=== mpontillo_ is now known as mpontillo [00:54] Bug #1555392 opened: [2.0a1] python3-maas-client needs to send data as bytes() [00:54] Bug #1555393 opened: [2.0a1] python3-maas-client API 2.0 seems to no longer use op but MAASClient.post requires it and incorectly passes it along [01:24] Bug #1539739 changed: Memory size reported by MAAS less than actual memory size by 1GB for commissioned VM [02:33] Bug #1555406 opened: API needs to report what images have been sync to what rack controllers === med_ is now known as Guest93664 [11:46] Bug #1555570 opened: Problem commissioning nodes (2.0) [12:38] Bug #1555570 changed: Problem commissioning nodes (2.0) [12:38] Bug #1555595 opened: Changes in the UI between versions are not detected unless you clear browser cache [12:38] Bug #1555597 opened: My previously managed network in 1.10 was migrated to 2.0 with DHCP disabled [13:05] going to assume an autopilot install of openstack shouldn't take 24hours+ [13:08] Bug #1555597 changed: My previously managed network in 1.10 was migrated to 2.0 with DHCP disabled [13:20] found an error message in my install logs [13:20] "465 error fetching public address: "public no address"" [13:58] roaksoax: you marked my bug as a duplicate [13:58] roaksoax: it's not *obviously* a duplicate of the one you linked it to [13:59] roaksoax: do you think when that bug is fixed I'll be able to commission nodes - or is there something else going on? [14:02] voidspace: you are running MAAS on the host system [14:03] voidspace: err [14:03] and KVM's on that host system [14:03] and trying to get MAAS to manage them right? [14:03] roaksoax: no, I'm running MAAS in a KVM too [14:04] roaksoax: maas controller and maas nodes on the same KVM defined network [14:04] with maas running dhcp [14:05] voidspace: right, so I think it may still be related bug [14:05] ok [14:05] voidspace: so does the rack have interfaces ? If so, are any of those interfaces the same as the IP fo the BMC ? [14:06] voidspace: i.e, the gateway maybe ? [14:06] or and actualy interface ? [14:06] roaksoax: maas rack controller is running on a machine with a single nic - ip is 172.16.0.2, gateway is 172.16.0.1 [14:07] voidspace: the BMC of the VM's you are trying to manage, what's the IP ? [14:08] roaksoax: BMC? [14:09] voidspace: how are you trying to power manage the VM's ? [14:23] roaksoax: ah, I'm not - manually starting them [14:23] roaksoax: if I was power managing them I'd put virsh connection strings into the power type [14:23] so no bmc [14:25] voidspace: right, so virsh -> BMC in maas terms [14:25] voidspace: ok, if you can share with me a console log I could probably try to discover why it is happening [14:26] roaksoax: ok, I've diverted to looking at another bug - I'll come back to you on this [14:26] roaksoax: I really appreciate your help [14:58] well i'm giving up on using maas/landscape/autopilot [14:59] Bug #1555673 opened: [2.0a1] Rack Controller interfaces UI appears greyed out. [15:03] roaksoax: ok, what sort of console log do you want - I do most things through the ui [15:03] roaksoax: I can get you any of the maas log files though [15:03] voidspace: the consolo log from the commissioning process.. [15:04] roaksoax: ah [15:04] roaksoax: ok [15:04] roaksoax: the "Settings" tab says " [15:04] One rack controller is not yet connected to the region. Visit the rack controllers page for more information." [15:04] roaksoax: yet the rack controller page shows no error [15:05] Interesting, on the settings page the Commissioning section is showing "No Usable Release" for default release used for commissioning [15:05] same for deploy [15:11] and now I can't enlist, time to reinstall again I think [15:29] Bug #1555679 opened: [2.0a1] bridges with same mac as physical interfaces prevent rack interface discovery [16:14] Bug #1555703 opened: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes [16:26] Bug #1555703 changed: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes [16:29] Bug #1555703 opened: [2.0a1] network provisioningserver code fails to parse ipv6 routes [16:41] Bug #1555715 opened: [2.0a1] changing a subnet's space does not cause a refresh in networks/spaces tab in the UI [17:02] i just upgraded to 2.0 anyone have having issue with tftp not being able to bind to port 69 ? permission denied which is normal since it's running as maas user [17:32] ok i found out [17:32] you guys use... authbind but it seem the package isn't configuring the port... [17:50] Bug #1555736 opened: [2.0a1] Need to release all DHCP leases at the end of commissioning [18:39] Bug #1555759 opened: [2.0a1] If no VLAN has DHCP enabled, MAAS should notify the user. [19:18] is there an easy way to reset the maas db? [19:32] or is a better way to put it, is there a way to reinitialize the db? [21:18] Running into a situation with MAAS where on restart it looses the association between a node and its IP address and thus wipes it from the zone file. an if down/up of the interface on the node doesn't seem to get MAAS to realize the association. Anyway to get the association back and into the zone file? [22:00] dbainbri: is this DHCP ? [22:01] yes [22:01] roaksoax: yes [22:01] dbainbri: is this < 1.8 ? [22:02] from the UI: MAAS Version 1.9.1+bzr4543-0ubuntu1 (trusty1) [22:02] roaksoax: ^ [22:03] dbainbri: so you set the interface as DHCP in the web ui ? [22:03] roaksoax: yes [22:04] dbainbri: for a subnet where MAAS is providing DHCP for? [22:04] yes [22:04] dbainbri: interesting.. but that's probably why this happens since the interface is being set to dhcp, so it really is not static [22:04] dbainbri: can you please file a bug and we'll look into it [22:04] soaksoax: so a variable in the equation is i have a host, fixed-address entry in DHCP for this host. [22:06] soaksoax: i don't expect it to be static, but i am surprised that MAAS isn't picking up when a lease is renewed. it may be that with ISC DHCP a fixed-address is treated differently than a real lease. [22:08] dbainbri: hold on, so you are manually making a hostmap in dhcpd for the IP of that interface? [22:08] dbainbri: if that's the case then that'ds the bug [22:08] dbainbri: you can tell MAAS what IP address you want for the interface without having to manually modify that [22:09] Bug #1555363 changed: "No storage information." commissioning PowerVM (Power 8) [22:10] soaksoax: it is somewhat temporary (the fixed mapping). if i assign it in MAAS as a "fixed" address with MAAS assign it via DHCP? [22:29] dbainbri: dbainbri if it is sent to dhcp it will dhcp from the dynamic range [22:29] which is not ensure to give you dns mappeins [22:30] dbainbri: if you select an IP for the interface, it will give you the IP you want [22:30] and it will end up in DNS [22:30] dbainbri: yes [22:30] dbainbri: static ip assigments in MAAS (either Auto-assign, or Static, for the PXE interface, will end up in DNS) [22:31] dbainbri: 2.0 adds supports for PTR records for the rest of the IP's [22:31] but the DNS A record will always be given to the PXE interface [22:31] roaksoax: ok thanks. eventually i want all DHCP and don't care about assigning fixed-address, but for now i need more static addresses because of some other software. guess i will change to static IPs in MAAS [22:31] roaksoax: thx [22:54] Bug #1553261 changed: [FFe] Standing FFe for MAAS 2.0 [22:55] Hey any chance someone could have a quick look at my vlan config https://bpaste.net/show/5b5c65b1d5b3 and make sure I don’t have any glaring mistakes?