[00:54] <mup> Bug #1555392 opened: [2.0a1] python3-maas-client needs to send data as bytes() <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555392>
[00:54] <mup> Bug #1555393 opened: [2.0a1] python3-maas-client API 2.0 seems to no longer use op but MAASClient.post requires it and incorectly passes it along <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555393>
[01:24] <mup> Bug #1539739 changed: Memory size reported by MAAS less than actual memory size by 1GB for commissioned VM <oil> <MAAS:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1539739>
[02:33] <mup> Bug #1555406 opened: API needs to report what images have been sync to what rack controllers <MAAS:Triaged by ltrager> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555406>
[11:46] <mup> Bug #1555570 opened: Problem commissioning nodes (2.0) <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555570>
[12:38] <mup> Bug #1555570 changed: Problem commissioning nodes (2.0) <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555570>
[12:38] <mup> Bug #1555595 opened: Changes in the UI between versions are not detected unless you clear browser cache <MAAS:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555595>
[12:38] <mup> Bug #1555597 opened: My previously managed network in 1.10 was migrated to 2.0 with DHCP disabled <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555597>
[13:05] <imranh_> going to assume an autopilot install of openstack shouldn't take 24hours+
[13:08] <mup> Bug #1555597 changed: My previously managed network in 1.10 was migrated to 2.0 with DHCP disabled <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555597>
[13:20] <imranh_> found an error message in my install logs
[13:20] <imranh_> "465 error fetching public address: "public no address""
[13:58] <voidspace> roaksoax: you marked my bug as a duplicate
[13:58] <voidspace> roaksoax: it's not *obviously* a duplicate of the one you linked it to
[13:59] <voidspace> roaksoax: do you think when that bug is fixed I'll be able to commission nodes - or is there something else going on?
[14:02] <roaksoax> voidspace: you are running MAAS on the host system
[14:03] <roaksoax> voidspace: err
[14:03] <roaksoax> and KVM's on that host system
[14:03] <roaksoax> and trying to get MAAS to manage them right?
[14:03] <voidspace> roaksoax: no, I'm running MAAS in a KVM too
[14:04] <voidspace> roaksoax: maas controller and maas nodes on the same KVM defined network
[14:04] <voidspace> with maas running dhcp
[14:05] <roaksoax> voidspace: right, so I think it may still be related bug
[14:05] <voidspace> ok
[14:05] <roaksoax> voidspace: so does the rack have interfaces ? If so, are any of those interfaces the same as the IP fo the BMC ?
[14:06] <roaksoax> voidspace: i.e, the gateway maybe ?
[14:06] <roaksoax> or and actualy interface ?
[14:06] <voidspace> roaksoax: maas rack controller is running on a machine with a single nic - ip is 172.16.0.2, gateway is 172.16.0.1
[14:07] <roaksoax> voidspace: the BMC of the VM's you are trying to manage, what's the IP ?
[14:08] <voidspace> roaksoax: BMC?
[14:09] <roaksoax> voidspace: how are you trying to power manage the VM's ?
[14:23] <voidspace> roaksoax: ah, I'm not - manually starting them
[14:23] <voidspace> roaksoax: if I was power managing them I'd put virsh connection strings into the power type
[14:23] <voidspace> so no bmc
[14:25] <roaksoax> voidspace: right, so virsh -> BMC in maas terms
[14:25] <roaksoax> voidspace: ok, if you can share with me a console log I could probably try to discover why it is happening
[14:26] <voidspace> roaksoax: ok, I've diverted to looking at another bug - I'll come back to you on this
[14:26] <voidspace> roaksoax: I really appreciate your help
[14:58] <imranh_> well i'm giving up on using maas/landscape/autopilot
[14:59] <mup> Bug #1555673 opened: [2.0a1] Rack Controller interfaces UI appears greyed out. <MAAS:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555673>
[15:03] <voidspace> roaksoax: ok, what sort of console log do you want - I do most things through the ui
[15:03] <voidspace> roaksoax: I can get you any of the maas log files though
[15:03] <roaksoax> voidspace: the consolo log from the commissioning process..
[15:04] <voidspace> roaksoax: ah
[15:04] <voidspace> roaksoax: ok
[15:04] <voidspace> roaksoax: the "Settings" tab says "
[15:04] <voidspace> One rack controller is not yet connected to the region. Visit the rack controllers page for more information."
[15:04] <voidspace> roaksoax: yet the rack controller page shows no error
[15:05] <voidspace> Interesting, on the settings page the Commissioning section is showing "No Usable Release" for default release used for commissioning
[15:05] <voidspace> same for deploy
[15:11] <voidspace> and now I can't enlist, time to reinstall again I think
[15:29] <mup> Bug #1555679 opened: [2.0a1] bridges with same mac as physical interfaces prevent rack interface discovery <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555679>
[16:14] <mup> Bug #1555703 opened: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555703>
[16:26] <mup> Bug #1555703 changed: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555703>
[16:29] <mup> Bug #1555703 opened: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555703>
[16:41] <mup> Bug #1555715 opened: [2.0a1] changing a subnet's space does not cause a refresh in networks/spaces tab in the UI <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555715>
[17:02] <mag009_> i just upgraded to 2.0 anyone have having issue with tftp not being able to bind to port 69 ? permission denied which is normal since it's running as maas user
[17:32] <mag009_> ok i found out
[17:32] <mag009_> you guys use... authbind but it seem the package isn't configuring the port...
[17:50] <mup> Bug #1555736 opened: [2.0a1] Need to release all DHCP leases at the end of commissioning <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555736>
[18:39] <mup> Bug #1555759 opened: [2.0a1] If no VLAN has DHCP enabled, MAAS should notify the user. <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555759>
[19:18] <stormmore> is there an easy way to reset the maas db?
[19:32] <stormmore> or is a better way to put it, is there a way to reinitialize the db?
[21:18] <dbainbri> Running into a situation with MAAS where on restart it looses the association between a node and its IP address and thus wipes it from the zone file. an if down/up of the interface on the node doesn't seem to get MAAS to realize the association. Anyway to get the association back and into the zone file?
[22:00] <roaksoax> dbainbri: is this DHCP ?
[22:01] <dbainbri> yes
[22:01] <dbainbri> roaksoax: yes
[22:01] <roaksoax> dbainbri: is this < 1.8 ?
[22:02] <dbainbri> from the UI: MAAS Version 1.9.1+bzr4543-0ubuntu1 (trusty1)
[22:02] <dbainbri> roaksoax: ^
[22:03] <roaksoax> dbainbri: so you set the interface as DHCP in the web ui ?
[22:03] <dbainbri> roaksoax: yes
[22:04] <roaksoax> dbainbri: for a subnet where MAAS is providing DHCP for?
[22:04] <dbainbri> yes
[22:04] <roaksoax> dbainbri: interesting.. but that's probably why this happens since the interface is being set to dhcp, so it really is not static
[22:04] <roaksoax> dbainbri: can you please file a bug and we'll look into it
[22:04] <dbainbri> soaksoax: so a variable in the equation is i have a host, fixed-address entry in DHCP for this host.
[22:06] <dbainbri> soaksoax: i don't expect it to be static, but i am surprised that MAAS isn't picking up when a lease is renewed. it may be that with ISC DHCP a fixed-address is treated differently than a real lease.
[22:08] <roaksoax> dbainbri: hold on, so you are manually making a hostmap in dhcpd for the IP of that interface?
[22:08] <roaksoax> dbainbri: if that's the case then that'ds the bug
[22:08] <roaksoax> dbainbri: you can tell MAAS what IP address you want for the interface without having to manually modify that
[22:09] <mup> Bug #1555363 changed: "No storage information." commissioning PowerVM (Power 8) <MAAS:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555363>
[22:10] <dbainbri> soaksoax: it is somewhat temporary (the fixed mapping). if i assign it in MAAS as a "fixed" address with MAAS assign it via DHCP?
[22:29] <roaksoax> dbainbri: dbainbri if it is sent to dhcp it will dhcp from the dynamic range
[22:29] <roaksoax> which is not ensure to give you dns mappeins
[22:30] <roaksoax> dbainbri: if you select an IP for the interface, it will give you the IP you want
[22:30] <dbainbri> and it will end up in DNS
[22:30] <roaksoax> dbainbri: yes
[22:30] <roaksoax> dbainbri: static ip assigments in MAAS (either Auto-assign, or Static, for the PXE interface, will end up in DNS)
[22:31] <roaksoax> dbainbri: 2.0 adds supports for PTR records for the rest of the IP's
[22:31] <roaksoax> but the DNS A record will always be given to the PXE interface
[22:31] <dbainbri> roaksoax: ok thanks. eventually i want all DHCP and don't care about assigning fixed-address, but for now i need more static addresses because of some other software. guess i will change to static IPs in MAAS
[22:31] <dbainbri> roaksoax: thx
[22:54] <mup> Bug #1553261 changed: [FFe] Standing FFe for MAAS 2.0 <maas (Ubuntu):Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1553261>
[22:55] <stormmore> Hey any chance someone could have a quick look at my vlan config https://bpaste.net/show/5b5c65b1d5b3 and make sure I don’t have any glaring mistakes?