=== tsimonq2alt is now known as tsimonq2- === tsimonq2- is now known as tsimonq2 [20:13] cyphermox ? [20:13] hi [20:13] 16.04 installer disabled my Secure Boot [20:13] in Shim [20:13] how can I enable it again ? [20:13] sudo mokutil --enable-validation [20:14] but it's *supposed* to disable it, if you have any dkms package installed, as otherwise soon those modules will not be loaded by the kernel [20:15] by "soon", I mean possibly next week [20:38] is Secure Boot then also disabled on PC's where you CAN'T disable Secure Boot ? [20:41] cyphermox you are a life saver ! [20:42] you can't "can't disable Secure Boot" when it comes to Linux [20:42] ie. the change is done in shim and thus does not affect Windows at all [20:43] the update that does this also should be asking you to confirm before applying the change [20:43] so you can install Linux on all pc's from now? :-o [20:43] well, that depends [20:43] some weird BIOSes may not be able to do the right thing [20:44] I have an asus notebook [20:44] ie. if you can't boot EFI, it's not going to install in EFI, and thus won't do anything to Secure Boot [20:44] no but on some you can't disable secure boot [20:44] I don't know [20:45] the Ubuntu CDs are signed, so you should be able to boot them even with Secure Boot enabled, provided that the BIOS has a Microsoft key loaded to verify the signature -- most do [20:45] I thought, ah :-) they disable secure boot in shim so they found a way to do it without affecting the bios [20:46] what we're changing is some kind of flag that only affects things loaded via shim [20:46] and *only* if there are dkms packages detected, otherwise it's unnecessary to disable Secure Boot [20:46] virtualbox needs dkms [20:47] yes, that's possible [20:47] and for Fedora you need to self sign and probe with mokutil [20:47] right [20:47] in Ubuntu it is signed with the Canonical key I think [20:47] you can still do that, we're just making it possible for users to skip the self-signing part because it's a little complicated, and instead disable shim validation [20:48] ah, :-) [20:48] we'll do some thing to make it easy for users to self-sign instead in the future