[14:43] <flocculant> balloons: so if I follow the link to the tests I see that xubuntu fails - so I go to http://162.213.34.238:8080/job/ubiquity_ap-xubuntu_devel_daily-test_custom_install/79/ARCH=amd64,label=master/testReport/ubiquity_autopilot_tests.tests.test_custom_install/CustomInstallTestCase/test_custom_install/
[14:43] <flocculant> how do I work out from that what failed?
[14:45] <balloons> well the traceback error is at the bottom
[14:45] <balloons> it kind of logs what's it is doing; sadly no screenshot
[14:46] <balloons> should probably add that. Anyways, it fails on the 2nd page
[14:46] <balloons> if you run it locally, you get the same error. It's quite reproducible
[14:53] <flocculant> right
[14:53] <flocculant> but if you go grab the image and boot it - it's fine :)
[14:53] <flocculant> which would suggest it's the test not the image
[14:58] <balloons> flocculant, of course it's the test
[14:59] <flocculant> oh - well I didn't know that :p
[14:59] <balloons> it's not finding an object it expects
[14:59] <balloons> ohh -- was that not clear? I guess you could take the 'tests are broken' the other way
[14:59] <balloons> but the images seem fine, the tests are broken because they don't run properly on a good ima
[14:59] <balloons> *image
[15:00] <flocculant> ack
[15:00] <flocculant> do the ubuntu ones test ok?
[15:00] <flocculant> or is it all broken?
[15:00] <balloons> nope, all broken, all for the same reason
[15:00] <flocculant> ok
[15:01] <balloons> I don't think it would be too too hard to fix, someone just has to take the time to debug it
[15:01] <balloons> it's simple to reproduce, so it's not chasing something exotric
[15:01] <flocculant> :)
[16:15] <om26er> pitti, Hi!