to update to xenial I'd probably wait until april when it gets released ...
[19:59] <BluesKaj> jonascj, wrong url , we don't want to download the file , just look at it
[20:00] <jonascj> oh, someone suggested that the urls was the same, so I just exchanged wily with xenial . When I dd that image to an usb key it looks very weird
[20:00] <jonascj> and should the xenial minimal exist if it is not listed with the ubuntu 16 xenial daily images?
[20:03] <ChibaPet> So, on a couple boxes I have, there's a 90-second timeout where the system tries and fails to take down LUKS root (and in one case an MD-RAID1 underneath it). Is there any sane way for me to specify a shorter timeout? Waiting 90s on each reboot is a pain.
[20:04] <BluesKaj> jonascj, itdoesn't exist, it's not there, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[20:06] <jonascj> exactly my point, but still the url I linked, which you didn't like, results in an image being downloaded